d email app.
> And I guess it's the same for about 500 other list users.
The outbound in my 'sent' mail folder shows the message addressed to me,
which was, of course, my intent. There was no intention of spraying the
list with it. However, somehow it happened. Apologies to the li
did this arrive on the droid via the droid email app, or via k-9?
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 4.0.38
AntispamSniper 3.2.3.7
Windows XP Service Pack 3
Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.
On Tuesday, September 14, 2010, Daniel Rail wrote:
> I'm still running 4.0.28.1. And, it's running perfectly well with
> Windows 7 64-bit.
Thanks. That answers the question... :)
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 4.0.38
AntispamSniper 3.2.3.7
Windows X
Still running 4.0.38 here, but would like to upgrade OS to Win 7. Does
anyone know 4.0.38 is compatible with Win 7-32? Win 7-64?
As always, many thanks...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 4.0.38
AntispamSniper 3.2.3.7
Windows XP Service Pack 3
evious message. I just upgraded my 3.99.29 to
4.0.38, which does not exhibit the problem I asked about.
Thanks...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 4.0.38
AntispamSniper
Windows XP Service Pack 3
Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Usi
age "Failed to set calendar selected range".
Does anyone know what this is trying to tell me, and how to fix it?
Any enlightenment appreciated...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.29
AntispamSniper
Windows XP Service Pack 3
Current versio
bout
all users
at one time; maybe that's the senior moment I mentioned. Thanks for the
nudge!
--
Dave Goodman
Current version is 4.2.10.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
I'm either having a senior moment, or am just in over my head. I'm
moving my TB! 3.99 from an antique W2K system to a semi-antique XP
system. On the XP system I want TB! to be available to those with User
privileges. The TB! installation must be done with Administrator
privileges, and once done is
On Thursday, May 22, 2008, Robin Anson wrote:
> ... I actually searched the archives and found a response from Marek
> Mikus to Dave Goodman back in March 2006 that pointed to autocomplete
> at
>> "Options | Preferences | Message headers" where click to header and
>&
ly, Nick. Unfortunately the Ctl-+ (where the "+" is
the numeric keypad "+") does nothing here. I've tried just about every
combination I can think of to no avail. :(
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.29
AntispamSniper 2.8.1.1
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
m Jones, after I type in
"Sam"? The ctl-+ does not seem to work for this purpose. At least not
here.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.29
AntispamSniper 2.7.1.5
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'U
Hello Costas,
> I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to
> use with The Bat.
Yet another vote for AntispamSniper. Here are my current statistics:
Received messages: 46324
Error rate:0.28%
False negatives: 0.25%
False positives: 0.04%
--
Dave Goodm
s->System->Mail Directory
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.29
AntispamSniper 2.7.1.5
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Jos,
> A download link
> http://www.thebatworld.de/modules/download/index.php?op=viewlinkdetails&lid=18&ttitle=MyGate_2.6.0.171
Thanks, Jos. Appreciate the link.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.29
AntispamSniper 2.7.1.5
Windows 2000
te currently available and
supported? I did a search of the archives and forum; the only references
I found were 2-4 years old and included a 2005 note from the developer
to the effect that he was giving up on the program. Further, I've not
found a source for MyGate; the links I've found are
within the TB!
database?
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.29
AntispamSniper 2.7.1.5
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ned I get the no
connection error. If the other is returned, the mail goes out.
I have no idea why a DNS query on 'smtp.comcast.net' (from my location)
returns two different IPs, seemingly at random, one of which is dead.
Thanks a bunch for your thoughts...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99
7;hung' I can connect perfectly using other
internet protocols, i.e. http, ftp, etc. I suppose I should install
second email program and see whether it exhibits the same symptoms. I
guess that would tell me whether I have a TB! problem or a system
problem.
This one really has me stumped. Any
t checked the DNS entries,
though they do not appear to be the problem, since all internet
connection types other than smtp (http, ftp, etc) work perfectly.
Appreciate your response, though... :)
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.29
AntispamSniper 2.7.1.1
Windows 20
would be appreciated...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.25
AntispamSniper 2.7.1.1
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello rich,
> Is anyone happily using any of the desktop seach applications with TB
> awareness?
Archivarius indexes TB! message bases nicely:
http://www.likasoft.com/
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.3
AntispamSniper 2.6.0.7
Windows 2000 Service
;t see it.
TIA
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.99.3
AntispamSniper 2.5.0.3
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Marek,
> go to "Account properties", open "Transport" section and You will see
> "Protocol logging" section there.
Thank you, Marek. Apparently I'm not bright enough to expand the tree
under "Transport", so I never noticed it there.
A detailed SMTP log (not the account log) can be turned on and off in
TB! I know, because I turned it on some months ago. Now I cannot
remember how to turn it off. Would some kind soul give me a clue?
Thanks...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.95.6
AntispamSniper 1.8.0.7
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
x27;ve only seen this delay on the Windows/TB! system; never on the
Linux/Kmail system.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.95.6
AntispamSniper 1.8.0.7
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http:/
elay I mentioned
happens intermittently. But it does occur about on about 70% of messages
sent.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.95.6
AntispamSniper 1.8.0.7
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Roelof,
DG>> Closed, but not stealthed.
> Bitten by a folder template?
Yup. Realized it just after I clicked "send". And I think there may be
one more coming.
Sorry...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.95.6
AntispamSniper 1.7.0.8
Windows
Any delay? Check new smtp log.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.95.6
AntispamSniper 1.7.0.8
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Closed, but not stealthed.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.95.6
AntispamSniper 1.7.0.8
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
it happens to at least two of us, but am I right in thinking it
> happens all the time for you if you have periodical checking enabled?
It happens here also. We have three accounts; on all three periodic
checking is enabled, check on startup is disabled. Still, TB!
ll create a .tbk file. ...
Thanks, Thomas. System 'A' worked very well indeed. Appreciate your
input.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.85.03
AntispamSniper 1.6.7.3
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL'
nd yet transfer whatever is necessary for the
new TB! to come up with all folders, settings, and mail database intact and
ready to go. Can anyone suggest a step-by-step procedure? Or give me a
pointer to such?
Version info in .sig. Any enlightenment appreciated...
--
Dave Goodman
T
cs back to zero to see how it
performed.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.80.06
AntispamSniper 1.6.4
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Antispamsniper earlier this month. As of right now,
with 1520 messages received, the error rate is 0.72%. I'm also using >60
as the spam score.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! 3.80.06
AntispamSniper 1.6.4
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current ver
l window is resized.
So the issue is still unresolved for those of us using large fonts.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.80.06
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.80.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
preferred font size again.
Temporarily reducing the font size did the trick. Thanks very much to
both of you for your prompt responses.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.80.03
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
Current version is 3.80.03 | '
ach of these lines there is only the check box, no window into which to
enter a numerical value.
The 'repair' option under the TB! installer has been no help. Any
comments or suggestions would be appreciated.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.80.03
Windows 200
I would like to be able to color the name of a folder, as it appears in
the folder tree pane, in response to some condition in the folder. For
example, have the folder name appear in red if there are any flagged
messages in the folder.
Possible?
TIA...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.71.03
e editor) - you can invoke it by using the View|Edit Shortcuts
menu command of any of such window."
Perhaps age is making me blind and stupid, but I can't find it.
Any hints?
TIA.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.71.03
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
___
omas. RIT labs has hidden those settings in a most
obscure place, but they are exactly where Marek said. Once you get into
the edit headers panel, click on 'To:', then on the 'edit' button and
you'll find them.
Thanks again, Marek.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.71.03
Windows
On 3/13/2006 Marek Mikus wrote:
>> Where are the settings for address and history AutoComplete located in
>> 3.71.03? ...
> "Options | Preferences | Message headers" where click to header and
> select "Edit".
Thank you, Marek. I would never have found th
Where are the settings for address and history AutoComplete located in
3.71.03? According to the help file, the are at
options->preferences->system, but they don't seem to be there (or
anywhere else I've searched).
TIA.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.71.03
Windows 200
On 3/7/2006 Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> The term "Match" means that it will use Regex. If you use
> "Contains" it does not use Regex.
Aha! Thanks, Stuart.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v.3.71.03
Windows 2000 Service Pack 4
__
them to work in the new filtering setup. In version 1.x
there was a checkbox for regex, but I don't find one in 3.x (unless it
is in the "Advanced filtering conditions" which I can't find.
If anyone would care to contribute a pointer on these to i
vice versa. Or whatever.
Any words of wisdom on the best way to accomplish this in as pain-free a
way as possible would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.62r
Windows 2000 [5.0.2195 Service Pack 4]
Current ver
ing X-Ray because I can not send
outgoing messages with attachments. This happens, as Cyrille wrote, with
any ISP. Further, there is no filtering of outbound messages; no
anti-virus check, no outbound firewall.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.62r
Windows 2000 [5.0.21
unfortunately no go. I
guess there is true data corruption (as opposed to an error in TB!'s
bookkeeping).
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.62r
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
l have to keep the
regular system backups much longer than I have been keeping them.
Thanks for your thought, and best to your daughter...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.62r
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBU
On Tuesday, December 02, 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
> Dave Goodman, [DG] wrote:
DG>> Trying to backup TB! using tools/backup (1.62r), I get an error message
DG>> for a particular folder saying "An error occurred while storing data of
DG>> the folder x'.
> Th
gs back to normal?
Thanks...
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.62r
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ould like that to be the last mail (newest).
> That's funny. I *LIKE* returning to the last message viewed.
Indeed. Returning to the last message viewed allows me to leave a folder
to look at something else, then return and pick up where I left off.
I would be *very* sorry to see that cha
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
JD>> Now as I'm viewing TB! at 1600x1200 an unwrapped
JD>> mail line is very long. Is it possible to set the viewer to force
JD>> the mail to wrap at 80 columns?
> Oh how I wish for that feature. :)
Hear, hear! :)
Ctrl+Shift+NumLock+*
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.62r
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ut have given it up
given the current environment.
Just a few thoughts.
Kind regards...
--
Dave Goodman
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ine various views (based
> on combination of the settings from the View menu) and switch between
> them quickly...
Perhaps this will address some of these issues. Or perhaps wishful
thinking... :)
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.61
Windows 98 4.10 A
_
erence or subject implemented.
Can this be done? How?
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.61
Windows 98 4.10 A
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Jernej Simončič wrote:
> Am I the only one who got about 10 copies of Stuart's messages ("Re: Message
> Archive" and "Re: Sending signed messages")
Nope. We're knee deep in them here.
--
Dave Goodman
T
I have seen that item in the
FAQ you quoted. There does seem to be an apparent discrepancy between
policy and practice. You're right... it doesn't make sense!
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.61
Windows 98 4.10 A
Current vers
rough my MyRealBox account with no
problems.
[The sharp-eyed will note the double space between sentences. :)]
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.61
Windows 98 4.10 A
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silve
t key while you click on the reply icon. Only the
selected text will be quoted.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 98/SE
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
e
> have tried to work with them many times but they have done nothing to
> prevent the spam. We are sorry to tell you that because of this we no
> longer accept any mail from Yahoo! Groups.
Curious... I receive mail from four yahoo group mailing lists through
myrealbox with no problem.
-
ading window.
Ctl-Shift-K
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 98
Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailt
vailable which have the added advantage
of being usable outside of TB!.
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 98
Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://t
han '>' as the quote character,
how can I do so? Note that I am not asking about prefixes to '>',
such as 'DG>' or whatever. Just something like:
| This is a quoted line.
Yes, I realize that this may not be a good idea for several r
o the spam box,
while all other mail "falls off the end" of the filter list
into the inbox.
Just wondering if I've missed some subtlety here... :)
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 98
Current Ver: 1.6
mplates, along with
comments from several others. What I have not seen is an explanation
why this is a Bad Idea.
Would someone educate this newbie? :)
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98
Current Ver: 1.60 / 1.60a
FAQ: h
DG Raftery Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although myrealbox is an extremely good account, and used here, myrealbox is
> IMAP and not pop3.
Ummm... I've been running a myrealbox account for some months now,
using POP3/SMTP. I don't argue that they don't also provi
nt filters. What I
have in mind is two levels of filters; a 'global' (or common) level
and an 'account' level. A global filter would be the default and
would operate unless an account filter took precedence. Something
very much like the way templates are h
vide for what one might
call 'common-filters', i.e., a set of filters which operate on all
inbounds regardless of account, before the account filters are
invoked?
Or I way out here by myself? :)
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98
___
eally solve the problem?
That should, of course, have been:
... do the common folders really solve the problem?
^^^
--
Dave Goodman
The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98
Current Ver: 1.53d
FA
ers really solve the problem? Don't you
still need duplicate filters in all accounts to filter inbound mail
into the common folders?
Or am I misunderstanding the way common folders work?
Thanks for any enlightenment.
--
Dave Goodman
The
Eddie Castelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can not confirm. on Feb. 9 I got 24 msg. Not counted is Rick's
> Question and your answer.
Hmm... Something peculiar here. I have only seven messages dated Feb
9, and I too was wondering about the seemingly light traffic.
--
Da
Marck D Pearlstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The sample is in from the individual having the problem (Dave Goodman)
> and the problem is that Date: headers are not present on the message
> that imported with the wrong date.
> The date is there on the From line, but TB does
inated with Agent.
For example, here is an actual header from a message sent by me
using Agent:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 29 15:58:39 2002
> From: Dave Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Congratulations
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
ix message file exported by my former MUA (Forte
Agent v1.8) does not include an actual 'Date:' header at all _if_ the
message was one that originated with Agent.
For example, here is an actual header from a message sent by me
using Agent:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 2
t
shows up under the 'Received' time/date, rather than under the
'Created' time/date.
This seems strange. To me the creation time of the message is the
original time/date when the message was sent, not the time it was
"created" in TB!. Further, the strange 1899 date i
into several other programs which accept the
Unix file format.
Anyone know what's going on here?
--
Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mai
cked
results in that threading selection being propogated to all folders so
ticked.
Or am I missing something? Any enlightenment appreciated.
--
Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows 98
--
Archives : ht
How does one set up the message-list account default column settings?
I see that one can change the size of each field by dragging its
border, and that one can right-click on the headings and get a column
setting dialog. But neither of these setups seems to 'take'
permanently.
TIA
uld system-wide "common default settings", and system-wide
"common default templates." Just my $.02!
BTW, I see people using 1.54 betas. Are these available to the
(registered) masses? I see no mention of this on the T
n?
I have several POP3 accounts. The mail coming through all of these
accounts needs to be sorted into a common set of folders. Is there
not some alternative to maintaining multiple sets of identical
filters, one for each account?
--
Dave Goodman
[EMAIL
he details are
probably beyond the scope of this forum.
Thanks for your reply...
--
Dave Goodman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
> Looks like it has something to dao with the MIME setting.
> I am no expert but try switching it on and off.
Apparently Marck is correct in that the digests in question are
malformed. See my message to him further down the thread.
But I appreciate your reply. Thanks.
--
Dave G
> Select the message and press , then you'll see the full source
> code of the message. Unless it's encoded you'll be able to read the
> whole thing.
Thanks very much for your reply, but unfortunately not. :-(
Please see my response to Marck at the bottom of this th
hat message containing all the constituent
messages, one after the other.
Whether my problem is with TB! or with the formatting of these
particular digests, I would be able to read them if there were some
way to disable TB!'s apparently automatic bursting of digests.
Thanks for your repl
; boundary=""
But my interest is not so much in troubleshooting TB!'s problem as in
asking whether there is a way to prevent TB! from bursting the digest.
Thanks for any enlightenment.
--
Dave
86 matches
Mail list logo