It would be nice if The Bat let you select a browser.
Exactly my opinion. Pegasus has this function, but I haven't found it in any other
e-mail client I've tried.
--
Britt Henrikson
Mit schönen Grüßen von Yahoo! Mail.
Mit dem Yahoo! Messenger können Sie Freunde noch
Just received this:
QUOTE
You recently sent a message to
Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject
Re[2]: Volatile identity template.
/QUOTE
It was from RiskFreeMail
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat 2.10.03
with POPFile 0.21.1
on XP Pro v2002 SP1
Hallo Marten,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 09:45:18 +0100GMT (18-5-04, 10:45 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MG Just received this:
Snip
MG It was from RiskFreeMail
Don't react to it. Anybody who's so clueless that (s)he subscribes to
a mailing list with an address hidden behind a challenge/response
Hallo Marten,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 09:45:18 +0100GMT (18-5-04, 10:45 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MG Just received this:
Snip
MG It was from RiskFreeMail
Don't react to it.
I agree - I only quoted it to the list because I thought - as it had a
name - it would help the tracking down
***^\
~~( __ _o Was Tue, 18 May 2004, at 11:58:09 +0200,
@ @ when Roelof Otten wrote:
BTW Is there anybody who created a filter that catches these messages.
But only when they're about messages sent to this list. Care to share
your solution?
I just received a message
Hi all,
I just joined this forum, and and am fairly new to the Bat, and I
think it's a really great program. I'm using version 2.10.03.
I installed it on my computer, and then I bought a new box - networked
the two together. I have the Bat installed on both, but I really just
want to use it on
Hallo Mica,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:10:21 +0200GMT (18-5-04, 13:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BTW Is there anybody who created a filter that catches these messages.
But only when they're about messages sent to this list. Care to share
your solution?
MM I just received a message with
Hello Marten!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 3:45 AM, you wrote:
MG Just received this:
snipped
MG /QUOTE
MG It was from RiskFreeMail
My first from RiskFreeMail arrived this morning. Its subject line was
E-mail verification. The body said it had put my post to tbudl on
the subject Re: Tracking down
Hello Leif,
On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:52:08 -0600 GMT (18/05/2004, 02:52 +0700 GMT),
Leif Gregory wrote:
Thomas In the meantime I have receive it twice for each email address
Thomas I am subscribed with.
LG Good! :-) I really wasn't looking forward to spelunking a bunch of
LG logs to see where it
Dear Thomas,
@18-May-2004, 22:46 +0700 (18-May 16:46 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Leif:
TF ... if you think it helps you if I forward the whole mail to you
TF by PM, just say the word.
It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
out a
Hello Coyle306,
On Mon, 17 May 2004 20:25:29 -0400 GMT (18/05/2004, 07:25 +0700 GMT),
Coyle306 wrote:
C It would be nice if The Bat let you select a browser.
A nice idea. I'd second a wish.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
When you breath, you inspire.
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
out a probe with a tracking subject. However, it appears that the
C/R server outwitted the probe and suppressed it as spam without
challenging it :-(.
FYI, I never received the probe e-mail. Maybe the C/R
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 16:52:20 +0100 GMT (18/05/2004, 22:52 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
MDP out a probe with a tracking subject. However, it appears that the
MDP C/R server outwitted the probe and
Hello graffito,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:25:34 +0200 GMT (18/05/2004, 18:25 +0700 GMT),
graffito studios wrote:
gs Where does the PGP info reside, and how do I transfer it over?
In the directory ...\The Bat!\Mail I find the files pubring.pgp and
secring.pgp. You might want to copy these from the
Dear Thomas,
@18-May-2004, 23:00 +0700 (18-May 17:00 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP It helps not a bit. These mails are useless, which is why Leif sent
MDP out a probe with a tracking subject. However, it appears that the
MDP C/R server outwitted the
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 17:12:28 +0100 GMT (18/05/2004, 23:12 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF Smart. It also means that whoever subscribed with RsikFreeMail
TF doesn't see any of the TBUDL traffic about him, right?
MDP Presactly!
Now that's totally risk free!
Let me
Howdy Mary,
Sunday, May 16, 2004, 11:30:34 PM, Mary wrotened:
MB Hello Martin!
MB On Sunday, May 16, 2004, 5:15 PM, you wrote:
BBT NO FAIR! Put that third one back right away or I'm gonna tell!
RO Why? After all I got four.
MW You're just showing off! :-))
MB I got two, but they were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marten,
On 18 May 2004, 11:40 Marten Gallagher [MG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MG It was from RiskFreeMail
Don't react to it.
MG I agree - I only quoted it to the list because I thought - as it had a
MG name - it would help the
Hello Ben!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 1:04 PM, you wrote:
BA oops didnt mean to kill yahoo
Yahoo seems to be a cat with 9 lives--got up and started running as
soon as I answered Martin Webster's P.S. here with info that your post
was the last I'd seen on tbot in nearly 2 days.
--
Best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Coyle306,
On 18 May 2004, 20:25 -0400 (18/05/200401:25 local time) Coyle306 [C] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AJ I am pretty sure when I changed my default browser (from IE to Firefox)
AJ my wife complained the following day that I had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ben,
On 18 May 2004, 19:04 Ben Allen [BA] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW PS. Anyone picking up TBOT messages? I haven't seen a dickie since
MW Friday. I think I may have a few e-mail problems of my own.
MB Yes, I answered yours on May 15.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
On 18 May 2004, 17:12 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF Smart. It also means that whoever subscribed with RsikFreeMail
TF doesn't see any of the TBUDL traffic about him, right?
MDP Presactly!
It's been quite
Hello Martin!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 1:50 PM, you wrote:
MW PS. Anyone picking up TBOT messages? I haven't seen a dickie since
MW Friday. I think I may have a few e-mail problems of my own.
MB Yes, I answered yours on May 15. But I've only had one TBOT message to
MB show since then. From Ben
AJ I am pretty sure when I changed my default browser (from IE to Firefox)
AJ my wife complained the following day that I had changed something
AJ again. Indeed she was getting Firefox launched.
C That was the point of my original message. I don't want to change the
C default browser or
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Re: Managing multiple identities]
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:19:41 -0400
From: Dan Grunberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gabriel Menini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gabriel,
Mon, 17 May 2004 18:53:43 -0300 (5:53 PM
Martin Webster @ 2004-May-18 2:48:36 PM
Opening url with non-default browser mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be nice if The Bat let you select a browser.
Please no, that's an OS feature...
I'll have to agree with you. Now if The Bat! had a built-in browser...
--
Chris - Nun mi Esperanton
Coyle306 @ 2004-May-18 3:26:35 PM
Opening url with non-default browser mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be nice if The Bat let you select a browser.
Please no, that's an OS feature...
Yeah, right. That's why I've got a dozen programs that let me select
outside editors, file viewers, e-mail
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 10:44:06 PM, Chris wrote:
I'll have to agree with you. Now if The Bat! had a built-in browser...
...we could call it Outlook!
Julian
--
Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current
Hi All,
After many years of pitching the Bat! I finally convinced a friend to
switch over to the Bat! (that makes a total of 5 happy converts!).
However he called me with a problem last night regarding registering
his copy of the Bat! that I couldn't help him with.
It's been years since I went
Dear Nick,
@18-May-2004, 20:30 -0400 (19-May 01:30 UK time) Nick OHare [NO] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
NO The only other thing I can think may be complicating this is that I
NO downloaded and set up the Bat! v. 1.62 on his machine and he bought a
NO license for v.2
It is the only thing. v1
Nick Ohare, [NO] wrote:
NO It's been years since I went through the registration process and
NO obviously forgot one of the steps. The email he received clearly
NO shows the Bat! key and the Bat! key checksum but he's confused as
NO what the Key password is. He was asked to define a password when
Hello users,
We have discovered the true address for the user who subscribed with
an improperly configured C/R system.
Right now the moderators are bidding, arguing, punching and slapping
to see who will get to delete that subscriber with extreme prejudice.
I only had one dissenting voice among
Hello Allie,
It doesn't take a long time to copy that batch file to a text file,
alter the paths and use it.
It does take time also to learn how to use Second Copy.
snipped a bit
Yes, but I don't just backup TB. I backup all my important data:
databases, documents, web pages, etc., etc. And
Hello Allie,
TB! isn't the only thing I backup.
See my reply to your mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.03
Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Roelof,
BTW Is there anybody who created a filter that catches these messages.
But only when they're about messages sent to this list. Care to share
your solution?
I have blocked all mail from RiskFreeMail at my server, it just rejects
the connection :))
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello Leif!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 7:54 PM, you wrote:
LG We have discovered the true address for the user who subscribed with
LG an improperly configured C/R system.
Hooray for our persistent, smart moderators!
LG Right now the moderators are bidding, arguing, punching and slapping
LG to
Dear Miguel,
@19-May-2004, 03:16 +0200 (19-May 02:16 UK time) MAU [MAU] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Roelof:
BTW Is there anybody who created a filter that catches these messages.
But only when they're about messages sent to this list. Care to share
your solution?
MAU I have blocked all
Hello Mica,
I cannot see the way how to implement that in selective download
filter. Is it possible at all?
As far as I know all such messages have a From address similar to this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. So, you can try a Selective Download
filter for:
On rule tab:
Detect by: Originator
Signal
TBUDL,
I'm using The Bat! Version 2.10.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
The Spam Filtering does not appear to be working on
TheBat!
It is not catching ANY SPAM at all.
I have the Protection set at Average and to move junk
mail on a score of 60 or more.
I have marked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leif,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 18:54:49 -0600 (8:54 PM here), Leif Gregory [LG]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG We have discovered the true address for the user who subscribed with
LG an improperly configured C/R system.
I have to ask can you
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, 18 May 2004, at 21:42:49 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:42 PM where
I live) you wrote:
KC I have to ask can you now disclose the purpose of the probes
KC and what the initial problem was? If I missed the original thread
KC can you point me in the right direction?
A user
Miguel Urech, [MU] wrote:
MU Yes, but I don't just backup TB.
Does that really matter especially since you're not really aware of
just what others here may or may not need to backup? This seems to be
the crux of the misunderstanding. The discussion has been about
backing up TB! and nothing else.
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 8:14:30 PM, MAU wrote:
TB! isn't the only thing I backup.
M See my reply to your mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well it all comes down to an individual's needs. Geez have I heard that
before. :-) For me running a BAT file for an incremental backup on
shut down of TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leif,
On Tue, 18 May 2004 20:02:14 -0600 (10:02 PM here), Leif Gregory [LG]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KC I have to ask can you now disclose the purpose of the probes
KC and what the initial problem was? If I missed the original thread
Hello Kevin!
On Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 9:44 PM, you wrote, in part:
KC Thanks for the background information. I'm not a fan of the C/R
KC philosophy. It seems much too annoying when controlling spam can
KC simply be resolved by having an efficient spam filtering system.
It would have been more
45 matches
Mail list logo
