Re[2]: BayesIT in 2.04.7 and 2.04.04
Hi Doug, I have been plodding on telling BayesIT what is Junk and what is not, about half and half, but BayesIT refuses to do anything on its own. I understand that this started with 2.04.04. I am about to upgrade to 2.04.07 but from what I've read that only fixes a search problem. Can anyone shed light on this? Ah, I found out. You post to the list. Since I posted it has picked up 3 spam emails. But it's missed 5. Sounds about right. I've trained it with over 1700 spam and 7000 ham e-mails and it's just starting to pick up about 80% of the incoming spam. I currently have my score set to 1 to identify junk with no false positives. I've had spam with a score of as little as 1. I assigned Mark as Junk to a hotkey. It makes continued training a little easier. :) -- Regards, Terry Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Modes choices Not same
Hello Greg, View Modes in Option | Preferences | Messages | VM | select VM | click Used by ... are not the same as when in Main window Folder Properties | column settings | Use view mode VMname or when in Main window and right mouse click folder | Folder view mode | selected VM. Used by ...? My button says Use by See my mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Is that what you mean? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Question About Reply Templates
Hi, My current reply to template is thus: %Cursor %FromFName %cookie On %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, you wrote: %Text I was wanting to change it so that on a message that I reply to, it will have the following: -Original Message- From: Sent: (this is a date field - eg Friday, 27 February 2004 12:34) To: Suject: (original message text) Can someone please tell me if this is possible to do, if so, what syntax I use? Thanks, Chris Avoid parking tickets by leaving your windshield wipers turned to fast wipe whenever you leave your car parked illegally. Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
restoring registry: socket errors, retrieving bunch of dupes
Hello , I once went to a backup (image) of my system partition that was two days old and recognized strange behaviour while fetching mail, probably because of the last message marker stored somewhere in the registry, I assume - but as you can see this is a bad idea.. this highwater marker should be stored with the accounts, I propose. I took a look into thebat's registry settings, but could not find anything highwater related, so there has to be something else that confuses thebat if you restore it's registry entries from two days ago. At first catchup (after restoring zhe backup) I received Socket errors: [02:22:48] C: Connected to 127.0.0.1, port 110 [02:22:48] S: +OK POP3 POPFile (v0.20.1) server ready [02:22:48] C: USER xxx [02:22:49] S: +OK May I have your password, please? [02:22:49] C: PASS xxx [02:22:50] S: +OK mailbox has 580 messages (2497411 octets) [02:22:50] C: STAT [02:22:50] S: +OK 580 2497411 [02:22:50] C: LIST [02:22:50] S: +OK mailbox has 580 messages (2497411 octets) [02:22:51] S: 1 3486 [...] [02:22:52] S: 580 4645 [02:22:52] S: . [02:22:52] C: UIDL [02:23:52] S: -ERR no response from mail server [02:23:52] C: TOP 1 1 [02:24:20] S: !!! Socket error: #10054 (0x2746) [...] [02:24:21] S: !!! Socket error: #10054 (0x2746) The socket error appeared 585 times while there were only 580 mails. After fetching nothing TB said 580 mails, 580 new. The POPFile log does not say ANYTHING about this session..?! What I also found confusing was that tb said Retrieiving (sic!) message header #1 (1/580) for quite a while, though I did not invoke the dispatcher and have no selective download filters. On the next Get new mail it downloaded these 580 messages again. Posted this on TBBETA (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]), but no answer. It was with tb 2.04.2.. -- shinE! http://www.thequod.de ICQ#152282665 GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 with POPFile 0.20.1 and avast Jan2004 (4.1.342). Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[OT] SpamCop
Hello all, Sorry for OT, but I seem to recall there are a number of people here that use SpamCop to report spam. Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? TIA. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP filtering problem
Hello John, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:42:39 AM, you wrote: The message was from Michael to Randy, Susannah, and me -- but it was sorted into my Randy folder. I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael folder? Can you paste your Michael Randy filters into a reply to this email? Maybe that could shed some light on the problem. -- Dave Using The Bat! v2.04.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Sumbission Forms
Hello, Has anybody do something with submission forms? I created one using the one from help as template. The problem is I found no way to use it! I mean it is listed on Options/Sumbission Forms but I can do nothing with it except Add/Delete! How am I supposed to use it? -- /\/\ || George M. Menegakis - System Administrator || || Centre of Communications and Networking|| || Iraklion Campus - University Of Crete || || mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], icq: 4557532 || || phone: +30 81 393 305, fax:+30 81 39 3318 || \/\/ Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Modes choices Not same
Hello MAU, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 4:47:56 AM, MAU wrote: M Is that what you M mean? NO. If you have global view modes off and are using individual view modes for folders which have been set from the main window when you go into Options | Preferences | Messages | View Modes | select VM (one which you are using on a folder) | click Use by Now look at the folder where you know you are using that particular view mode and you will see it is NOT selected. BUG? -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Modes choices Not same
Hello Greg, Now look at the folder where you know you are using that particular view mode and you will see it is NOT selected. Maybe I didn't explain it clearly enough, but that is exactly what I mean when I say that Use by ... should also and actually be UseD (notice the D) by Use by =/= Used by. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
Hello MAU, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 6:56:49 AM, MAU wrote: M Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour M of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? Yes, but maybe it is related to the new account I'm using because I shut down the old email address for an old SpamCop reporting account. I reported 2 spam email this morning. The first did not give me an option to click on the button to report because the email had been previously reported. This has never happened on the old account so it could be related to the new account, or as you suggest new behavior. -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP filtering problem
Hi John, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: JR When I filter the Known folder the program moves 218 messages into JR Eddie's folder. 118 of them are from Eddie. It appears that all of JR the others have Eddie's address in one of the recipient fields. I might add that the filtering did *not* move messages in which eddie's address is in the CC field, but it appears that it moved all but one (!) of the messages in which eddie's address is in the TO field. -- Best, Johnmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Running The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Modes choices Not same
Hello MAU, View Mode you can open the Use by.. dialog to select the folder that Present and past tenses make a difference, and so do singular and plural :) The quoted line should read folderS, because you can select more than just one :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
Hello Paul, On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:17:06 -0500 GMT (26/02/2004, 04:17 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: Please Visit This Week's Sponsor Below Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The next time you feel like complaining, remember: Your garbage disposal probably eats better than thirty percent of the people in this world. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.04.7 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Configure X-Header field
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 7:06 PM, you wrote: RO You've got to prepare that for TB: RO Options - Preferences - Messages - Message header - Edit items - Add RO Now enter 'X-Sender' both at display and as RFC header and check RO 'this field is an address field' my RFC field shows just Sender , is that wrong? -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jan2004 (4.1.342) (avast! version number) 0402-2 (25.02.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.342 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:56 AM, you wrote: M Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour M of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? just for you, I sent another message to spamcop today. My automatic filters worked like they always have, and my browser came up with the spamcop web page to finish it. Nothing has changed here. -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jan2004 (4.1.342) (avast! version number) 0402-2 (25.02.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.342 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
Hello Paul, On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:13:04 -0500 GMT (27/02/2004, 01:13 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: TF Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. my apologies! Let me think about it... sorry! OK, I forgive you! g -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Isn't is it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do practice? Message reply created with The Bat! 2.04.7 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: BayesIT in 2.04.7 and 2.04.04
Hello Doug, on Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 1:42:17 PM, Doug Weller wrote: Can anyone shed light on this? Ah, I found out. You post to the list. Since I posted it has picked up 3 spam emails. But it's missed 5. Well, as my internet provider is filtering spam very hard (well, in my eyes too hard) I hardly get spam. But with another account (where I only get from time to time mail) there BayesIT was finding 4 spam mails and missed 1. When this happens you have to mark the mail as Junk (right click on the mail -- Specials -- Mark as Junk). Then the mail automatically is moved to the Junk Folder and BayesIT is learning that this mail was junk to increase the hit rate. -- Best regards, Martin Using The Bat 2.04.4 on Windows XP Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
Hello Peter, Yes, indeed. It seems that it is now sufficient to click the report ID to be accepted for reporting this spam. So you don't have to log in if there is only one spam to report. If you want to report several spams, as I usually have to, it is more convenient to log in with the top right input windows. After that it goes as usual. That's exactly the behaviour I have seen. I only report spam one or two times each day so I have to login, and the login is different. Previously I would get the standar login popup and all I had to do was to click OK. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
Hello Paul, just for you, I sent another message to spamcop today. My automatic filters worked like they always have, and my browser came up with the spamcop web page to finish it. Nothing has changed here. I use only the first filter to submit spam more orless as soon as I get it, but I report my spam only once or twice a day. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 2:41 PM, you wrote: M I use only the first filter to submit spam more orless as soon as I get M it, but I report my spam only once or twice a day. I'm lazy, I let the filters do all the work;) so all I have to do is scroll down the web page, click OK, then alt-F4 to close the page. -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jan2004 (4.1.342) (avast! version number) 0402-2 (25.02.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.342 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Connection Centre is empty but the bat cannot shut down
Hello, I've got no connections showing in the CC and my firewall confirms no pending connections but I cannot shut the bat down normally. The dialog ' Some tasks are still active...etc' shows up. Would it be possible to force the bat to close with the seemingly none functional 'abort' button! -- David Stone (UK) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! Version 2.04.7. Platform Windows 98SE 4.10. Ver. A I.E. Version: 6.0.2800.11061C SP1 Customised. Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
Hello Paul, I'm lazy, I let the filters do all the work;) so all I have to do is scroll down the web page, click OK, then alt-F4 to close the page. I bet you are not much lazier than me, that's why I use so many filters and templates of all kind in TB to highly automate many chores that are repetitive. But with reporting spam to Spamcop, and because I get fairly high amount of spam, I don't want to be interrupted by my browser opening in front of me. Once or twice a day I click on the links in one of the Spamcop responses an quickly cycle through all the pending reports. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Winamp Playing: Gabriela Anders - Fire Of Love (Smoothjazz.com - The world's best Smooth Jazz - Live from Monterey, Calif.) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
M I bet you are not much lazier than me, that's why I use so many filters M and templates of all kind in TB to highly automate many chores that are M repetitive. But with reporting spam to Spamcop, and because I get fairly M high amount of spam, I don't want to be interrupted by my browser M opening in front of me. Once or twice a day I click on the links in one M of the Spamcop responses an quickly cycle through all the pending M reports. to be honest, I don't know how to do that. I can't remember doing anything except using the filters to get me to the web page! I can't even remember where the filter puts the old SPAM emails! -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jan2004 (4.1.342) (avast! version number) 0402-2 (25.02.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.342 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: View Modes choices Not same
Hello Greg, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 5:03:20 PM, you wrote: GS If you have global view modes off and are using individual view modes GS for folders which have been set from the main window when you go into GS Options | Preferences | Messages | View Modes | select VM (one which you GS are using on a folder) | click Use by Now look at the folder GS where you know you are using that particular view mode and you will see GS it is NOT selected. It may be selected, but what if you uncheck a box? It's not quite clear what to do... -- Cheers! Stefan pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: View Modes choices Not same
Hello MAU, Friday, February 27, 2004, 2:52:31 AM, you wrote: M If I uncheck a box I would expect the corresponding folder to be set to M (no view mode). Why not? No view mode means using some column settings anyway. Which one should be used? Is it account-wide, folder-specific or parent folder's? -- Cheers! Stefan pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Modes choices Not same
Hello Stefan, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 6:19:39 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: GS If you have global view modes off and are using individual view modes GS for folders which have been set from the main window when you go into GS Options | Preferences | Messages | View Modes | select VM (one which you GS are using on a folder) | click Use by Now look at the folder GS where you know you are using that particular view mode and you will see GS it is NOT selected. ST It may be selected, but what if you uncheck a box? It's not quite ST clear what to do... M If I uncheck a box I would expect the corresponding folder to be set to M (no view mode). Why not? ST No view mode means using some column settings anyway. Which one ST should be used? Is it account-wide, folder-specific or parent ST folder's? Ok I now see what you are saying. I still feel there is inconsistency here. Shouldn't there be a default order here which should provide some insight as to what No view mode should be used? Don't get me wrong because I think View Modes are GREAT, however I do feel it is this inconsistency which make them difficult and confusing to learn. How could you have a folder specific No view mode if you had a View Mode previously selected? So a proposed hierarchy could be to inherent the No view mode of the parent, and if none for the parent to default to the account-wide No view mode. Which raises the question: Where are account-wide No view mode defined? Just thinking out loud, and excuse me if I'm all wet. -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question About Reply Templates
Hello Chris, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:36:09 PM, Chris wrote: C I was wanting to change it so that on a message that I reply to, it C will have the following: Close but not exact. You can tweak it. Begins Here Hello %OFromFName, %ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, %OFROMNAME wrote: %Quotes %Cursor -- Sincerely, Your Name ===8==Begin Original Message=== From: %OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR To: %OTOLIST CC: %OCCLIST Date: %ODateEn %OTimeLongEn Subject: %OSUBJ %OTEXT ===8==End Original Message= Ends Here -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Question About Reply Templates
Dear Chris, @27-Feb-2004, 12:36 +1100 (27-Feb 01:36 UK time) Chris [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: C Can someone please tell me if this is possible to do, if so, C what syntax I use? My revulsion led me to only give you a half-finished version. Here's the real deal: ~~~ %Cursor %FromFName %cookie -Original Message- From:%OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR Sent:%ODATE To: %OTOLIST Subject: %OSUBJECT %QUOTES ~~~ This template doesn't provide a cut mark, which should be used to sever a signature following a message. Of course, this also means cutting any references to the original material being discussed in a reply chain, so a top post template shouldn't include a cut mark. Of course, cut marks should always be used. A dichotomy, no? Ergo, top posting is inherently incorrect. QED. (scnr). I certainly do use top posting in my private technical mail, but never for conversation nor for list traffic. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP: filtering doesn't work
25.02.2004, U wrote: Alexander A. Gomanyuk, [AAG] wrote: AAG Wow! Cool features! :))) Just read on thebat forum about IMAP AAG realization problem... Now i'm in depression... :))) AAG By the way, would You clarify, why, even after registration and AAG logging in a can't post new message there ? Where is 'there'? I don't understand. Which system have you registered and logged unto? http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/list.php?FID=14 Regards, AG Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
Hello Paul, to be honest, I don't know how to do that. I can't remember doing anything except using the filters to get me to the web page! I can't even remember where the filter puts the old SPAM emails! Well, I only use the first filter, the manual one. It submits the message to Spamcop and also moves it to my Sent to Spamcop folder. Then I have added a second filter that just received the Spamcop responses to my Spamcop responses. This folder is the one I look at once ar twice a day and, if there are any messages, select one of them and click on the link, etc., etc. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Winamp Playing: Brian Hughes - Wherever You Are (Smoothjazz.com - The world's best Smooth Jazz - Live from Monterey, Calif.) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Could not store message
Hello Thomas, on Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 10:41:17 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: That's a new one. I believe From is mandatory (I am reporting from memory, didn't check RFC2822), but subject is optional. A recipient of some kind must be present, otherwise you wouldn't have received the mail. Well, as it is from the provider itself he maybe copied the mail to each user (with some wrong or missing header data). In the webmailinterface everything is displayed correctly but when checking with the message dispatcher I see all(!) fields empty. Here are the header informations from the Mail Dispatcher: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= schnipp -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From: Address Unknown X-Information: Could not retrieve the message header X-Server-Response: +OK -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= schnapp -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -- Best regards, Martin Using The Bat 2.04.4 on Windows XP Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Connection Centre is empty but the bat cannot shut down
Hello David, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 10:15:18 PM, you wrote: DS Hello, DS I've got no connections showing in the CC and my firewall confirms no DS pending connections but I cannot shut the bat down normally. DS The dialog ' Some tasks are still active...etc' shows up. DS Would it be possible to force the bat to close with the seemingly none DS functional 'abort' button! -- I normally hit Ctrl Alt Delete and put the Bat to bed in the task manager when that happens to me. Abort tasks doesn't seem to close it either Barry Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OOPS, was:Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
Hello Paul, On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:44:38 -0500 GMT (27/02/2004, 01:44 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: that's why you moderators are so well liked! I'm not a moderator on this list... but thanks anyway. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.04.7 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OOPS, was:Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 1:25 PM, you wrote: TF Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. my apologies! TF Let me think about it... sorry! TF OK, I forgive you! g that's why you moderators are so well liked! -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jan2004 (4.1.342) (avast! version number) 0402-2 (25.02.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.342 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
Hi MAU, on Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:56:49 +0100GMT, you wrote: M Have any of you noticed any change in the last few days on the behaviour M of SpamCop (i.e. when logging in to finish spam reporting)? Yes, indeed. It seems that it is now sufficient to click the report ID to be accepted for reporting this spam. So you don't have to log in if there is only one spam to report. If you want to report several spams, as I usually have to, it is more convenient to log in with the top right input windows. After that it goes as usual. -- Cheers Peter | RandomSignature-Professional 3.2 - DEMO | !!!You are using an illegal key! Please buy a LEGAL copy!!! Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 12:55 PM, you wrote: Please Visit This Week's Sponsor Below TF Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam. my apologies! the discussion was on searching, using , and I made the test on chickensoup vs chicken soup. That one recipe showed up in one test and not the other. Not having a clue WHY, I posted the entire email involved. That is a daily email I get, with diabetic recipes. I am diabetic. Obviously I'm so used to skipping those sponsor messages, that I didn't think anything of it. It wasn't a long message, and I did change the subject, so those not interested in a SEARCH thread, didn't have to read it. sorry! -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jan2004 (4.1.342) (avast! version number) 0402-2 (25.02.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.342 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
toggle-ALT-0 for views, was:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 7:25 PM, you wrote: rg What do ALT-0 ALT-1 do? AW It toggles between non-threaded view and thread by references. MAN, DON'T DO that to me!!! I decided to try that, and hit ALT-0. WOW! that scared me to death!!! that was a totally different look, with no threads, no folders showing for my filters... luckily ALT-1 put me right back to threaded view, WHEW! you know, when I first saw the ticker, I laughed and wondered why anyone would use it, but now, if it stops working, goes off the screen, or I try a different program, I don't know how to act without it! -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jan2004 (4.1.342) (avast! version number) 0402-2 (25.02.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.342 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMAP message counts
Hi TBUDLers, I believe this has been brought up before, but the IMAP message counts are just weird. For instance, my Inbox message count is listed as 19 6. 6 is the actual number of messages in the inbox. I don't know where the 19 is coming from -- maybe the number of messages that used to be there? At any rate, why doesn't it just say 6? Eventually it turns into just 6, but I don't know why I should have to wait for an accurate message count? -- Dave Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Modes choices Not same
Hello Greg, I don't get to hung up on past tense and present tense. I thought you meant what was actually in the UI. Maybe I may have made a slight grammatically error, but my point is I think it is a BUG. Well, as you know, English is not my mother language and I thought the idea that Use by =/= Used by would be clearly understood. No, I don't thing it is a bug, I think it is WAD. When you create a new View Mode you can open the Use by.. dialog to select the folder that will USE the just created view. However, when you open the dialog for an already existing view, I agree with you, and that was my wish for an additional feature, the dialog should show as selected (ticked) the folders that are already using (view is being USED by) the selected view. You should see folders selected for the view mode your looking at under the options | preferences that you have set from the main window. Right, agree. And same thing when you right click on a folder and select Copy column settings to BTW, for sake of coherency I think this option should be called Copy view mode to..., or even better Assign view mode to..., because it is what the option does. It is not just the column settings (columns displayed and widths) that get copied. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP filtering problem
Hi Dave, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:02:48 AM, you wrote: DG I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael DG folder? Can you paste your Michael Randy filters into a reply to DG this email? Maybe that could shed some light on the problem. I thought this question had led me to the solution to the problem, because when I pasted the filters in my initial reply I noticed that I'd inadvertently put a space at the beginning of the name of my Georgetown folder. All of these other folders (michael's, randy's, eddie's, etc) were nested within this folder, and I thought that perhaps the filters couldn't handle the space. However, I've now fixed that. I also noticed when I pasted the filters that the email address on which I'm filtering is prefaced with two 0's, so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I assume from looking at other folders that the 00 is a code to indicate which field the text should be in. I've simplified further to try to isolate the problem. I now have only one Georgetown filter activated -- one for Eddie. When I filter the Known folder the program moves 218 messages into Eddie's folder. 118 of them are from Eddie. It appears that all of the others have Eddie's address in one of the recipient fields. Here it is: BeginFilter Name: Eddie Active: 1 Source: \\GeorgetownIMAP\$KNOWN$ Target: \\GeorgetownIMAP\Georgetown\Eddie CopyFolder: none MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actions: AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: ExtractDir: ColourGroup: default AddAddrItems: DelAddrItems: HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: default SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter And here are the headers of a message from Barbara to Eddie and me that was filtered into the eddie folder: ***paste starts here Return-path: Barbara's email address Received: from uis-gumail-2.georgetown.edu (postoffice-2.georgetown.edu [141.161.1.110]) by GUMail.georgetown.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTPS id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:00:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from georgetown.edu (barbara's ip #) (user=bac mech=PLAIN bits=0)by uis-gumail-2.georgetown.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1QE0tOd006147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:00:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:00:57 -0500 From: barbara's email address Subject: Re: draft message to Mindy re: Programs leadership X-Sender: Barbara Craig barbara's email address To: eddie's email address CC: john's email address Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Georgetown University MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en]C-C-UDP; georgetownU-campus-4.7-08.06.2001 (Windows NT 5.0; U) Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=6D0E4028C34FCAE7ECFDCC14 X-Accept-Language: en X-GU-FilterVersion: 1.22 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --6D0E4028C34FCAE7ECFDCC14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit *paste ends here Any ideas? -- Best, Johnmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Running The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [OT] SpamCop
Hello Greg, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:54:40 AM, Greg Strong wrote: GS I reported 2 spam email this morning. The first did not give me an GS option to click on the button to report because the email had been GS previously reported. Probably my mistake. New account indicates silent reporting about source of mail where old account did NOT state this. -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: View Modes choices Not same
Hello MAU, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:35:10 AM, MAU wrote: Now look at the folder where you know you are using that particular view mode and you will see it is NOT selected. M Maybe I didn't explain it clearly enough, but that is exactly what I M mean when I say that Use by ... should also and actually be UseD M (notice the D) by Use by =/= Used by. Whatever. I don't get to hung up on past tense and present tense. I thought you meant what was actually in the UI. Maybe I may have made a slight grammatically error, but my point is I think it is a BUG. You should see folders selected for the view mode your looking at under the options | preferences that you have set from the main window. -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: IMAP filtering problem
Hi Allie, Thanks for the reply. AM Where string matching and filter order is concerned, I've been AM having no problems here when using read filters. I've been using AM IMAP for some time now. I've seen that you and others have been using it. And the fact that I've not seen anyone else describing what I'm seeing here leads me to think there must be a problem with the way I'm setting it up. But I have absolutely no clue what that problem might be. snip AM Check for an x-sender header for those messages and see. AM Usually there's an explanation for this. Here are headers from a message that was sorted incorrectly into the randy folder. The only changes are that I've replaced the email addresses and user IDs with text descriptions and removed IPs of particular workstations: ***paste starts here Return-path: michael's email address Received: from uis-gumail-1.georgetown.edu (postoffice-1.georgetown.edu [141.161.1.18]) by GUMail.georgetown.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTPS id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:11:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from georgetown.edu (Michael's IP) (user=michael's username mech=PLAIN bits=0) by uis-gumail-1.georgetown.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0SGBcDd021459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:11:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:11:37 -0500 From: michael's email address Subject: Re: questions re VKP posters In-reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: john's email address, randy's email address CC: susannah's email address Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Georgetown University MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=040409030509000901040109 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-GU-FilterVersion: 1.22 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 References: ***paste ends here The message was from Michael to Randy, Susannah, and me -- but it was sorted into my Randy folder. (I'm having all of my email forwarded from the IMAP server to another server where I collect it via POP in another account, and the POP account filtered it correctly into the michael folder in that account.) JR One final bit of information -- the order of the filters seems JR not to have an effect on the sort. E.g., there are messages from JR barbara to eddie and me sorted into the eddie folder even though JR the barbara filter is placed above the eddie filter. AM Ordering of filters works as expected here. Yes, but the filtering itself doesn't. I'd like the message in my barbara folder, not my eddie folder. -- Best, Johnmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Running The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600 Current version is 2.04.07 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
