Hi Allie,
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 19:44 your local time, which was
Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 01:44 my local time, Allie Martin [AM]
wrote;
AM> There's nothing you can do about this. This is how TB!'s IMAP
AM> filtering behaves at the moment.
8< Snipped a bit >8
AM>
> Spam, [S] wrote:
>> I posted a message earlier about mail filtering on IMAP folders. I
>> am using The Bat! 3 and it seem as the mail filters only activate if
>> I click on the Inbox folder. The mail is still received as normally
>> and I get a "new mail"
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, at 19:44:54 [GMT -0500] (which was 5:44 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Otherwise, TB!'s IMAP is very frustrating when it
> comes to auto-filtering.
To say the least.
--
Best Regards,
Kevin
PGP Keys: idap://key
Spam, [S] wrote:
> I posted a message earlier about mail filtering on IMAP folders. I
> am using The Bat! 3 and it seem as the mail filters only activate if
> I click on the Inbox folder. The mail is still received as normally
> and I get a "new mail" icon in the system tr
Hello everyone,
I posted a message earlier about mail filtering on IMAP folders. I
am using The Bat! 3 and it seem as the mail filters only activate if
I click on the Inbox folder. The mail is still received as normally
and I get a "new mail" icon in the system tray. The prob
Hello Dan,
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:10:14 -0400 GMT (09/06/2004, 20:10 +0700 GMT),
Dan Grunberg wrote:
DG> For what it's worth, this works for me:
DG> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | in the Kludges | Yes
The only condition under which this will not work is when you have
seperate folders for mailing lists,
Hello Jonathan,
Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 6:52:01 PM, you wrote:
Jonathan> Would do in this example, Duane put
Jonathan> Reply-To:.*TBUDL The .*
Whoops. Musta not been paying too close attention.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Tagline of the day:
Stupidity got me into this
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:52:01 -0500 (8:52 PM EDT here) Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 08, 2004, Leif Gregory wrote...
> Duane>> ...and I've turned on Regular Expressions under the Options.
>> Don't need the Regular Expressions. That'll break it.
> Would do in this example, Duane put Repl
On Tuesday, June 08, 2004, Leif Gregory wrote...
Duane>> ...and I've turned on Regular Expressions under the Options.
> Don't need the Regular Expressions. That'll break it.
Would do in this example, Duane put Reply-To:.*TBUDL The .*
wouldn't match anything if regular expressions were off, s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Leif,
On 08 June 2004, 15:46 -0600 (08/06/200422:46 local time) Leif Gregory
[LG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LG> A ma!!! You were doing so good.. What'd you do with your
LG> cut-mark / sig delimiter?
I could see that one coming! =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Duane,
On 08 June 2004, 16:33 -0400 (08/06/200421:33 local time) Duane Lambe
[DL] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW>> I'd use Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not worry about the
MW>> regular expressions.
DL> Did as much, but I can't seem to g
Hello nednieuws,
Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 11:16:01 PM, you wrote:
MW>> If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your hands
MW>> on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much improved IMAP
MW>> support.
nc> Where do I get this beta?
Disregard...
--
Regards, Charles
Hello Martin,
Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 8:14:24 PM, you wrote:
MW> If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your hands
MW> on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much improved IMAP
MW> support.
Where do I get this beta?
--
Regards, Charles.
_
MW> I'd use Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not worry about the
MW> regular expressions.
Did as much, but I can't seem to get it to work... I /did/ put a space
after the colon - not sure that that should be in there or not.
Also, I'm IMAP-ping an Exchange box - I don't think that should make a
di
Hello Chris,
On 08 June 2004, 20:09 Chris Weaven [CW] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW>> If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your
MW>> hands on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much
MW>> improved IMAP support.
CW> Sorry to jump in here, but what is the
Hi Martin
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004 19:14 our local time, Martin Webster [MW]
wrote;
MW> If you're happy using beta versions I recommend you getting your
MW> hands on 2.11.03 (you're probably using 2.11.02) as it has much
MW> improved IMAP support.
Sorry to jump in here, but what is the improved
Hello Duane,
Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 11:48:05 AM, you wrote:
Duane> Hi - I've just picked up The Bat! (whatever version's current),
Duane> and jumped on this mailing list to help me get into the
Duane> interface, etc.
Welcome! :-)
Duane> I've set up a filter for my Incoming IMAP box, as per the
D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Duane,
On 08 June 2004, 13:48 -0400 (08/06/200418:48 local time) Duane Lambe
[DL] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DL> Hi - I've just picked up The Bat! (whatever version's current), and
DL> jumped on this mailing list to help me get into the in
Hi - I've just picked up The Bat! (whatever version's current), and
jumped on this mailing list to help me get into the interface, etc.
I've set up a filter for my Incoming IMAP box, as per the Welcome
email, but I'm not sure I'm doing things right.
For the account, I've gone to Incoming Mail, ma
19 matches
Mail list logo
