Hello Paul Berger,
zondag 1 februari 2004, 1:48:42, you wrote:
>> Anyone know where I can download v1.62r?
GI>> I can help you.
PB> Great!
PB> Is there a download site, or could you email it to
PB> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Sorry on the moment I do not have a site.
I wil sent you it by email.
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Friday, January 30, 2004, 4:09:59 PM, you wrote:
GI> Hello Paul Berger,
GI> vrijdag 30 januari 2004, 5:25:52, you wrote:
PB>> Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
PB>> Friday, January 30, 2004, 1:05:19 AM, you wrote:
> Anyone know where I can download v1.62r?
GI> I can help y
Hello Paul Berger,
vrijdag 30 januari 2004, 5:25:52, you wrote:
PB> Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
PB> Friday, January 30, 2004, 1:05:19 AM, you wrote:
Anyone know where I can download v1.62r?
I can help you.
--
Kind regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gerda Ilmer
Using The Ba
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Friday, January 30, 2004, 1:05:19 AM, you wrote:
>>> Anyone know where I can download v1.62r?
kg>> http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/
rg> Do you need a copy of the 1.49 X-Mas edition?
Thank you, but have 1.61, so no need.
--
Paul
-
>> Anyone know where I can download v1.62r?
kg> http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/
Do you need a copy of the 1.49 X-Mas edition?
--
Rich
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.h
>> Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently
>> kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r
> http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/
Also at
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
Elaine
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" info
Paul Berger wrote:
> Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and
> discarded 1.62r
http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/
(I assume this is OK since all require registration keys)
--
Ken Green
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
___
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 29, 2004, 6:04:02 AM, you wrote:
kg> Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> I can give you hope
Anyone know where I can download v1.62r?
I inadvertently kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r
--
Paul
-
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> I can give you hope
Thank you for your post. I have come to a workable solution for now,
while I anxiously await the stability and feature set that The Bat's
potential hints at.
--
Ken Green
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
_
Dear Jean,
@28-Jan-2004, 10:50 +0100 (28-Jan 09:50 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
>> is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3
>> first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP
>> accounts.
JS> you switch the accounts to
Hello Marck,
> is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3
> first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP
> accounts.
you switch the accounts to POP3 first!
How can I do that?
Thanks for help.
--
Best regards,
Jeanmail
On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, ken green wrote...
M>> These instructions were an integral part of the beta cycle for v2.
> If a Bat user purchases an upgrade to the Christmas Edition, THEY
> HAVE TO BE ON THE BETA LIST to get through the problems of
> installation?
Not entirely the case. The issu
quoting Marck D Pearlstone:
K>> If there were no such thing, why is there a CONVERSION PROCESS
K>> during the upgrade?
M> Pass - I didn't know they'd been added.
OK. We were coming from different places.
M> These instructions were an integral part of the beta cycle for v2.
If a Bat user purch
Dear Ken,
@27-Jan-2004, 18:14 -0600 (28-Jan 00:14 UK time) ken green [K] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
K>>> My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to Pop
K>>> conversion?)
>> Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing.
K> If there were no such thi
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
K>> My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to Pop
K>> conversion?)
> Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing.
If there were no such thing, why is there a CONVERSION PROCESS during
the upgrade? Are you talking about something else?
Dear Ken,
@27-Jan-2004, 17:35 -0600 (27-Jan 23:35 UK time) ken green [K] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to ken:
...
K> Would it help to set all accounts to POP and do another full
K> backup in 1.62? Then try to restore from that?
This is the optimum route.
...
K> One more thing... I seem to
Marten Gallagher wrote:
> But you did a backup and an EML export first didn't you.. so that's alright then ;-))
Backup yes. EML export no. Why EML export? Are you kidding? Create
over 60,000 EML files?
Full restore after reverting back to 1.62 seems to be OK.
--
Ken Green
Using The Bat!
Dear Ken,
@27-Jan-2004, 17:18 -0600 (27-Jan 23:18 UK time) ken green [K] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
K> My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to
K> Pop conversion?)
Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing. The
instructions for the upgrade wer
> Well, I decided to take the plunge and upgrade my desktop to v2.
UPDATE: uninstalled TB (leaving message base directories intact),
re-installed 1.62r, full restore...
everything seems back to normal.
Now...
I would *LIKE* to use the v2 I paid for. What is the best way to
upgrade to v2? Shou
On Tuesday, January 27, 2004 at 11:18:01 PM, you wrote:
> Well, I decided to take the plunge and upgrade my desktop to v2.
[snip]
> I was feeling good about The Bat again. I'm now going to have to
> spend time trying to get back to 1.62r and see if I can recover some
> messages
But you did
Well, I decided to take the plunge and upgrade my desktop to v2.
BAD IDEA
My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to Pop
conversion?) as well as a subfolder of that Inbox containing older
(but still important) messages.
Also, my main personal account was screwed up as w
21 matches
Mail list logo
