Re: TheBat or Pocomail
Vishal Nakra wrote: Poco's interface is beautiful. Outright winner in the usability shootouts in my opinion. Its more powerful features are often a match for TB's, and are more easily used. I downloaded PocoMail this evening and have been playing around with it. I agree wholeheartedly on your comments above. The usability improvements that Poco offers are significant. There are some things that I found right away to just make more sense. I had always thought that the visual aspects of a mail client were unimportant. And back when I last looked at other clients, many reviews said Eudora had the nicest interface - and I hated it. But Poco does look nice. And it's skinnable - which seems silly to me, but I have thought that about skins before. And with some of the skinnable apps I have, I end up finding a few skins that are simple, clean and toned down and I find it's a nice touch. The HTML sanitizing features are another part that is impressive from a security standpoint. TB's HTML capability is better left unspoken about, since the many threads on this list will have shown you how far it has to go yet. Poco's is polished, though I didn't use it much either. I'm a big advocate of NOT using HTML, so for me, this really isn't a negative for TB. I just want an e-mail client that allows me to turn it all off, and for the rare occasions that I need to view an HTML message - and easy method for doing so (both Poco and TB have this). I played with Poco a few months ago, but resisted changing because I hadn't fully experimented with TB's very powerful macros and templates. I don't know if there is ever a good time to go through the painful process of switching. I want to give Poco a fair shot and spend some time with it, but learning a new program is time-consuming. My initial impression, though, is that there are some features that I consider important that Poco has - and are easy to use/set-up. I didn't want to give up on TB without doing that. TB's templates are better, but then Poco has its own scripting language that could do wonders for you if you know how to use it well. I didn't even want to consider another e-mail client that did not allow at least some basic address book templates. I didn't think Poco had them, but they're there. I have not delved into the scripting capabilities of Poco yet. TB has other advantages. Speed, for one. You'll quickly notice that Poco is pretty slow at downloading lots of mail. This won't be a problem if you don't receive a lot, but if you plan on subscribing to heavy-traffic mailing lists, be prepared to wait a lot. I used version 3, though, and the mailing lists had posts after that on how the speed was improved significantly in the later betas. My speed comment may be out of date now. Poco also tended to crash somewhat more than TB, and the user forums reveal other bugs that people weren't happy about. TB is definitely fast. That's been one of its biggest assets for years. I can't tell yet how much slower Poco is, but it doesn't seem to be a problem. It's definitely not as fast as The Bat, though. I'm not sure if that is such a problem if I'm checking mail regularly throughout the day (unless its REALLY slow) Can't say anything about crashing. TB has been pretty stable for me for a long time. Since there's only one developer for Poco, that's understandable. (Hats off to the guy for the singlehanded effort he's pulled off). Honestly, I think The Bat would be dead in the water were it not for this list. That's my opinion and could very well be completely wrong. But I find the community that is involved with a product is often just as (or more) important that the developer(s). People here have been very helpful and friendly. I don't know how the Poco forums are, but they are active. The problem, though, is that some issues that I may deem critical - if they aren't important to the list, they might just go unnoticed. I know that's very self-serving, but at the end of the day, I purchased The Bat for me to use. There have been a few issues with TB that I just can't comprehend. They go beyond idiosyncrasies. I don't like several things about TB - the HTML rendering, attachment handing and user interface primarily. But ultimately, I stuck with it because it was just plain too much bother to switch, with all the address book and other incompatibilities. It's interesting to see what people will go through to keep from changing. I'm convinced that a few of the expert users here would probably drop The Bat were it not for the hassle of switching, and their know-how and willingness to concoct elaborate work-arounds to problems the software itself should address. I think for me, the timing is right. I was irritated about The Bat's handling of the Memo field (and not being able to change the Subject line), and then experienced some weird, unexplainable behavior with attachments. I didn't get the answers I
Re: Can I import TB into Outlook?
Julian- Sunday, January 4, 2004, 5:49:57 AM, you wrote: JBL I use TB to directly access the Exchange Server, so I can continue to JBL use TB to send and receive work email. I found that just adding the JBL name of our Exchange Server in the Mail Server box in the account JBL properties|transport worked fine with my logon details. I believe this will only work if pop access is enabled on the Exchange Server, and Steve Sawczyn said his employer has decided to disable pop access. It's off by default - I don't remember off the top of my head whether it can be enabled on an account-by-account basis or if it's a global switch. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
ken- Sunday, January 4, 2004, 8:16:18 PM, you wrote: kg The only thing I can think of that might be an issue is that the kg messages in question are both affected by a filter that moves them to a kg common folder, and I have the attachment option set not to store with kg message, but in a specific folder. (grasping at straws, here...) Nope - that's how I have mine set, too, and messages moved with filters still have attachments ...er... attached... -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
ken- Sunday, January 4, 2004, 5:43:03 PM, you wrote: kg Since I first noticed it missing, I have restarted both TB and my kg computer - I suspect one of those may have fixed the problem. How long do you go without rebooting your computer? Windows likes to be rebooted every so often in order to rebuild its driver tables, especially if you've installed something new or changed some system setting. (or if there's unusual sunspot activity or if it's a day ending with the letter y). I now make sure I shut down my computers every night and restart them in the morning to give the house of cards called an operating system a chance to rebuild things. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
Mark Wieder wrote: How long do you go without rebooting your computer? Windows likes to be rebooted every so often Yeah, I know about Windows... ;) I have gone for weeks without a reboot, but that's rare. I experienced this recent attachment issue (nothing to do with mommy) with my Windows box no more than 24 hours from a reboot. And this recent one that won't come back tells me something funny is going on. It's frustrating - I know that *something* changed, and I probably changed (broke) it. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat or Pocomail - THANKS
Again, the question 'what is better, The Bat! or Pocomail? is an impossible question to answer Similar to asking a group of motorcyclists what is the best out of BMWs, Ducatis, Harleys etc Questions of personal preferences - aesthetics, and what weight you put on different characteristics - come into play big time. But thank you all for your helpful comments. No, you haven't 'answered' my question - an impossible 'ask' - but your insights have been interesting and helpful... Finally, whatever I personally dislike about The Bat! (and I dislike something about all of the several programs I have tried!), I do not doubt it is an excellent email program - easily among the best... -- Kind regards, Steve NSW AUSTRALIA Monday, 5 January 2004 20:39 Mailer: The Bat! v2.02.3 CE (www.ritlabs.com) Modern English is the Wal-Mart of languages: convenient, huge, hard to avoid, superficially friendly, and devouring all rivals in its eagerness to expand. -Mark Abley, journalist (1955- ) Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
Hi Ken, @5-Jan-2004, 02:01 -0600 (05-Jan 08:01 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Mark: How long do you go without rebooting your computer? Windows likes to be rebooted every so often K Yeah, I know about Windows... ;) I have gone for weeks without a K reboot, but that's rare. I experienced this recent attachment K issue (nothing to do with mommy) with my Windows box no more than K 24 hours from a reboot. K And this recent one that won't come back tells me something funny K is going on. It's frustrating - I know that *something* changed, K and I probably changed (broke) it. It's about the registered document type -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
Hi Ken, @5-Jan-2004, 02:01 -0600 (05-Jan 08:01 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Mark: Try again - that one escaped! K Yeah, I know about Windows... ;) I have gone for weeks without a K reboot, but that's rare. I experienced this recent attachment K issue (nothing to do with mommy) with my Windows box no more than K 24 hours from a reboot. K And this recent one that won't come back tells me something funny K is going on. It's frustrating - I know that *something* changed, K and I probably changed (broke) it. Looking at the headers you posted in another branch of this thread, it looks to me that something is going awry with the registered document hive in your windows configuration. TB is enquiring as to the registered document type but is being fed a crock when it makes the enquiry of a corrupted windows kernel. This is probably because of an in-memory corruption of the Win9x OS due to needing a reboot. BTW the Content-Type: application/msword;, although reasonable to a degree, is bad - it's completely windows/mac-centric and non-portable. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat or Pocomail - THANKS
S J Love wrote: Similar to asking a group of motorcyclists what is the best out of BMWs, Ducatis, Harleys Honda VFR -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat or Pocomail
Hello, Sunday, January 4, 2004, 10:32:51 AM, you wrote: tko I must say I don't get Pocomail. Then again, I don't get XP. Windows XP works. I've been using it for a couple of years, and no blue screens, in fact, I've never had an XP-related problem. Pocomail, on the other hand, is currently too buggy for public release, despite the fact that it is out of beta. It has a more modern looking, and more modern working (i.e. mouse rather than Ctrl-Alt-Shift-F12) interface. -- Cheers, Ken Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat or Pocomail
-- Monday, January 5, 2004, 11:55:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Sunday, January 4, 2004, 10:32:51 AM, you wrote: tko I must say I don't get Pocomail. Then again, I don't get XP. I don't use consumer OS and I don't care for the pleasing interface. I know you can disable it, but it was mostly an off-hand remark. I see PocoMail as similarly marketed. I am not the target market. Windows XP works. I've been using it for a couple of years, and no blue screens, in fact, I've never had an XP-related problem. Pocomail, on the other hand, is currently too buggy for public release, despite the fact that it is out of beta. It has a more modern looking, and more modern working (i.e. mouse rather than Ctrl-Alt-Shift-F12) interface. The Bat! has been historically buggy for extended periods of time. The keyboard interaction is another factor of marketing. Those who use professional and server OS, with traditional win32 ui, also happen to be sufficiently advanced enough (not the other way around), to also use keyboard shortcuts to a greater degree than others. Does The Bat! provide features accessible by keyboard alone that PocoMail provides in Menus? After all, The Bat has mouse/menu interaction as well. A typical consumer/customer could be confused by the options in TB, but they simply do not have to worry about the keyboard shortcuts. The big thing about Poco, to me, a developer, and possibly others, is... What the is this interface? That's not Windows. If I remember right, it was also lacking in many other areas important to *me*. As such, I think Becky is the closest rival to The Bat. PocoMail is an orange to The Bat's apple. All the while, I wish The Bat was simply better, there are simple things which would make it ultimately more useful and now that i think of it, some of these things might actually make it more consumer-ly appealing. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
How to eliminate the TB start logo?
How can I eliminate The Bat's start logo with Windows XP? The relevant shortcut to start the program currently is: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /nologo but it doesn't work. -- Best regards, Costas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to eliminate the TB start logo?
On Monday, January 05, 2004, Costas Papadopoulos wrote... How can I eliminate The Bat's start logo with Windows XP? The relevant shortcut to start the program currently is: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /nologo but it doesn't work. I think the /nologo should be inside the shouldn't it? Such as: C:\[..]\thebat.exe /nologo -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Jesus saves sinners and redeems them for cash and valuable prizes. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:How to eliminate the TB start logo?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Jonathan, I think the /nologo should be inside the shouldn't it? No, outside as: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /nologo -- regards Clive Taylor Using TB 2.03 Beta/25 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:How to eliminate the TB start logo?
Hallo Tbudl, How can I eliminate The Bat's start logo with Windows XP? The relevant shortcut to start the program currently is: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /nologo but it doesn't work. I use C:\Programme\The Bat!\thebat.exe /nologo /minimize in my autostart folder, and it works. I even tried to change the order of the options, and deleted the minimize option. It worked in all cases. Bis demnaechst. Alex -- Alexander Kleiser Bis 1980 gab es in Bhutan kein einziges Telefon. Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to eliminate the TB start logo?
On Monday, January 05, 2004, Clive Taylor wrote... I think the /nologo should be inside the shouldn't it? No, outside as: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /nologo Hrm... Couldn't remember which way around, thanks -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) You could be reading the next message by now. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Stuck Connection Centre
Hello Dennis, On Monday, January 5, 2004, 4:52:49 AM, you wrote: Hello Scott, I'm using the newest version and have the same problem. Seems to happen most often after an auto mail check. As I type this the connection center (centre) is stuck at 100% on a message. I will have to go into task manager to kill The Bat application. I also have this problem but luckily it does not occur frequently. I think it will get stuck after an automatic mail check. -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v2.02 CE, Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Anarchism is founded on the observation that since few men are wise enough to rule themselves, even fewer are wise enough to rule others. - Edward Abbey To request my public key select this url: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Stuck Connection Centre
On Sunday, January 4, 2004, Scott wrote: DWG I'm using the newest version and have the same problem. Seems to DWG happen most often after an auto mail check. As I type this the DWG connection center (centre) is stuck at 100% on a message. I will have DWG to go into task manager to kill The Bat application. I'll chime in with a me too here ... that was *exactly* what I was experiencing ... but not any more. This began as soon as I installed the Christmas edition and I was getting pretty frustrated at having to 3-finger-salute to close TheBat! ... was close to posting about it, not having had any of the other difficulties with the version that some folks mentioned. I wasn't sure whether it was the one IMAP account I was connected to on a nearly constant basis, or something else (except for filtering, IMAP is working acceptably for me, though if I could filter mail I want to keep to local folders and delete it from the server in one fell swoop it would be better) ... ummm, sorry, that was an aside. However, I knew that I'm using a Win98 machine that is extremely over-extended in the amount of software installed on it (most of which I need) and finally took some time to uninstall the few programs I no longer required, run Ad-Aware (Lavasoft ... only found 1 nasty) and then do a thorough registry cleanup. The reg cleanup seems to have done it ... after doing that, the problem disappeared. -- Brigitte Conrad-Avarmaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TheBat or Pocomail
On Sunday, January 4, 2004, 1:32:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Friday, January 2, 2004, 4:24:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bat Persons, This may not be an appropriate question to ask on this list - and one impossible to answer anyway - but I will ask anyway... tko Despite what mere mortals might say, this is perfectly fine. What is 'better': The Bat! or Pocomail? tko I'd recommend checking out Becky as an alternative to The Bat. tko For me, that is the product which comes closest to replacing TB. tko I must say I don't get Pocomail. Then again, I don't get XP. I'm always willing to try alternative programs even for the ones when I'm entrenched in (like TB) so I just downloaded Becky. Any TB users that require anything more than very basic templates can forget about Becky. Though there does seem to be some sort of API available with the client, the out of the box macro capabilities are pretty much non-existent from what I can tell. jon -- jwayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit subject line
On Sun 4 January 2004, 1:37:39 +1000, Cs4l wrote: Actually, this would not solve my issue. SpamPal would modify the headers instead of the subject, and I would want to remove the modified header so it it does not get picked by the filters. In that case I'd need a script to remove the header instead of the subject tags. Any idea? See Mssg header editor on The Bat! Macro and Solutions Library web page (http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#mssg+%26amp%3b+header+editor) -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Stuck Connection Centre
-- Monday, January 5, 2004, 1:33:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Dennis, On Monday, January 5, 2004, 4:52:49 AM, you wrote: Hello Scott, I'm using the newest version and have the same problem. Seems to happen most often after an auto mail check. As I type this the connection center (centre) is stuck at 100% on a message. I will have to go into task manager to kill The Bat application. I also have this problem but luckily it does not occur frequently. I think it will get stuck after an automatic mail check. I've had this problem forever. For a short time I thought it was fixed in v2, but it was not. I work around the problem by making TB much less useful. Forever means... since 1.x something. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat or Pocomail
-- Friday, January 2, 2004, 4:24:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may not be an appropriate question to ask on this list - and one impossible to answer anyway - but I will ask anyway... tko Despite what mere mortals might say, this is perfectly fine. What is 'better': The Bat! or Pocomail? tko I'd recommend checking out Becky as an alternative to The Bat. tko For me, that is the product which comes closest to replacing TB. tko I must say I don't get Pocomail. Then again, I don't get XP. I'm always willing to try alternative programs even for the ones when I'm entrenched in (like TB) so I just downloaded Becky. Any TB users that require anything more than very basic templates can forget about Becky. Though there does seem to be some sort of API available with the client, the out of the box macro capabilities are pretty much non-existent from what I can tell. Yes, a lot of Becky functionality is provided through it's wonderful plugin API. There are some other problems as well. I have documented them and discussed them with various Becky communities online. Any users that require anything more than very basic plugin API can forget about TB. You see, I can say similar things of TB, but that's not what this was about. This was about a recommendation to throw Becky into the mix being discussed; PocoMail and TB. Similarly, I use UltraEdit, but can most certainly spare the space in my memory to recommend close runners up, like EditPlus and CrimsonEditor. The same goes for many topics when people are seeking recommendations. Remember though, I use TB. Yes, TB. And more than adequately licensed. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Looking at the headers you posted in another branch of this thread, it looks to me that something is going awry with the registered document hive in your windows configuration. TB is enquiring as to the registered document type but is being fed a crock when it makes the enquiry of a corrupted windows kernel. This is probably because of an in-memory corruption of the Win9x OS due to needing a reboot. Not sure if this helps, but if I invoke Message Dispatcher and re-download the message in question, the Word doc attachment shows up. *AND* the previous version of message that wasn't showing the attachment now *does* show the attachment. BTW the Content-Type: application/msword;, although reasonable to a degree, is bad - it's completely windows/mac-centric and non-portable. Ummm... OK... So it's bad - who/what is setting the content-type? I thought this was MIME stuff set at the server level? (this is beyond my expertise, so excuse my ignorance on the subject) -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
Marck D Pearlstone wrote: This is probably because of an in-memory corruption of the Win9x OS due to needing a reboot. By the way, I am using Windows 2000, and the attachment still does not appear after a reboot. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: not receiving attachments
Hi Ken, @5-Jan-2004, 17:38 -0600 (05-Jan 23:38 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: K Not sure if this helps, but if I invoke Message Dispatcher and K re-download the message in question, the Word doc attachment K shows up. *AND* the previous version of message that wasn't K showing the attachment now *does* show the attachment. This is file association gone sour down to silly content type settings. BTW the Content-Type: application/msword;, although reasonable to a degree, is bad - it's completely windows/mac-centric and non-portable. K Ummm... OK... So it's bad - who/what is setting the K content-type? The original sender. ISTM that MS is messing more and more with MIME types and they really shouldn't. It confuses the heck out of some hapless recipients down the line. Like you, for instance. K I thought this was MIME stuff set at the server level? (this is K beyond my expertise, so excuse my ignorance on the subject) The server usually only sets Received headers. Sometimes they add missing Message-Id headers and Spam processing or routing headers. Stuff like that. Any server that message with content types should not be doing so. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Version 2.02.3 (CE) using up system resources?
Hi, Sunday, January 4, 2004, 9:29:32 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you started running some other programs alongside TB? Not anything new, that I haven't been running with the old version, before... -- Best regards, Susannemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.02.3 CE OS: Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
New SecureBat List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For those that are interested, there is a new SecureBat Mailing List that is now on the same Server as TBBETA and TBUDL. Here is the URL: http://thebat.dutaint.com/mailman/listinfo/securebat/ -=Nick Andriash=- Creston, B.C. Canada Using SecureBat Pro! v2.02.8 CE on Windows 98 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0.3 Comment: Using SecureBat! Pro for Increased Security iQA/AwUBP/oB5trrL7k7yn3SEQLmogCePl0qBhn59zUMjYvVhECIPWK3oj8AoJol iTiO5OwPa5gljry6h9vEjCpK =Zi5w -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Wrapping reply quotes
Howdy, Folks A few weeks ago I promised that the next time I saw a certain behavior from TB! I would post the sample here. OK, FIRST OF ALL... I know it is not The Bat!'s fault. So the topic was wrapping reply quotes and it was suggested that scrolling down through an outgoing reply one cold fix the word wrap points for each paragraph by pressing ALT-L on each. I pointed out that I had often seen long emails where this strategy breaks down at a point down the road. I have below an edited quote that demonstrates the point I was trying (so ineloquently) to make... MK This seems like JUST the kind of blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, and MK blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah. The thing is, blah, blah, blah.. NOW, is there any non-invasive way to fix this or is it an exercise in wastefulness to spend the time bothering with it and it would better be left as is? Thanks! Rich -- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Export filter
Hello Batters! How do I export a filter? I want to quote one (quote a filter, that is) along with a passage from an email that the filter doesn't seem to work on but seems as it should! Thx RG -- Rich Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Export filter
On Tuesday, January 6, 2004 at 12:34:22 AM, rich gregory wrote in the message Export filter mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: How do I export a filter? I want to quote one (quote a filter, that is) along with a passage from an email that the filter doesn't seem to work on but seems as it should! In the Sorting Office, right-click on the filter in question and select Copy. Then, paste the filter into your e-mail message. You will get a text equivalent of the filter. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. If little green men land in your back yard, hide any little green women you've got in the house. Using The Bat! v2.02 CE on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Export filter
You wrote: How do I export a filter? I want to quote one (quote a filter, that is) along with a passage from an email that the filter doesn't seem to work on but seems as it should! Go Account, then Sorting Office/Filters and do CTRL+C on a filter you want, then CTRL+V in a place you want to quote it. -- Lowell Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Manual filter with shortcut key
Hi, Not sure if this is possible...I've been unable to find reference to it in the archives. I would like to have a shortcut key that activates a manual filter. The filter is a simple if shortcut key is hit, move to folder 'Important'. How would I do this? -- Regards, Matt Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
