Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote:
RG If a file, a text file I'd assume
RG (c:\progra~1\theba~1\cookies.txt?)
Just to add to this point. I've noted that the file doesn't have to
have a .txt extension. TB! will assume the file is a text file and
read it as such. At least this is so the last time I
Hello,
Is there a way to display _all_ addressees in the preview pane?
At the moment the line just gets truncated at the right hand side of
the window.
The only way that I've found to see everyone is to forward the
message.
Ta,
--
Nick
Using TheBat!: v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 1:37:40 PM, you wrote:
Only by viewing the headers.
For quick headers view press F9 on and off.
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Dear Shahar,
@24-Mar-2004, 13:42 +0200 (24-Mar 11:42 UK time) Shahar [S] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
Only by viewing the headers.
S For quick headers view press F9 on and off.
Or Ctrl-Shift-K
--
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v2.04.7 on Windows 2000
Hello Richard,
Tuesday, March 23, 2004, 6:11:18 PM, you wrote:
Is it possible that the Avast! plugin is causing problems for Bayesit?
Are they incompatible? Or is there some other explanation for this?
I'm using both of them and they work like a charm.
--
Denis
Using The Bat! 2.05 Beta/1
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 12:26:14 AM, you wrote:
Scott Does anyone know of a way to import Lotus Notes .nsf (ver 4.5) files into
Scott TheBat or outlook so I can use the outlook import?
Who-hoo! I did this ages ago and it wasn't fun...
1. You need to create a replica of your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tuesday, March 23, 2004, at 7:26:51 PM PST, I wrote:
This has *never* been a problem for me in the past, but recently, it
has begun to happen. Whenever TB! is checking for new mail, while
CPU usage does go up to 30% or so, it isn't until
Hello bats,
I renamed my account personal - domain.tld to domain.tld, where TB
did not simply rename the subdirectory in MAIL, but left the old
folder with protocol.ini and two logfiles created out of it.
These three files were not copied into the new folder.
I also renamed another account from
Hi Marck,
Your identity is identical - it's still your
anonymous yahoo account.
Why suffer the web interface? It makes no sense. All you are really
doing is the voodoo dance of self-castigation with no good reason.
Posting via SMTP server is not as anonymous as posting via the web
Hello John,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:14:08 -0500 GMT (24/03/2004, 08:14 +0700 GMT),
John wrote:
J Just read over some of the worm info from
J http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1552856,00.asp about Bagel.
From that website: the worm can automatically run and install itself
when a user opens an
Hi again,
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, at 8:39:13 AM PST, I wrote:
I have no idea why, but when I got to my computer this morning, I'm
no longer noticing the problem described above.
Eek! To continue this little conversation with myself...
After a re-start, it's happening again! :-( As
Hello Melissa,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:26:51 -0800 GMT (24/03/2004, 10:26 +0700 GMT),
Melissa Reese wrote:
MR This has *never* been a problem for me in the past, but recently, it
MR has begun to happen. Whenever TB! is checking for new mail, while CPU
MR usage does go up to 30% or so, it isn't
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:08:06 -0500 GMT (24/03/2004, 04:08 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
TF ACK. How does PGP work: Follow these 120 easy steps, that's all!
PC well, if it makes you feel smarter, I was able to send/receive
PC signed/encrypted messages to, and receive messages
Hello Allie,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:36:17 -0500 GMT (24/03/2004, 06:36 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
TF If *you* are not a power user, I'm a bloody beginner!
AM Actually, I used Forte' Agent for mail prior to using TB!. I was quite
AM content at the time except for the need for a little
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:20:47 +0100 (MET) GMT (25/03/2004, 00:20 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Received: from 208.147.1.3 by www14.gmx.net with HTTP;
TF Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:20:47 +0100 (MET)
[...]
TF Posting via SMTP server is not as anonymous as posting via the
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, at 9:47:34 AM PST, you wrote:
No suchs problem in the office, XP Pro with a fresh install of TB,
only once upgraded to the current version. Oh, and the folders in
the office are as large as the ones at home.
This is interesting. I think the last fresh
thebat,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 7:02:16 PM, you wrote:
Tuesday, March 23, 2004, 6:11:18 PM, you wrote:
tdc I'm using both of them and they work like a charm.
I don't know if Avast caused the problem, but since I deleted its
plugin and reinstalled Bayesit it's working again. Of course it now
Hi Melissa,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 6:18:46 PM, you wrote:
MR Hi Thomas,
MR On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, at 9:47:34 AM PST, you wrote:
No suchs problem in the office, XP Pro with a fresh install of TB,
only once upgraded to the current version. Oh, and the folders in
the office are as
Hi TBUDL,
Currently I am using GPG 1.2.4 with The Bat! 2.04.7 and it is working
fine however I have always wondered about how good The Bat!'s internal
implementation of PGP is?
I remember [a long time ago] reading on some sites that it was really
bad, etc. so I stuck to GPG however now that I
Hi TBUDL,
I was just wondering how I can filter message a) sent from me to this
DL and b) sent to me (as in replying to a question I posted) to this
DL?
I could figure it out myself but I don't have the time at the moment
and would really like to get it to work ASAP. Basically all I want is
to
1./ I have some people on my mailing list who have 2 addresses: say one for
work and one for home.
I listed both E-mail addresses in the addressbook, but how can I get to the
secondary address?
I marked in Addressbook|Properties|Other|added a checkmark Automatically add
secondary
address to
Hi Morgan,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 8:59:23 PM, you wrote:
MRP Hi TBUDL,
MRP I was just wondering how I can filter message a) sent from me to this
MRP DL and b) sent to me (as in replying to a question I posted) to this
MRP DL?
MRP I could figure it out myself but I don't have the time at
Thomas,
On 24-03-2004 19:03, you [TF] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
TF Posting via SMTP server is not as anonymous as posting via the web
TF interface. You cannot even tell which country I am sending this
TF from. ;-)
TF OK, maybe you can, when I use the GMX web interface. With Hotmail you
TF
Hello Thomas,
On 24 Mar 2004 at 01:03:41 +0700 GMT [19:03 CET] you wrote:
TF Posting via SMTP server is not as anonymous as posting via the web
TF interface. You cannot even tell which country I am sending this from. ;-)
TF OK, maybe you can, when I use the GMX web interface. With Hotmail you
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, Morgan R. Pugh wrote...
MRP I was just wondering how I can filter message a) sent from me to
MRP this DL and b) sent to me (as in replying to a question I
MRP posted) to this DL?
Right a quick update. I have got a from me filtering working with the
following
Hi Jonathan,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 9:27:20 PM, you wrote:
JA msg-id :) Or more specifically In-Reply-To field. It contains your
JA domain, you could filter on that. For example:
JA [EMAIL PROTECTED]recipient yes
JA In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kludgesyes
JA Regular
Hi all
yep it's the new boy again. Can anyone please explain
the difference between these two features/options -
also can one select both (depending on the difference
and if this would be desireable) in one go instead of
selecting each individually from the drop down menu.
Thanks
--
Stef
If a
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, stefan ketola wrote...
yep it's the new boy again. Can anyone please explain the difference
between these two features/options - also can one select both
(depending on the difference and if this would be desireable) in one
go instead of selecting each
Hi Melissa,
on Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:26:51 -0800GMT, you wrote:
MR ... 100% CPU usage ...
MR Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Try to find out which application eats your CPU. I had a similar
problem with PowerPro combined with a beta version of Total Commander.
Process Explorer
Hiya
Confirm Receipt is an option that is supposed to be
answered by the final mail server
while confirm read is one the user confirms
that they have read it.
snip
Thanks for that ..anyone else anything to add ?
Don't sweat petty things, or pet sweaty things.
What's wrong with petting
Jonathan Angliss, [JA] wrote:
JA msg-id :) Or more specifically In-Reply-To field. It contains your
JA domain, you could filter on that. For example:
JA [EMAIL PROTECTED]recipient yes
JA In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kludgesyes
JA Regular Epxressions Checked
JA Of course,
Peter Kerekes, [PK] wrote:
PK I listed both E-mail addresses in the addressbook, but how can I
PK get to the secondary address?
PK I marked in Addressbook|Properties|Other|added a checkmark
PK Automatically add secondary address to bcc field, but it doesn't
PK happen. Actually I would prefer to
Hi
Are 'kludges' (as in filter options) synonymous with 'headers' or is
there some arcane differentiation I don't know about?
And if the answer is YES to 'synonymous' then does the 'kludges'
option mean 'absolutely anywhere in the 'invisible' bit of an email?
Marten Gallagher
--
Annery Kiln
Morgan R. Pugh, [MRP] wrote:
MRP I have always wondered about how good The Bat!'s internal
MRP implementation of PGP is?
MRP I remember [a long time ago] reading on some sites that it was
MRP really bad, etc.
There are two 'internal' things about TB! and PGP. There's built in
support for
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Original message text=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 5:22:21 AM, you wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to display _all_ addressees in the preview pane?
At the moment the line just gets truncated at the right hand side of
the window.
The only way that I've found to
Hello Marten,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 4:12:33 PM, you wrote:
Marten And if the answer is YES to 'synonymous' then does the
Marten 'kludges' option mean 'absolutely anywhere in the 'invisible'
Marten bit of an email?
Yes to both answers.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/24/2004 05:13 PM wrote:
There are two 'internal' things about TB! and PGP. There's built in
support for PGP v5,6,7,8 if you have any of those versions otherwise
installed on your system. Enabling this support will make TB!
integrate with with those PGP
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 12:52 PM, you wrote:
PC well, if it makes you feel smarter, I was able to send/receive
PC signed/encrypted messages to, and receive messages from, other people on
PC this list, in only two days !G
TF I think I needed more than two days, but I managed it, too. What
38 matches
Mail list logo
