Hi all,
I have a selective download filter set to Ignore certain messages. I
assumed that meant that the messages would stay on the server until I
used the dispatcher to delete them. This isn't what is happening.
Here's what does seems to be happening (I'm using a test account
and sending
When I click on the down arrow that shows history in the above fields,
it shut TB! down with extreme prejudice. Has anyone else experienced
this? Is there a fix?
-Peter
Using The Bat! version 1.60c (www.ritlabs.com) on Windows XP Build 2600
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, August 03, 2001, at 02:04:32 AM PDT, Ryan Phillips wrote:
Go to any sent message with an attachment, then delete the
attachment from the message. Close the message. Then reopen the same
message (not in a preview but full screen). Does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL Members!
I discovered something quite not so funny today:
I composed a message which should contain my vCard and a Word
document. First I wrote the mail, then I put the vCard in
(Utilities/Attach vCard). After that I clicked on
Hello Dierk,
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 12:19:01 PM you wrote:
DH Anyone else seeing this behaviour?
cannot confirm over here ... tried to attach as QP, MIME, UUE and per
drag-n-drop. every time both attachments are present when the mail is
stored in outbox.
tried to attach .txt and .doc.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dierk Haasis wrote:
I composed a message which should contain my vCard and a Word
document. First I wrote the mail, then I put the vCard in
(Utilities/Attach vCard). After that I clicked on the toolbar button
to attach a file, chose the right one and opened (=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk,
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 6:19:01 AM, you wrote:
DH I composed a message which should contain my vCard and a Word
DH document. First I wrote the mail, then I put the vCard in
DH (Utilities/Attach vCard). After that I clicked on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerry!
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 5:30:43 PM you wrote:
I was unable to duplicate this problem after following your directions
to the letter.
I tried it again, changing some settings. Normally I use Bind
attachments only while sending.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk,
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 1:02:08 PM, you wrote:
DH I tried it again, changing some settings. Normally I use Bind
DH attachments only while sending. For good measure I unchecked it.
Interesting. I have Bind already activated.
DH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerry!
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 8:30:43 PM you wrote:
Interesting. I have Bind already activated.
I do have normally, I just changed it for testing purposes.
DH I added the file by using the toolbar button.
I did the same, but
On Saturday, January 06, 2001, 11:09:50 PM, Andrey wrote:
ML I'm not sure about this. As Thomas said, different scan codes
ML are sent to the system when the NumLock status is changed.
I'm afraid you're incorrect here. The down state of an Alt key just
changes the way the keyboard handler
On Saturday, January 06, 2001, 10:54:07 PM, Andrey wrote:
Partially - it depends on OS used. In DOS we are limited to 256
characters. In Windows we can use all those characters that a
particular font supports. For example, Alt+0149 != Alt+149 - try
it yourself and you'll feel the difference.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ming-Li,
On 07 January 2001 at 05:32:13 -0800 (which was 13:32 where I
live) Ming-Li wrote and made these points:
I'm afraid you're incorrect here. The down state of an Alt key just
changes the way the keyboard handler interprets the actual
Hallo Andrey,
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 09:54:07 +0300 GMT (07/01/2001, 14:54 +0800 GMT),
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:
AGSAA Partially - it depends on OS used. In DOS we are limited to 256
AGSAA characters. In Windows we can use all those characters that a particular
AGSAA font supports. For
Hello!
Friday, January 05, 2001, 9:13:13 AM, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGSAA It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI
AGSAA codes via Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts
AGSAA as a cursor control keys :-(.
TF I wouldn't know about ANSI
Hello!
Friday, January 05, 2001, 6:15:32 PM, Ming-Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI
codes via Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts as
a cursor control keys :-(.
The correct behaviour is to ignore the NumPad status.
Hello!
Friday, January 05, 2001, 7:03:02 PM, Tim Musson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lost
TF I say it's not a bug in TB.
TM Agreed, it seems to be application dependent. M$ NotePad gets a t with
TM NumLock on and off.
Disagreed, it seems to be an UI inconsistence - like an absent New
Message
Hey Thomas,
Friday, January 05, 2001, 1:13:13 AM, you wrote:
AGSAA The correct behaviour is to ignore the NumPad status.
TF Is that so? I have never heard this. I think if you want to inoput
TF ASCII codes via AtlNumPad, you have to make sure the NumLock light is
TF on. It has always been this
On Thursday, January 04, 2001, 8:49:17 PM, Andrey wrote:
It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI
codes via Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts as
a cursor control keys :-(.
The correct behaviour is to ignore the NumPad status.
I'm not sure about
Hallo Tim,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:26:11 -0500 GMT (05/01/2001, 21:26 +0800 GMT),
Tim Musson wrote:
TM Alt+116 = t regardless of the NumLock status for
TM Win2k/NT/98/95/m$-dos6/5/3/dr-dos7 on ThinkPad/Dell workstation, and
TM Compaq servers.
Not for Word 97 under Win98. I just tried it. Returns
Hey Thomas,
Friday, January 05, 2001, 10:30:25 AM, you wrote:
TM Alt+116 = t regardless of the NumLock status for
TM Win2k/NT/98/95/m$-dos6/5/3/dr-dos7 on ThinkPad/Dell workstation, and
TM Compaq servers.
TF Not for Word 97 under Win98. I just tried it. Returns t when NumLock
TF is TRUE and
Hello!
It seems to be impossible to enter characters using their ANSI codes via
Alt+NumPad in TB message editor when the NumPad acts as a cursor control
keys :-(.
For example, you can try to enter char - it's code is 0149. You have
to hold down one of Alt keys while entering 0149 on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Extremely minor, but interesting. The Bat! reports -19 unread messages
in the system tray (via the floating tool-tip that you can get). This
happened after I marked a bunch of messages (that had been automatically
moved to other folders by filters)
Hallo Arthur,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:58:16 -0500 GMT (08/12/2000, 00:58 +0800 GMT),
Arthur Warren wrote:
AW Extremely minor, but interesting. The Bat! reports -19 unread messages
AW in the system tray (via the floating tool-tip that you can get). This
AW happened after I marked a bunch of
Hi TBUDL,
I work with 1.47 Halloween Edition and found a possible bug.
Maybe somebody can verify this...
In my editor settings I use the autosave feature (40seconds).
Now if I write a new message and wait for 40 seconds, I see this message
in my outbox. If I send it, it will be deleted from
Hello Juergen,
on Thursday, November 02, 2000, 09:46, you wrote:
Now if I write a new message and wait for 40 seconds, I see this message
in my outbox. If I send it, it will be deleted from this location after
a successful send. But if I write a new message, wait 40 seconds until
it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Juergen,
On 02 November 2000 at 10:00:21 GMT +0100 (which was 09:00 where I
live) Juergen Frisch wrote and made these points:
The only chance to get rid of this mail is to delete the messages.*
files in the filesystem outbox folder.
JF
Hi Juergen,
The only chance to get rid of this mail is to delete the messages.*
files in the filesystem outbox folder.
JFYour first message has been saved as draft. Mark it in the outbox
JFpane and remove the "draft save icon" near the envelope by clicking
JFon it.
this made the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL,
Try this:
Start typing a new message with the Mail Ticker on top. Change one of
the font settings of the Mail Ticker. Go back to the Editor and you'll
find that you can't make any further changes to your message. You can
save
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
On 25 October 2000 at 17:58:06 GMT +0100 (which was 17:58 where I
live) Paul White wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Possible bug - Ticker and Editor":
PW Is this a bug or have I missed something?
Confirmed!
Hello,
Saturday, September 23, 2000, 9:04:06 AM, Marek Mikus wrote:
MM Hello all,
MM Friday, September 22, 2000, Diana Calder wrote:
I downloaded and installed 1.46d from the RIT Labs site today. Ack!!
Not good at all. First, it ignored the /LOGIN= and PASSWORD=
parameters on the shortcut
Hello all,
Friday, September 22, 2000, Diana Calder wrote:
I downloaded and installed 1.46d from the RIT Labs site today. Ack!!
Not good at all. First, it ignored the /LOGIN= and PASSWORD=
parameters on the shortcut that I've been using just fine with 1.45.
Do You use parameter _/LOGIN_ ?
I downloaded and installed 1.46d from the RIT Labs site today. Ack!!
Not good at all. First, it ignored the /LOGIN= and PASSWORD=
parameters on the shortcut that I've been using just fine with 1.45.
Okay, that was really annoying, but not the end of the world. Then it
started up. Well, all of my
Hallo Diana,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:25:10 -0400 GMT (23/09/2000, 03:25 +0800 GMT),
Diana Calder wrote:
DC the "flag" column was empty (still there on-screen, but empty)
DC [...] "Flagging" wasn't listed either as an available column or
DC one in use.
No such problem here.
DC First, it ignored
Hi To All You BATty People,
Thomas wrote:
J I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed
J something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has an
J attached document I do not get the attached file. The Bat shows that
J the message has an attachment.
Hello JWorley,
On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 13:10:03 GMT -0600 (which was 11:10 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hi To All You BATty People,
I did some digging and can now narrow the field a little more. This
only happens when someone using Outlook receives a message with
Hello JWorley,
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:10:03 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, February 19, 2000, 2:10:03 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
JWorley wrote:
Hi To All You BATty People,
Thomas wrote:
J I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed
J something
Hi tracer,
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 08:33:16 +0700GMT (19/02/2000, 09:33 +0800GMT),
tracer wrote:
I receive a lot of .doc and .xls attachments from Outlook users and
have no problems with it.
t I dump them and then tell the user that my server zaps exe, doc, xls,
t bmp's as attachment and can
Hi JWorley,
On 17 February 2000 at 21:44:29 GMT -0600 (which was 03:44 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
J I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed
J something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has
J an attached document I
Hi there!
On 16 Feb 00, at 21:44, JWorley wrote
about "Possible bug / problem":
I work with a bunch of Outlook / MS Office users and have noticed
something strange. Whenever they forward a message to me that has an
attached document I do not get the attached file. The
Hi Marck,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:03:10 +GMT (17/02/2000, 18:03 +0800GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP The usual format for these PITA messages is MS-TNEF. There is a
MDP decoder available for this format (mentioned recently in a thread
MDP specifically about MS-TNEF - check
Hi All,
I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain
folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are
never deleted unless I go into the folders and manually delete them.
Is this a problem / bug or am I doing something wrong? I do not
have any of
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:46:33 -0600, JWorley wrote:
I have noticed that even though I have set the properties on certain
folders to delete messages after X number of days, the messages are
never deleted unless I go into the folders and manually delete them. Is
this a problem / bug or am I
In Reference to "Possible Bug ??" From Angel:
A Description:
A After selecting multiple emails to REDIRECT, and ticking the "Address All Messages
A To The Address Below" option in popup-box then hitting "OK",
A TB! gets an EAccessViolation message and the program
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 09:39:02 ,Thomas scribbled:
TF Angel, how much RAM do you have? I have a suspicion that TB has a
TF problem swapping
128 Megs
Regards,
~~~Angel ...your RDR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"No hay extraños en este mundo, simplemente amigos
On Friday, January 14, 2000, 11:19:49 AM, Angel wrote:
Apologies if this sort of Q has been answered before :D
Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some
reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time... and it only seems to
be with posts originating from you?
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 12:29:43 ,Nick scribbled:
NA Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some
NA reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time...
Because I posted to both the TBUDL and TBBETA mailing lists.
From: Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 11:31:30 ,Allie scribbled:
AM I suggest that you write to Ritlabs about it and leave it at that. :)
AM Just be sure to include exactly what the error message said as you did on
AM the list.
I will, and thanks, Allie :D
Regards,
~~~Angel ...your RDR
[EMAIL
On Friday, January 14, 2000, 12:50:11 PM, Angel wrote:
NA Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some
NA reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time...
Because I posted to both the TBUDL and TBBETA mailing lists.
Hmmm... strange then, because I have filters
Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:59:10 PM, Angel wrote:
Hello fellow Bataholics!
I am using
Version 1.39 Beta/1Registered
Under Windows 98 4 .10 Build
Description:
After selecting multiple emails to REDIRECT, and ticking the "Address All Messages
To The Address Below" option in
On Friday, January 14, 2000 at 13:29:52 ,Nick scribbled:
NA My original TBBETA filter has the List Address as "Recipient", but it
NA didn't seem to catch any messages with the Beta List address in the Cc:
NA box. How would you set up a filter to catch messages with a certain
NA address in the
Hi Nick,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:29:52 -0800GMT (15/01/2000, 05:29 +0800GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Angel, I'm not sure why, but all of your posts are doubled for some
NA reason... I'm receiving two exact posts every time...
Because I posted to both the TBUDL and TBBETA mailing lists.
NA
Hello fellow Bataholics!
I am using
Version 1.39 Beta/1Registered
Under Windows 98 4 .10 Build
Description:
After selecting multiple emails to REDIRECT, and ticking the "Address All Messages
To The Address Below" option in popup-box then hitting "OK",
TB! gets an EAccessViolation
Hello there Bataholics!
An afterthought...and also FMPI (For My Personal Information) as I am just
now delving into/learning in-depth tecchy-stuff LOL):
I notice that Thomas and Nick are using Win98 build 1998... I am using
Win98 Build (Second Edition). Graham "confirmed" using Win NT4 SP5.
Hello Everybody,
can anybody confirm this?
when i collapse an account, select it (without expanding it) and hit
the F2-key (or using the mouse), I always get:
'server reports error: the respons is:
--
Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen
Roel [EMAIL
Hello Roel,
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 at 14:04:55 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
R can anybody confirm this?
R when i collapse an account, select it (without expanding it) and
R hit the F2-key (or using the mouse), I always get: 'server reports
R error: the respons is:
Nope, I don't have any problems
Hello Roel,
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:09:01 +0100 you told us :
R can anybody confirm this?
R when i collapse an account, select it (without expanding it) and
R hit the F2-key (or using the mouse), I always get: 'server reports
R error: the respons is:'
R when i expand the account hit
Hallo Roel,
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:09:01 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 15, 1999, 9:09:01 PM (GMT+0800) my local time,
Roel wrote:
R I checked everything the accounts are exactly the same (apart from
R the login password that is)... every setting is identical...
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Thomas,
R I checked everything the accounts are exactly the same (apart from
R the login password that is)... every setting is
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Thomas,
R over here, when i use account-specific settings, it won't give
R anything but an error... so i use the general (as in
R
Hallo Roel,
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 at 16:43:25 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
TF What if you choose account-specific settings for one of the accounts?
R as said above: it'll give an error for that account...
R don't know why though...
R also, i noticed that now hitting f2 _sometimes_ work...
R seems to
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Thomas,
TF What happens if you hit alt-F2 (check mail for all)?
alt-f2 gives the same problem...
TF Are the different addresses on the same
62 matches
Mail list logo
