Re: How to save filters

Hallo Claude, On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:15:02 +0200GMT (23-6-2005, 7:15 +0200, where I live), you wrote: CR> I would like to only save TB filter and not all the configuration. CR> So how to do this ? CR> P.S. : I can not copy the file containing filters as I use OTFE and I plan CR> on giving it up

What about The Bat! Mobile Edition ?

Hi all and Ritlabs folks, As The Bat! 3.5.0.30 has been released recently. I wonder how many time we have to wait before seeing the release of the long awaited and promised TBME ? Greetings, -- Claude Renaud Skype : Name : renaud_claude Number : 0870445179 Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Wi

How to save filters

Hi, I plan to reformat my ar disk and reinstall everything from scratch. I would like to only save TB filter and not all the configuration. So how to do this ? P.S. : I can not copy the file containing filters as I use OTFE and I plan on giving it up ... Greetings, -- Claude Renaud Skype

Re[2]: Latest 3.0.x version

Hello Mary, MB> Additionally, several other important fixes have been made in 3.5.31, MB> although it hasn't yet been released to the TBBETA testers. I expect MB> it, or a later-numbered version with further improvements and fixes, MB> to be offered later today. (Just my own speculation, given two

Re: Move to next unread message

Hi On Tuesday 21 June 2005 at 2:48:09 PM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote: M>> If I try to move to the next unread message when there are none, M>> nothing happens. > True. This is how I know that there are no more unread messages in > that folder. I mean no more unread mes

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:00:41 PM, Ian A. White wrote: > Yes, ensuring an e-mail is as it was sent is only important in some > situations, however those situations are critical when they arise. Even more apt comparison: we need to ban digital cameras, because someone might change or enhanc

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:00:41 PM, Ian A. White wrote: > Yes, ensuring an e-mail is as it was sent is only important in some > situations, however those situations are critical when they arise. But that has nothing to do with enabling a user to annotate, condense, edit incoming mail. Shoul

Re: Woo-hooooops! Unleashed bunch!

Hi On Tuesday 21 June 2005 at 2:57:34 PM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote: M>> And "parking" the message in the outbox (rather than just saving M>> it there) is the only difference between "Save" and "Save Draft", M>> right? > No, "draft" is just another word for "parked mess

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 5:52:05 PM, Ian A. White wrote: > None of this is important until problems arise. I think the thing that is so wrongheaded about this insistence in limiting the possibilities of TB! and making it less functional than other e-mail clients, is that it is always explaine

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 5:52:05 PM, Ian A. White wrote: > Ensuring e-mails are as the sender sent is is important, and it is > only seen when there is a problem. may be important, in some situations > I was recently caught up in such a situation recently where a client > refused to pay up a

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

Hello Ian, On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:52:05 +1000 GMT (23/06/2005, 05:52 +0700 GMT), Ian A. White wrote: IAW> If RITLabs want to implement such a feature, then editing a message IAW> should see text added to the message indicating the message and/or IAW> head contents have been changed. Yes, I agree

Re[2]: Yet another RegEx question

Hello Marten Gallagher, > \[[0-9]{1,3}\/[0-9]{1,3}\] Thanks so much! Somehow I missed the '{1,3}' parts which made it work with more than 1 numeric character! DUH! ;-p One of these days I may 'get' 50% of the RegEx syntax. But then again I flunked both typing and basic programming in 1972...

Re: Woo-hooooops! Unleashed bunch!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 21 Jun 2005, @ @ at 03:30:46 +0200, when Arjan de Groot wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:54:09 +0200, Mica Mijatovic wrote: > [Parked drafts in Outbox] >> In my case, rece

Re: New bug on refresh list of mail after moving one of them to an other folder...

Hello WilWilWil, > When I move a mail from a folder to another, the list of mails is > not refresh, so the mail just moved steel appears in the list. It's > not all the time but often. Especially if the mail is not read > flagged ! > It's truth when the move is done with menu or key shortcut or d

Re: New bug on refresh list of mail after moving one of them to an other folder...

Hello WilWilWil & everyone else, on 22-Jun-2005 at 21:28 you (WilWilWil) wrote: > Do you have this problem ? No, I never noticed this. Is this an IMAP or a POP (local) folder? Did you try a folder maintenance? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) To witness s

New bug on refresh list of mail after moving one of them to an other folder...

Io, When I move a mail from a folder to another, the list of mails is not refresh, so the mail just moved steel appears in the list. It's not all the time but often. Especially if the mail is not read flagged ! It's truth when the move is done with menu or key shortcut or drag'ndrop... Do you

Re: Exporting messagebase to Mozilla Thunderbird?

Hello Edgar van Dijk & everyone else, on 22-Jun-2005 at 19:33 you (Edgar van Dijk) wrote: A>> If you can't go the direct route, you can export to .MSG/.EML which can A>> be imported in OE, and then import from OE to Thunderbird. > This will work, but you have to export all messages in one folder

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Ouch, > create the user -user +registry -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Someone commented to Rudolph Bing, manager of the Metropolitan Opera, that George Szell is his own worst enemy. "Not while I'm alive, he isn't!" said Bing. __

Re: Exporting messagebase to Mozilla Thunderbird?

Hello Alexander, On Monday, June 20, 2005, 11:20:18 PM, you wrote: >> Thunderbird appears to only import from Netscape Communicator, >> Eudora, Outllok or Outlook Express A> If you can't go the direct route, you can export to .MSG/.EML which can be A> imported in OE, and then import from OE

Re[2]: Ancient bug finally revealed!

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > Right now, everyone yearns for .ini style single configuration files > instead of the registry. But a couple of years back, everyone cursed at the > darn .ini files that were scattered all over one's harddisk. > Its not exactly

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Hello Thomas Fernandez & everyone else, on 22-Jun-2005 at 18:38 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote: > With installation, some un-obvious registry keys are created that make > it impossible to just install it a second time. I believe that is the > whole point of using the registry. I don't think that w

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

Hello Dwight, On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:50:51 -0500 GMT (22/06/2005, 21:50 +0700 GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: DAC> There is some moralistic notion among some bat users and apparently DAC> the developers that this would be wrong, and so it is not allowed. To DAC> tamper with the mail someone sends yo

Re: Latest 3.0.x version

Hello Vili, On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:37:32 +0200 GMT (22/06/2005, 19:37 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V>>> So, what you guys consider the latest, most reliable v3.0.x version? TF>> I use 3.0.1.33 in the office. V> That has LNG file problems. I don't use the LNG file in the office - strictly English. V>

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Hello Jeff, On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:47:31 +0100 GMT (22/06/2005, 15:47 +0700 GMT), Jeff Gaines wrote: JG> The key advantage, apart from avoiding registry bloat, is that apps JG> don't need to be 'installed' if they don't use the registry, you can JG> just copy them to your HD. Say you download a

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Hello Allister Jenks & everyone else, on 22-Jun-2005 at 08:06 you (Allister Jenks) wrote: > Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has > with the Registry. What on earth is wrong with properties files? If > you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

Hello Martin, Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 4:58:32 PM, you wrote: MS> Thought so, thanks for the reply. I just hope this bad habit will someday MS> dissappear... OTOH, if you were trying to save the text of the message to a textfile, automatically stripping the disclaimers, that can be done... --

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

Hello Dwight, >> I want to automatically remove those endless disclaimers some >> companies put in the bottom of every mail. Is there a filter setting >> or some other clever trick to do this? > There is some moralistic notion among some bat users and apparently > the developers that this would b

Re: Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 9:10:09 AM, Martin Schuster wrote: > I want to automatically remove those endless disclaimers some > companies put in the bottom of every mail. Is there a filter setting > or some other clever trick to do this? There is some moralistic notion among some bat users and

Re: Problem with FROM: header in reply messages

Hello Paul, A reminder of what Paul Jansen typed on: June 22, 2005 at 15:08:10 GMT +0100 PJ> Dear All, PJ> I have a problem that I think started when I installed 3.5 If I PJ> receive an e-mail with the headers TO: someone else CC: me if I PJ> reply the message contains the header: FROM: some

Re: Problem with FROM: header in reply messages

Hallo Paul, On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:08:10 +0100GMT (22-6-2005, 16:08 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PJ> If I receive an e-mail with the headers PJ> TO: someone else CC: me PJ> if I reply the message contains the header: PJ> FROM: someone else PJ> when it should be from me?! Are you using a repl

Removing those endless disclaimers in incoming mails

Hello tbudl, I searched in the archives, but maybe I just don't know the right english words to ask the right question... ;-) I want to automatically remove those endless disclaimers some companies put in the bottom of every mail. Is there a filter setting or some other clever trick to do this?

Problem with FROM: header in reply messages

Dear All, I have a problem that I think started when I installed 3.5 If I receive an e-mail with the headers TO: someone else CC: me if I reply the message contains the header: FROM: someone else when it should be from me?! I have tried fiddling with the reply macro, but to no avail. on a r

Re: Latest 3.0.x version

Hello Vili! On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:37 AM, you wrote: > I am using 3.0.2.10 now. It seems to be stable. This used to be my favorite. Yet, it is a beta, as you know. > I am only TESTING :) 3.5.x on an other machine, so far I dont use it > as my active client... Understood. > I have as

Re[2]: Latest 3.0.x version

Hello Thomas, TF> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:47:56 GMT GMT (21/06/2005, 20:47 +0700 GMT), TF> Vili wrote: V>> So, what you guys consider the latest, most reliable v3.0.x version? TF> I use 3.0.1.33 in the office. That has LNG file problems. V>> For me, it was 3.0.1.33, until I found out that the Filt

Re[2]: Ancient bug finally revealed!

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005 at 1:06:46 AM [GMT -0500], Allister Jenks wrote: > Yes, well I thought of that, but can you explain why some accounts which > are present in both users' registry have different numbers??? TB! updated each registry key in different ways. > Given that TB! is clearly a m

Re: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 8:47:31 PM, Jeff wrote: >> Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has >> with the Registry. What on earth is wrong with properties files? If >> you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper backups are >> a breeze and multi-user

Re: Yet another RegEx question

> Hello tbudl, > OK, a RegEx question: > I am receiving hundreds of spam messages that contain the following > text, with the numeric part in the brackets varying endlessly - > "Re: [1/53]: Reday 2 Odrer olinne" > How do I pattern match the "[1/53]" and all the endless numeric and > text variat

Re[2]: Ancient bug finally revealed!

Hello Group On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:06:46 AM, Allister wrote: > Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has > with the Registry. What on earth is wrong with properties files? If > you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper backups are > a breeze