-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Tuesday, September 26, 2000 14:21:52, our bat friend A . Curtis Martin typed:
JD Or they could just look in the TBUDL archives. Also no one even seems
JD to read the welcome message or help file anymore. Frequently there are
JD posts that
Hello Gary Mort,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:03:46 -0400 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, September 25, 2000, 20:03:46 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Gary Mort wrote:
A I suppose that writing a good manual, explaining the use of
A most advanced features of the program, written by experts,
Hello Jamie and TBUDL,
Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 04:20:26, Jamie wrote:
snipped
JD Or they could just look in the TBUDL archives.
Suggesting that peope use TBUDL archives for help is nothing more then
a bandaid; you can't seriously expect people to wade through hundreds
of messages on case
Hello Jan,
Monday, September 25, 2000, 5:09:53 PM, you wrote:
JR Another thing to consider is that a manual can be divided
JR into sections -- a casual user section, followed by an
JR advanced user section. Maybe the casual reader wouldn't
JR bother reading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:20:26 +0100, Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD Or they could just look in the TBUDL archives. Also no one even seems
JD to read the welcome message or help file anymore. Frequently there are
JD posts that could easily be answered if
On Monday, September 25, 2000, 2:23:16 PM, Arjan wrote:
I'm sorry, Ming-Li. That "initiative" of mine was meant to be a
joke.
Marck pointed that out already. I got caught pants down this time,
didn't I. flushing
Honestly I only vaguely remember your post, and that Marck poked
some fun on it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:05:54 +0100
Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TB Can I, as a subscriber to a discussion list about The Bat e-mail
TB client, call upon the odd moderator or two, to ask that the Bat/Becky
TB comparison be moved onto
This message: 25/09/2000 08:53 GMT.
Hello A,
A reminder of what A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
24 September 2000 at 17:58:45 GMT -0500
ACM In all fairness Tony, I don't think we should make those who are not
ACM using TB! unwelcome here. There is no rule to say that you should be
ACM
This message: 25/09/2000 09:25 GMT.
Hello Andrzej,
A reminder of what Andrzej ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
25 September 2000 at 01:18:22 GMT +0200
A Dear Mr. Boom!
You can call me Tony, everyone else does. I have no intention of this
becoming a personal issue. Like yourself stating
This message: 25/09/2000 09:48 GMT.
Hello Graham,
A reminder of what Graham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
25 September 2000 at 07:31:15 GMT +0100
G I only pointed out that Becky was a program to which
G TB developers could cast a glance to see how TB interface could be
G changed.
Why
Hi Tony,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:52:06 +0100GMT (25/09/2000, 16:52 +0800GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
Allow me.
TB Why should it be changed? I personally use this program because of the
TB way it *is*, not because of the way I want it to be.
The way it is, is probably better the rest of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Monday, September 25, 2000 00:25:25, our bat friend Karin Spaink typed:
If, and that's a big IF... Becky is so good and that is your chosen
e-mail client which you are quite obviously using, why are you
subscribed to a mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:25:37 +0100, Tony Boom wrote:
ACM :-) I hear your cry Tony but let's leave it a bit shall we?
TB Well OK. but keep your eye on it won't you . You yourself know how
TB much I like to try other email software but I never raise
On Monday, September 25, 2000, 2:29:41 AM, Tony wrote:
Like yourself stating your reasons for using Becky, I was just
stating my reasons why I think they have no place on a Bat Users
List.
And I'm not convinced. IMHO, information about competing products
should be welcome, especially
ACM In all fairness Tony, I don't think we should make those who are not
ACM using TB! unwelcome here. There is no rule to say that you should be
ACM using TB! to be subscribed and I don't think there ever will or should
ACM be such a rule
While I agree in part with the above, my opinion is
On Monday, September 25, 2000, 1:06:42 AM, Oleg wrote:
3. The ability to zoom preview window to full window.
Enter on the message?
In TB, this would open a new window (the folder view window, or how
is it called?). It's similar (if you turn off the message list pane
in that window, but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marco,
On 25 September 2000 at 08:18:41 GMT -0400 (which was 13:18 where I
live) Marco Qualizza wrote and made these points on the subject
of "censoring?! (was Re[2]: wishlist (was Re: Main Window in Bat!))":
MQ Like I said, I'm
MQ Like I said, I'm not trying to pick on you Tony -- I enjoy reading your
MQ posts... I'm just jumping on the call for censorship and the Pure
MQ State.
S'okay - we're not letting it take hold. Topic censored! g
Ack! Oh no, more censoring! I'm being oppressed! (*grin* and some
who know me
Thank you for writing the following lines:
moderator Ok, enough already. This is indeed degenerating into
bickering. Please, if you (whoever is involved or feel like getting
involved) must continue these arguments, do it off-list or on TBOT,
please. Thanks. /moderator
Agreed! I've no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ming-Li,
On 25 September 2000 at 05:02:55 GMT -0700 (which was 13:02 where I
live) Ming-Li wrote and made these points on the subject
of "wishlist (was Re: Main Window in Bat!)":
There is a dedicated list that has been set up sp
Hello Andrzej,
Sunday, September 24, 2000, 5:14:19 PM, you wrote:
A Talking about the somehow hidden power of TB and his Sorting
A Office, the possibilities of Templates and macros. I would suggest
A to you guys, [especially after reading in several postings about a
A will to help
Dear Gary,
Included in your e-mail stamped Sunday, September 24, 2000,
3:14 PM re: wishlist (was Re: Main Window in Bat! ) you wrote:
A [...] writing a good manual, explaining the use
A of most advanced features of the program would be an enormous
A contribution and a "big
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 05:02:55 -0700, Ming-Li wrote:
Though I appreciate Arjan's initiative, I don't think it's meant to
take such discussions away from TBUDL. It's not OT, and I'm not sure
RIT guys read TBOM. The bottom line is, I can't go set up, e.g.,
TBFLT, and say all discussion about filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Arjan,
On 25 September 2000 at 23:23:16 GMT +0200 (which was 22:23 where I
live) Arjan de Groot wrote and made these points on the subject
of "wishlist (was Re: Main Window in Bat!)":
AdG However, be assured that in no way
Hello Ming-Li,
On Monday, September 25, 2000 at 06:17:55 GMT -0700 (which was 6:17 AM
where I live) witnesses say Ming-Li typed:
OTOH, I sometimes like to have a glance at my folder tree
and see the distribution of messages, and I appreciate TB for giving
me that.
See I view my
On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 4:19:33 AM Ming-Li wrote:
ML On Saturday, September 23, 2000, 3:18:59 PM, Andrzej wrote:
ML While it's a nice feature to have, and probably high on many TB
ML users' wish list, I personally are quite content with TB's editor.
ML For me, the ability to reflow
On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 4:49:41 AM Mark wrote:
MW Hi Andrzej -
MW Saturday, September 23, 2000, 5:18:59 PM, you wrote:
MW I'm intrigued about the plug-in newsreader support; that sounds great! I am
MW another long-time Agent user, and I would love to see TB! offer plug-in
MW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
On 24 September 2000 at 10:01:54 GMT +0100 (which was 10:01 where I
live) Charlie Turner wrote and made these points on the subject
of "wishlist (was Re: Main Window in Bat!)":
CT when I hit the reply button the only inc
Hello All,
On 24-9-2000 11:01:54, Charlie wrote:
C However my newsreader does allow me to highlight the text to be
C included in a reply so that when I hit the reply button the only
C included text is that which was highlighted. Simply hitting reply
C without highlighting includes all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 10:19:48 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
CT when I hit the reply button the only included text is that which
CT was highlighted. Simply hitting reply without highlighting
CT includes all the original text. Can This be acheived
On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 10:25:45 AM - Fred wrote:
FvV Hello All,
FvV On 24-9-2000 11:01:54, Charlie wrote:
C However my newsreader does allow me to highlight the text to be
C included in a reply so that when I hit the reply button the only
C included text is that which was
On Saturday, September 23, 2000, 8:49:41 PM, Mark wrote:
Nice list of the features you like. After reading all of the
posts about Becky, I downloaded version 2 beta 28, and here's what
I didn't like. I didn't take too much time to play with it, but
the following features either weren't
Thank you, Ming-Li!
Continuing the comparison
That being said, there're a few other Becky's features I like (in no
particular order):
1. Current account on top: well, it's a little hard to explain
unless you try it. Simply speaking, Becky can (optionally)
automatically
This message: 24/09/2000 22:51 GMT.
Hello Andrzej,
A reminder of what Andrzej ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
24 September 2000 at 23:14:19 GMT +0200
A Hi! There are other minor nice implementations in the interface of
A Becky that I like:
If, and that's a big IF... Becky is so good and
The bat of happiness fluttered its wings and whispered to me that
Tony Boom said on Sunday, September 24, 2000:
Can I, as a subscriber to a discussion list about The Bat e-mail
client, call upon the odd moderator or two, to ask that the Bat/Becky
comparison be moved onto TBOT or
On 25-09-2000 at 00:05, Tony Boom kindly wrote:
Andrzej ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
A Hi! There are other minor nice implementations in the interface of
A Becky that I like:
If, and that's a big IF... Becky is so good and that is your chosen
e-mail client which you are quite obviously
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:05:54 +0100, Tony Boom wrote:
Can I, as a subscriber to a discussion list about The Bat e-mail
client, call upon the odd moderator or two, to ask that the Bat/Becky
comparison be moved onto TBOT or whatever the new Bat versus other
e-mail clients list is please.
TBOM!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:05:54 +0100, Tony Boom wrote:
TB If, and that's a big IF... Becky is so good and that is your chosen
TB e-mail client which you are quite obviously using, why are you
TB subscribed to a mailing list primarily for users of The
Dear Mr. Boom!
1. I did not start this thread [TB versus Becky v.2]
2. I am not trying to "convert" anybody. Why should I? It's a pure
nonsense.
3. I do not like this kind of defensive behaviour. We are not
discussing any ideological matters here.
4. I am currently using both programs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tony,
On 24 September 2000 at 23:05:54 GMT +0100 (which was 23:05 where I
live) Tony Boom wrote and made these points on the subject
of "wishlist (was Re: Main Window in Bat!)":
TB Can I, as a subscriber to a discussion list about The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrzej,
On 25 September 2000 at 01:18:22 GMT +0200 (which was 00:18 where I
live) Andrzej wrote and made these points on the subject
of "wishlist (was Re: Main Window in Bat!)":
A 5. Thank you, guys, for solidarity in
Hi Ming-Li,
Saturday, September 23, 2000, 10:45:33, you wrote:
ML I tried out Becky v2 betas (up until beta 20) and TB at the same
ML time, when I was looking for a new email program. I have to say
ML Becky also impressed me and had some features I like that TB
ML didn't (and doesn't) supply.
On 23-09-2000 at 21:48, Havivah D. Schwartz kindly wrote:
Saturday, September 23, 2000, 10:45:33, Ming-Li wrote:
ML I tried out Becky v2 betas (up until beta 20) and TB at the same
ML time, when I was looking for a new email program. I have to say
ML Becky also impressed me and had some
In response to0 Hi Ming-Li,
Saturday, September 23, 2000, 10:45:33, you wrote:
ML I tried out Becky v2 betas (up until beta 20) and TB at the same
ML time, when I was looking for a new email program. I have to say
ML Becky also impressed me and had some features I like that TB
ML didn't
On Saturday, September 23, 2000, 3:18:59 PM, Andrzej wrote:
ML I tried out Becky v2 betas (up until beta 20) and TB at the same
ML time, when I was looking for a new email program. I have to say
ML Becky also impressed me and had some features I like that TB
ML didn't (and doesn't) supply.
Hi Andrzej -
Saturday, September 23, 2000, 5:18:59 PM, you wrote:
Andrzej Hi All! As you will recall I posted only once to the list, but I am
Andrzej watching and learning a lot from you, guys. As for today, I am about to
Andrzej change over to Becky, although I like and appreciate TB very
46 matches
Mail list logo
