IMAP: Inbox = ROOT

2004-07-15 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
Hello Batmans! Well, have someone got a success to View as INBOX both user created on Root level ? I mean, that all folders created by me is placed as subfolders of INBOX... upgrading to 2.12 seems to be useless Courier Mail Server Any advices and comments would be appreciable! Your sincerely

TB 2.12: IMAP: (#0002383) INBOX can be set as pre-defined Outbox, Sent and Trash too

2004-07-15 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
Hello Batmans! Here You are IMAP: (#0002383) INBOX can be set as pre-defined Outbox, Sent and Trash too Would You explain the sense of that hightech frase ? :))) BTW, IMAP account properties Mail management - ROOT folder still doesn't work :((( Your sincerely registered, Sasha.

Re: White spot in the header

2004-07-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jakub, On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:33:53 +0200GMT (14-7-2004, 8:33 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JM I have a strange problem for a long time. And I don't know how to JM solve it. JM I have hidden message header by default. And if the selected message JM is signed, the header

Re: Re[2]: hot key for mark as junk- PLEASE

2004-07-15 Thread Samson
Who doesn't use mark as junk at least 5 times a day? i set it to ctrl+alt+j, works well. i have lots of spam today but seldom use this hotkey now, only because bayesit is working great ! -- Samson, using Agent newsreader Current version is

Re: Error creating ...\mail\BayesIt folder on startup?!

2004-07-15 Thread Cory
On Thu, 6 May 2004 22:12:41 +0700, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Options / Preferences / Plugins. Delete the one you are not using. Should be OK then - I think. Please let us know. Yes it did, thanks. And sorry for omitting the confirmation (while reading back I came across this

Re: TB 2.12: IMAP: (#0002383) INBOX can be set as pre-defined Outbox, Sent and Trash too

2004-07-15 Thread 9Val
Hello Alexander, AAG Here You are AAG IMAP: (#0002383) INBOX can be set as pre-defined Outbox, Sent and Trash too Incorrect citation, original is: [-] IMAP: (#0002383) INBOX can be set as pre-defined Outbox, Sent and Trash too It means that in previous versions was possible to select IMAP

Threading: store outgoing msgs in folder sent from?

2004-07-15 Thread Cory
Hi all, How can I achieve that all messages I sent are stored in the folders these msgs are sent from? (without creating filters for every folder) My goal is to keep the threads complete, including my own msgs. Thanks for your input! -- Happy flappin'! Corne' (aka Cory, The Batdmin)

Re: Threading: store outgoing msgs in folder sent from?

2004-07-15 Thread Allie Martin
Cory, [C] wrote: How can I achieve that all messages I sent are stored in the folders these msgs are sent from? (without creating filters for every folder) My goal is to keep the threads complete, including my own msgs. You will have to use outgoing filters for that. There's no one shot

How to do this!

2004-07-15 Thread speedguy
Hi, What kind of combination of filters etc I must use to achieve this. - For incoming message, if it has an attachment, automatically upload that attachment file in my addressbook as picture of the sender. s.g. Current version is 2.12.00 |

Re: How to do this!

2004-07-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Speedguy, @15-Jul-2004, 15:07 +0300 (15-Jul 13:07 UK time) speedguy said: What kind of combination of filters etc I must use to achieve this. - For incoming message, if it has an attachment, automatically upload that attachment file in my addressbook as picture of the sender. This is

Re: How to do this!

2004-07-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo speedguy, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:07:47 +0300 (EEST)GMT (15-7-2004, 14:07 +0200, where I live), you wrote: S - For incoming message, if it has an attachment, automatically S upload that attachment file in my addressbook as picture of the S sender. You can't. -- Groetjes, Roelof

Re: How to do this!

2004-07-15 Thread speedguy
S - For incoming message, if it has an attachment, automatically S upload that attachment file in my addressbook as picture of the S sender. You can't. Probably if this can't be done, then is there any way that when my filters automatically tries to save attachments from incoming emails,

Re: How to do this!

2004-07-15 Thread Zonnet
ON Thursday, July 15, 2004, 2:07:47 PM, you wrote: s Hi, s What kind of combination of filters etc I must use to achieve this. s - For incoming message, if it has an attachment, automatically s upload that attachment file in my addressbook as picture of the sender. Hi speedguy, I do not think

Re: How to do this!

2004-07-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo speedguy, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:29:51 +0300 (EEST)GMT (15-7-2004, 14:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: S - For incoming message, if it has an attachment, automatically S upload that attachment file in my addressbook as picture of the S sender. Please set Options - Preferences -

Re[2]: Spell Checher in HTML

2004-07-15 Thread joeo
Hi Roelof, Thanks for the help. That change does not work for me. In fact I cannot queue nor send when I check check before send/queue Bat ver. 2.10.03! Best regards, Joe O mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 12:52:44 PM, you wrote: Hallo joeo,

Re: The Bat! Help files

2004-07-15 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello jwayne, Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 5:15:44 PM, you wrote: jwayne What is the sound of one hand smacking? (my head, that is) Probably similar to the sound mine makes after realizing how to solve a bug in my software that had been staring me in the face the whole time! :grin: -- Leif

Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Zonnet, On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:15:06 +0200 GMT (14/07/2004, 20:15 +0700 GMT), Zonnet wrote: Z You convinced me. It was a bid of work to make a decent photo but here it Z is (or at least it should be after you updated your Rogues file) I just updated, but no, I don't see it. Your handle is

Alphabetizing .MSL was - Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 11:19:39 AM, you wrote: Thomas BTW Leif, can you make the entries in the .msl file Thomas alphabetically? M. I thought it would be more challenging, and therefore fun to have to search for it. Yeah, easy to do. How you want it? By filename (hence

Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Zonnet
ON Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 7:19:39 PM, you wrote: TF I just updated, but no, I don't see it. Your handle is Gerard to TF trigger the display of image file Gerard_de_Vries.jpg, but you have TF put Gerard_de_Vries instead of Gerard into your X-Roge header. TF Doesn't match. Please just put Gerard

Filter to move msgs assigned to color group not working

2004-07-15 Thread jan . rifkinson
Battyfolks, Here's the filter referenced in the subject heading. It's not working. Anyone got any ideas why not. TIA BeginFilter Name: DELETE - all msgs in DELETE COLOR GROUP Active: 1 Source: \\IDT\Inbox Target: \\IDT\$JUNK$\Test folder CopyFolder: none MainSet: 00@ Actions:

Re: Alphabetizing .MSL was - Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Leif, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:49:44 -0600 GMT (15/07/2004, 21:49 +0700 GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: Thomas BTW Leif, can you make the entries in the .msl file Thomas alphabetically? LG M. I thought it would be more challenging, and therefore fun LG to have to search for it. LG Yeah,

Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Zonnet, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:32:58 +0200 GMT (15/07/2004, 22:32 +0700 GMT), Zonnet wrote: Z Actually I forgot to give a handle and assumed that it would be my name. I Z only read the instructions partially :o Z I have added my name and changed the X-Rogue header, as you can see. I see

Re: Alphabetizing .MSL was - Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Thomas, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:53:06 AM, you wrote: Thomas Lemme think. Something related to the email address perhaps? I Thomas can't judge whether on average that's the name or the handle, Thomas but I think the handle will be fine as a sorting key. The .MSL files will never contain

TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread admin
Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a broadband connection and WinXP Pro? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 2.11.02 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current

Re: Filter to move msgs assigned to color group not working

2004-07-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo jan, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:50:47 -0400GMT (15-7-2004, 18:50 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JR Here's the filter referenced in the subject heading. It's not JR working. Anyone got any ideas why not. TIA You've got two actions defined. What's not working? Moving, deleting or neither?

Re: TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Thu 15-Jul-04 11:59am -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a broadband connection and WinXP Pro? That's my setup. Installed it on the 13th - no problem. On the 14th it hung during initial fetch sequence. I installed 11.02 on top

IMAP SpamPal.

2004-07-15 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi all, I installed SpamPal yesterday as an alternative to bayesit. It's working fine after a few tweaks, but I'm still having a problem with IMAP. As I use a TLS connection, I'm having to also use stunnel aswell as SpamPal to connect, but after some time, I hear the error noise and a message

Re: IMAP SpamPal.

2004-07-15 Thread Charles M. Gerungan
Hello Chris, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:13:38 +0100 UTC, Chris Weaven wrote: CW Has anyone here successfully set-up SpamPal with Stunnel using TLS CW without having these, what appear to be, timeout problems? CMG Have you considered posting this to the stunnel list at mirt.net? CW Hmm, didn't

Re[2]: TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread admin
On Thu 15-Jul-04 11:59am -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a broadband connection and WinXP Pro? That's my setup. Installed it on the 13th - no problem. OK - would you mind sending me (PM) a copy of your popfile.cfg file?

Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Zonnet
ON Thursday, July 15, 2004, 6:53:25 PM, you wrote: TF I see you! ;-) I hope I did not scare your :o -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= In sport, the bad news for the present champion is that tomorrow is a new day, when the

Re: In-mail and Out-mail Examples

2004-07-15 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Wed 14-Jul-04 3:33pm -0400, Roelof Otten wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:12:24 -0500GMT (14-7-2004, 22:12 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Yes, it's great for some things, like changing a header line. But, AFAIK, it can't add headers that I include at the beginning of a message (with, for

RE:TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello admin, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 6:59:15 PM, you wrote: Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a broadband connection and WinXP Pro? well, only XP Home, but the rest fits. What's your problem? -- Regards, Jurgen :eu-flag: :de-bw: The shortest distance

Re: IMAP SpamPal.

2004-07-15 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Charles, On Thursday, July 15, 2004 20:17 your local time, which was 19:17 my local time, Charles Gerungan [CMG] wrote; CW Hmm, didn't really want to join a mailing list to ask one question, but CW should that be the only option, then so be it. CMG The experts on stunnel are there, and this

Re: Alphabetizing .MSL was - Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Zonnet
ON Thursday, July 15, 2004, 6:57:11 PM, you wrote: LG If you sort by Handle, then the problem you were addressing with LG someone using the wrong Handle, won't help. Hi Leif, Since your discussion a problem I created I think I should add my voice. Sorting is nice but with a big file I always

Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Morgan Pugh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBUDL, I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I click on the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL accounts not just the active one? I am sure this has been asked before and I apologize if it is answered

Re[2]: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Morgan Pugh
Hi subscriber2list, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:30:40 PM, you wrote: Hello Morgan, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 5:23:26 PM, you wrote: snip MP I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I click on MP the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL accounts not just MP the

Re: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Maggie
Hello Morgan, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 5:23:26 PM, you wrote: M I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I click on M the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL accounts not just M the active one? Just hit Alt+F2 or, you can get to any individual account by clicking

Re: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Morgan, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:23:26 PM, Morgan wrotened: MP I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I MP click on the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL MP accounts not just the active one? MP I am sure this has been asked before and I

Re[2]: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Ben, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:28:01 PM, Ben wrotened: Ben Howdy Morgan, Ben Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:23:26 PM, Morgan wrotened: MP I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I MP click on the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL MP accounts

Re[3]: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Morgan Pugh
Hi Ben, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:36:24 PM, you wrote: Howdy Ben, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:28:01 PM, Ben wrotened: Ben Howdy Morgan, Ben Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:23:26 PM, Morgan wrotened: MP I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I MP click on the

Re[4]: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Morgan, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:45:09 PM, Morgan wrotened: MP I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I MP click on the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL MP accounts not just the active one? MP I am sure this has been asked before and I

Re: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Morgan, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 3:45:09 PM, you wrote: Morgan Yeah I want to make it so that it does that but when I just Morgan click it! Click the down arrow next to it and select Check mail for all. I think that's as close to keyboardless. -- Leif Gregory (TB list moderator and

Re: Alphabetizing .MSL was - Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Zonnet, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 2:18:04 PM, you wrote: Zonnet Since your discussion a problem I created I think I should add Zonnet my voice. Sorting is nice but with a big file I always prefer Zonnet to use the search function. I open de MSL files in Notepad and Zonnet doing a search

Re[2]: TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread admin
Hello admin, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 6:59:15 PM, you wrote: Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a broadband connection and WinXP Pro? well, only XP Home, but the rest fits. What's your problem? Would you object to letting me have a copy of your POPFile.cfg

Re: Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Dan Grunberg
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 22:23:26 +0100 (5:23 PM EDT here) Morgan Pugh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBUDL, I was wondering if it is possible to make it so that when I click on the Get New Mail button it checks mail for ALL accounts not just the active one? I am

Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Code 2
RO A new version of TB was released among us. It supports RO Roguemoticons (for more info see: RO http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.php ) and loads of extra RO smileys. RO As I prefer my smileys the old fashioned way, I'm not that RO enthusiastic about the additional smileys, but I

Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Code, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 4:45:56 PM, you wrote: Code Also, is it correct that the header pane will only show images Code from the rogues.msl file? For example, if I created an X-Rogue Code header that contained a :) smiley, it will not display in the Code header pane? Correct. I

Re: Threading: store outgoing msgs in folder sent from?

2004-07-15 Thread Dan Grunberg
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:10:41 +0200 (6:10 AM EDT here) Cory wrote: How can I achieve that all messages I sent are stored in the folders these msgs are sent from? (without creating filters for every folder) Unfortunately you have to create filters for each folder, but it shouldn't be too hard to

Re: Threading: store outgoing msgs in folder sent from?

2004-07-15 Thread Kevin Amazon
Hi Cory - On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, at 12:10:41 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:10 AM where I live) you wrote: Hi all, How can I achieve that all messages I sent are stored in the folders these msgs are sent from? (without creating filters for every folder)

Re: IMAP SpamPal.

2004-07-15 Thread Charles M. Gerungan
Hello Chris, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:26:56 +0100 UTC, Chris Weaven wrote: CW I'll join if I have to, but was hoping the knowledgeable people here at CW TBUDL may be of help! :-) Well, at least you must be doing something right as at least the moderators of this list don't think that this is

Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Leif, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:56:57 -0600GMT (16-7-2004, 0:56 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Code Also, is it correct that the header pane will only show images Code from the rogues.msl file? For example, if I created an X-Rogue Code header that contained a :) smiley, it will not display

Re: In-mail and Out-mail Examples

2004-07-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bill, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:03:31 -0500GMT (15-7-2004, 21:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Well, why don't you add those headers with the %SetHeader and %AddHeader macros in TB? BM Yes, I do that for fixed add-ins with a template or a qt (when a given BM address doesn't always get

Re[2]: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Code 2
Code Also, is it correct that the header pane will only show images Code from the rogues.msl file? For example, if I created an X-Rogue Code header that contained a :) smiley, it will not display in the Code header pane? LG Correct. I believe this is based off two things: LG 1. The line

Re:Check Mail for All

2004-07-15 Thread Anne
Thursday, July 15, 2004, 10:28:01 PM, Ben wrote: B You could just press Alt-F2 or F11 :) -- Cheers, Anne Flying high with The Bat! v2.12.00 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL'

Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
When I first start up TB! 2.12 it takes roughly 80 secs from opening the TB! window until numbers start to appear next to folders indicating numbers of messages. If I close and restart TB! it takes less time for this process to happen, but it is still 30 or 40 secs until the numbering process

Re: TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri 16 July 2004, 2:59:15 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a broadband connection and WinXP Pro? Yes I am -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see:

Re: Alphabetizing .MSL was - Re: X-Rogue header is better than roguemoticon in signature

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri 16 July 2004, 8:11:08 +1000, Leif Gregory wrote: I use search functions too. However, the order in the .MSL file is as easy as adding: ORDER BY Handle or ORDER BY Image No problem for me to do it. I just want to know how they want it. Ordering would be useful, and each of

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, July 15, 2004, 7:52 PM, you wrote: RA Furthermore, the contents of the folder that is initially highlighted RA will often not appear for some considerable time. Sometimes the contents RA appear once number of messages in the folder has been counted, but at RA other times the message

Re[2]: subject hijacking

2004-07-15 Thread Maggie
Hello Allie, Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 5:01:48 PM, you wrote: A Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote: RG OT: I may like the term hijacking, but I LOVE the phrase 'trout RG not accepted'! A ;) :gdr: duck cover yow! -- Maggie

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri 16 July 2004, 10:36:28 +1000, Paul Cartwright wrote: that's not a problem, that's a feature! but seriously, how many accounts do you have and how many messages ??? 3 accounts, 8,000 messages I never timed mine, but it does take a while to load up, and I also use K9 spam filter, so

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri 16 July 2004, 10:40:32 +1000, Peter Ouwehand wrote: Not unless I try to start TB while other $^*( is still loading during startup of my PC. Hmm, I checked that nothing else was loading before I started TB! Msg bases for my TB are stored on a networked location (LAN), in case the

Re: TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread George Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: aacu Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a aacu broadband connection and WinXP Pro? Yep, all those things and it works fine. I check 4 accounts through POPFile v0.21.1. -- George Using The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows XP Pro 5.1, Build 2600,

RE:TB and POPFile and more than one account

2004-07-15 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello admin, Friday, July 16, 2004, 12:12:45 AM, you wrote: Hello admin, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 6:59:15 PM, you wrote: Is anyone using TB 2.12.00 and POPFile and multiple accounts and a broadband connection and WinXP Pro? well, only XP Home, but the rest fits. What's your problem?

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread George Mitchell
Robin Anson wrote: RA When I first start up TB! 2.12 it takes roughly 80 secs from RA opening the TB! window until numbers start to appear next to RA folders indicating numbers of messages. snip RA Has anyone else experienced either of these problems? Do you have many virtual folders? I don't

exporting and importing QuickTemplates?

2004-07-15 Thread Jurgen Haug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo Fledermäuse, is there a way to export the QuickTemplates that I have on one of my accounts, to move them to a different PC and use them there? It would be a bit tedious to copy and paste all of them (around 25) into a text file or whatever