Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-09 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
> So, if you are holding off on an upgrade because you are afraid that > TB! v5 will not be as good as your current version, my experience is > that the upgrade is painless. If you are expecting a new look and feel to > the software, then v5 is probably not for you, however! I tried v5 as well, bu

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Rick, Thursday, January 5, 2012, 9:41:45 AM, you wrote: R>>> There are a couple of "glitchy" random things that happen and MAY be R>>> happening on just my computer >> POP or IMAP? R> POP - they have fixed most of the IMAP issues Thanks. I hope they will fix this elusive glitch next. I

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, Thursday, January 5, 2012, 11:33:59 AM, you wrote: PB>>> I have only 5 sets of filters for one account, but all is working just PB>>> fine. TF>> Are you using POP or IMAP? PB> POP. Thanks. Nobody knows yet why filters in v5 only sometimes don't work. I hope they are looking into th

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread Paul Berger
Hello TBUDL@thebat., Thursday, January 5, 2012, 11:44:46 AM, you wrote: TF> Hello Paul, TF> Thursday, January 5, 2012, 7:50:17 AM, you wrote: PB>> Good luck. PB>> I installed version 5 yesterday relying on people's positive comments. PB>> I have only 5 sets of filters for one account, but all

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread Rick
R>> There are a couple of "glitchy" random things that happen and MAY be R>> happening on just my computer > POP or IMAP? POP - they have fixed most of the IMAP issues -- Rick Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine. - Sir Arthur Eddington v5.0.

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Rick, Thursday, January 5, 2012, 8:57:22 AM, you wrote: R> Good move - there are things that are being fixed, but I for one, R> am not having trouble with my filters. R> There are a couple of "glitchy" random things that happen and MAY be R> happening on just my computer POP

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread Rick
TF>> I cannot afford to try v5 until it is confirmed that the filters for TF>> POP accounts are 100% reliable, as they are in v4. > I installed version 5 yesterday relying on people's positive comments. > I have only 5 sets of filters for one account, but all is working just > fine. Good move

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, Thursday, January 5, 2012, 7:50:17 AM, you wrote: PB> Good luck. PB> I installed version 5 yesterday relying on people's positive comments. PB> I have only 5 sets of filters for one account, but all is working just PB> fine. Are you using POP or IMAP? -- Cheers, Thomas. ___

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread Paul Berger
Hello TBUDL@thebat., Thursday, January 5, 2012, 2:50:14 AM, you wrote: TF> Hello Ian, TF> Wednesday, January 4, 2012, 7:24:37 AM, you wrote: IAW>> RITLabs don't want to describe releases as BETA because they are not IAW>> betas. They describe them as ALPHA yet the list footer added keeps IAW>

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ian, Wednesday, January 4, 2012, 7:24:37 AM, you wrote: IAW> RITLabs don't want to describe releases as BETA because they are not IAW> betas. They describe them as ALPHA yet the list footer added keeps IAW> saying An ALPHA version is a crude attempt at fixing bugs or adding new features

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread jb_lists_tb
Hello Avram, On Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 6:42:24 PM, Sacks, Avram wrote: > Does ver. 5 now work better with IMAP? > If I do switch to IMAP, will "IMAP" mail that is filtered appear to be > merged seamlessly with mail that has already been downloaded and > filtered to one of two dozen folder

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-04 Thread jb_lists_tb
Hello Ian A. White, On Wednesday, January 4, 2012, 12:24:37 AM, Ian A. White wrote: > Current beta is 5.0.26.19 | 'Using TBBETA' information: > So it comes down to is 5.0.26.19 an ALPHA or BETA. The announcement of > this versions clearly states: > The Bat! 5.0.26.19 (ALPHA) is available at

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-03 Thread Rick
> Hello TBUDL, > I have been using TB! for many years (12+), but have been holding off > upgrading to Version 5 because of the various problems that I have > seen reported here and on TBBETA, particularly with IMAP. I have 9 > IMAP accounts, including a GMail account, so I was worried about how >

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-03 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Tue, 2012-01-03, Dwight Corrin wrote: > On Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 11:44:45 AM, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: > >> So, if you are holding off on an upgrade because you are afraid that >> TB! v5 will not be as good as your current version, my experience is >> that the upgrade is painless. If y

RE: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-03 Thread Sacks, Avram
On Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 11:44:45 AM, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote and to which Dwight Corinn concurred:: >> So, if you are holding off on an upgrade because you are afraid that >> TB! v5 will not be as good as your current version, my experience is >> that the upgrade is painless. If you are e

Re: The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-03 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 11:44:45 AM, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: > So, if you are holding off on an upgrade because you are afraid that > TB! v5 will not be as good as your current version, my experience is > that the upgrade is painless. If you are expecting a new look and feel to > the sof

The Bat! v5 Upgrade Experience

2012-01-03 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
Hello TBUDL, I have been using TB! for many years (12+), but have been holding off upgrading to Version 5 because of the various problems that I have seen reported here and on TBBETA, particularly with IMAP. I have 9 IMAP accounts, including a GMail account, so I was worried about how well v5 woul