Re: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Steve, @01 April 2002, 17:09:52 +1000 (08:09 UK time) Steve Mullarkey wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! 1.60 has created duplicate folders of many of my folders outside of the accounts. Messages are now contained in the new

Re: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dave, @01 April 2002, 00:29:30 -0700 (08:29 UK time) Dave in Phoenix wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Am I missing something simple...probably... Yes - Paste formatted. moderator Please don't use reply to start a new thread.

Re[2]: Remove old messages, what date is used?

2002-04-01 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Dwight, I wish it was at least optional to use Received or Created. I find that Created in general is more real. actually it isn't at all. I get messages which where created next week, or even next year, and that were created in 1985. I have no control over the clock settings of

Re: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 17:09:52 +1000, Steve Mullarkey [SM] wrote these comments: ... SM TB! 1.60 has created duplicate folders of many of my folders SM outside of the accounts. Messages are now contained in the new SM folders and in the old folders

Re: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Allie, On Monday, April 1, 2002 at 12:47:58 PM you wrote (at least in part): ACM If your old folders are intact, why not delete the newly created ones. ACM You'll have to go through your filters and readjust things. But be aware: don't 'Delete and move to Trash' or even 'Wipe', but only

Re: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 13:01:28 +0200, Peter Palmreuther [PP] graced us with these comments: ... ACM If your old folders are intact, why not delete the newly created ACM ones. You'll have to go through your filters and readjust ACM things. PP But be

Re: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Allie, On Monday, April 1, 2002 at 1:10:43 PM you wrote (at least in part): PP But be aware: don't 'Delete and move to Trash' or even 'Wipe', but PP only 'Delete and leave message base intact' !!! The old and the new PP folders seem to be different folders but in fact they do share the PP

Re: Mass mailing by macros + limits question

2002-04-01 Thread Shahar
Hello Joern On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 3:53:48 PM, Joern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to Shahar about: Mass mailing by macros + limits question in some way (if not by The Bat! then by my uplinks MTA) - so it'll be better to use individually generated mail (=mass mailing). However I was

Re: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Gene Gough
Agree, as another ex PMMAIL user I also miss the auto flow when pasting. Monday, April 1, 2002, 2:29:30 AM, Dave wrote: The reflow and wrap options work fine when I am typing a message directly. But if I paste either from clipboard of a file (I often use pasted canned messages) it

Re: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, April 1, 2002, 5:10:43 AM, Allie C Martin wrote: PP But be aware: don't 'Delete and move to Trash' or even 'Wipe', PP but only 'Delete and leave message base intact' !!! The old and PP the new folders seem to be different folders but in fact they do PP share the same message

Re: Mass mailing by macros + limits question

2002-04-01 Thread Dave in Phoenix AZ
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:53:48 +0200, Joern Barthel wrote: I'd like to do a newsletter using The Bat! targeting 2000+ users. I use to have a 2000+ subscribed to E-mail list before a website for newsletters which were huge. But I had to break down the list way down to about 200 to send at a time

Re[2]: Mass mailing by macros + limits question

2002-04-01 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Monday, April 01, 2002 11:19:50 AM RE: Mass mailing by macros + limits question Greetings Dave, On Monday, April 1, 2002, 11:16:46 AM, you wrote: Dave If I send using my ISP (Cox cable) it takes an hour or so one message at a Dave time, typically

Re: Re[2]: Mass mailing by macros + limits question

2002-04-01 Thread Dave in Phoenix AZ
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:27:20 -0500, DG Raftery Sr. wrote: Take a look at it and I think you will be happier with Mercury/32 than Postcast and at the same price! Thanks for sharing your experience. I will try it. Price certainly is right ! Dave in Phoenix

Re: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In a message dated, Mon, 1 Apr 2002 09:13:10 -0500, Gene Gough [GG] wrote: ... GG Agree, as another ex PMMAIL user I also miss the auto flow when GG pasting. PMMail is one of those that formats mail upon sending while it soft formats while

Dutch TB! users?

2002-04-01 Thread Marion
Hello tbudl, Does anyone know if there is a Dutch language TB! users list? -- Best regards, Marion mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe:

Re: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Marck, On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 10:19:08 AM (-0700), you typed the following in reference to Pasted Text reflow: Yes - Paste formatted. That is hidden in the Edit menu of the Message Editor Toolbar. I wonder how difficult it would be to include that command on the right click

Re: Dutch TB! users?

2002-04-01 Thread Alexis Haeringer
Bonjour Marion, Lundi, le 1 avril 2002 à 20h30 [GMT +0200] (ce qui correspond à 20h30 ici où j'habite), Marion =[M] a écrit à [EMAIL PROTECTED] : M Does anyone know if there is a Dutch language TB! users list? Yes, I suppose. Apparently you can write to Maurice Snellen maurice at

Re[2]: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Michael Disabato
Monday, April 1, 2002, 1:09:52 AM, Steve scribbled: SM TB! 1.60 has created duplicate folders of many of my folders outside SM of the accounts. Messages are now contained in the new folders and in SM the old folders inside the accounts. In addition a number of my SM filters are now not working

Re[2]: Version 1.60 and Common Folders

2002-04-01 Thread Michael Disabato
Monday, April 1, 2002, 4:47:58 AM, Allie scribbled: ACM Oh cripes! You're the second one that has reported this terrible ACM situation on this list. Most don't get this problem and we don't know ACM what it is that triggers its occurrence. I figured out this is what does it. Evidently 1.53 and

Re: Dutch TB! users?

2002-04-01 Thread Karin Spaink
On 1-4-02 at 20:30, Alexis Haeringer kindly wrote: Bonjour Marion, M Does anyone know if there is a Dutch language TB! users list? Yes, I suppose. Apparently you can write to Maurice Snellen maurice at lnbi dot demon dot nl Uhm, no; that list was created just for testing and

Re: KAV

2002-04-01 Thread Oleg Titov
Hello Robert, I would be veryinterested on these files. I use TheBat! v1.60c with KAV 4.0 Pers Pro. Regards, Oleg Titov Sunday, March 31, 2002, 11:13:11 PM, you wrote: RG Hello List, RGI've got some information on having The Bat! work with KAV RGPersonal and higher.

Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-04-01 Thread Dave Goodman
Gene Gough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... What I have found best is having a filer for each of the various list groups I listen to that looks at the TO field to divert them to the associated folder. Then next to the last filter is one that

Address book

2002-04-01 Thread Daniel Maier
Hallo, the address book functionality is fairly good, although I'd like to see an additional address entry tab called personal 2 or other to store another address/phone number (e. g. home/study). What might come handy is the integration of all communication data in one tab like in Outlook.

Re: Address book

2002-04-01 Thread Francis X. Mendez
Hello Daniel, You can do this. Just create a new address book, or create a new group. Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 3:24:08 AM, you wrote: DM Hallo, DM the address book functionality is fairly good, although I'd like to see DM an additional address entry tab called

Re: maybe I'm dense but...

2002-04-01 Thread Gene Gough
I think it works just as well. I wasn't exactly sure how well the filters were working as I had one fall through that never should have. I set up the double check and have just left it that way. Monday, April 1, 2002, 3:49:37 PM, Dave wrote: 1) filter all mail with unrecognized addresses

Re[2]: Dutch TB! users?

2002-04-01 Thread Marion
Hello Karin, Monday, April 1, 2002, 8:51:42 PM, you wrote: KS On 1-4-02 at 20:30, Alexis Haeringer kindly wrote: Yes, I suppose. Apparently you can write to Maurice Snellen maurice at lnbi dot demon dot nl Thanks, Alexis and Karin, I'll ask how many women are interested, then I

Next Unread navigation behavior

2002-04-01 Thread Yuki Taga
Like many, I suppose, but certainly not like all, I sort by 'created', so that old mail is at the top of the message list, and new mail at the bottom, with the newest of the new mail at the very bottom. Control-Alt-Left is supposed to move to the next unread message, and does so. But when the

Re: Next Unread navigation behavior

2002-04-01 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In a message dated, Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:56:45 +0900, Yuki Taga [YT] wrote: ... YT Wondering if I'm alone in seeing this as a flaw (*next* unread, YT after all, would seem to connote the unread message that came in YT *least* recently, therefore being

Re: Next Unread navigation behavior

2002-04-01 Thread Yuki Taga
Tuesday, April 2, 2002, 8:56:24 AM, Allie wrote: ACM CTRL+Alt+Right will take you through the unread messages from ACM the top of the list to the bottom of the list. And so it does. I must be in 'misread the context menu' mode today. Sorry about that. :) Best, Yuki

Re: Dutch TB! users?

2002-04-01 Thread Luc
Good morning Marion, It was foretold that on 2-4-2002 @ 00:49:26 GMT+0200 (which was 0:49 where I live) Marion wrote and spread these wise comments on Dutch TB! users?: snipped a bit M This Dutch interface btw doesn't seem to work for me, it doesn't come up M in the list under language. Do I

Re[2]: Can't connect to 1 of my POP3 accounts

2002-04-01 Thread Ken Marilyn
Hello Luc, No it isn't. Best Regards, KennyB www.runnerduck.com Sunday, March 31, 2002, 8:36:08 PM, you wrote: Good morning Ken, It was foretold that on 1-4-2002 @ 20:00:49 GMT-0800 (which was 6:00 where I live) Ken Marilyn wrote and spread these wise comments on Can't connect to 1

OT - Windows 2000 server

2002-04-01 Thread Roel
Hello Everybody, Does the windows 2000 server has to be within the same subnet as the windows 2000 client in order to make use of roaming profiles? I can't test it in the upcoming couple of days, but I do need to know this pretty urgent, since I need to reinstall several systems and

Re: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Anthony Xin Chen
Hello Dave, %WRAPPED or %WRAPJUSTIFY is perhaps what you are looking for. The quick template may resemble the below: %WRAPPED=%INCLUDE='c:\foo.txt' On 1 Apr 2002 21:34:58 [GMT -0700] (which was 02 Apr 2002 12:34:58 where I live) you wrote: I may be missing the obvious as a newbie...but is

Re[2]: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Dave in Phoenix
%WRAPPED=%INCLUDE='c:\foo.txt' Low and behold it seems to work :) Thanks Dave in Phoenix Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Anthony, On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 10:33:38 PM (-0700), you typed the following in reference to Pasted Text reflow: %WRAPPED=%INCLUDE='c:\foo.txt' foo text? Nick -- PGP Public Keys: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGPKeys

Re: Pasted Text reflow

2002-04-01 Thread Anthony Xin Chen
Hello Nick, On 1 Apr 2002 22:34:32 [GMT -0800] (which was 02 Apr 2002 14:34:32 where I live) you wrote: %WRAPPED=%INCLUDE='c:\foo.txt' ^^ foo text? It is a bogus file name used for illustration. Replace *c:\foo.txt* with the file name you wish to be included.

Invalid argument to date encode

2002-04-01 Thread Roman Katzer
Hello list, when I fire up TB I get this error message now: Invalid argument to date encode - I click OK and can use TB with no problems. But it's annoying. What's causing this error? Roman -- Roman Katzer, Aachen, Germany Current