Re: Deleting HTML attachment

Hi David, on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:33 +0100 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 19:05 +0100 GMT where I live) David Elliott wrote: %TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR' I tried this with all lists, but with my German lists I don't have success with it! -- Best regards, Roland

Re: Deleting HTML attachment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roland, On 15 April 2001 at 13:01:00 +0200 (which was 12:01 where I live) Roland Burger wrote to David Elliott on TBUDL and made these points: RB on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:33 +0100 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 19:05 RB +0100 GMT where I live)

Re: Deleting HTML attachment

Hi Marck, on Sun, 15 Apr 2001 12:21:17 +0100 GMT (which was 15.04.2001, 13:21 +0100 GMT where I live) Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: On 15 April 2001 at 13:01:00 +0200 (which was 12:01 where I live) Roland Burger wrote to David Elliott on TBUDL and made these points: RB on Sat, 14 Apr

Re: Change reply-to for a folder - OT

On 15-04-2001 at 05:38, Thomas kindly wrote: moi: Douglas: KS Gouglas, we were joking. Seriously. "Gouglas"? Oh well. What's that stuff you're smoking? Ordinary tobacco. I already privately apologised to Douglas. Do you have the necessary expert participation lined up? Yes, in a police

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On April 14, 2001, at 8:19:43 PM, Maurice Snellen wrote: ACM Some of the editors great formatting routines such as the ACM reformatting of quoted material will lead to this sort of ACM limitation. Sorry I'm coming in late on this thread, but could

Re: Search for No Sender messages

On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 at 20:12:36 +0400 jlaikan wrote: I don't really need the feature I mentioned. I posted the message was for 2 reasons:- 1) I have read in this list that someone proposed to stop spam by setting filters to automatically deleted messages with No Sender. As you've known,

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 at 10:42:36 -0400 dMb wrote: I'm happy to report that moving from my Win 95 to Win2k machine was very easy. Good. All I did was back up the registry settings and then copied the entire TB! directory structure onto a zip disk. Insert zip disk into new machine, copy to

Re: TB temp files mystery -- an experiment

On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 at 16:55:12 -0400 Tim Musson wrote: ML even when the number of messages to download is large, I don't ML always see temp files created. One question, what dir are you monitoring? You say the "temp" dir, but which "temp" dir? I guess you didn't follow the other thread

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

On April 15, 2001, at 8:53:22 AM, Ming-Li wrote: Insert zip disk into new machine, copy to same directory structure and restore the registry settings. I've performed that same routine a number of times, and have yet to run into any kind of problem. :o) Wait a minute. You didn't mention

Re: TB temp files mystery -- an experiment

On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 at 09:23:24 -0700 Ming-Li wrote: I'll get a real-time monitoring tool to try again. Ok, I installed a real-time file activity monitor (freeware) from System Internals, and indeed for every received message there's a temp file created in the temp dir. They're all closed and

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick! On Sunday, April 15, 2001 at 6:17:33 PM you wrote: The only thing that has stopped working is the spell checker. Are there any error messages given? What exactly do you mean by "stopped working"? It shouldn't have if you moved the

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 at 09:17:33 -0700 Nick Andriash wrote: The difference? Upon installation, TB make changes/additions to the registry. Most, *but not all*, of them are under the HKCU...\RIT tree, as explained several times on the list. Yes, but he did mention that he restored the Registry

Re[2]: Search for No Sender messages

Hello Ming-Li, Sunday, April 15, 2001, 7:44:57 PM, you wrote: ML As you've known, you can do that with filters. You don't have to ML delete/move them if you don't want to. You may assign them a color ML group so you can easily tell them apart. Also, you may search across ML folders/accounts

Re: Search for No Sender messages

Hi jlaikan, On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, at 21:00:26 +0400 you wrote: The problem is that Filters use InBox Outbox as source folders, but my incoming "no sender" messages have already been moved automatically to other folders using "Subject" as filtering string. That's not a problem at all, you

Sending to a address book group

In Outlook Express I could just enter a group name in the To: field, and it was automatically expanded to the group members on sending. I cannot get this to work in The Bat. If I just enter the address book group name, the message is sent using that name, and rejected from my ISP on

Newbie

Hi, I just discovered TB! yesterday. I had been using Pegasus for years and a few months ago, I began to look for a mail program that would have better HTML reading capabilities than Pegasus. At that time, I switched to Poco but was getting tired of the "invalid pointers faults" etc and realized

Re: good bye, for now

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, at 10:21:10 -0700 (1:21 PM where I live) Ming-Li wrote to TBBETA and made these comments: ML I'm sorry to say good bye to all of you, Good Luck Ming-Li and take care. Looking forward to your return as you are a

Re: Sending to a address book group

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ottar, On 15 April 2001 at 19:39:00 +0200 (which was 18:39 where I live) Ottar Grimstad wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: OG If I just enter the address book group name, the message is sent OG using that name, and rejected

Re: Newbie

Hello Anne-Sophie, Sunday, April 15, 2001, 8:05:22 PM, you wrote: ASH I just discovered TB! yesterday. I had been using Pegasus for ASH years and a few months ago, I began to look for a mail program ASH that would have better HTML reading capabilities than Pegasus. At I downloaded and tested

Re: Newbie

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anne-Sophie, On 15 April 2001 at 20:05:22 +0200 (which was 19:05 where I live) Anne-Sophie Hombert wrote to TBUDL and made these points: ASH ... So I installed and played with TB! yesterday and found it so ASH fantastic that I registered it

Re: TB temp files mystery -- an experiment

Hello, Ok, I installed a real-time file activity monitor (freeware) from System Internals, I just did that myself as well. Now I'm rather irritated... Scanning only TB! I get the following results/errors: Request: FASTIO_READ, file is messages.tbi, Result is SUCCESS. Ok, sound good. Then:

Re: TB temp files mystery -- an experiment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexander, On 15 April 2001 at 20:45:40 +0200 (which was 19:45 where I live) Alexander Levenetz wrote to Ming-Li and made these points: AL Then: FASTIO_WRITE, file is messages.tbi, Result is FAILURE - what the AL heck is that? What does

Re[2]: Sending to a address book group

Hello Marck, Sunday, April 15, 2001, 8:24:26 PM, you wrote: MDP Yes there is. TB uses two methods for this. Enter a part match MDP for a first name and use Ctrl+Plus to expand the name from the MDP address book. Press it again to find the next match. The second MDP method is to type the handle

Re: Sending to a address book group

Hello Ottar, On Sunday, April 15, 2001 19:39:00 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Sending to a address book group': Ottar In Outlook Express I could just enter a group name in the To: field, Ottar and it was automatically expanded to the group members on sending. I Ottar

Address Book Templates

Hello TBUDL: I have been advised not to use folder templates, but instead use address boook templates, so I have experimented a little with these. It seem that if I have made a template for a Address Book Group, that template will be used also for individual mails to members of this

Re[2]: Newbie

Hi Marck, MDP When it comes to HTML message display, TB will *not* display MDP out-of-line images - it has no browser GET capabilities. Nor will it MDP execute scripts. Other than this, the HTML preview is not too bad at MDP all (if you like that kind of thing ;-) ). Don't be afraid ;-) I do

Re[3]: Newbie

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, I'm using TB! for a couple of weeks, and I greatly enjoy it. Almost every other day there is something new to discover. Now I found this list. This seems to be another good discovery... :o) On Sunday, April 15, 2001 at 22:45 (my local

Re: Address Book Templates

Hello Ottar, On Sunday, April 15, 2001 22:40:15 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Address Book Templates': Ottar I have been advised not to use folder templates, but instead use Ottar address boook templates, so I have experimented a little with these. Ottar It seem

Re: Synchronization How-To

Hello Ethan, as I don't use the Sync function myself, I am forwarding your message to the list. Some kind soul will help you out. Cheers, Thomas. Monday, April 16, 2001, 6:27:24 AM, you wrote: EJM The Desk E-Mail Correspondence EJM From:Ethan J. Mings, Principal EJM Date:4/15/2001

Re: Address Book Templates

Hi Jan, On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 18:49:47 -0400GMT (16/04/2001, 06:49 +0800GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR TB! usese the following precedence: This is correct. But with all the hype about the templates, I don't know why people rely on software more than on their human ability to decide things. An

Re: Address Book Templates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:11:13 +0800, Thomas thoughtfully wrote the following: JR TB! usese the following precedence: T This is correct. But with all the hype about the templates, I don't T know why people rely on software more than on their human

take me off Please

Please unsubscibe me my address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ThanksGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Unsubscribe:

Re: take me off Please

Hi mark, @ 10:51:40 PM on 4/15/2001, mark b wrote: mb Please unsubscibe me my address is:[EMAIL PROTECTED] No. __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[3]: Killing dupes

Hello David, Friday, April 13, 2001, 8:11:21 PM, you wrote: Which leads me to a question: how *is* it possible to have same message-ID on several messages?! I'm dumbstruck! There are even messages with no IDs at all. Recently I imported messages from Eudora 3, several of which were