-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, 1 May 2002 at 4:36 p.m. Julius wrote:
JS How can we/you spend all our time nit-picking the program of our
JS choice every time we sign-on to the net??
JS Easier for me to go back to OE and not have to read 200 questions/
JS day
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:01:35 AM, Ken wrote:
KM Hello All,
KM This may be a little off topic but wanted to ask your opinion. I've
KM received several emails in the past two days that look suspicious. The
KM last one read:
KM Hello,This is a IE 6.0 patch
KM I hope you would enjoy it.
Why you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 9:59:49 PM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC Just give me an other answer but with a S/MIME Sig. After your
changes
EC you did not sign anymore so I can't confirm for validity after
your
EC changes
Okay, I had
+ when is not AVG installed and plugin is added to Virus Centre, error
message is displayed on start of The Bat!
I have AVG installed and it still says that AVG is not installed :-(
Jerry
Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ:
Dear Lynna,
--- Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 09:40:36
Anti-Virus
[...] When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back,
they appear with the green icon and as valid. Dont know if that is a
valid way to verify or not but to me, when the come back from the
list they are
I think I have discovered a workaround for the intermittent problem
that I mentioned last week. The problem was that I would occasionally
get a message sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed
rcpthosts (#5.7.1) which would mysteriously go away later.
I now know what makes it go away.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eddie,
@01 May 2002, 10:05:59 +0200 (09:05 UK time) Eddie Castelli wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back, they appear
with the green icon and as valid. Dont know if that is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:05:59 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC Sorry Lynna but your Signature is still *not valid*.
EC It say's: No signed attribute and your Serial Number is
075A8B
Okay, I have not a clue as to what the serial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eddie,
@01 May 2002, 07:22:33 +0200 (06:22 UK time) Eddie Castelli wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW - another mistake in such templates is to use the construct
%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED] without a %TO='' before it. So any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:22:41 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
MDP This is your fault not Lynna's. Switch to CryptoAPI (if you're
not
MDP using it) and Import the certificate. You don't have the
certificate
MDP in your list of valid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lynna,
@01 May 2002, 23:40:36 -0800 (08:40 UK time) Lynna Lunsford wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back, they appear with
the green icon and as valid.
Lynna: Don't change
Dear Marck,
--- Marck D Pearlstone / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 10:22:41
Anti-Virus
This is your fault not Lynna's. Switch to CryptoAPI (if you're not
using it) and Import the certificate.
But when I look at the posting from Michael Disabato
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Marck,
--- Marck D Pearlstone / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 10:22:41
Anti-Virus
[...] Hang on - you may not be able to do that - you're still using
a 1.54 beta!
Mark, when under Option|S/MIME I change to 'CryptoAPI' and right click
Lynna's Signature it say that it was Imported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eddie,
@01 May 2002, 11:20:56 +0200 (10:20 UK time) Eddie Castelli wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] Hang on - you may not be able to do that - you're still using
a 1.54 beta!
Mark, when under Option|S/MIME I change to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 11:51 PM, you wrote:
wow, I think I have things all screwed up now, I'm not sure which way
is up anymore!
I did an uninstall of PGP 6.5.8 and installed pgp6.5.8ckt build 07.
I also have the box checked for pgp version pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:26 AM, you wrote:
Marck,
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by internal
S/MIME setting ?
running TB 160h with PGP6.5.8ckt 07 on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@01 May 2002, 05:52:29 -0400 (10:52 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will
MDP appear as valid for anyone who imports it. Anyone who says
Dear Paul,
--- Paul Cartwright / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 11:52:29
Anti-Virus
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by internal
S/MIME setting ?
Check your Menu Option and S/MIME. There you should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@01 May 2002, 05:33:25 -0400 (10:33 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wow, I think I have things all screwed up now, I'm not sure which way
is up anymore!
Looks like a case of non-terminal
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 2:07:55 AM, you digitally penned the following:
on the reply menu while I am writing this I have openPGP checked and
SMIME checked.
MDP Aha - the belt and braces ploy. Use one or the other, not both!
; ) Some of us like to feel really secure! LOL!
--
On 01 May 2002, 00:01, Ken Marilyn wrote:
This may be a little off topic but wanted to ask your opinion. I've
received several emails in the past two days that look suspicious. The
last one read:
Hello,This is a IE 6.0 patch
I hope you would enjoy it.
~~~
This looks to me like a variant
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:15:03 PM, Lynna scribbled:
LL certificate wrong or something...You signature is showing as
LL valid in h for me. I did not even have my SMIME
LL h I just did that yesterday and was trying it out. I may
LL have selected the wrong format or something...sorry.
Drat. And
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:12:23 PM, Marck scribbled:
Ever since you started using 1.60h, your signature has displayed as
invalid.
MDP Valid here using the CryptoAPI.
The only problem I have with this is that, in my lexicon, Microsoft
and Security don't fit well in the same sentence, unless
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:01:35 PM, Ken scribbled:
KM It had a message.htm with 136K of random characters, alphanumeric. It
KM also has and attached file dEv.zlo. The other messages are about the
KM same size but the attached files are; dEv.zl9 and author.zlq.
Now go thank Zone Alarm for
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:51:01 PM, Allie scribbled:
ACM When using v1.60h, you have to enable MS CryptoAPI for S/MIME. All
ACM S/MIME signatures were invalid for me.
This is a problem for me, as I have an inherent distrust of
Microsoft's security mechanisms based on long, painful experience.
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:07:55 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
MDP Internal - the alternate setting to MS CryptoAPI.
When I had the setting Internal, I was not able to even look at the
messages from Lynna Lunsford. Though they were highligthed in the
message list, the preview pane
Hello all,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, Jerry wrote:
+ when is not AVG installed and plugin is added to Virus Centre, error
message is displayed on start of The Bat!
J I have AVG installed and it still says that AVG is not installed :-(
I can confirm this on 1.60h, version 1.60c,d works
Don't know what is going on folks, but I'm sure someone does. This
list only, e-mail is showing up with what appears to be a yellow
clock symbol with the envelope symbol. Any such e-mail, when
selected, does not then relinquish the viewer when another such
e-mail is subsequently selected. So,
Good morning Julius.
At 12:36 AM on Wednesday, May 01, 2002 you wrote the
following about [All this effort for what?? Batted-out!!]:
Julius I [...] purchased [...] the bat! about 2 weeks ago.
Julius I was expecting a reasonable new alternative to OE.
And you got it.
Julius But all I see is
Dear Marek,
--- Marek Mikus / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 12:59:40
Anti-Virus
as I know, problem is in incompatibility between Internal S/MIME
implementation and CryptoAPI - there is used another algoritmus and
Cryptographic provider. So, messages signed by CryptoAPI are VALID
with
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:26:56 AM, Marck scribbled:
MDP Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will appear as
MDP valid for anyone who imports it. Anyone who says it is invalid just
MDP hasn't imported it yet (or is using version 1.60h with the
MDP internal S/MIME setting).
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:14:04 AM, Eddie scribbled:
EC But when I look at the posting from Michael Disabato
EC [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] there I see his S/MIME
EC as valid.
I am using 1.60c with internal S/MIME
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hello all,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
... When I receive my own SMIME signed emails back, they appear with
the green icon and as valid.
MDP Lynna: Don't change anything. You are doing fine.
MDP Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will appear as
MDP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, May 01, 2002
7:07:00 AM
RE: Intermittent send problem
Greetings Christopher,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:10:39 AM, you wrote:
Christopher However, if I try to send mail from Compuserve *before* I check for
Christopher POP3 mail on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Eddie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:06:46 AM, you digitally penned the
following:
EC This is what just came to my mind when reading the posting from
Micael
EC Disabato. His S/MIME I can see as valid and he use it under
internal
EC Implementation.
EC So,
Dear Lynna,
--- Lynna Lunsford / Mittwoch, 01.05.2002, 13:18:14
Anti-Virus
Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am using
the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version 160.h So as far as I
can see, I have no problems viewing emails from persons using either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yuki Taga [YT] wrote:
...
YT Don't know what is going on folks, but I'm sure someone does. This
YT list only, e-mail is showing up with what appears to be a yellow
YT clock symbol with the envelope symbol. Any such e-mail, when
YT selected, does not
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:10:31 PM, DG wrote:
Some SMTP servers, HOTPop for example, require you be authenticated to it's
POP server prior to sending through their SMTP server, hence this may, and
probably is, the reason you are getting a send error if you have not yet
authenticated,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
@01 May 2002, 05:42:46 -0500 (11:42 UK time) Michael Disabato wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has the fact that the internal S/MIME is broken been reported to
RITLABS?
Yes.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:
...
MDP Correct. When you use the MS CryptoAPI, certificates are managed
MDP in the system certificate pool. See Control Panel (or IE)
MDP Internet Options | Content | Certificates. That's the
MDP certificates that are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
@01 May 2002, 20:38:15 -0500 (02:38 UK time) Michael Disabato wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Valid here using the CryptoAPI.
The only problem I have with this is that, in my lexicon, Microsoft
and Security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Disabato [MD] wrote:
...
MD This is a problem for me, as I have an inherent distrust of
MD Microsoft's security mechanisms based on long, painful experience.
I can understand that though there is an advantage to the concept of
keeping the
Hello John.
At 11:46 PM on Tuesday, April 30, 2002 you wrote the
following about [TB! doesn't see connections]:
John When I changed to local area network or manual
John connection, I had no more troubles. I believe that DSL
John even using pppoe would be a lan connection [...]
Exactly right,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:06:46 AM, Eddie scribbled:
EC This is what just came to my mind when reading the posting from Micael
EC Disabato. His S/MIME I can see as valid and he use it under internal
EC Implementation.
EC So, is there a TB! version that can handle it both way?
1.60c is the last
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Disabato [MD] wrote:
...
MD What does it show when you use the internal?
MD And yours are still invalid here, BTW.
Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
- --
-=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60h | Windows XP Pro
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:18:14 AM, Lynna scribbled:
LL Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am
LL using the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version 160.h So
LL as far as I can see, I have no problems viewing emails from
LL persons using either setting. AND the majority of
LL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 3:30:41 AM, you digitally penned the
following;
MD Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:18:14 AM, Lynna scribbled:
LL Michaels emails are showing a VALID signature to me and I am
LL using the Microsoft CryptoAPI setting in version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
...
ACM Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
^^^
That should have read 'Lynna's'. My
apologies Lynna. :-)
- --
-=Allie C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:01:29 AM, you digitally penned the
following;
ACM Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
ACM ...
ACM Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
ACM ^^^
ACM That
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:17:16 PM, Marck wrote:
MDP @01 May 2002, 20:38:15 -0500 (02:38 UK time) Michael Disabato wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Valid here using the CryptoAPI.
The only problem I have with this is that, in my lexicon, Microsoft
and Security don't
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:26:24 PM, Marck wrote:
MDP Switch your S/MIME setting to MS CryptoAPI and then you will see
MDP that the mail are simply ordinary S/MIME singed messages. The
MDP Internal S/MIME support is broken in the 'h' release.
MDP Either that or downgrade to 'c'.
Yuck. I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, May 01, 2002
8:04:19 AM
RE: All this effort for what?? Batted-out!!
Greetings Julius,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:36:13 AM, you wrote:
Julius Hi there, List members ,
Julius I signed-on and purchased my entry to the bat! about 2
Same problem, same solution as you.
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:00:51 AM, Yuki wrote:
Don't know what is going on folks, but I'm sure someone does. This
list only, e-mail is showing up with what appears to be a yellow
clock symbol with the envelope symbol. Any such e-mail, when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Yuki,
@01 May 2002, 21:10:29 +0900 (13:10 UK time) Yuki Taga wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have no idea how to set the S/MIME setting to MS CryptoAPI. I
simply have enable S/MIME checked in Account Properties/Options.
Hmmm, so it is. I just did a tracert on it and sure enough, located
on my machine. Oh well I upgrade the signatures every morning in
any case.
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:13:48 PM, Ricardo wrote:
don't be confused: your mail is being checked _in your machine_ , the
address
At Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 2:36:13 PM, Julius wrote:
Hi there, List members ,
I signed-on and purchased my entry to the bat! about 2 weeks ago.
I was expecting a reasonable new alternative to OE.
And it is definately that.
But all I see is about 200 e-mail exchanges per day!! about
Hello Christopher,
You can set up BAT! to do POP authentication automatically before
retrieving email.
Go to Account-Property-Transport, you will notice a Authentication
button next to the SMTP server setting. Click on it, and click both Perform
SMTP authentication and Use POP before SMTP
Julius,
I know how you feel about the mailing list. I too kinda felt that way
when I first signed up, but I don't think it's as bad as you may
think.
The Bat! is EXTREMELY powerful and allows for a LOT of tweaks and
edits to customize almost every nuance to your personal preferences. I
joined
I'm a moderator on a couple of other lists (LYRIS based) and the
moderation mail comes in with separated MIME, which makes it display
the contents as 2 attachments. Is there a way of making TheBat display
these messages in 'raw' form, rather than attachments? If not, is
there a way of making
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 2:47:37 PM, Anthony wrote:
You can set up BAT! to do POP authentication automatically before
retrieving email.
Thank you very much for that tip! I have made the change and can now
send email happily no matter what I have been doing before.
Another big tick for The
On 01 May 2002, 09:22, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
This is your fault not Lynna's. Switch to CryptoAPI (if you're not
using it) and Import the certificate. You don't have the certificate
in your list of valid certificates to verify with. Hang on - you may
not be able to do that - you're still
when I open and html mail in a separate window (instead of the
preview pane) I get a tabbed window, with a tab labeled 1 and a tab
labeled message.htm. In the text tab 1 I see the headers in the
gray area above the text (From, To, Subject, etc) but in the
message.htm tab I can't see them. The
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:47:21 AM, Allie scribbled:
ACM Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
This may be semantics, but I'm getting concerned that we are heading
to a road where the CryptoAPI becomes the correct way. IMNSHO, this
is merely a work-around until Ritlabs gets the
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:33:21 AM, Allie scribbled:
ACM I can understand that though there is an advantage to the concept of
ACM keeping the keys at a central location. It avoids having to import
ACM them into TB!.
That is until I abandon IE in favor of Opera and remove it from my
system.
ACM
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:17:16 AM, Marck scribbled:
MDP LOL! Just be thankful they merely implemented rather than invented the
MDP standard! (or did they ...?)
Their implementations are the problem.
Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:45:48 PM, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
I purposefully searched for a different email client to get
away from OE or MS Outlook 2000 of which I had both
installed on my system (still do) but I was extremely
dis-satisifed with the security problems, lock-ups, and
misc.
On 1-5-2002 at 0:45, Michael Disabato wrote:
H Nothing new in 1.60h. Just some bug-fixes.
RMR I guess they should list the bugfixes too, don't you?
How about the new bugs? :)
Like I said: nothing new. ;)
Haico
Current Ver: 1.60h
Hello tbudl,
I would like to know your opinion on import/export filter feature.
I imagine it as a powerful tool to exchange/distribute filters as
you will be able to export your filter (filter set) into a file and
easily send them by e-mail, publish on web pages.
Greetings,
Oleg
ON Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 6:47:43 PM, you wrote:
OT Hello tbudl,
OTI would like to know your opinion on import/export filter feature.
OTI imagine it as a powerful tool to exchange/distribute filters as
OTyou will be able to export your filter (filter set) into a file and
OT
Hello Gerard,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 12:19:44 PM, you wrote:
G Hi Oleg,
G You can already copy and send filters.
G Go to the filter you want to copy. Press Ctrl+C or right click Copy.
G Start a new email and do a Paste in the body.
Wow! Never knew about that. Great.
G The only thing I
Hello Ricardo,
On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:18:31 -0300GMT (1-5-02, 17:18 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
RMR Do you know how can I see the headers in the html mails in a
RMR separate window?
If I read you correctly, you can't.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Hello Oleg,
On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:29:10 -0500GMT (1-5-02, 19:29 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
G You can already copy and send filters.
G Go to the filter you want to copy. Press Ctrl+C or right click Copy.
G The only thing I never tried was to copy+paste the other way around.
OT
Hello Roelof,
this sounds to me that the general purpose filter parser is already
done, so we need just 2 buttons in Account|Sorting Office/Filters:
Export and Import.
Any supporting votes for this feature for next TB! ? (message me
privately, if I get more than 5 requests I'll file
El miércoles 1 de mayo de 2002, a las 14.25, Roelof Otten decía:
RO Hello Ricardo,
RO On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:18:31 -0300GMT (1-5-02, 17:18 +0200GMT, where I
RO live), you wrote:
RMR Do you know how can I see the headers in the html mails in a
RMR separate window?
RO If I read you correctly,
Hi Marck
On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:26:24 +0100GMT
(which was 1/05/2002, 13:26 +0200GMT for me),
you wrote:
MDP Either that or downgrade to 'c'.
I'd love to downgrade, but I've lost my copy...
somebody can give me a link to a 1.60c exe?
--
Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen
Roel
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 19:19:44 (+0200 GMT) Gerard wrote:
The only thing I never tried was to copy+paste the other way around.
This way works great. I have several mailaccounts with many filters.
Some of this filters are in every account. I declare this filters in
one account and copy
Hello Ricardo,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002 at 8:00:34 PM you wrote (at least in part):
RMR anyone knows a reason?
It's an obvious one, but the only one coming to my mind: not
implemented?! :-)
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Bat! v1.60g on
Wednesday, May 1, 2002,
Hello udlers,
I noticed that I can couple TB! to Kaspersky's AVP (that so
bravely protects me each day against the virus roulette of
Internet). (Where) can I download the plug-in that is asked
for?
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Heinz,
my point was applied for cases than you want to share your filters
not only on one computer but with the hole world.
I was thinking globaly :) about users sharing their filters, about
servers with TheBat! sets of filters for PGP public key mailing,
SPAM protection,
El miércoles 1 de mayo de 2002, a las 15.16, Peter Palmreuther decía:
PP Hello Ricardo,
PP On Wednesday, May 1, 2002 at 8:00:34 PM you wrote (at least in part):
RMR anyone knows a reason?
PP It's an obvious one, but the only one coming to my mind: not
PP implemented?! :-)
ok, but if it shows
Hello Nick,
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002 at 10:34:24 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
ND I know you can right click on an address in the message header and add
ND it to the address book, but if it's already in there is there some way
ND to open it up for editing quickly via some mouse click or
Hello Fré,
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:20:48 PM, you wrote:
I noticed that I can couple TB! to Kaspersky's AVP (that so
bravely protects me each day against the virus roulette of
Internet). (Where) can I download the plug-in that is asked
for?
It is only possible with the Personal Pro
Hello Oleg,
On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:59:23 -0500GMT (1-5-02, 19:59 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
OT this sounds to me that the general purpose filter parser is already
OT done, so we need just 2 buttons in Account|Sorting Office/Filters:
OT Export and Import.
It's not very high on my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roel,
@01 May 2002, 20:08:56 +0200 (19:08 UK time) Roel wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Either that or downgrade to 'c'.
I'd love to downgrade, but I've lost my copy... somebody can give me
a link to a 1.60c exe?
Hello Roel,
On Wed, 1 May 2002 20:08:56 +0200GMT (1-5-02, 20:08 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
MDP Either that or downgrade to 'c'.
R I'd love to downgrade, but I've lost my copy...
R somebody can give me a link to a 1.60c exe?
http://ritlabs.tps.sk/the_bat/the_bat.exe according to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 1:26:56 AM PST, Marck D Pearlstone
wrote:
Lynna: Don't change anything. You are doing fine.
Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will appear
as valid for anyone who imports it. Anyone who says it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 4:30:41 AM PST, Michael Disabato wrote:
And yours are still invalid here, BTW.
Same here (Lynna's signatures show as invalid, while yours show as
valid). I'm using TB! 1.60c, and the above is true whether I'm
using
Hi Marck
On Wed, 1 May 2002 19:44:54 +0100GMT
(which was 1/05/2002, 20:44 +0200GMT for me),
you wrote:
MDP http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/tb160c.rar
thanks :-)
--
Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen
Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zum Antworten bitte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ricardo,
@01 May 2002, 15:21:19 -0300 (19:21 UK time) Ricardo M. Reyes wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PP It's an obvious one, but the only one coming to my mind: not
PP implemented?! :-)
ok, but if it shows them in the text
Hello Gerard!
On Wednesday 1-05-02 (20:45) you wrote:
GK It is only possible with the Personal Pro version.
--
Thanks, Gerard. AVP is a powerful tool, so I'll consider it.
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 4:47:21 AM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
Okay Allie - please explain to me how to set up my TB! 1.60c
correctly to show Lynna's signatures as valid.
I get invalid
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 19:29:10 (-0500 GMT) Oleg Titov wrote:
G The only thing I never tried was to copy+paste the other way around.
That's there I feel a file container could help :)
Thats no problem with copy and paste:
BeginFilter
Name: The Bat Mailing
Active: 1
Source:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Melissa,
@01 May 2002, 11:55:30 -0700 (19:55 UK time) Melissa Reese wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please explain this then...
I'm using 1.60c. All of Lynna's S/MIME signed messages show here as
invalid with *both* TB!'s
Hello Marck,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002 at 8:58:50 PM you wrote (at least in part):
ok, but if it shows them in the text tab, why not in the html tab?
MDP 1). Because the headers immediately precede the text and the text will
MDP flow on from them. It's a simple issue of changing the starting
Hello Marck,
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002 at 9:21:17 PM you wrote (at least in part):
If I open her certificate to have a look, it says: No signed
attributes.
MDP That sounds like a non-imported certificate.
Nope :-)
1.) You don't have to have someones certificate imported for verifying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 May 2002, at 11:55:30 -0700 Melissa wrote:
MR I'm using 1.60c. All of Lynna's S/MIME signed messages show here as
MR invalid with *both* TB!'s internal S/MIME implementation and with MS
MR CryptoAPI (and yes - her key is properly imported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Smith [MS] wrote:
...
MS I'm a moderator on a couple of other lists (LYRIS based) and the
MS moderation mail comes in with separated MIME, which makes it
MS display the contents as 2 attachments. Is there a way of making
MS TheBat display these
Hi everyone,
I just removed the bat and it's registry entries and reinstalled TB!
1.60h.
Now all the s/mime-signed messages are readable with the internal
encryption implementation.. But the (valid/invalid) signs right of the
message body are gone.
Not that it matters.. But when I installed
Hi,
I don't know if my previous mail comes through..
I haven't seen it yet.. but maybe the connection isn't good
right now.. Or I used a wrong address.
What I said in that mail is not true. :-(
Excuse me/ignore
Haico
Current Ver: 1.60h
El miércoles 1 de mayo de 2002, a las 16.39, Peter Palmreuther decía:
PP It doesn't matter for me, so please ... this is no request :-) But to
PP me there seem not to be any effort needed by the programmers to 'not
PP deactivate' the pane, as already done in preview pane :-)
ok, .\\arck says
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
