Hi tracer,
on Monday, December 20, 1999, 3:47:05 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote:
AVK snipped what in Russian we call "îÁ×ÅÌ ÔÅÎØ ÎÁ ÐÌÅÔÅÎØ",
AVK although I have no idea how this might be translated:-(
Thomas That's a real pity as I value your comments and advices - can someone
Thomas help out
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 13:49:28 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 12:49:28 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hi Alexander,
Thomas on Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:01:48 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
PS But
Hi Alexander,
on Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:01:48 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
PS But this works not for the Subject line, unless somebody can tell
PS how to nest quotes. The normal way to replace the subject of a
PS message is
PS %SUBJECT=""%SUBJECT="Re: (This was the
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:12:55 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AVK snipped what in Russian we call "îÁ×ÅÌ ÔÅÎØ ÎÁ ÐÌÅÔÅÎØ",
AVK although I have no idea how this might be translated:-(
Thomas That's a real pity as I value your comments and advices - can someone
Thomas help out here and translate
Hi there!
On 18 Dec 99, at 14:41, Dirk Heiser wrote
about "Re: re's and regexp's":
Some Mailing list have the mailinglistname in the Subject. I give an
example:
Antwort: Re: [Palm] Antwort: [Palm] Re: [Palm] FlashPro und Palm Update
how can i strip these [Palm]
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:41:58 +0100, Dirk Heiser wrote:
I use this (Antwort|Antw|Re|Aw|FW) for searching. But one Problem i
have.
Some Mailing list have the mailinglistname in the Subject. I give an
example:
Antwort: Re: [Palm] Antwort: [Palm] Re: [Palm] FlashPro und Palm Update
SOT:
Hi Peter,
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:56:46 +0100, you wrote:
PS There are two reasons why this doesn't work:
PS 1. [ and ] have a special meaning inside regular expression (see in
PSthe Help under Regular Expressions Syntax (Basic)). You have to
PSwrite \[ and \]
OK, Time for me to read
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 18:26:16 +0100, Dirk Heiser wrote:
IMHO this example must be in the FAQ.
Wait, wait... FAQ means frequently Answered Questions (though some
people may prefer F. Asked Q.). Now this question has been answered
only once and does therefore not qualify ;-))
It is very useful
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:16:14 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
on Thursday, December 16, 1999, 7:44:46 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote:
PS The macros for stripping down all Re:'s and Aw:'s look like:
PS %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)"
PS %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ"
PS Re: %SUBPATT="3"
Hi Peter,
on Friday, December 17, 1999, 4:02:13 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote:
PS The normal way to replace the subject of a message is
PS %SUBJECT=""%SUBJECT="Re: (This was the original subject)"
Not quite. In Z notation, what you want is:
PS What's Z notation?
It's a mathematical way
Hi there!
On 17 Dec 99, at 10:16, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re[2]: re's and regexp's":
OK, let's see.
Let's:-)
PS %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)"
PS %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ"
PS Re: %SUBPATT="3"
I will trust you on this,
Hi there!
On 16 Dec 99, at 14:35, Jast wrote
about "Re[2]: re's and regexp's":
It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see
how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]: TB's regexps
currently don't allow replacing, only straightforward matching:-
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 03:19:27 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the
AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a
Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new recounter macros?
It's *very* easy indeed to convert
Hi Peter,
OK, let's see.
on Thursday, December 16, 1999, 7:44:46 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote:
PS The macros for stripping down all Re:'s and Aw:'s look like:
PS %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)"
PS %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ"
PS Re: %SUBPATT="3"
I will trust you on this, as I
Morning Alexander V. Kiselev,
It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see
how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]: TB's regexps
currently don't allow replacing, only straightforward matching:-(
From the new version announcement of 1.38:
[+]
Morning sirs,
I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the
AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a
Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new recounter macros?
A subject line with "AW: AW: AW: AW: AW:" or even "Re: AW: Re: AW: Re:
AW:" in front of
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Jast!
÷ 20:10, 15 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ
ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "re's and regexp's":
Morning sirs,
I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the
AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a
Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new
Hi there!
On 16 Dec 99, at 3:19, I wrote
about "Re: re's and regexp's":
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Jast!
÷ 20:10, 15 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ
ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "re's and regexp's":
Whoops, seems that it's really time to go to bed for me:-) My
apologies:-)
--
SY, Alex
(St.Pete
18 matches
Mail list logo