Re[2]: BayesIT in 2.04.7 and 2.04.04

2004-02-26 Thread Terry
Hi Doug, I have been plodding on telling BayesIT what is Junk and what is not, about half and half, but BayesIT refuses to do anything on its own. I understand that this started with 2.04.04. I am about to upgrade to 2.04.07 but from what I've read that only fixes a search problem.

Re: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello Greg, View Modes in Option | Preferences | Messages | VM | select VM | click Used by ... are not the same as when in Main window Folder Properties | column settings | Use view mode VMname or when in Main window and right mouse click folder | Folder view mode | selected VM. Used by ...?

Question About Reply Templates

2004-02-26 Thread Chris
Hi, My current reply to template is thus: %Cursor %FromFName %cookie On %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, you wrote: %Text I was wanting to change it so that on a message that I reply to, it will have the following: -Original Message- From: Sent: (this is a date field - eg Friday, 27

restoring registry: socket errors, retrieving bunch of dupes

2004-02-26 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello , I once went to a backup (image) of my system partition that was two days old and recognized strange behaviour while fetching mail, probably because of the last message marker stored somewhere in the registry, I assume - but as you can see this is a bad idea.. this highwater marker should

[OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello all, Sorry for OT, but I seem to recall there are a number of people here that use SpamCop to report spam. Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? TIA. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El

Re: IMAP filtering problem

2004-02-26 Thread Dave Gorman
Hello John, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:42:39 AM, you wrote: The message was from Michael to Randy, Susannah, and me -- but it was sorted into my Randy folder. I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael folder? Can you paste your Michael Randy filters into a reply to

Sumbission Forms

2004-02-26 Thread George M. Menegakis
Hello, Has anybody do something with submission forms? I created one using the one from help as template. The problem is I found no way to use it! I mean it is listed on Options/Sumbission Forms but I can do nothing with it except Add/Delete! How am I supposed to use it? --

Re: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread Greg Strong
Hello MAU, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 4:47:56 AM, MAU wrote: M Is that what you M mean? NO. If you have global view modes off and are using individual view modes for folders which have been set from the main window when you go into Options | Preferences | Messages | View Modes | select VM

Re: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello Greg, Now look at the folder where you know you are using that particular view mode and you will see it is NOT selected. Maybe I didn't explain it clearly enough, but that is exactly what I mean when I say that Use by ... should also and actually be UseD (notice the D) by Use by =/=

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread Greg Strong
Hello MAU, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 6:56:49 AM, MAU wrote: M Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour M of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? Yes, but maybe it is related to the new account I'm using because I shut down the old email

Re: IMAP filtering problem

2004-02-26 Thread John Rakestraw
Hi John, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: JR When I filter the Known folder the program moves 218 messages into JR Eddie's folder. 118 of them are from Eddie. It appears that all of JR the others have Eddie's address in one of the recipient fields. I might add that the

Re: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, View Mode you can open the Use by.. dialog to select the folder that Present and past tenses make a difference, and so do singular and plural :) The quoted line should read folderS, because you can select more than just one :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -

Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4

2004-02-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:17:06 -0500 GMT (26/02/2004, 04:17 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: Please Visit This Week's Sponsor Below Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner

Re: Configure X-Header field

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 7:06 PM, you wrote: RO You've got to prepare that for TB: RO Options - Preferences - Messages - Message header - Edit items - Add RO Now enter 'X-Sender' both at display and as RFC header and check RO 'this field is an address field' my RFC field shows just

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:56 AM, you wrote: M Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour M of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? just for you, I sent another message to spamcop today. My automatic filters worked like they always

Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4

2004-02-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:13:04 -0500 GMT (27/02/2004, 01:13 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: TF Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. my apologies! Let me think about it... sorry! OK, I forgive you! g -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat!

Re: BayesIT in 2.04.7 and 2.04.04

2004-02-26 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello Doug, on Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 1:42:17 PM, Doug Weller wrote: Can anyone shed light on this? Ah, I found out. You post to the list. Since I posted it has picked up 3 spam emails. But it's missed 5. Well, as my internet provider is filtering spam very hard (well, in my eyes

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello Peter, Yes, indeed. It seems that it is now sufficient to click the report ID to be accepted for reporting this spam. So you don't have to log in if there is only one spam to report. If you want to report several spams, as I usually have to, it is more convenient to log in with the top

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello Paul, just for you, I sent another message to spamcop today. My automatic filters worked like they always have, and my browser came up with the spamcop web page to finish it. Nothing has changed here. I use only the first filter to submit spam more orless as soon as I get it, but I

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 2:41 PM, you wrote: M I use only the first filter to submit spam more orless as soon as I get M it, but I report my spam only once or twice a day. I'm lazy, I let the filters do all the work;) so all I have to do is scroll down the web page, click OK, then

Connection Centre is empty but the bat cannot shut down

2004-02-26 Thread David Stone
Hello, I've got no connections showing in the CC and my firewall confirms no pending connections but I cannot shut the bat down normally. The dialog ' Some tasks are still active...etc' shows up. Would it be possible to force the bat to close with the seemingly none functional 'abort' button!

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello Paul, I'm lazy, I let the filters do all the work;) so all I have to do is scroll down the web page, click OK, then alt-F4 to close the page. I bet you are not much lazier than me, that's why I use so many filters and templates of all kind in TB to highly automate many chores that are

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
M I bet you are not much lazier than me, that's why I use so many filters M and templates of all kind in TB to highly automate many chores that are M repetitive. But with reporting spam to Spamcop, and because I get fairly M high amount of spam, I don't want to be interrupted by my browser M

Re[2]: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Greg, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 5:03:20 PM, you wrote: GS If you have global view modes off and are using individual view modes GS for folders which have been set from the main window when you go into GS Options | Preferences | Messages | View Modes | select VM (one which you GS are

Re[2]: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello MAU, Friday, February 27, 2004, 2:52:31 AM, you wrote: M If I uncheck a box I would expect the corresponding folder to be set to M (no view mode). Why not? No view mode means using some column settings anyway. Which one should be used? Is it account-wide, folder-specific or parent

Re: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Stefan, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 6:19:39 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: GS If you have global view modes off and are using individual view modes GS for folders which have been set from the main window when you go into GS Options | Preferences | Messages | View Modes | select VM (one which

Re: Question About Reply Templates

2004-02-26 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Chris, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:36:09 PM, Chris wrote: C I was wanting to change it so that on a message that I reply to, it C will have the following: Close but not exact. You can tweak it. Begins Here Hello %OFromFName, %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn,

Re: Question About Reply Templates

2004-02-26 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Chris, @27-Feb-2004, 12:36 +1100 (27-Feb 01:36 UK time) Chris [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: C Can someone please tell me if this is possible to do, if so, C what syntax I use? My revulsion led me to only give you a half-finished version. Here's the real deal:

Re: IMAP: filtering doesn't work

2004-02-26 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
25.02.2004, U wrote: Alexander A. Gomanyuk, [AAG] wrote: AAG Wow! Cool features! :))) Just read on thebat forum about IMAP AAG realization problem... Now i'm in depression... :))) AAG By the way, would You clarify, why, even after registration and AAG logging in a can't post new message there

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello Paul, to be honest, I don't know how to do that. I can't remember doing anything except using the filters to get me to the web page! I can't even remember where the filter puts the old SPAM emails! Well, I only use the first filter, the manual one. It submits the message to Spamcop and

Re: Could not store message

2004-02-26 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello Thomas, on Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 10:41:17 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: That's a new one. I believe From is mandatory (I am reporting from memory, didn't check RFC2822), but subject is optional. A recipient of some kind must be present, otherwise you wouldn't have received the

Re: Connection Centre is empty but the bat cannot shut down

2004-02-26 Thread Barry
Hello David, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 10:15:18 PM, you wrote: DS Hello, DS I've got no connections showing in the CC and my firewall confirms no DS pending connections but I cannot shut the bat down normally. DS The dialog ' Some tasks are still active...etc' shows up. DS Would it be

Re: OOPS, was:Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4

2004-02-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:44:38 -0500 GMT (27/02/2004, 01:44 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: that's why you moderators are so well liked! I'm not a moderator on this list... but thanks anyway. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. I drive way

OOPS, was:Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 1:25 PM, you wrote: TF Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. my apologies! TF Let me think about it... sorry! TF OK, I forgive you! g that's why you moderators are so well liked! -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi MAU, on Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:56:49 +0100GMT, you wrote: M Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour M of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? Yes, indeed. It seems that it is now sufficient to click the report ID to be accepted for reporting

Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 12:55 PM, you wrote: Please Visit This Week's Sponsor Below TF Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. my apologies! the discussion was on searching, using , and I made the test on chickensoup vs chicken soup.

toggle-ALT-0 for views, was:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4

2004-02-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 7:25 PM, you wrote: rg What do ALT-0 ALT-1 do? AW It toggles between non-threaded view and thread by references. MAN, DON'T DO that to me!!! I decided to try that, and hit ALT-0. WOW! that scared me to death!!! that was a totally different look, with no

IMAP message counts

2004-02-26 Thread Dave Gorman
Hi TBUDLers, I believe this has been brought up before, but the IMAP message counts are just weird. For instance, my Inbox message count is listed as 19 6. 6 is the actual number of messages in the inbox. I don't know where the 19 is coming from -- maybe the number of messages that used to be

Re: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread MAU
Hello Greg, I don't get to hung up on past tense and present tense. I thought you meant what was actually in the UI. Maybe I may have made a slight grammatically error, but my point is I think it is a BUG. Well, as you know, English is not my mother language and I thought the idea that Use by

Re: IMAP filtering problem

2004-02-26 Thread John Rakestraw
Hi Dave, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:02:48 AM, you wrote: DG I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael DG folder? Can you paste your Michael Randy filters into a reply to DG this email? Maybe that could shed some light on the problem. I thought this question had led me

Re: [OT] SpamCop

2004-02-26 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Greg, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:54:40 AM, Greg Strong wrote: GS I reported 2 spam email this morning. The first did not give me an GS option to click on the button to report because the email had been GS previously reported. Probably my mistake. New account indicates silent

Re: View Modes choices Not same

2004-02-26 Thread Greg Strong
Hello MAU, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:35:10 AM, MAU wrote: Now look at the folder where you know you are using that particular view mode and you will see it is NOT selected. M Maybe I didn't explain it clearly enough, but that is exactly what I M mean when I say that Use by ... should

Re: IMAP filtering problem

2004-02-26 Thread John Rakestraw
Hi Allie, Thanks for the reply. AM Where string matching and filter order is concerned, I've been AM having no problems here when using read filters. I've been using AM IMAP for some time now. I've seen that you and others have been using it. And the fact that I've not seen anyone else