Hello MFPA,
Sunday, September 6, 2009, 2:14:40 AM, you wrote:
M Yahoo's webmail interface (classic rather than the one with the
M extra annoying features) does even worse: the link ends with
M Echelon_ and the whole of (signals_intelligence) sits immediately
M after it in normal text.
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 8:08:23 AM, in
mid:1124955533.20090906090...@tiscali.nl, Jos Klaassens wrote:
M Yahoo's webmail interface (classic rather than the
M one with the extra annoying features) does even
M worse: the link ends with Echelon_ and the whole
M of (signals_intelligence)
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 12:44:12 AM, in
mid:819549211.20090906064...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
Of course it's fixable.
I'm told Thunderbird 3.0b4 manages to include the closing bracket as
part of the link.
--
Best regards
MFPA
Hello MFPA,
Sunday, September 6, 2009, 12:16:54 PM, you wrote:
M Yahoo's webmail interface (classic rather than the
M one with the extra annoying features) does even
M worse: the link ends with Echelon_ and the whole
M of (signals_intelligence) sits immediately after
M it in normal text.
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:22:58 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 17:22 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Of course it's fixable.
M I'm told Thunderbird 3.0b4 manages to include the closing bracket as
M part of the link.
I didn't know that, but thanks for confirming my logic.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 01:14:40 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 7:14 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
It's not an excuse to not fix a bug if any other
application has the same bug. In fact, if all other
applications have the same bug, Ritlabs should race to
be the first one to fix it.
From a
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:00:25 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 8:00 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Of course it's fixable. The algorithms to pair
parenthesis are out there, many softwares do that and
even colour-code the left and right parenthesis in
nested code, so that it is easier to see which
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 2:50:28 PM, in
mid:956675579.20090906205...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
Any applications that do it even worse cannot be used
as a benchmark. But thans for the info, I would have
indeed expected better from Yahoo. OTOH (and I have not
On Sun, 2009-09-06, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:22:58 +0100 GMT (06/Sep/09, 17:22 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Of course it's fixable.
M I'm told Thunderbird 3.0b4 manages to include the closing bracket as
M part of the link.
I didn't know that, but thanks for confirming my
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 11:32:25 PM, in
mid:1256772869.20090906153...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote:
Although I do not remember seeing any instances of a
URL enclosed in Parentheses,
I have definitely seen it in letters Word documents occasionally:-
Our website
Hello MFPA,
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:01:00 +0100 GMT (07/Sep/09, 7:01 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
http://example.com/ends-with-(parens)
both the MicroEd and Windows editors do not highlight
the final Parentheses.
M Confirmed. The HTML editor does, though..
However if I use the same URL in
On Fri, 2009-09-04, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:25:28 +0100 GMT (05/Sep/09, 4:25 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
M http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M that TB! does not treat the closing
Hello MFPA,
Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:25:28 PM, you wrote:
M I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
M http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
Probably not a TB! issue? After
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 9:11:53 AM, in
mid:591365848.20090905101...@tiscali.nl, Jos Klaassens wrote:
Probably not a TB! issue? After pasting this URL,
including the closing bracket :) , into OpenOffice
Writer same result here with Writer.
Interesting. Same result here in MS
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 7:20:22 AM, in
mid:1853742792.20090904232...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-04, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:25:28 +0100 GMT (05/Sep/09, 4:25 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M I just noticed when including the following URL
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 1:56:12 PM, in
mid:482957195.20090905075...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I suspect I'm missing the whole point of this thread
here and should probably keep my big mouth out of it
but curiously, when you click on the (complete) link,
it takes you to
Hello MFPA,
M Hi
M I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
M I'm using MicroEd, in case it makes a difference.
I'm not sure what's going on
Hello MFPA,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 3:36:24 PM, you wrote:
M On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 9:11:53 AM, in
M mid:591365848.20090905101...@tiscali.nl, Jos Klaassens wrote:
Probably not a TB! issue? After pasting this URL,
including the closing bracket :) , into OpenOffice
Writer same
Hello Jos,
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:18:59 +0200 GMT (05/Sep/09, 22:18 PM +0700 GMT),
Jos Klaassens wrote:
M Interesting. Same result here in MS Word 2002.
M Not sure that means it's not a TB! issue, though. An issue with a
M software application doesn't *have* to be ignored just because there
M
On Sat, 2009-09-05, Jos Klaassens wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 5:44:06 PM, you wrote:
TF It's not an excuse to not fix a bug if any other application has the
TF same bug. In fact, if all other applications have the same bug,
TF Ritlabs should race to be the first one to
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 5:44:06 PM, you wrote:
TF It's not an excuse to not fix a bug if any other application has the
TF same bug. In fact, if all other applications have the same bug,
TF Ritlabs should race to be the first one to fix it.
TF From a practical POV, it's simply
Hello Bill,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 6:57:49 PM, you wrote:
BM Well, I checked the RFCs for URLs and Right Parenthesis is a valid
BM character in this position, so I have reported it in the Bug Tracker:
BM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7709
Fixable? See
Hello Jos,
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:26:22 +0200 GMT (06/Sep/09, 2:26 AM +0700 GMT),
Jos Klaassens wrote:
BM Well, I checked the RFCs for URLs and Right Parenthesis is a valid
BM character in this position, so I have reported it in the Bug Tracker:
BM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7709
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 4:44:06 PM, in
mid:132137587.20090905224...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
Hello Jos,
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:18:59 +0200 GMT (05/Sep/09, 22:18
PM +0700 GMT), Jos Klaassens wrote:
M Interesting. Same result here in MS Word 2002.
M Not sure
Hi
On Saturday 5 September 2009 at 8:26:22 PM, in
mid:1577927151.20090905212...@tiscali.nl, Jos Klaassens wrote:
Hello Bill,
Saturday, September 5, 2009, 6:57:49 PM, you wrote:
BM Well, I checked the RFCs for URLs and Right
BM Parenthesis is a valid character in this position,
BM so I have
Hi
On Sunday 6 September 2009 at 12:44:12 AM, in
mid:819549211.20090906064...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
Of course it's fixable. The algorithms to pair
parenthesis are out there, many softwares do that and
even colour-code the left and right parenthesis in
nested code,
Hi
I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
I'm using MicroEd, in case it makes a difference.
--
Best regards
MFPA
If
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:25:28 +0100 GMT (05/Sep/09, 4:25 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M I just noticed when including the following URL in a message:-
M http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_(signals_intelligence)
M that TB! does not treat the closing bracket as part of the link.
M I'm
28 matches
Mail list logo
