Hi Samson,
anyone could show me how to purge server IMAP inbox? thanks!
With focus on the folder you wish to purge, go Folder|Compress.
--
regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 2.00.18
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Martin,
Sunday, September 28, 2003, 7:22:59 PM, you wrote:
MW ,- [ BayesIt ]
MW | [ http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesiteng.htm ], as before, is the english
MW | page of BayesIt which reflect the current version.
MW | Direct links (if anybody wants) are
MW
Hi Batpersons,
In recent days, I've had messages telling me that my replies have come through like
this:
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:24:38 +0100
From: Nick Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Syncing Questions (I'm a testing Ecco for
the 1st time)
[This message is not in displayable
Hello Clive,
CT With focus on the folder you wish to purge, go Folder|Compress.
it works. i should have tried this at the first time... i thought it
was for local purge...
thanks for the help.
(Using The Bat! v2.00.18 on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 )
--
Best regards,
Samson
Hi Nick,
@29-Sep-2003, 09:38 Nick Gordon [NG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
NG In recent days, I've had messages telling me that my replies
NG have come through like this:
... snip
NG [This message is not in displayable format]
NG That is, there's no body. The problem has occurred with a Yahoo
Neal Laugman, [NL] wrote:
AM My mailserver, MDaemon uses spam assassin technology, in
AM combination with blacklist checking and a Bayesian filtering
AM mechanism.
NL I will investigate MDaemon http://www.altn.com/ further. They offer
NL an interesting package. Do you run this commercially?
No.
Hi Batpersons,
On or about, Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:35:49 AM, we have reason to believe that
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
NG That is, there's no body. The problem has occurred with a Yahoo
NG Group mailing list. Has anyone come across this? The problem
NG might be with Yahoo, or with the
I see that a few folks are using 2.00.18. What's fixed in this?
Release notes anywhere?
--
Dave Kennedy
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello, Miguel, Paul John and Mark:
Thank you, all, for your help with the filtering roundup I had
proposed. I want to implement Bayesian filtering and am looking for
best practices and products. of course that's always going to be
somewhat subjective.
So these are the solutions mentioned which
Hi Dave,
@29-Sep-2003, 07:44 -0400 (12:44 UK time) Dave Kennedy [DK] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DK I see that a few folks are using 2.00.18. What's fixed in this?
DK Release notes anywhere?
Please review the TBBETA archive since this version is only
available as a beta release.
--
Cheers
9/29/2003, 7:44 AM: Dave said in Info about TB! 2.00.18?
DK I see that a few folks are using 2.00.18. What's fixed in this?
DK Release notes anywhere?
It's over in TBBETA, mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- not
an official release, they just didn't use 'beta numbering' for this
particular
Monday, September 29, 2003, 7:56:55 AM, Marck wrote:
M @29-Sep-2003, 07:44 -0400 (12:44 UK time) Dave Kennedy [DK] in
M mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DK I see that a few folks are using 2.00.18. What's fixed in
DK this? Release notes anywhere?
M Please review the TBBETA archive since this version
Hi Marck,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, at 12:56:55 [GMT+0100] (which was 21:56:55
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
DK I see that a few folks are using 2.00.18. What's fixed in this?
DK Release notes anywhere?
Please review the TBBETA archive since this version is only
available as a beta release.
Since these Invalid HTML messages are pretty garish and otherwise unidentified, I
had been treating them as spam up till now. After checking the mail source, I'm
believing that it IS being generated by The Bat!
Before I go forwarding messages anywhere, I would like to get that confirmed. And,
Hello all,
Monday, September 29, 2003, Lawrence Johnson wrote:
Since these Invalid HTML messages are pretty garish and
otherwise unidentified, I had been treating them as spam up till
now. After checking the mail source, I'm believing that it IS being
generated by The Bat!
Before I go
On Sunday, September 28, 2003 at 02:24 (which was Sunday, September
28, 2003 at 9:24 where I am) Ken Green [KG] wrote:
KG It appears that there may have been something to the use account
KG default settings but I'm not sure.
It does.
For folders that do _not_ have the 'Use the account default
ON Friday, September 26, 2003, 5:44:14 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Gerard,
It gets obvious if you do it with 20-30 or more.
M Not here, sorry.
Well, then it must be the beer ;-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Deuce - A score of
Hello Neal,
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, at 11:17:50 [GMT -0800] (which was 20:17 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
NL Hi,
NL Here are the two text files I have cobbled together that will stop
NL most of the swen worms. Still getting one or two a minute and none got
NL through in the last 8 hours since I
Hello David,
Monday, September 29, 2003, 17:11, you wrote:
DRA Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else?
This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun to use. I actually
look forward to spam so I can train the filter!
--
Regards,
Mogens
Using The Bat!
I sent a message to a mailing list from TheBat! 2.00, it ended up like this
(original below). Sending this from Horde to see if that works.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 07:42:13 +0100
From: Doug Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Me: Beards
Hi Doug,
on Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:03:40 +0100GMT (29.09.03, 18:03 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DW N¬?ë,[EMAIL PROTECTED] ²Ä5*.²)©?'è¯
Looks like an unsupported character set...?
--
Cheers
Peter
When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant, I could
hardly
29-Sep-2003 14:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a way, I believe the version numbering system is wrong.
Maybe current version should be 2.00.06, not 2.00.6, if 2.00.18 is
later than current?
That discussion is as old as version numbering itself. :-) Just do not
treat version numbers like
Hello Doug,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:03:40 +0100 GMT (29/09/2003, 23:03 +0700 GMT),
Doug Weller wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I sent a message to a mailing list from TheBat! 2.00, it ended up like this
(original below). Sending this from Horde to see if that works.
Try changing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@29-Sep-2003, 18:57 +0200 (17:57 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Doug:
DW N¬?ë,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DW ²Ä5*.²)©?'è¯
PM Looks like an unsupported character set...?
Looks *more* like an unsupported encoding or
Hello tbudl list,
What is the best way to read such failures - in this case created
using a MS Exchange server? I.E, in Agent, I had the option to view
the raw message, in TB, I get two attachments visible with .at
extentions. What can I do?
Thanks,
Andrew.
--
Best regards,
Bats-
(sigh)
I have to say that so far I'm not very impressed with v2.00.6. Mind
you, this is after only about half an hour's look at it, but I don't
at all like the way it handles MIME digests. In 1.6x I can
double-click the contents in the preview pane on the left to view the
subject and who
Hi Marck,
Monday, September 29, 2003, 6:40:30 PM, you wrote:
Looks *more* like an unsupported encoding or stripped encoding
header. Try the same QP fix I recommended here:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks (and thank you Thomas), I saw that this morning and decided I was going to do it
tonight,
Hello, Mogens:
Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:15:53 AM, you wrote:
MH This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun
MH to use. I actually look forward to spam so I can train the filter!
Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too,
and I don't know how
Hello David,
On 29 Sep 2003 at 15:25:29 -0400 GMT [21:25 CEST] you wrote:
DRA Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too,
DRA and I don't know how I forgot to put it on my list.
You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since 2.0.
So unless you intent to
Hello Andrew,
Thursday, September 25, 2003, 8:49:11 AM, you wrote:
Hello tbudl list,
Does anyone know why this is the default charset for TB mail? What
is the cignificance of this charset, and is it safe to tell TB to
use no encoding on mails?
Thanks,
Andrew.
I have been
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Monday, September 29, 2003, 4:46:01 AM, David wrote:
So these are the solutions mentioned which are working well for some
of you:
Popfile, SpamPal, K9 and the Bat's Known filter approach.
Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else?
David, I missed
Do many people on this list use the Quick Search feature? I noticed a
thread about some UI issues, but I'm wondering about the actual
functionality of Quick Search.
I love TB's search speed and use the regular search quite a bit. But
after reading a few posts here, I thought I'd give Quick
Hello, Andre:
Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:11:24 PM, you wrote:
AW You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since
AW 2.0.
So none of these are usable until I upgrade:
BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach.
Correct? Thank you.
--
Best wishes,
Hello ken,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do many people on this list use the Quick Search feature?
Yes, in fact I have it on my toolbar.
But how do I *quickly* find the next occurrence?
Right click on the Quicksearch box and you will get the options.
Find next
Hello, Keith:
Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote:
(snip)
KRI Just switched from PopFile KR to SpamBayes (snip)
KR(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR of (snip)
KRa pain to set up--for me, at least--but I finally got it KR
KRworking today and it has great
Hello ken,
Monday, September 29, 2003, 7:07:43 PM, you wrote:
kg It appears that if I want to search for a word and just start typing,
kg the first closest match is selecting. As I get more specific, the
kg selected item may change to match the search string.
kg But how do I *quickly* find the
On Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:46:17 PM, David R. Austen wrote:
DRA So none of these are usable until I upgrade:
DRA BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach.
DRA Correct? Thank you.
I can't speak for the others, but Popfile works fine here with 1.62,
with earlier
9/29/2003, 6:11 PM: Adam said in Quick Search
A CTRL-ENTER will move to the next occurrence.
A But note that the Quick Search is kinda buggy. Or has been. I've
A noticed it ignoring a whole section of the message list, and advancing
A through only a few of the existing valid message search
I also was using K9 with the lower version of TB!
Elaine
Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello tbudl list,
Someone on hear mentioned gibberish in emails going to mailing list;
I have subsequently found out that this is because of base64
encoding of the message so as to preserve charsets; some versions of
Outlook even don't support this. I have gone into
Hello David,
On 29 Sep 2003 at 17:46:17 -0400 GMT [23:46 CEST] you wrote:
DRA So none of these are usable until I upgrade:
DRA BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach.
DRA Correct? Thank you.
No, incorrect. Of these only BayesIt is a Plugin. Popfile, Spampal and
K9
Hello David,
Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:03:19 PM, you wrote:
DRA Hello, Keith:
DRA Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote:
DRA (snip)
KRI Just switched from PopFile KR to SpamBayes (snip)
KR(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR of (snip)
KRa pain to set
Hi Andrew,
@29-Sep-2003, 23:34 Andrew Hodgson [AH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AH I have gone into account | properties | transport, but there is
AH no option in v 2.00.6 to change the way 8 bit characters are
AH handled (I need to change the setting to quoted printable). Am I
AH in the wrong
Hallo Mark,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:23:00 -0700GMT (29-9-03, 20:23 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MW I have to say that so far I'm not very impressed with v2.00.6. Mind
MW you, this is after only about half an hour's look at it, but I don't
MW at all like the way it handles MIME digests. In
Hallo Andrew,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:41:21 +0100GMT (29-9-03, 19:41 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AH What is the best way to read such failures - in this case created
AH using a MS Exchange server? I.E, in Agent, I had the option to view
AH the raw message, in TB, I get two
Mark Wieder, [MW] wrote:
MW In 1.6x I can double-click the contents in the preview pane on the
MW left to view the subject and who wrote the messge, etc.
This is preserved in v2. Double click one of the messages and you open a
virtual folder with a list of all the attached messages that you can
Richard Wakeford wrote:
Right click on the Quicksearch box and you will get the options.
Find next = CTRL+ENTER
Find previous = CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER
Thank you! Is there a way to get focus to Quick Search ... erm..
quickly? Whether on the tool bar or hidden, I'm wondering if there is a
Hello Geir,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:29:47 +0200 GMT (30/09/2003, 04:29 +0700 GMT),
Geir Bækholt wrote:
I have been struggling myself, trying to *make* theBat use
ISO-8859-15, but i cannot seem to make it happen.
Does it have to do with it not being present in my xlat-tables ?
Should it be
48 matches
Mail list logo
