jwayne wrote:
> In 1.x I regularly used a quick template when replying to messages in one of my
> folders. It filled in the To: header by grabbing it from the text:
> %TO=""
> %TO='%setpattregexp="(?i-s)(Buyer\:+)(.+\:)(.+)"%RegExpBlindMatch="%Text"%SUBPATT="3"'
> The replies are eBay confirmati
On Monday, December 22, 2003, 10:59:45 PM, Marck D Pearlstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
MDP> Hi Jwayne,
MDP> @22-Dec-2003, 22:41 -0500 (23-Dec 03:41 UK time) jwayne said:
>> (regarding template re-evaluation for header fields)
MDP> Just touch the message body once. As long as it is modified y
Hi Jwayne,
@22-Dec-2003, 22:41 -0500 (23-Dec 03:41 UK time) jwayne said:
> Any work-around?
Just touch the message body once. As long as it is modified you can
change the TO header at will and it will stick. If the body is
unmodified, the template is re-evaluated when you move from header
to bod
In 1.x I regularly used a quick template when replying to messages in one of my
folders. It filled in the To: header by grabbing it from the text:
%TO=""
%TO='%setpattregexp="(?i-s)(Buyer\: +)(.+\:)(.+)"%RegExpBlindMatch="%Text"%SUBPATT="3"'
The replies are eBay confirmations, but occasionally I
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:14:24 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
[Unprofessionalisms in TB!]
> To me, it sounds almost like fussing about the bad design of
> the indicator stalk in a Ferrari.
Your insertion of the word "almost" made me sigh with relief. ;-)
(I wouldn't dream of buying a Ferrari mo
Hello Jernej,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:38:21 +0100 GMT (22/12/2003, 23:38 +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simonèiè wrote:
>> Thus it appears that The Bat! is not vulnerable
> As far as I've understood, when IE engine
Two different pieces of software.
> encounters an image file, it will try to autodetect what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello rich,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:29:19 -0500 your time, you said:
rg> Again, both are quite unprofessional.
What a load of nonsensical claptrap! I've read some comments on this
list over the years but my word, these last few remarks really ta
Hi Rich,
@22-Dec-2003, 18:29 -0500 (22-Dec 23:29 UK time) rich gregory [RG]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to jwayne:
j>> ... the Ctrl-shift-left arrow keeps everything highlighted and
j>> puts the cursor at the beginning of the field.
RG> This is one of my BIGGEST complaints with TB. Though I us
On Monday, December 22, 2003, 5:31:13 PM, Stuart Cuddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SC> I have a telephone answering system on the computer that uses MAPI
SC> to send the message left on the answering machine to my e-mail
SC> address. I have set the option to use MAPI in Preferences, and when
Hello TBUDL,
I have a telephone answering system on the computer that uses MAPI
to send the message left on the answering machine to my e-mail
address. I have set the option to use MAPI in Preferences, and when
the e-mail is to be sent the program launches, but no message gets
sent. How
j> However, this does not work properly in any The Bat message header field
j> (To, Subject, etc); the Ctrl-shift-left arrow keeps everything highlighted
j> and puts the cursor at the beginning of the field.
This is one of my BIGGEST complaints with TB. Though I use TB myself (and put
up with it's
Hello Annette,
Monday, December 22, 2003, 3:11:24 PM, you wrote:
> Yes indeed, I found one saved by "MS Active Accessibility Core System
> Backup"! But the versions suggest, that the installed one is higher,
> or do I miss something?
What Folder did you find the installed on in?
> installed: 4.
Hello Nick!
> Do a search and see if you indeed have an Export-User32.dll file
> somewhere on your Computer.
Yes indeed, I found one saved by "MS Active Accessibility Core System
Backup"! But the versions suggest, that the installed one is higher,
or do I miss something?
installed: 4.01.0970 (06
On Monday, December 22, 2003, 22:25:49, Annette Mangels wrote:
> My USER32.dll seems to be one of the oldest files on my system ;-).
> Okay, but I have another WIN95 running, may be I should try and copy
> the other dll into this one. That is a good starting point. I will try
> it and report.
Don
Hello Annette,
Monday, December 22, 2003, 2:26:47 PM, you wrote:
> It seems mow, that the problem is more on the side of the Win95's
> *.dll-s, so I'm not sure if a fresh installation will help. Or are
> there newer libraries included in the package?
Do a search and see if you indeed have an Exp
Hello Peter!
> I'm sorry I don't know the particular meaning of this error. Did you
> run a setup from the_bat.exe or did you just copy thebat.exe to your
> directory? (Note that the install file has an underscore in its
> name.)
No, I launched the setup-file from my download-folder, and did not
Hello Chris!
> This bug has already been reported. Unfortunately, there is not
> solution at this time.
> Some Helpful Hints:
> * Make sure you don't have any seedy utilities running. They may have
> modified User32.dll.
My USER32.dll seems to be one of the oldest files on my system ;-).
Okay, b
Hello Chris,
> ...the one I finally decided on was MAU's "option 3" :-)
You selected the most expensive one, that'll cost you at least two
beers ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:
Curr
Marek Mikus wrote:
CC'ing to TBBETA in case the developers are too busy to read TBUDL.
>> 1) It's a real pain in the butt to search over all accounts because
>> you have to scroll down, checking each account, rather than
>> clicking a single checkbox.
MM> You can use right mouse button and selec
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> When I try to change the colour of the "Even Quotation" under
NA> Options/Preferences/Viewer&Editor/Plain Text/MicroEd I receive an
NA> AV Error each and every time.
Hmmm. Not confirmed here.
--
-=allie_M=- | List Moderator
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
__
William Moore wrote:
WM> Then I just reinstall TB, enter my registration key, copy the
WM> backed-up data files to where-ever I decide in the new (usually
WM> different) directory structure, reflect this using
WM> Options/Preferences/System/Mail directory and carry on as before.
Ok.
WM> It's alw
Martin-
Speedy Collection of Non-sequitur Replies
(thanks)
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/T
On Monday, December 22, 2003, 16:14:16, Carsten Thönges wrote:
> Thus it appears that The Bat! is not vulnerable against this
> scenario because it doesn't confuse being a mailreader with being
> a web browser ... like others do.
As far as I've understood, when IE engine encounters an image file,
* Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Be careful how you view your JPG and GIF files (from now on)...
[...]
> Any idea if The Bat would be vulnerable to this??
Take this (non-existant) URL: http://www.example.com/pics/me.jpg
If you visit such a site you'd expect your browser to display the
file
Thanks to everybody for the helpful replies - the one I finally decided on was MAU's
"option 3" :-)
Chris
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mark,
On 22 December 2003, 17:52 -0800 (22/12/2003 01:52 local time) Mark
Wieder [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF>> scnr
MW> scnr?
Take your pick...
Signal to Clutter plus Noise Ratio
Somatic Cell Nuclear Replacement
Sorry, Could Not
Hello all,
Monday, December 22, 2003, jwayne wrote:
> Just upgraded to 2.0 and am definitely underwhelmed.
> First, I was quite surprised that bugs in the 1.x version reported over a year
> ago haven't been addressed.
> Here are two of 'em:
> 1) Paste in any header field (e.g., To: or Subject:)
27 matches
Mail list logo
