-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam
On 21 July 2002 at 19:12:29 +0100 (which was 19:12 where I live) Adam Rykala
graced us with these comments
...
...electronic mail sent to a large number of recipients
define [a large number of recipients]
Is it 10, 100, 1000. They
Hi David,
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, at 19:48:49 [GMT +0100] (19:48 where I live) you wrote:
DE Hi Adam
DE On 21 July 2002 at 19:12:29 +0100 (which was 19:12 where I live) Adam Rykala
DE graced us with these comments
DE ...
...electronic mail sent to a large number of recipients
DE
On Sunday, July 21, 2002, 7:21:29 PM, Douglas Hinds wrote:
Use the Mail Dispatcher. Any message containing the string and
string location you indicated for selective download will have the
Receive box unchecked and (if you've set delete from server
immediately) will have the Delete box
The problem seems to be bigger than I supposed.
Some of the italian user are looking around to finde any indication
abut filteringg TheBat!
For the moment one of them find this:
http://www.kr.freebsd.org/internal/spam/header_checks
If I understood exactly this is the spam filter
Hi Alberto,
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, at 23:12:34 [GMT +0200] (22:12 where I live) you wrote:
AA The problem seems to be bigger than I supposed.
AA Some of the italian user are looking around to finde any indication
AA abut filteringg TheBat!
AA For the moment one of them find this:
AA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 22 July 2002 at 9:12 a.m. Alberto wrote:
AA The problem seems to be bigger than I supposed.
AA Some of the italian user are looking around to finde any
AA indication abut filteringg TheBat! For the moment one of them find
AA this:
AA
Hi Carren,
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, at 09:15:27 [GMT +1200] (22:15 where I live) you wrote:
CS I can't believe this! This kind of filtering on email client is
CS ridiculous. Geez even those of us who think OE is the pits, don't
CS stoop to these levels!
CS I have never
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 22:17:47 +0100GMT (21/07/2002,
23.17 +0100GMT),
Adam Rykala wrote:
AA If I understood exactly this is the spam filter policy of a korean
AA user group.
Oh the irony..
:-)
The only good think is that if we know the problem we can solve: is
not
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 22:24:56 +0100GMT (21/07/2002,
23.24 +0100GMT),
Adam Rykala wrote:
Well I haven't had a single message bounced or refused yet while using the Bat
and I've got a few thousand under my belt.
The fact that the rest of us haven't noticed before is proof enough of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Douglas,
@21 July 2002, 16:59 -0500 (22:59 UK time) Douglas Hinds [DH] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Carren Stuart:
CS I have never received *any* spam from anyone using TB!
DH I have.
You should all (not just Douglas)
Hello Carren Stuart,
In Reference to your Posting on Sunday, July 21 2002 at 02:15 PM PDT,
I can't believe this! This kind of filtering on email client is
ridiculous. Geez even those of us who think OE is the pits, don't
stoop to these levels!
It is probably because TB has the Mass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 22 July 2002 at 9:59 a.m. Douglas wrote:
CS I have never received *any* spam from anyone using TB!
DH I have.
CS and I can't imagine that anyone using it would use it for
CS spamming purposes.
DH A better class of spammer, no doubt.
Sunday, July 21, 2002, 3:38:03 PM, Alberto wrote:
AA :-)
AA The only good think is that if we know the problem we can solve: is
AA not possible to contact every ISP and ML service to avoid TheBat!
AA filtering but as we know that some of them use this stupid policy we
AA can understand why one
On Sunday, July 21, 2002, 5:10:59 PM, N. Sean Timm wrote:
NST Since we can't eliminate all of the stupid people, this just means we
NST need a new feature from The Bat!...X-Mailer header modification... :)
No... just a good hex editor?;-)
Artmailto:[EMAIL
Hello Julian,
On Sunday, July 21, 2002, 2:49:11 PM, you wrote:
JBL What I would like is an addition in the log file for the
JBL account to say that x messages were deleted without downloading
JBL - at the moment, it only tells me the number of messages on the
JBL server, the number of new
Hello Carren,
On Sunday, July 21, 2002, 4:15:27 PM, you wrote:
CS I have never received *any* spam from anyone using TB!
I have.
CS and I can't imagine that anyone using it would use it for
CS spamming purposes.
A better class of spammer, no doubt.
DH
Hello Marck,
Marck wrote:
MDP ... I've seen spam come through with The Bat! (1.52f)
MDP Business as the X-Mailer and an X-MS-Priority header.
*Is* there a TB! Business version? I DO recall seeing that on the
spam I saw with TB! mentioned as the mailer in the header.
MDP Advanced Mass Sender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Douglas,
@22 July 2002, 19:25 -0500 (01:25 UK time) Douglas Hinds [DH] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D
Pearlstone:
MDP ... I've seen spam come through with The Bat! (1.52f) Business
MDP as the X-Mailer and an
Hello Marck,
you wrote:
MDP If you get a spam that has this header:
MDP X-Mailer: The Bat! (1.52f) Business
MDP it, incongruously will also have an X-MS-Priority header. TB only
MDP uses X-Priority.
Only six of the 21 spam messages lack X-MSMail-Priority and none of
them are hard core spam.
Sunday, July 21, 2002, 6:34:34 PM, you wrote:
DH Only six of the 21 spam messages lack X-MSMail-Priority and none
DH of
DH them are hard core spam. They're spam for insurance or vacations
DH or
DH something equally innocuous. The nastiest ones all have the
DH X-MSMail-Priority or
20 matches
Mail list logo
