Hello Paddy,
Saturday, February 16, 2002, 3:18:25 PM, you wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
Using: Opera 6.0 Build 1010, Windows ME
At: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html ,
I can't get the = navigation buttons to work.
Says works best with IE, but I'm not going to do that.
Also, can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 26 February 2002 at 18:24:55 -0700 (which was 01:24 where I live)
Quin Selman wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As for your FAQs site eventually supporting Opera (whose users
represent a minority of users),
I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 18 February 2002 at 10:52:54 +0100 (which was 09:52 where I live)
Karin Spaink wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My error for not seeing it. But this experience shows that this
navigation and layout are anything but
On 19-02-2002 at 17:24, Marck D Pearlstone kindly wrote:
There is a new revision of the FAQ up there now with the blue lines
removed **plus** a completely flat HTML version in expanded outline
form. It's not pretty,
... but terribly useful. (And no, I don't mind plenty of
white.) Thank you!
Hi,
There is a new revision of the FAQ up there now with the blue lines
removed **plus** a completely flat HTML version in expanded outline
form. It's not pretty, but for those not using a compliant browser it
saves a lot of confusion.
Thank you very much.
--
Luís Avelino Relógio
One who
Hello Mrten!
On Monday, February 18, 2002 at 2:09:25 AM you wrote:
those are the -very- minor details in HTML that do not really effect the
rendering in most browsers. the HTML itself has many, many errors (try
running http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html through
validator.w3.org)
On 18-02-2002 at 10:31, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
First of all, my apologies, Marck: navigation _does_ work in
my browsers. The problem is that all the blue lines were
terribly confusing, and I thought I was still looking at
headers instead of information, _especially_ since, after
you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 18 February 2002 at 10:52:54 +0100 (which was 09:52 where I live)
Karin Spaink wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't shake the feeling that blue lines are meant to be
clickable, or that they are headlines.
This,
It was foretold that on 18-2-2002 @ 02:09:25 GMT+0100 (which was 2:09
where I live) Mrten wrote and spread these wise comments on The Bat
FAQ, = Navigation:
M those are the -very- minor details in HTML that do not really effect the
M rendering in most browsers. the HTML itself has many, many
It was foretold that on 18-2-2002 @ 10:31:07 GMT+0100 (which was 10:31
where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote and spread these wise comments on
The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
DH The main point is not so much Marck's appreciated effort to write up a
DH good FAQ, but the lack of a good (PDF?) documentation
On 18-02-2002 at 21:01, Luc kindly wrote:
Mrten wrote
i bet the validation of the entire page will be invalid: no doctype
and no character encoding specified -- W3 validator will not
parse a page (as far as i know and tried).
You can manually enter the presumed doc type, and then the
It was foretold that on 18-2-2002 @ 22:16:06 GMT+0100 (which was 22:16
where I live) Karin Spaink wrote and spread these wise comments on
The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
KS You can manually enter the presumed doc type, and then the
KS validator will do its work anyway.
_Presumed_ indeed
--
Best
Karin Spaink wrote:
I tried both Mozilla and NS4.7. Neither work, alas.
It works OK with Netscape 4.79, but only if you enable cookies.
It took me ages to work that out.
It's still pretty slow compared with html, though.
--
Mary
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
It was foretold that on 17-2-2002 @ 03:23:59 GMT+ (which was 4:23
where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and spread these wise comments
on The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
MDP I've investigated this one (a bit). It's not in 6.01 (although the
MDP release claims to have it) but beta testers report
Hello Luc,
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 2:39:15 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
L I have no problems what so ever with it and i'm using Opera 6.1
Opera 6.01 is the last official release. Is 6.1 beta? Stable enough to
use for everyone? Where can it be found?
--
Best regards,
Ottar Grimstad, Norway
It was foretold that on 17-2-2002 @ 14:52:46 GMT+0100 (which was 14:52
where I live) Ottar Grimstad wrote and spread these wise comments on
The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
OG Opera 6.01 is the last official release. Is 6.1 beta? Stable enough to
OG use for everyone? Where can it be found?
sorry
It was foretold that on 17-2-2002 @ 16:52:06 GMT+0100 (which was 16:52
where I live) Karin Spaink wrote and spread these wise comments on
The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
KS I'm afraid that this naviagtion isn't a very good idea.
KS What's the use of a FAQ that many people cannot access?
I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 17 February 2002 at 16:57:52 +0100 (which was 15:57 where I live)
Luc wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KS I'm afraid that this naviagtion isn't a very good idea.
KS What's the use of a FAQ that many people cannot
Hello Luc,
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 8:11:46 AM, you wrote:
L It was foretold that on 17-2-2002 @ 14:52:46 GMT+0100 (which was 14:52
L where I live) Ottar Grimstad wrote and spread these wise comments on
L The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
OG Opera 6.01 is the last official release. Is 6.1 beta
On 17-02-2002 at 19:28, Marck D Pearlstone kindly wrote:
Luc wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[re: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html ]
KS I'm afraid that this naviagtion isn't a very good idea.
KS What's the use of a FAQ that many people cannot access?
I have to
It was foretold that on 17-2-2002 @ 18:28:28 GMT+ (which was 19:28
where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and spread these wise comments
on The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
MDP If the percentages were different, I'd be extremely concerned, but
MDP they're not.
Without going on an never ending
On Sunday, February 17, 2002, 1:34:41 PM, Karin Spaink wrote:
Indeed. And is that a reason to ignore the rest? As I told you: I
cannot use the page in Mozilla, NS4.7 _nor_ in MSIE5.0. I have
proper and fully installed browsers.
You can't write for every legacy browser that used to be out
On Sunday, February 17, 2002, 2:21:18 PM, Luc wrote:
Without going on an never ending road: why are you using that
method? What's wrong with just plain javascripting or plain
drill down navigation?
Everyone wants to be a critic, but Marck seems to be the one who puts
in the time to put up
It was foretold that on 17-2-2002 @ 14:32:47 GMT-0600 (which was 21:32
where I live) Dwight A Corrin wrote and spread these wise comments on
The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
DAC Everyone wants to be a critic, but Marck seems to be the one who puts
DAC in the time to put up the information.
Keep your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 17 February 2002 at 20:34:41 +0100 (which was 19:34 where I live)
Karin Spaink wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to agree with that, although my version of Opera works with it.
I don't understand what the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 17 February 2002 at 21:21:18 +0100 (which was 20:21 where I live)
Luc wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP If the percentages were different, I'd be extremely concerned, but
MDP they're not.
Without going on an never
Karin,
I sympathize with your situation as I am sure Marck
does. What you may not be aware of is, if I'm not incorrect,
Marck has developed the FAQ voluntarily - as in he wanted to
help others without deriving any financial benefit. Don't take
offense as my intent isn't to make you
On 18-02-2002 at 00:07, James Senick kindly wrote:
Karin,
I sympathize with your situation as I am sure Marck
does. What you may not be aware of is, if I'm not incorrect,
Marck has developed the FAQ voluntarily - as in he wanted to
help others without deriving any financial
On 17-02-2002 at 21:30, Dwight A Corrin kindly wrote:
On Sunday, February 17, 2002, 1:34:41 PM, Karin Spaink wrote:
Indeed. And is that a reason to ignore the rest? As I told you: I
cannot use the page in Mozilla, NS4.7 _nor_ in MSIE5.0. I have
proper and fully installed browsers.
You
On 17-02-2002 at 19:28, Marck D Pearlstone kindly wrote:
The majority of people can read it and access it well.
My lover just tried with his NS6.2, and he can't see it
properly either. When he clicks = is there a compiled list
of keyboard shortcuts?, he loses the original menu and gets
a blank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 0:46 op maandag 18 februari 2002, Karin Spaink:
On 17-02-2002 at 19:28, Marck D Pearlstone kindly wrote:
The majority of people can read it and access it well.
My lover just tried with his NS6.2, and he can't see it properly either.
i hate
On Sunday, February 17, 2002, 5:46:57 PM, Karin Spaink wrote:
My lover just tried with his NS6.2, and he can't see it properly
either. When he clicks = is there a compiled list of keyboard
shortcuts?, he loses the original menu and gets a blank page.
my about netscape 6 page says:
Netscape
Hello TBUDL,
Using: Opera 6.0 Build 1010, Windows ME
At: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html ,
I can't get the = navigation buttons to work.
Says works best with IE, but I'm not going to do that.
Also, can't find the help button at the top of the page.
Anyone else have problem? Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 16 February 2002 at 14:18:25 -0800 (which was 22:18 where I live)
Paddy L wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using: Opera 6.0 Build 1010, Windows ME
At: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html ,
I can't get
Hello Paddy,
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:18:25 -0800GMT (16-2-02, 23:18 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
PL Using: Opera 6.0 Build 1010, Windows ME
PL At: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html ,
PL I can't get the = navigation buttons to work.
That's because the faq uses DOM standard
Hello Paddy,
Saturday, February 16, 2002, 11:18:25 PM, you wrote to TBUDL:
PL I can't get the = navigation buttons to work. Says works best
PL with IE, but I'm not going to do that. Also, can't find the help
PL button at the top of the page. Anyone else have problem? Or is it
PL just me?
It
It was foretold that on 17-2-2002 @ 23:23:11 GMT+ (which was 0:23
where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and spread these wise comments
on The Bat FAQ, = Navigation:
MDP Anyone using a browser with an incomplete DOM implementation will have
MDP trouble. Mozilla works well. Opera doesn't yet
Hello Ottar,
Saturday, February 16, 2002, 4:01:20 PM, you wrote:
OG But I think you in Opera have the setting Identify as
OG MSIE 5,0 (F12 to access menu). Try identify as Opera. This changes the
OG faq page so that there is two copies of the content. Scroll down to
OG last, and you can make
Hello Luc,
Saturday, February 16, 2002, 5:03:03 PM, you wrote:
L Yep, it's supported in 6.01
I can't get The FAQ to work with 6.01, so either it doesn't fully
support DOM or ...?
--
Regards,
Paddy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
On 17 February 2002 at 19:11:22 -0800 (which was 03:11 where I live)
Paddy L wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
L Yep, it's supported in 6.01
I can't get The FAQ to work with 6.01, so either it doesn't fully
support DOM
On 17-02-2002 at 00:57, Roelof Otten kindly wrote:
Hello Paddy,
PL Using: Opera 6.0 Build 1010, Windows ME
PL At: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html ,
PL I can't get the = navigation buttons to work.
That's because the faq uses DOM standard JavaScript. Opera does not
yet
41 matches
Mail list logo
