Hello Chris, On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:26:56 +0100 UTC, Chris Weaven wrote:
CW> I'll join if I have to, but was hoping the knowledgeable people here at CW> TBUDL may be of help! :-) Well, at least you must be doing something right as at least the moderators of this list don't think that this is off-topic. CW> 1. I tried connecting to my IMAP server straight through SpamPal with no CW> TLS and therefore no stunnel. My bad. I would've thought you'd tried this. CW> This again causes a the disconnection. That's why I said "this is an stunnel issue, if that.". It could be time-out issues on the server, severe latency -- whatever. CW> Also, on closer inspection of the mail headers (F9), I notice that the CW> SpamPal headers are not added!? I wouldn't know. I don't believe in client-side anti-spam systems (well, one, sorta). But I did take a look at the SpamPal page, and if it's just as effective as a well-trained SpamAssassin system, you're halfway there. CW> Is this correct with IMAP, as all my mail through POP has both the CW> SpamPal and the baysian (SpamPal plug-in) headers added!? That would a great question to ask on the SpamPal list. -- Regards, Charles. TB! 2.12 RC/4 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 / Courier IMAP 3.0.5
pgpk4QWWsv8df.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
