Not on my copy of j. It takes that second letter as the first
character for another search.
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 10:41:20 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Yes... and if I understand the function right... if you press another
letter, it'll search your folder list for T{otherletter} for example
TH
YES. And the part about this that scares me is that this is the way
the developers of PMMAIL 2000 (my prior e-mail client) operated and it
got worse and worse until users are abandoning ship as there is no
way to tell what/when/where or why the current or next release will do
and/or happen.
You are correct. Now do we get speed typing lessons when we purchased
THE BAT! ?Muhahahaha
Monday, May 6, 2002, 3:41:04 PM, Allie wrote:
GG Not on my copy of j. It takes that second letter as the first
GG character for another search.
When you type two or more characters TB! needs
This message (below) is marked INVALID SIGNATURE. The next one is not marked.
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 3:07:20 AM, Lynna wrote:
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 10:58:22 AM, you digitally penned the following;
L Good evening list,
L Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i
This message, (below) sent at almost the same time a previous is NOT
marked INVALID SIGNATURE
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 4:20:46 AM, Lynna wrote:
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you digitally penned the following;
L But that is still beta, isn't it?
Well, I admit the
Same problem, same solution as you.
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:00:51 AM, Yuki wrote:
Don't know what is going on folks, but I'm sure someone does. This
list only, e-mail is showing up with what appears to be a yellow
clock symbol with the envelope symbol. Any such e-mail, when
Hmmm, so it is. I just did a tracert on it and sure enough, located
on my machine. Oh well I upgrade the signatures every morning in
any case.
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 10:13:48 PM, Ricardo wrote:
don't be confused: your mail is being checked _in your machine_ , the
address
On the help button, feedback, bugs
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 3:57:00 PM, Mitja wrote:
Hello,
When redirecting messages with filter:
- local delivery on
- Send generated messages: Queue in Outbox
the delivery skips messages.
Does anyone else have this problems. Where can I report
And when and where was this announced? Thanks.
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 4:31:48 PM, Marck wrote:
Whoa there! Not so fast!
There's a newer, shinier, better way to report bugs these days.
http://bt.ritlabs.com is the RITlabs BugTraq server address.
The email address does still work
Since this never was entered into the database I would like to discuss
it a bit here before putting it in myself. Some off-line discussions a
month or more ago indicated that perhaps the operation that I see as a
failure is actually working as designed. If so, I feel the design is
faulty.
I have been for about six weeks now, must have missed it. Thanks.
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 5:09:56 PM, Marck wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gene,
@30 April 2002, 16:49:31 -0400 (21:49 UK time) Gene Gough wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL P
That is a virus e-mail and you may want to run your checker. I have
been getting them since last Thursday, about 8-15 a day. Not all the
same subject or return address. One even had my address as the from
so you can't trust a know e-mail address as being valid. All that I
received have been
PM, Jody wrote:
E-Mail Message
~~
From: Gene Gough
Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 at 6:48 PM
Subject: Strange Email
_
GG All that I
GG received have been caught by the Norton site where all of my mail is
GG filtered
That is the way Norton fixes virus e-mail when you use their pop site
to fetch your mail.
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 6:41:58 PM, mocha9mail wrote:
I got a spam with 3 tabs in it:
The following is in Tab 1:
-- Virus Warning Message (on scc077)
Found virus WORM_KLEZ.G
You can drag the message to the outbox and then you will be able to
edit it with a double click.
Friday, April 26, 2002, 2:33:34 AM, wrote:
HI!
tbudl:
Occasionally I send an email message, only to discover that I've left
out a URL or an attachment. How can I edit the sent message
I understand that Norton 2002 will scan ANY mailer's messages. I
don't know that for a fact as I have the 2001 version. With TB, I
just put pop3.norton.antivirus in the TB pop slot and provide the
userid and mindspring pop info in the userid slot. See your Norton
writeup to see how to set it
:
On Friday, April 26, 2002, 10:43:19 AM, Melissa Reese wrote:
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 9:45:43 AM PST, Gene Gough wrote:
Just that h is available on the beta site.
Or that h is now available on the public release site. :-)
So, what is better about g, h, etc. than the current c
That must have been all over the place yesterday. I saw it twice and
then again about ten minutes ago. I point my mailer to
pop2.norton.antivirus and thus they never make it to my machine let
alone to my mailer util that are disabled/isolated.
Friday, April 26, 2002, 2:26:41 PM,
In the beta forum they say that if you drag to the OUTBOX and then
double click as if going to edit, then you can see it. This release
is a few steps backwards.
Friday, April 26, 2002, 3:26:23 PM, Dwight wrote:
On Friday, April 26, 2002, 12:57:10 PM, Melissa Reese wrote:
When I click
A frequent request that doesn't seem to have been responded to.
Tuesday, April 2, 2002, 3:38:52 AM, Clif wrote:
Is there a way to do this with a Reply To All?
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c
I agree. I hate having to take up the space by expanding that window
enough to get rid of the slider. With the slider there, I am forever
bumping something and having the whole thing out of sight.
Tuesday, April 2, 2002, 1:22:20 PM, tracer wrote:
Agreed
All I want to see of a folder is
Well, many, many of us just edited the filter to point it at a folder
of choice and then got rid of the Unknown folder. Pretty simple.
Tuesday, April 2, 2002, 2:35:50 PM, Haico wrote:
Hi to all,
First of all: Hope that I don't offend anyone for dragging a almost
drowned horse out of
Agreed that the implementation was actually backwards from what was
desired and actually didn't do anything that wasn't possible before.
What it did do was make me think more about it and investigate the
address book idea enough to make a spam filter that is very low
maintenance.
The nice
Agree, as another ex PMMAIL user I also miss the auto flow when
pasting.
Monday, April 1, 2002, 2:29:30 AM, Dave wrote:
The reflow and wrap options work fine when I am typing a message
directly. But if I paste either from clipboard of a file (I often use
pasted canned messages) it
I think it works just as well. I wasn't exactly sure how well the
filters were working as I had one fall through that never should have.
I set up the double check and have just left it that way.
Monday, April 1, 2002, 3:49:37 PM, Dave wrote:
1) filter all mail with unrecognized addresses
I did similar to what you are doing but soon realized that the change
the sending ID very often just to defeat that method. What I have
found best is having a filer for each of the various list groups I
listen to that looks at the TO field to divert them to the associated
folder. Then next to
It just worked for me as you can see below. That is exactly where I
marked.
Friday, March 29, 2002, 12:39:59 AM, Dave wrote:
DiP I am still confused by this. All I get is a blank reply screen when I
DiP highlight text and use F4 using latest 1.60c Bat and WinXP. This is the
DiP only
Well, I used shift-F4 to create this reply without quoting. Select an
incoming message, right click and then select special for some of the
options. I too am moving from PMMAIL and pretty much have configured
what I want, a few things still to figure out.
Friday, March 29, 2002, 5:07:00
Account/Properties/Options
Friday, March 29, 2002, 10:09:57 AM, Dierk wrote:
DH To make it a bit clearer: I can't find the place where to set the
DH time interval before a message gets marked as read (I must have
DH been there once because I set messages to be marked read when opened
Yes, we have been asking for that and I submitted a formal enhancement
request for it. There was some response that seemed somewhat positive
but it has not been implemented yet. I also suggested a switch to
turn this on and off so that those that don't want the change do not
have to suffer
If you didn't pound a wooden stake through the heart they will not
die. :-)
Friday, March 29, 2002, 7:28:19 PM, Karin wrote:
They are like zombies, resurrecting themselves from
the dead after having been killed more than once.
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL
Yes but that is almost useless when you can't restrict it to the
nicknames only or at least cause it to search that field completely
prior to any others. If it finds a real name that matches the first
few characters of the nickname before it finds the nickname then it
stops. And YOU CAN'T
Sorry, I should have put the comments I was responding to in front in
this case. Here they are:
D Is it possible to have auto cmplete for a nickname too. I used to be
D able to do this on the various Amiga EMailers and I kind of miss this.
ST Try 1.60c - it should search for nicknames too...
YES!
Thursday, March 28, 2002, 12:26:26 PM, you wrote:
DAC What is needed is a key stroke which allows one to highlite text, then
DAC reply to all
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c
Go to the shortcut editor and then click on warning. That should
expand all the menus for you to look for the expand threads.
Thursday, March 28, 2002, 2:00:11 PM, you wrote:
S I recently upgraded to 1.60c. I have not been able to find an entry to
S modify the shortcut to expand all the
Nope. I didn't look for it but if it is available that is where is
should be. Perhaps one of the more experienced users or even one of
the developers will know.
Thursday, March 28, 2002, 3:44:00 PM, you wrote:
Go to the shortcut editor and then click on warning. That should
expand all
I knew I wasn't completely crazy. That happened to me today and I
couldn't figure out what happened. Had to close and re-open.
Thursday, March 28, 2002, 8:42:07 PM, Vincent wrote:
VDE Hi Co-Batties,
VDE as in every version since 1.3x the error persists:
VDE - Go to the pane which
Keys have assignments for each window. I.E., I set F5 to be send
queued mail. To make it work no matter where I was when I pressed F5 I
had to put it in two places. MainAccount and in Folder Pane PopUP.
What would really help is an index or search for all assignments on a
per function basis.
Should have read search per Key basis.
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 10:03:13 AM, you wrote:
GG It kinda exist on a search per basis.
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60
You will notice that when you make a change to any key that is shown
in the drop down menus, etc., your changes will show up there. I
thought that that was a great implementation. Someone was thinking
ahead when that was designed.
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 10:31:23 AM, you wrote:
K It
You can, I did. I set mine to F5 as it was in PMMAIL.
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 1:28:53 PM, you wrote:
A Why I cant edit shortcut for Queue in Outbox (Shift+F2)?
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c
As did I. No problem deleting it at all. Then when I finally figured
out that it was a much better way to filter spam than the stuff I had
I recreated the folder and then found out I could name it whatever I
wanted and did so. Just have to edit the known filter to use the new
folder name.
Every e-mail client I have used has that feature except BAT. I
requested it about two weeks ago and while they didn't say yes, they
also didn't say no. There was some private e-mail back and forth as
to what I would expect, etc. so I think it was taken seriously.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002,
No, what he means and I meant was the ability to auto complete the
nickname and also to restrict the search to the nickname. Current
implementation will stop if it finds a partial match in the name field
and may never reach the nickname that you were trying to use.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002,
Actually, when I babble about it I normally add that it needs to be
controlled by a switch so that the user has an option to limit the
search to nicknames or at very least, cause a pass through all of the
nickname prior to looking at any of the other fields.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 5:18:38
click Account; click Sorting/Office filters
click on the plus by inbox. Select Known
Click this rule is active should result in a check in that box.
In the list box above one or more address books will be listed. Check
those that you want searched to make a match.
Move this filter to the
I also would like that method or option. As it stands now, my INBOX
has become my SPAM box and the KNOWN my Inbox. Since the filter
itself will allow you to direct it's selection to any folder you want
the implementation is almost there. What we want is the other half
which would allow you to
Very much so. They are very active in the beta forum.
Try contacting Stefan Tanurkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RIT Research Labs)
Friday, March 22, 2002, 8:29:43 PM, you wrote:
PF Hello All,
PF Does anyone know what is going on with ritlabs? No one seems to be
PF responding to emails and I
To do that you are asking ALL of us to remember your name and that you
want that done. Reply all in TB does provide the option but I sure
don't want my stuff answered that way. Perhaps you need to use full
list instead of the digest?
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 4:12:16 PM, you wrote:
MSG I
Mine is at 3% with 1.54/49 and was about the same with 1.53. That is
with the ticker going and the bat wings a flapping and everything. I
don't use explorer to measure that, use Object Desktop but the numbers
should be the same.
Sunday, March 17, 2002, 9:02:32 PM, you wrote:
s Hi tbudl,
s
Earlier someone mentioned that the cc might be locked up. I am new to
TB also so I can't tell you what to do on that. I suspect there will
be help shortly when someone who knows sees your post.
Sunday, March 17, 2002, 9:27:06 PM, you wrote:
s On Sunday, March 17, 2002, Gene Gough wrote:
s
Yes, thanks.
Saturday, March 16, 2002, 5:20:12 AM, you wrote:
Hello Gene!
On Friday, March 15, 2002 at 11:57:13 PM you wrote:
Didn't find an links to get to subscribe to TBBETA at the web site
either.
Have you been gone to the FAQ link?
Some way you must have found a way, because I
I understand that there is a beta that allows the user to customize
function keys, etc. How can I get access to that beta, the key
assignments are driving me crazy after years of using PMMAIL 2000.
--
Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Retired Marietta, GA
Not there (below) but I will go look at the web site for TB.
March 15, 2002, 17:15:38, you wrote:
Hello Gene!
On Friday, March 15, 2002 at 10:54:46 PM you wrote:
I understand that there is a beta that allows the user to customize
function keys, etc. How can I get access to that
Didn't find an links to get to subscribe to TBBETA at the web site
either.
March 15, 2002, 17:49:54, you wrote:
Not there (below) but I will go look at the web site for TB.
March 15, 2002, 17:15:38, you wrote:
Hello Gene!
On Friday, March 15, 2002 at 10:54:46 PM you wrote:
I
Thanks Dwight.
March 15, 2002, 18:45:45, you wrote:
On Friday, March 15, 2002, 4:49:54 PM, Gene Gough wrote:
Not there (below) but I will go look at the web site for TB.
I understand that there is a beta that allows the user to customize
function keys, etc. How can I get access
want to use
is set as the address book for TB! to search.
3. Type the nickname in the To: field of a message composition
window, tab to the next field, and TB! should fill in the field.
JN
Gene Gough wrote on Wednesday, March 13, 2002:
I have just converted from using PMMAIL
I have just converted from using PMMAIL to THE BAT and this is one
of my most frustrating experiences with TB. In PMMAIL you can do
basically what your saying below and it works fine. I think that what
you describe is the proper operation as it works that way in all of
the mailers I have used
AMEN! Thanks for the pointer to BAT, Dave.
March 13, 2002, 02:08:45, you wrote:
Because I get hundreds of E-mails/day and am use to just sitting back
and using my mouse until I have to start actually typing a reply. I
never use keyboard shortcuts...hard to train an old dog new
I only sent this one time, no matter how many times it shows up. :-)
March 13, 2002, 08:55:56, you wrote:
I have just converted from using PMMAIL to THE BAT and this is one
of my most frustrating experiences with TB. In PMMAIL you can do
basically what your saying below and it works
I received a note today with a request for reading confirmation. I
have kept that note in my inbox as a reminder of some action that I
have to take. Now every new note into my inbox causes the attempted
send of a reading confirmation of that first note. I have sent one
just to see if
Thanks.
March 11, 2002, 20:09:46, you wrote:
Hello Gene,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:10:05 -0500GMT (12-3-2002, 0:10 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
GG I received a note today with a request for reading confirmation. I
GG have kept that note in my inbox as a reminder of some action
I would like a way to tall Bat to start a new instance of the
browser when I click on a link in a message. A switch in
preferences would be great.
--
Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428
Home Page:
Thanks Charles, I will look there. When using PMMAIL you make that
selection in PMMAIL.
March 09, 2002, 15:26:05, you wrote:
Gene,
I would like a way to tall Bat to start a new instance of the
browser when I click on a link in a message. A switch in
preferences would be great.
I just started using BAT this week, am converting from PMMAIL 2000
Pro.
I have been trying to set up a SPAM filter using the Alternative
(OR |) function in the filter builder. The problem is that
everything is being trapped by this filter. The filter is set up to
look at the sender
I know I typed insight and not incite... sig :-)
March 08, 2002, 08:46:19, you wrote:
Does anyone here have any incite to this? Is it a known bug in this
release? Thanks.
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Thanks Marcus,
I went back to recreate so that I could be sure I had it correct before
I posted it here. When I did I found that it works properly if there
is a string in the Rules side. Remove that string and just run with
the alternative and it will trap every thing that has not been
Did you copy him with this note? I would be curious to his response
if you did.
March 08, 2002, 17:04:50, you wrote:
He has two major issues, in both of which he has missed the point of
what TB can really do.
68 matches
Mail list logo
