Re[4]: re's and regexp's

1999-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi tracer, on Monday, December 20, 1999, 3:47:05 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote: AVK snipped what in Russian we call "îÁ×ÅÌ ÔÅÎØ ÎÁ ÐÌÅÔÅÎØ", AVK although I have no idea how this might be translated:-( Thomas That's a real pity as I value your comments and advices - can someone Thomas help out

Re[3]: re's and regexp's

1999-12-20 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 13:49:28 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Monday, December 20, 1999, 12:49:28 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Thomas Hi Alexander, Thomas on Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:01:48 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: PS But

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

1999-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Alexander, on Friday, December 17, 1999, 11:01:48 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: PS But this works not for the Subject line, unless somebody can tell PS how to nest quotes. The normal way to replace the subject of a PS message is PS %SUBJECT=""%SUBJECT="Re: (This was the

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-20 Thread Peter Steiner
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:12:55 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: AVK snipped what in Russian we call "îÁ×ÅÌ ÔÅÎØ ÎÁ ÐÌÅÔÅÎØ", AVK although I have no idea how this might be translated:-( Thomas That's a real pity as I value your comments and advices - can someone Thomas help out here and translate

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-18 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 18 Dec 99, at 14:41, Dirk Heiser wrote about "Re: re's and regexp's": Some Mailing list have the mailinglistname in the Subject. I give an example: Antwort: Re: [Palm] Antwort: [Palm] Re: [Palm] FlashPro und Palm Update how can i strip these [Palm]

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-18 Thread Peter Steiner
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:41:58 +0100, Dirk Heiser wrote: I use this (Antwort|Antw|Re|Aw|FW) for searching. But one Problem i have. Some Mailing list have the mailinglistname in the Subject. I give an example: Antwort: Re: [Palm] Antwort: [Palm] Re: [Palm] FlashPro und Palm Update SOT:

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-18 Thread Dirk Heiser
Hi Peter, On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:56:46 +0100, you wrote: PS There are two reasons why this doesn't work: PS 1. [ and ] have a special meaning inside regular expression (see in PSthe Help under Regular Expressions Syntax (Basic)). You have to PSwrite \[ and \] OK, Time for me to read

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-18 Thread Peter Steiner
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 18:26:16 +0100, Dirk Heiser wrote: IMHO this example must be in the FAQ. Wait, wait... FAQ means frequently Answered Questions (though some people may prefer F. Asked Q.). Now this question has been answered only once and does therefore not qualify ;-)) It is very useful

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-17 Thread Peter Steiner
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:16:14 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: on Thursday, December 16, 1999, 7:44:46 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: PS The macros for stripping down all Re:'s and Aw:'s look like: PS %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)" PS %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ" PS Re: %SUBPATT="3"

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

1999-12-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Peter, on Friday, December 17, 1999, 4:02:13 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: PS The normal way to replace the subject of a message is PS %SUBJECT=""%SUBJECT="Re: (This was the original subject)" Not quite. In Z notation, what you want is: PS What's Z notation? It's a mathematical way

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-17 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 17 Dec 99, at 10:16, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re[2]: re's and regexp's": OK, let's see. Let's:-) PS %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)" PS %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ" PS Re: %SUBPATT="3" I will trust you on this,

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-17 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 16 Dec 99, at 14:35, Jast wrote about "Re[2]: re's and regexp's": It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]: TB's regexps currently don't allow replacing, only straightforward matching:-

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-16 Thread Peter Steiner
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 03:19:27 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new recounter macros? It's *very* easy indeed to convert

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

1999-12-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Peter, OK, let's see. on Thursday, December 16, 1999, 7:44:46 PM GMT+0800, Peter Steiner wrote: PS The macros for stripping down all Re:'s and Aw:'s look like: PS %SETPATTREGEXP="(?i)((Re|Aw)\:\s*)*(.*)" PS %REGEXPBLINDMATCH="%OSUBJ" PS Re: %SUBPATT="3" I will trust you on this, as I

Re[2]: re's and regexp's

1999-12-16 Thread Jast
Morning Alexander V. Kiselev, It's *very* easy indeed to convert AW: to Re:, but I cannot see how is it possible to convert AW: to Re[n]: TB's regexps currently don't allow replacing, only straightforward matching:-( From the new version announcement of 1.38: [+]

re's and regexp's

1999-12-15 Thread Jast
Morning sirs, I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new recounter macros? A subject line with "AW: AW: AW: AW: AW:" or even "Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW:" in front of

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-15 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Jast! ÷ 20:10, 15 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "re's and regexp's": Morning sirs, I just was wondering if regexps would allow to replace the AW:'s and whatnot generated by localized versions of LookOut by a Re[x] in a reply? Maybe together with the new

Re: re's and regexp's

1999-12-15 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 16 Dec 99, at 3:19, I wrote about "Re: re's and regexp's": ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, Jast! ÷ 20:10, 15 Dec 99, ÔÙ ÉÚ×ÏÌÉÌ ÓÏÞÉÎÉÔØ ÐÏÓÌÁÎÉÅ "re's and regexp's": Whoops, seems that it's really time to go to bed for me:-) My apologies:-) -- SY, Alex (St.Pete