Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-10-01 Thread MAU
Hello Konrad, >> The file I use is much simpler: > >> ([\s"']*)\*([\w\s\+/\-\.\:\\_']*)\*(\s)=\1\2\3 >> ([\s"']*)/([\w\s\+\-\.\:\\_']*)/(\s)=\1\2\3 >> ([\s"']*)_([\w\s\+/\-\.\:\\']*)_(\s)=\1\2\3 > >> and it works just the same for italics, bold and underline. > > Simpler, but has many shortcomings

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread George Mitchell
Konrad Szkudlarczyk wrote: KS> Since a few days Alexander S. Kunz and me exchanging mails about KS> file txt2html.regexps and undocumented feature in The Bat!. Wow, this is the coolest TB! trick I've seen in a good long while. Thanks to all for your efforts on this. I found I was a

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Konrad, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in KS> Below is corrected version of my txt2html.regexps file. Works /perfectly/ for me, thank you very much. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.85.03 with POP3 account & AntispamSniper 1.6.7.3 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Konrad Szkudlarczyk
egexp will not works. Below is corrected version of my txt2html.regexps file. First line, as always, is style: (\

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Konrad Szkudlarczyk
Hello, MAU. On the thirtieth September 2006 You wrote: > The file I use is much simpler: > ([\s"']*)\*([\w\s\+/\-\.\:\\_']*)\*(\s)=\1\2\3 > ([\s"']*)/([\w\s\+\-\.\:\\_']*)/(\s)=\1\2\3 > ([\s"']*)_([\w\s\+/\-\.\:\\']*)_(\s)=\1\2\3 > and it works just the same for italics, bold and underline. Sim

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Roelof, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in ASK>> Wimp. ;-) RO> That reminds me I've got this moderator template for abusive language RO> offenders. Please don't make me use that. That's it, you tell him! ;-) It's not bad language though is it? I thought a "wimp" was just a weedy person.

Re: Viewing RTV in Outbox [was: Re: txt2html.regexps]

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 12:17 PM, you wrote: >> I might learn to use Preview Pane in the Outbox. Would be faster >> than my other workaround. > I only use preview pane. That's of course because I use TB maximised and > have enough screen real estate. Ah. I use TB! taking

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Alexander, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:51:09 +0200GMT (30-9-2006, 15:51 , where I live), you wrote: ASK> Wimp. ;-) That reminds me I've got this moderator template for abusive language offenders. Please don't make me use that. -- Groetjes, Roelof WYSIWYG: see "Optical illusion" http://www.vo

Re: Viewing RTV in Outbox [was: Re: txt2html.regexps]

2006-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, > So, I brought my no-preview-pane prejudice with me to TB! and by the > time I realized that TB!'s preview pane is safe, I had the folder-view > and mailticker-view mode firmly ensconced in my visual-motor habits. > > Okay, I might learn to use Preview Pane in the Outbox. Would be fas

Viewing RTV in Outbox [was: Re: txt2html.regexps]

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 10:53 AM, you wrote: >> I have never been able to see RTV in the Outbox. > Have you tried viewing Outbox in the preview pane? It works here just > fine. Didn't know about that. Every day's a schoolday. :) Thanks for the info, Miguel. > If you nor

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, > I have never been able to see RTV in the Outbox. Have you tried viewing Outbox in the preview pane? It works here just fine. If you normally use folder view, this won't work for Outbox. Normally, when you double click on a message in the message list pane a folder view will open. F

SOT: unofficially moderating Alex [was Re: txt2html.regexps]

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
r to be officially moderated! :-P :-P >> Shaking with fear and cowering in a corner now ;-) > Wimp. ;-) Big bully! :whip: To all who didn't see the "txt2html.regexps" thread, in which we were testing it on TBOT: this is all in fun between Alexander and me. He actually c

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Richard Wakeford & everyone else, on 30-Sep-2006 at 14:55 you (Richard Wakeford) wrote: > I know. Strange, it was just that one time and Alexander ticked me off > too. The big bully :-( If that was your impression, I'm really sorry. I'll try to remember next time that you prefer to be offi

SOT: music for testing files with regular expressions [was Re: txt2html.regexps]

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 8:18 AM, you wrote, in re Mary Bull's comment on what Alexander Kunz remarked to her on TBOT when she said she was afraid of destroying her fragile Bat if she put the txt2html.regexps file into its directory: MB>> I told Alex to his fac

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in MB> I told Alex to his face that he's a bully, on TBOT, when he said I was MB> chicken for not wanting to put this file into my TB! directory to test MB> it. hehehe Going /slightly/ off topic but good for you. MB> It's okay. Let's go off somewhere b

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 7:55 AM, you wrote: MB>> It works. But, as with "*" and "/" the "_" _cannot be the last_ of the MB>> characters on the line. > Or if it's followed by a punctuation mark. Yes. Miguel figured it out. It must have a trailing space, and also a before

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Sebastian! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 7:10 AM, you wrote: > The Bat! has an internal engine allows you to automatically replace > | strings wilt other strings when you are using HTML viewer. This means > | that you can, for example, highlight specific words using schema like > |

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 7:09 AM, you wrote: M>>> It looks like it doesn't work if the second *, / or _ is the last M>>> character in a line. >> >> Interesting because I posted a response to Mary at the same blink that >> yours arrived and now, on reading it, I see my bold a

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in MB> It works. But, as with "*" and "/" the "_" _cannot be the last_ of the MB> characters on the line. Or if it's followed by a punctuation mark. MB> Your sig delimiter worked perfectly for me in this reply. I know. Strange, it was just that one ti

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 7:01 AM, you wrote: > Why can't I preview the message in the outbox when I save it as draft. I > could earlier and I'm still viewing with MicroEd as always? Thigs aren't > quite right here since I installed the file. Little gremlins are jumping > up

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 6:55 AM, you wrote: MB>> I'm intensely curious as to what I should type to make a word become MB>> bold, italic, or underlined. > use an asterisk before and after to make *bold*, a forward slash before > and after to make /italic/ and an underscore

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 6:55 AM, you wrote: >> With Konrad's, examples were posted, so I could at least verify by >> reading the message. >> I'm intensely curious as to what I should type to make a word become >> bold, italic, or underlined. > Switch to PTV and you will s

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Miguel! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 6:52 AM, you wrote: >> Of course, with your expressions now replacing Konrad's in my >> TB!/txt2html.regexps file, the posts containing the visible bold, >> italic, underline fonts, using Konrad's file, no longer show th

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Alexander, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in >> -- ASK> That sig delimiter is bröken. I know. Don't know why it happened either. :-( -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.85.03 with POP3 account & AntispamSniper 1.6.7.3 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpo

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello MAU, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in M> It looks like "my file" (which I didn't invent, BTW) doesn't work if the M> closing *, / or _ is not followed by a space. But don't ask me why. OK, thanks. For now I'm trying the more complicate one again just to see if it /works/. -- Regards, Ri

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Sebastian Murawski
Hello TheBat TBUDL List Members!!! .==[ Stanislav V. Mikov ]== | | The Bat! has an internal engine allows you to automatically replace | strings wilt other strings when you are using HTML viewer. This means | that you can, for example, highlight specific words using schema lik

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Richard, M>> It looks like it doesn't work if the second *, / or _ is the last M>> character in a line. > > Interesting because I posted a response to Mary at the same blink that > yours arrived and now, on reading it, I see my bold and _underscore_ > aren't showing because they're directly

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Richard Wakeford & everyone else, on 30-Sep-2006 at 10:56 you (Richard Wakeford) wrote: > It only cuts it just a /little/ bit but I agree, it's annoying all the > same. Surely there must be a way round the problem as, in my reply to > Alexander, AMEOL displayed /italics/ perfectly. The sol

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello MAU, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in M> It looks like it doesn't work if the second *, / or _ is the last M> character in a line. Interesting because I posted a response to Mary at the same blink that yours arrived and now, on reading it, I see my *bold* and _underscore_ aren't showing b

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Roelof, > Unfortunately your file only shows me underlined etc in quoted text, in > original text I'm seeing the markers, but not the desired effects. > What is it that I'm doing wrong? (Only on this topic of course, don't > give me the full list.) I don't know what may be the problem, I'm

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, > With Konrad's, examples were posted, so I could at least verify by > reading the message. > > I'm intensely curious as to what I should type to make a word become > bold, italic, or underlined. Switch to PTV and you will see the trick :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Esco

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in MB> I'm intensely curious as to what I should type to make a word become MB> bold, italic, or underlined. use an asterisk before and after to make *bold*, a forward slash before and after to make /italic/ and an underscore before and after to make _u

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Mary, > Of course, with your expressions now replacing Konrad's in my > TB!/txt2html.regexps file, the posts containing the visible bold, > italic, underline fonts, using Konrad's file, no longer show these. Maybe you have to re-start TB or at least switch from

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Roelof! On Saturday, September 30, 2006, 6:05 AM, you wrote: > What is it that I'm doing wrong? (Only on this topic of course, don't > give me the full list.) That's my modest moderator! ;) Roelof, I don't know what to type in my body text to test either Konrad's or Miguel's file. With K

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Miguel, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:14:47 +0200GMT (30-9-2006, 12:14 , where I live), you wrote: M> I've known about this txt2html.regexps since May 2005 or so, but I M> thought it was just an experimental thing for perhaps future M> functionality. The file I use is much simpler:

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Mary Bull
use it's been asked for enough by >> various users. > I've known about this txt2html.regexps since May 2005 or so, but I > thought it was just an experimental thing for perhaps future > functionality. The file I use is much simpler: > ([\s"']*)\*([\w\s\+/\-\.\:\\

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Richard, > Despite that little problem I'm very impressed with your efforts as reg > ex is way over my head and I can't understand why it's not been hard > coded into The Bat! main exe file because it's been asked for enough by > various users. I've kn

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Konrad Szkudlarczyk
file You are mixed two files, each of them making a serious changes in message. txt2html.regexps should be created very carefully. But - maybe You found a bug in my idea. Please, send Your file txt2html.regexps. My ambition is to create text styles steady as rock. -

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Alexander, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in ASK> Thats intentional. If you render italics in different sizes (to hide the ASK> slashes) there will be rendering errors if there's no whitespace. ASK> Therefore, the slashes are not hidden, only the asterisk and underscore. Well /Italics/ wer

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
miracle to me! :-) on 30-Sep-2006 at 00:15 you (Konrad Szkudlarczyk) wrote: > Copy this four lines to the text file called "txt2html.regexps" (not > "txt2html.regexps.txt"!), place that file in main TB's! directory, > turn on smileys and admire. For those who want to

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Richard Wakeford & everyone else, on 30-Sep-2006 at 01:20 you (Richard Wakeford) wrote: > In your example (and mine on looking at it in the outbox) the "/" are > still either side of the /italics/ word, even though the word is shown > in italics. The *bold* and _underline_ work fine though

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-29 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Konrad, On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 you wrote in KS> In the first line are words "color:white" - this must be Your KS> background's colour (Options / Preferences / "HTML/Windows editor" / KS> Item - Background), for example my colour is "color:#A7B3B4". "White" KS> is most common. KS> If You have

Re: txt2html.regexps

2006-09-29 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Konrad, Friday, September 29, 2006, 5:15:13 PM, you wrote: KS> When you're using the rich text viewer, TB uses an KS> optional file "txt2html.regexps" (in TB's program KS> dir) that contains parsing information in the form KS> of regular expressi

txt2html.regexps

2006-09-29 Thread Konrad Szkudlarczyk
Hello Since a few days Alexander S. Kunz and me exchanging mails about file txt2html.regexps and undocumented feature in The Bat!. Three days ago Alexander sent an info and this file to the TBOT. <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tbot/message/65065> My English is poor, so I simple copy