On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 14:10:51 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[reasons for not using folder view snipped...]
> so basically: a matter of taste.
Yes, it is. I used to find the folder view awkward but now that I've
gotten used to it and I can't go back to the preview window. That
sense of relie
Hi Ali,
on Friday, December 24, 1999, 6:48:25 AM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote:
AM> I have a setup identical to Steve's and do prefer not using the
AM> preview window for a couple reasons he sited, namely that it reduces
AM> having to scroll through the message list since more of it is visible.
OK
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:01:06 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[]
> I don't use them in general. I find that the space that it takes up on
> the display causes problems with me elsewhere as everything doesn't line up
> quite right. Currently with TB! I have the folder view to the left go all the
Thursday, December 23, 1999, 12:28:35 PM, Nick wrote:
> Since we've come to know you're very opinionated in your preferences (I'm
> saying that in a nice way :-))
Awww, just admit it, I'm a crusty ol' email curmudgeon. :)
> I was wondering what exactly you have against a preview pane? For t
In Reference to "Multiple problems with "the bat"" From Steve Lamb:
>> How do I turn of the feature that marks my messages as "read" if I leave the
>> cursor on the message list for more than one second? (I actually didn't read
>> the mess
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 4:49:47 AM, tracer wrote:
> He said he took all of one hour to try and use the bat...
That doesn't describe how long he took looking for any particular item
before giving up. Personally nearly everything on his list I found and
configured to my liking (or at lea
Hello tracer,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:58:53 +0700 you told us :
FF> Why doesn't CTRL-R reply for messages, like Eudora? How do I
FF> customize this?
t> But it works in my version, try it!!
It work here too
--
- syafril -
*
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:58:14 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 7:58:14 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> Hallo tracer,
Thomas> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:42:26 +0700 GMT your local time, which was
Thomas> Wednesday,
Hallo tracer,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:42:26 +0700 GMT your local time, which was
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:42:26 PM (GMT+0800) my local time,
tracer wrote:
Frank>> Why doesn't CTRL-R reply for messages, like Eudora? How do I customize this?
t> Seems to work on my machine...
As a matter of
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:20:10 +0700, Frank Farance wrote:
> In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format:
> -MM-DD HH:MM:SS
> Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns?
Is this a TB! setting or a windows setting? The Bat! shows message
dates in a par
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:04:39 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:04:39 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> Hi Steve,
Thomas> welcome back. :-)
Thomas> on Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:42:46 PM GMT+0800, Steve La
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 23:07:07 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 2:07:07 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Januk> Read all your new mail, or go to Options and check out that menu.
Januk> Really, how much did you look around bef
Hello Frank Farance,
One doesnt learn a program in an hour and while the Bat's
docucmentation could be improved a lot and while there are bugs, most
of these things can be found relatively easy by either looking at the
various menus or by asking someone to help you setup the program...
Frank>
Hi Steve,
welcome back. :-)
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:42:46 PM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
FF>>> How do I turn off the animation of the bat in the task bar?
SL> Options / Icon Animation.
Didn't know that. Thanks - but I like the animation.
FF>>> Why doesn't CTRL-R reply for mess
Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:20:10 PM, Frank wrote:
> -MM-DD HH:MM:SS
> Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns?
Because TB! doesn't use the Windows settings.
> For today's messages, why don't they have today's date?
Because it is a given that if a
Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:43:47 PM, Thomas wrote:
> Two possiblities:
> 1.) On an account level: Account/Properties.../Templates/New Message.
> 2.) On a folder level: Folder/Properties/Template.
Three. Recipient level at Addressbook / Recipient / Properties.
FF>> How do I turn off the
Hello Frank,
Tuesday, December 21, 1999, 10:20:10 PM, you wrote:
> In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format:
> -MM-DD HH:MM:SS
> Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns?
This is standard for most mail programs. Since presumably you know
tod
Hi Frank,
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 2:20:10 PM GMT+0800, Frank Farance wrote:
Many questions. Let me try to anser some:
FF> In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format:
FF> -MM-DD HH:MM:SS
FF> Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns?
How d
In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format:
-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns?
For today's messages, why don't they have today's date?
How do I edit the "new message template"? ... there isn't any information in the Help
f
19 matches
Mail list logo
