Dieter Hummel [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:35:14 +0100:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 at 06:13:32 [GMT +] Uwe Brockmann wrote:
I suspect that the problem (of having to call Outlook Express from
within The Bat! to read some e-mail) can only be solved by modifying
TB!'s source code.
It
Oleg Zalyalov [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon, 13 Mar 2000 16:03:14
+0400:
Why wait for 2.0 if the only thing that has to be done is to add eml
to supported extensions and treat .eml attachments the very same way
as .msg ones?
I agree.
--
Uwe Brockmann, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hello Uwe,
I'm able to view both of those attachments with TheBat!. OExpress
didn't open up for either one. I was also able to see the nested .html
file.
Best regards,
Justin
Windows NT 5.0 Build:2195
Tuesday, March 14, 2000 1:01:04 AM
God does not play dice with the universe.
-Albert
Hello Uwe,
On Tuesday, March 14, 2000 at 08:52:38 GMT + (which was 12:52 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
To illustrate the problem, I enclose two identical copies of a sample
.EML file that I created with Microsoft Outlook Express. The first
attachment is named
How-do-you-do,
Jast posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
J Morning Simon,
Good God! My fingers are groaning at the idea of it! And this is a valid
_shortcut_? :) 'carpophalangeal contortionism' perhaps?
J Hell yeah! I just tried it. But I managed with 2 hands ie
How-do-you-do,
Januk Aggarwal posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
JA I can view both of them using TB. No external editors/viewers. See
JA my sig for my version info.
Hows that then? I am also running 1.41 final but TB! does not open the eml
file when I try to view
Hello Simon,
On Tuesday, March 14, 2000 at 09:10:21 GMT + (which was 1:10 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
How-do-you-do,
Januk Aggarwal posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
JA I can view both of them using TB. No external editors/viewers. See
JA
Hello Uwe Brockmann,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:52:38 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 3:52:38 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Uwe Brockmann wrote:
TB! 1.41 can open "sample.msg" with its internal viewer but has to call
Outlook Express to open "sample.eml".
Uwe
How-do-you-do Januk,
You posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
scissor action
Hows that then? I am also running 1.41 final but TB! does not open the eml
file when I try to view it. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact
that OExpress and Outlook are not, and have
Hi tracer,
Thanks for your message.
When I attempted what you advised I got an Edit Mail Message window to no on in
particular with the .eml file as an attachment.
Best wishes, Roy Using the Bat 1.41 and Windows 95
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, March 14,
How-do-you-do list members,
Rather annoying gripe. TB! executable does not have any version info. I
use a shell extension that displays version info in context menu and no
info on TB! So I guess we are left to guess?
Slán anois,
Simon send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Januk,
On 14 March 2000 at 01:42:12 GMT -0800 (which was about 09:42 where I
live) Januk Aggarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "How to open
attached files with ".EML" file extensions?" and made these points:
Januk Aggarwal posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following
Hello Tracer,
you posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
t remove association eml to outlook express.
t click on this eml message andselect the bat as required program.
t It will now open the bat
t Tested on your email
Odd. First thing I tried but opened in TB! as
How-do-you-do,
I posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in reply to Tracers comments:
S Odd. First thing I tried but opened in TB! as attachment. Shall look at
S registry to make sure I have 100% rid myself of .eml and emlfile extensions.
Off course, if like me, you have Notepad open
How-do-you-do,
David Elliott posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DE Open up regedit and look eml if M$ Outlook or express has been loaded you
DE will see links into them from .eml
Funny how .eml seems to registered whether or not you ever installed
OExpress or Outlook!
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, Simon wrote to List about
TB! Version info:
S Rather annoying gripe. TB! executable does not have any version info. I
S use a shell extension that displays version info in context menu and no
S info on TB! So I guess we are left to
Hi Simon,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:03:13 +GMT (14/03/2000, 19:03 +0800GMT),
Simon wrote:
OZ Did you try to press Alt-F1 in TB!?
S Yes. I didn't mean that. I was actually talking about the properties page of
S an executable. The version tab to be precise. This tab can provide you with
S
Hello Simon,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:11:52 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 5:11:52 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
Hello Tracer,
you posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
t remove association eml to outlook express.
t click on this
Hello Roy Jackson,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:11:26 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 5:11:26 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Roy Jackson wrote:
Hi tracer,
Thanks for your message.
When I attempted what you advised I got an Edit Mail Message window to no on in
Hello Listmembers,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 at 11:03:13 [GMT +] Simon wrote:
application. I use a shell extension to view this info as it is
extremely quick, saves me having to open an application necessarily,
and usually provides better details. It is a particular gripe of mine
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:10:21 +, Simon wrote:
Hows that then? I am also running 1.41 final but TB! does not open the eml
file when I try to view it. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact
that OExpress and Outlook are not, and have never been, part of this
particular windows
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, Allie Martin wrote to Simon on TB!UDL about
How to open attached files with ".EML" file extensions?:
AM OExpress opens and views the .eml file on my system. :(
AM Probably it has something to do with the associations. Those that
How-do-you-do,
Thomas Fernandez posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
TF Hi Simon,
TF On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:03:13 +GMT (14/03/2000, 19:03 +0800GMT),
TF Simon wrote:
scissor action
TF What is that? A programme? Can you tell us which one?
Version Info free from
How-do-you-do,
Dieter posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH(guess it's version info, contained in a collection of useful utils)
Yes. It is indeed Version Info!
DHand can confirm that TB lacks this information.
Thanks.
Slán anois,
Simon send private
This message: 14/03/2000 13:13 GMT.
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 12:29:50 PM, Allie wrote:
AM OExpress opens and views the .eml file on my system. :(
AM Probably it has something to do with the associations. Those that are
AM able to open it in TB!. Do they have OExpress installed?
Hello,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, You wrote:
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, Allie Martin wrote to Simon on TB!UDL about
How to open attached files with ".EML" file extensions?:
AM OExpress opens and views the .eml file on my system. :(
AM Probably it has
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, Marek Mikus wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
How to open attached files with ".EML" file extensions?:
MM For EML extension is "Description of File Type":
MM "Microsoft MHTML Document 4.0".
MM Try to find it and change to TB.
I don't
On Monday, March 13, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PF Actually, Thomas, it's DEL. :P
You are right, and I didn't know that - supporting the original
poster's claim of missing documentation.
It's on the menu!
But DEL only deletes but does not go to the next message. Any ideas
here?
I
Hello Listmembers,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 at 18:33:10 [GMT +0400] Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
MM "Microsoft MHTML Document 4.0".
I don't have such file type.
I have such a file type - v 5.0 ...
MIME-type is message/rfc822 - and this type offers only .mht, .mhtml and
.nws file extensions and uses
Hi there!
On 14 Mar 00, at 8:52, Uwe Brockmann wrote
about "Re: How to open attached files with .EML...":
Hello guys, I'm not even trying to shed some light to the problem discussed
by you (although if I were you, I'd first of all compare the IE versions you've
got outta there;-) IMHO,
Hi there!
On 13 Mar 00, at 22:30, John Killeen wrote
about "Helo error":
SEND: server reports error. The response is: syntactically invalid HELO
argument(s).
Get hold of the SMTP session log and send it to RIT labs;-) I've got no other
ideas right now. Usually, the SMTP session is
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:22:47 +, Tony Boom wrote:
AM OExpress opens and views the .eml file on my system. :(
AM Probably it has something to do with the associations. Those that
AM are able to open it in TB!. Do they have OExpress installed?
Yes, I have Outlook Express and
Hello Januk,
Have you received the AtGuard setup info sent to your private address?
--
Best regards,
Istvánmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To
Hi Thomas,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 11:43:11 AM, you wrote:
TF What is that? A programme? Can you tell us which one?
S quick, saves me having to open an application necessarily, and usually
S provides better details. It is a particular gripe of mine that some authors
S don't include this
How-do-you-do,
Mark Aston posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
MA You actually don't need a utility to do this, if you right click the
MA file in Explorer and look at properties it will show you this
MA information, if it's there, in the case of TB! it's not.
Hallo Simon,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:36:17 + GMT (15.03.2000, 01:36 +0800 GMT),
Simon wrote:
MA You actually don't need a utility to do this, if you right click the
MA file in Explorer and look at properties it will show you this
MA information, if it's there, in the case of TB!
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Thomas,
TF So, which one is the choice for these details?
General rule in windows:
properties is always the bottom-one :-)
hth
--
Der Immer
Hallo Roel,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:59:06 +0100 GMT (15.03.2000, 01:59 +0800 GMT),
Roel wrote:
TF So, which one is the choice for these details?
R General rule in windows:
R properties is always the bottom-one :-)
R hth
Thanks, it did. :-)
And no version number for TB.
--
Cheers,
Thomas
Hello Tony,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 2:22:47 PM, you wrote:
I do have here an attachment that has been sent to me with a .ged
extension that I can't open if anyone knows what program that's
associated with?
That must be a GEDCOM-file.
All genealogy programs have their own ways of
Hello Bat'ler! ;-)
I have got a macro-problem:
Using the macro
%RETURNPATH=""%RETURNPATH="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the
Return-Path in the header is setting to "Return-Path:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]", that is right. But if I save the
message (as draft for example), change the message and save it again,
Hi Simon,
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 5:36:17 PM, you wrote:
MA You actually don't need a utility to do this, if you right click the
MA file in Explorer and look at properties it will show you this
MA information, if it's there, in the case of TB! it's not.
S I take it you are not a
Hi there!
On 14 Mar 00, at 20:26, Mark Aston wrote
about "Re: TB! Version info":
S I take it you are not a big fan of speedy little shell extensions Mark :)
Well since I installed W2k on my 166 *nothing* could be
described as even remotely 'speedy' :-) so I tend not to
This message: 14/03/2000 23:31 GMT.
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 6:35:42 PM, Jan-Arild wrote:
JAL Hello Tony,
JAL That must be a GEDCOM-file.
JAL All genealogy programs have their own ways of storing/organizing data.
Hi Jan.
You are very correct and my utmost thanks. My wife has just
Hello!
Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 18:44, Alexander V. Kiselev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SEND: server reports error. The response is: syntactically invalid HELO
argument(s).
AVK Get hold of the SMTP session log and send it to RIT labs;-)
You want to say "SMTP server log", aren't you?
Hint: if
Hello Simon,
Count me in.
A small gripe but still very useful information when you have several
copies of beta programs. Often the point build is not enough.
See the enclosed gif. TB is not displaying Product name or version
all the other programs do (well almost Gravity doesn't know its
Hello Allie,
Yup. I have OExpress installed (by default.. that's win2k for ya) but
TheBat! still opens those attachments..
Best regards,
Justin
Windows NT 5.0 Build:2195
Tuesday, March 14, 2000 5:28:58 PM
Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age 18.
-Albert Einstein-
How-do-you-do,
Paul posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
P Count me in.
OK. After 3... :)
P A small gripe but still very useful information when you have several
P copies of beta programs. Often the point build is not enough.
That was exactly the point I was making.
P
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 01:05:56 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 15, 2000, 5:05:56 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Hi there!
On 14 Mar 00, at 20:26, Mark Aston wrote
about "Re: TB! Version info":
S I take it you
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 20:15:35 +0100GMT (15/03/2000, 03:15 +0800GMT),
Michael Wieczorek wrote:
MW Using the macro
MW %RETURNPATH=""%RETURNPATH="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the
MW Return-Path in the header is setting to "Return-Path:
MW [EMAIL PROTECTED]", that is right. But if I save the
MW
Hello Paul,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 01:17:00 + GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 15, 2000, 8:17:00 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Paul wrote:
Hello Simon,
Count me in.
A small gripe but still very useful information when you have several
copies of beta programs. Often the
Hi Simon,
On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 at 21:15:52 GMT + (which was 1:15 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
How-do-you-do,
I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
Hello Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris),
Responding to your article on Wednesday, March 15, 2000 at 03:51:34 GMT
+0300 (which was 15/03/2000 7:51 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
AVK Actually, this might be, for example:
AVK EHLO default
AGSAA ^
AGSAA ...And this is an incorrect (at
Hello tracer,
Monday, March 13, 2000, 6:11:58 PM, you wrote:
Now, however, the thing is working using ftp.ritlabs.com with my
ordinary anonymous login, and email as password. Perhaps there was
something amiss with a server. I'm not sure yet, but I may have been
using a different SMTP
Hello,
I am trying to set up a good printing template for my messages in
TB. Right now I have the default,
-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: %FromName %FromAddr
To: %ToName %ToAddr
Date: %ODateEn %OTimeLongEn
Subject:
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Wednesday, March 15, 2000, Januk Aggarwal wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
Printing Template:
JA Having looked at my options in the Macros, it would seem that I
JA need to set up some fancy Regular Expressions. Does anyone have a
JA template already set up
Hi Oleg,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:25:23 +0400GMT (15/03/2000, 14:25 +0800GMT),
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
JA Having looked at my options in the Macros, it would seem that I
JA need to set up some fancy Regular Expressions. Does anyone have a
JA template already set up that does what I'm looking
Hello users,
Every once in a while we want to remind you all of all the things
related to TBUDL/TBBETA.
TBUDL/TBBETA FAQ:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat
Wish List (maintained by Konstantin G.):
http://www.konstantin-online.de/bat/
TBUDL list archive:
http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
TBBETA list
The following people can open .eml file attachments with TB! 1.41's
internal viewer without any problems:
(1) Justin D. Paine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], NT 5.0 Build 2195
(2) Januk Aggarwal, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Win 98 4.10 Build A
(3) Tony Boom, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Win 98
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Wednesday, March 15, 2000, Uwe Brockmann wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
How to open attached files with ".EML" file extensions?:
UB If you think that Alexander V. Kiselev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has the
UB right idea, please feel free to state your version of
59 matches
Mail list logo
