Hi Andy,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, at 15:11:56 [GMT -] (which was 02:11 where I
live) you wrote:
OK, assuming you've not filtered out my email completely because I'm
using Outlook 2000 :-), I have a question (or two). I've just found The
Bat!, test-installed it (latest as of yesterday, 1.62
Hello Julian
JBL I still use Outlook for my contacts
JBL and diary (I have not got round to finding a suitable replacement that
JBL will work with my Palm)
What's wrong with Palm's own desktop? Needs vary, but I switched from
Outllok to this and find it more effective and easier to use --
Hello Dave,
Wow! 2 years of TBing for me, and I had no idea this existed!
I don't know if it was here or in TBBETA that someone said recently
that it takes about 10 years to become aware of all TB capabilities.
;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Hello John
JP One major problem (IMO - your needs may vary) is the inability to have
JP recurring tasks.
You can set events to repeat at regular intervals but, I agree,
there's no way to automate irregular future commitments.
--
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Hello John,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 9:07:43 AM, you wrote:
JP However, trying to import the Outlook address book - forget it. I
JP found it easier to update the Bat! address book from an Outlook print
JP out.
JP (Best e-mail move I have ever made - YMMV)
You could have save yourself a
Hi,
Does anyone know when the BAT v2 is going to be out? I've been holding
back from buying the Bat so as to wait for v2.
Does anyone else have problems with the auto format when do lists?
When I try and do a list (see below) auto formatting ends up putting them
all on the same line?
Apple
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:27:30 [GMT -0500] (11:27 AM EST here) Spike wrote:
Hello fellow tbudl'ers,
I have been exploring my drive for wasted file space and have
discovered 324 files in;
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP
The files are MOSTLY '0-byte' empty files, but there are 14 that
are between 21 and 45MB
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:52:26 [GMT +0100] (9:52 AM EST here) Roelof Otten
wrote:
Hallo Biju,
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:31:31 -0800GMT (30-1-03, 23:31 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
BN what i want is BAT should automatically pick up the CC list when i
BN am forwarding the mail
Do you mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@15-Jan-2003, 09:25 -0500 (14:25 UK time) Daniel Grunberg [DG] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DG Particularly in this computer age, doesn't cc stand for
DG copies? Compare cc to pp, which always has stood for
DG pages.
Thanks for the info. I used the actions tab, and set both a flag and
the color group. On a test message, it did set the flag properly, but
not the color. Perhaps just a problem unique to me?
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 8:07:53 AM, TF wrote:
TF OK, here is the confusion. Action and Advanced
Hello Daniel,
(Almost every time is because when I reboot, as I must, after
using VirusScan's UPDATE button McAfee ViruScan won't update if the
temporary files are deleted.)
What version of viruscan are you using? I use version 6 and it doesn't
need a reboot after updating.
--
Best regards,
Hello Ben,
Does anyone else have problems with the auto format when do lists?
Yes, that is why I normally have Auto Format off. It can be easily
toggled with Shift+Ctrl+F when needed.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
ON Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:45:48 PM, you wrote:
RHS Thanks for the info. I used the actions tab, and set both a flag and
RHS the color group. On a test message, it did set the flag properly, but
RHS not the color. Perhaps just a problem unique to me?
Hi Richard,
There is a know
John,
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, John Phillips wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JP One major problem (IMO - your needs may vary) is the inability to have
JP recurring tasks.
I missed the earlier parts of this thread, so this reply may be
totally off the mark, but I
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:18:18 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 21:18 +0700 GMT),
Daniel Grunberg wrote:
To make a long story short, I've used Hardware Hell's suggestions in
my autoexec.bat file. Deleting the files almost every time my system
starts helps to keep my computer running
Hello Ben,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:06:17 + GMT (15/01/03, 20:06 +0700 GMT),
Ben Keeley wrote:
Does anyone know when the BAT v2 is going to be out? I've been holding
back from buying the Bat so as to wait for v2.
You'd better not hold your breath. Your trial period will be over
before v2 is
Hello Richard,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:45:48 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 21:45 +0700 GMT),
Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
Thanks for the info. I used the actions tab, and set both a flag and
the color group. On a test message, it did set the flag properly, but
not the color. Perhaps just a problem
miércoles, 15 de enero de 2003
12:53:32 pm
Invalid HTML !
Please forward this message to developers.
Thanks.
EAccessViolation Access violation at address 0040501B in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of
address 017D8000
Hi,
Is there a specific reason the bat behaves like this as appose to other
email clients?
Thanks
Ben
Hello Ben,
Does anyone else have problems with the auto format when do lists?
Yes, that is why I normally have Auto Format off. It can be easily
toggled with Shift+Ctrl+F when needed.
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Invalid HTML !
Please forward this message to developers.
Thanks.
EAccessViolation Access violation at address 0040501B in module
'thebat.exe'. Read of address 017D8000
-
Error continues to generate on Bat
Hello justino,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 12:54:50 PM, you wrote:
miércoles, 15 de enero de 2003
12:53:32 pm
Invalid HTML !
Please forward this message to developers.
Thanks.
EAccessViolation Access
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@15-Jan-2003, 17:04 Ben Keeley [BK] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does anyone else have problems with the auto format when do
lists?
Yes, that is why I normally have Auto Format off. It can be
easily toggled with
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:52:03 [GMT +0700] (10:52 AM EST here) Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:18:18 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 21:18 +0700 GMT),
Daniel Grunberg wrote:
To make a long story short, I've used Hardware Hell's suggestions in
my autoexec.bat file. Deleting the
miércoles, 15 de enero de 2003
1:29:15 pm
Hello Marek,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 1:06:21 PM, you wrote:
MM 1.62e was not officially released, it has Beta status.
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:18:18 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 21:18 +0700 GMT),
Daniel Grunberg wrote:
I found an article Deleting Temporary Files Painlessly, at
http://hardwarehell.com/bootclean.shtml
I get a 404. Which link do I have to use from
http://hardwarehell.com/index.shtml ?
--
Hello Thomas,
On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 00:44:26GMT +0700
(which was 12:44 PM in the tropics where I live) Thomas Fernandez
queried:
TF Hello Daniel,
TF I get a 404. Which link do I have to use from
TF http://hardwarehell.com/index.shtml ?
Hi,
Just wondering... If I were to purchase the bat now before v2 is released
would I get a free upgrade or would I have to purchase another license?
Thanks
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
--
Happy New Year,
Timbo
Timothy Casten mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZDC Area 5 Rep. 703.606.2379
NATCA National Communications Chairman
NatcaNet Administrator
Current version
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 11:04:01 AM, Ben wrote:
Is there a specific reason the bat behaves like this as appose to other
email clients?
TB!'s editor sees everything *not* separated by an empty line as
belonging to one paragraph. I always leave auto-format off and
reflow text with alt-L as
TC What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
NAV 2003 works great with TB!
Go NATCA!!! (ZSU)
--
Ramon L. Negron (Cuco)
Air Traffic Controllers tell pilots where to go!
PATCO Lives!
Current version is 1.62 | Using
Hello Timothy,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
TC What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
Personally, Norton but YMMV. :)
--
Best regards,
Mike
Current version is
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow? One sort is the
order in which they were added. Another is alphabetical order.
Another might be hierarchical grouping.
Does the Sorting Office note the date a filter was added? Somewhere
outside of the interface maybe.
I would always like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Adam wrote...
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the order
in which they are applied. That could have a disastrous affect in
some
I have tried NAV 2002 and 2003 and have a problem with timeouts due to its e-mail
scanning.
The problem is that I maintain both of NATCAS big Internet servers.
One we use as a e-mail server running mailsite and the other as a web server.
We use sieve filters for virus protection in the e-mail
Hello Jonathan list,
On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 13:18:05GMT -0600
(which was 2:18 PM in the tropics where I live) Jonathan Angliss
murmured:
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
JA If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the
JA order in which
Hello justino,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 1:29:36 PM, you wrote:
miércoles, 15 de enero de 2003
1:29:15 pm
Hello Marek,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 1:06:21 PM, you wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:48:05 PM, you wrote:
JA On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Adam wrote...
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
JA If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the order
JA in which they are applied. That could have a
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:18:05 PM, you wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Adam wrote...
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the order
in which they are applied. That could have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Adam wrote...
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
JA If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the
JA order in which they are applied. That could have a disastrous
JA affect in some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Daniel Rail wrote...
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the order
in which they are applied. That could have a disastrous affect in
some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@15-Jan-2003, 17:54 Ben Keeley [BK] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BK Just wondering... If I were to purchase the bat now before v2 is
BK released would I get a free upgrade or would I have to purchase
BK another license?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timothy,
@15-Jan-2003, 12:58 -0500 (17:58 UK time) Timothy Casten [TC] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TC What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
I use AVG. I recommend NOD32 and Kaspersky(?) as better
On 15-1-2003 at 20:49, Daniel Rail wrote:
The same goes for version 1.62h that I mentioned in my
message, that one too is a beta version of an upcoming release. It's
just that they probably haven't decided what the official version
number will be for that release.
1.63 is currently in its
I've bought my license from French dealer malka www.malka.com ; they
told me that licenses bought after decembre 2002 would be valid for
TheBat v2.0
Erwan.
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:17:48 [GMT +0100] (10:17 AM EST here) Miguel A.
Urech wrote:
Hello Daniel,
(Almost every time is because when I reboot, as I must, after
using VirusScan's UPDATE button McAfee ViruScan won't update if the
temporary files are deleted.)
What version of viruscan are you
Hello Erwan CHAUTY,
On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 22:07:03GMT +0100
(which was 4:07 PM in the tropics where I live) Erwan CHAUTY
whispered:
EC I've bought my license from French dealer malka www.malka.com ; they
EC told me that licenses bought after decembre 2002 would be valid for
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003 Marck D Pearlstone stated:
MDP This may be a shame, because many newcomers that at first complained
MDP and kicked against the way the editor works are now devout fans of
MDP what is actually a very appropriate editor for the purpose. It has a
MDP learning curve and
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:44:26 [GMT +0700] (12:44 PM EST Wed here) Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:18:18 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 21:18 +0700 GMT),
Daniel Grunberg wrote:
I found an article Deleting Temporary Files Painlessly, at
http://hardwarehell.com/bootclean.shtml
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 11:04:58 PM, Peter Kerekes wrote:
PK Try Time and Chaos http://www.isbister.com/ I use it for a number
PK of years.
I've been using TC for only a few months, but I'll second the vote.
It's terrific. I only downloaded it for comparison purposes - I was
testing out a
Hello Daniel,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 6:14:52 PM, you wrote:
DR
DR Get The Bat! 1.62h, the problem is supposed to be fixed.
Where would I find that version?
--
Best regards,
FJ de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62 |
Hello Daniel,
I'm using an earlier version. When I update by pressing the Update
button, I (almost?) always have to reboot to have the update take
effect.
Yes, I remember from earlier versions. That is one of the reasons I
upgraded to v6, because it updates automatically and doesn't need a
Hello all,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Spike wrote:
EC I've bought my license from French dealer malka www.malka.com ; they
EC told me that licenses bought after decembre 2002 would be valid for
EC TheBat v2.0
Nice to know if true! I think I'll get the whole family their
(6) licenses now!!
Hello,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 4:17:23 PM, you wrote:
If the sort is only applied to the viewing of the list of filters, I
wouldn't mind.
But how do you sort on displayed, and not alter the order of affect?
You'd then have to tag each filter with an order number, and have that
Hello all,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, FJ de Bruin wrote:
DR
DR Get The Bat! 1.62h, the problem is supposed to be fixed.
Where would I find that version?
wait for official version, it will be relased very soon as I know.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Daniel Rail wrote...
If the sort is only applied to the viewing of the list of filters,
I wouldn't mind.
But how do you sort on displayed, and not alter the order of
affect? You'd then have to tag each filter with
Hello Daniel,
On January 15, 2003, 09:25, you wrote:
DG Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:52:26 [GMT +0100] (9:52 AM EST here) Roelof Otten
DG wrote:
DG An off-topic (arguably, smart-assed) question:
DG Particularly in this computer age, doesn't cc stand for copies?
DG Compare cc to pp, which always has
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow? One sort is the
order in which they were added. Another is alphabetical order.
Dangerous! (...at least for me!) My rules are IF? THEN! ELSE!! based.
Sorting then around alfabetically would be THEN what IF...HUH!? DOH!
Another might be
I just couldn't imagine someone having around 100 filters
under incoming and trying to manage them.
I have 301 rules working hard for the money...on a PII233!
/ St
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Timothy,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 7:25:39 PM, you wrote:
TC I have tried NAV 2002 and 2003 and have a problem with timeouts due to its e-mail
scanning.
TC The problem is that I maintain both of NATCAS big Internet servers.
TC One we use as a e-mail server running mailsite and the
I can do that in Mailsite also Mike.
I can have it deliver the infected e-mail or deposit it in a folder on the server or
do both.
I just prefer downloading it every day.
Just a preference of mine.
--
Happy New Year,
Timbo
Timothy Casten mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZDC Area 5 Rep.
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:50:42 -0500 GMT (16/01/03, 04:50 +0700 GMT),
Daniel Grunberg wrote:
I'll copy the article and email it to you.
I received your PM, thank you.
It is a combination of the cleanup.bat file I lost and the file I have
now. It misses the c:\tmp and c:\recycled
Hello Adam,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:26:14 -0330 GMT (16/01/03, 02:56 +0700 GMT),
Adam wrote:
If you could sort them, perhaps hierachically, or hiding some
elements, you could have a better overview of the Rule set that you
created, and easier to maintain, and update. I'm referring to their
Hi Thomas,
If you could sort them, perhaps hierachically, or hiding some
elements, you could have a better overview of the Rule set that you
created, and easier to maintain, and update. I'm referring to their
user display, not internal rule list.
TF Oh please, no. The order of the display
The new 1.63 beta introduces an experimental Windows style editor
that uses soft formatting. You won't catch me using it - I like to
know that what I see in the message edit window is what will be
sent :-), but it may suit some newcomers
I'm just trying the new version now (1.63b4). Once
I vote for leaving it the way it is too.
I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted
in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be nice
if one could group related rules:
Instead of
VirusShield Spamvestigater (Virus)
VirusShield SpamCop detected
Marek,
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Marek Mikus wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DR Get The Bat! 1.62h, the problem is supposed to be fixed.
Where would I find that version?
MM wait for official version, it will be relased very soon as I know
Why is RITlabs producing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bruno Fernandes [BF] wrote:'
The new 1.63 beta introduces an experimental Windows style editor
that uses soft formatting. You won't catch me using it - I like to
know that what I see in the message edit
Hi St,
Now that I can see what you had in mind - I like it!
Actually, I'd prefer a plain external text file
with the rules in execution order.
(Makes sharing of rules very easy to do.)
TB reads the text file and presents the default view
which would be execution order. It'd have a couple
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 05:38:13GMT +0100
(which was 11:38 PM in the tropics where I live) St - Musaic.Net
opined:
SMN I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted
SMN in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 6:58:20 PM, you wrote:
What Virus Plug-in do you all recommend for use with the Bat?
I used the following software in the past 2 years, each of it for a
longer period of time, all full versions:
G Data Antiviren Kit 11
Great software, test winner in c't and
70 matches
Mail list logo
