Thursday, May 19, 2005, 12:23:12 PM, Andrew wrote:
AC I'm afraid I've been guilty of changing the subject of a thread by
AC bringing this up in my original post, for which I apologise; I'm
AC rather a beginner in these things. Am I allowed to revert to the
AC original question raised by Allister?
Hello Steve.
--On 18 May 2005 22:21 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam
filters:
I use Spamcop and can only whitelist senders not receivers and the
sender is yourself not the bat.
In that case may I suggest http://www.firetrust.com/
--
Tony.
M.
pgpyNHfY2S1CE.pgp
Description:
Hello Alexander.
--On 18 May 2005 23:30 +0200 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters:
Well, the Sender of the list messages, according to the headers I'm
seeing, is Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED], while the From
field has the address of the message author.
Exactly what I said, add [EMAIL
Hello Steve.
--On 18 May 2005 22:21 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam
filters:
I use Spamcop and can only whitelist senders not receivers and the
sender is yourself not the bat.
I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the Download Trial link
and it took me to the
Hello Tony,
-- just now (on 05/19/2005 at 09:32) you noticed:
In that case may I suggest http://www.firetrust.com/
BAD Sig!
-- just now (on 05/19/2005 at 10:17) you wrote:
Exactly what I said, add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the white list if that's
the sender.
BAD Sig!
-- just now (on
On Mon, 16 May 2005 07:58:12 -0500, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
No help, but misery loves company. ;) I am getting the same message.
Seems to be a Bayesit problem as the error is reported in the bayesit.log
at the end of the session.
19.05.2005 08:57:25
TBP_Finalize function: exception C005 at
Hello,
I have a filter that creates messages that should be sent to
SpamCop, nothing special about it (included in end of mail).
It responds only to the hotkey ALT-CTRL-S (AltGr-S).
I have copied and pasted this filter onto three of my accounts and
attached the same hotkey to all of
On Thu, 19 May 2005 09:41:35 +0100, Barry wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 07:58:12 -0500, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
No help, but misery loves company. ;) I am getting the same message.
Seems to be a Bayesit problem as the error is reported in the bayesit.log
at the end of the session.
19.05.2005
ON Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 11:11:36 PM, you wrote:
IAW My notebook has an ATI Radeon 9600 series card with 64 MB RAM running
IAW at 1400 x 1050. I have no reduction in graphics hardware acceleration.
IAW I don't believe it is a graphics card problem as my desktop has a
IAW VideoExcel card with 8
ON Thursday, May 19, 2005, 11:09:49 AM, you wrote:
B I suspect that the problem was due to the fact that my plugin was not
B located in the default place. I have my Mail Folder on a different
B partition which is where the Bayesit Plugin was also located.
Non-conformity will always be punished
I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the Download Trial link
and it took me to the Mailwasher Pro download page.
It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612
Tony Boom:
http://www.firetrust.com/
I see that...
...MailWasher is still suggesting that you should bounce back unwanted
email to the spammer so it looks as if your email address is not valid.
That feature is a big problem, and I can't believe it is still in there!
--
St
Steve Lee:
It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
Yes - spamcop.com is is someone trying to trade on SpamCop.Net's
trademark and reputation. spamcop.com's marketing tactics are down-
right un-sporting. Gotta ask yourself what FirstTrust's deal is in
this...
--
St
Dear Steve,
@19-May-2005, 11:27 Steve Lee [SL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Tony:
I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the Download Trial link
and it took me to the Mailwasher Pro download page.
SL It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
I think you'll find that
@19-May-2005, 11:49 Marck D Pearlstone [MP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Steve:
MP @19-May-2005, 11:27 Steve Lee [SL] in
MP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Tony:
I just visited the Spamcop web site, I clicked the Download Trial link
and it took me to the Mailwasher Pro download page.
SL It
Hello Steve.
--On 19 May 2005 11:27 +0100 you wrote about Re[4]: Proposal for spam
filters:
It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
No difference at all! Quoting direct from spamcop.net:
SpamCop is the premier service for reporting spam.
You still didn't say what software you
Hello St.
--On 19 May 2005 12:26 +0200 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters:
That feature is a big problem, and I can't believe it is still in there!
It's a feature I never use. You don't need Mailwasher to bounce mail
though, The Bat is more than capable of doing that on it's own
Hello Marck.
--On 19 May 2005 11:49 +0100 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters:
Spamcop do filter spam for you, but only if you use a spamcop.net
email address, which you are not doing, so it's not that.
I quite like the idea of that for 16 quid a year, what do you think?
--
Hello Marck.
--On 19 May 2005 11:57 +0100 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters:
No Marck - it was Tony's mistake.
Yes, sorry my mistake.
But I can't find where they define their whitelisting stuff.
How odd, you gave the impression you used it all the time for allowing
certain
I think you'll find that was Tony's typo. His description is of
spamcop.net.
Not if Mailwasher is involved it wasn't.
Spamcop (as in spamcop.net) has no association with Mailwasher whatsoever that
I am aware
of.
Spamcop do filter spam for you, but only if you use a spamcop.net
email
How odd, you gave the impression you used it all the time for allowing
certain addresses through that were wrongly classified as spam? Isn't that
why you wanted a [TAG] in the subject line, to make it easier for you to
enter those addresses into your spamcop whitelist?
No Tony that was me
I quite like the idea of that for 16 quid a year, what do you think?
I have used them commercially for a few years and find it is a great
system. You have a certain level of tweaking to adjust the
balance between false reporting and getting too many spams. Until I
joined this group (and it
You still didn't say what software you use for initially trapping spam? I
can't find Spamcop software anywhere. Could you please tell me where to
download it from?
Spamcop.net is a service not software
Spamcop.com sell Mailwasher software
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Dear Tony,
@19-May-2005, 12:41 Tony Boom [TB] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TB How odd, you gave the impression you used it all the time for allowing
TB certain addresses through that were wrongly classified as spam? Isn't that
TB why you wanted a [TAG] in the subject line, to make it easier
1.- Open Customise and for 'Select container:' select 'Main Form'. Then
click on down pointing arrow to the far right to expand Main Form and
select 'Message List Pop-up Menu'. This will show on the right window
'Current items' the context menu that you get when you right click on
the
Hello Marck.
--On 19 May 2005 13:02 +0100 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters:
pssst - wrong person! I was replying to myself, correcting my faulty
research. It is Steve Lee who uses the Spamcop mail filtering, not me!
So ... sorry ... your mistake it remains ;-)
Oooops, sorry
Dear Steve,
@19-May-2005, 13:17 Steve Lee [SL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
1.- Open Customise and for 'Select container:' select 'Main Form'. Then
click on down pointing arrow to the far right to expand Main Form and
select 'Message List Pop-up Menu'. This will show on the right
Hello,
I've an odd problem with running The Bat and NAV2005 and I'm wondering
if anyone has any ideas or come across the problem before.
I upgraded NAV2000 to NAV2005 the other day for some strange reason
which I cannot yet fathom out!*
On starting up TB the splash screen opens followed by the
Hello Steve.
--On 19 May 2005 13:04 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: Proposal for spam
filters:
Until I
joined this group (and it will settle down) I had usually 1 or 2 spams
and maybe 1 false report out of 500 genuine spams.
I might give that a go I think.
Am I right in thinking I can use it
Hello MAU,
on Thu, 19 May 2005 01:56:30 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote:
M ,- [ QT1 ]
M | %CLEAR
M | This QT will work as expected.
M `-
M but
M ,- [ QT2 ]
M | %CLEAR%-
M | This one will do what you are seeing.
M `-
as of my tests it also depends on WHERE you write the
I am using v3.5 (but not right now). In 3.0.1.33 I have different sounds set up
to indicate the arrival of mail in my accounts. This does not appear to work
correctly in 3.5. When mail arrives, all the sounds are the same as the one set
in my first account. If I turn off the sounds in my first
Hello Allister,
A reminder of what Allister Jenks typed on:
May 19, 2005 at 19:25:45 GMT +1200
AJ Maybe, just maybe, they will look at my other group bug if they look at
AJ this one. I've been putting up with that one since 1.62 or thereabouts!
AJ Do so few people use groups that it isn't
Am I right in thinking I can use it for an NTL account and then forward all
that to my boomclan account?
Yes that is right. Redirect your NTL stuff to your spamcop.net
account then either use their POP to collect *all* your emails or else
instruct spamcop to forward to your other account.
I
It was Miguel, but I can tell you anyway. Right click any old toolbar
and choose Customise there.
Silly me. I wrote to Miguel and gave your name.
Thanks for the help.
--
Best wishes,
Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612
Tony Boom:
[MailWasher's Mail Bouncer] is a feature I never use.
Good!
My point is that the software suggest and promotes a feature that adds
to the spam problem: Say that a spam is misusing your address as Sender.
Would you dislike Mailwasher to accuse you of spamming and thus
I've noticed a slight difference in the way my templates are handled
in v3.5. All appears well in MicroEd. However, if I use html or Windows
editors, inserting any template with a %cursor macro places a garbage
character where the cursor is supposed to be and the cursor appears at
the end of the
St:
In the stricked sense...
Huh...that misspell was loud and embarrasing... :/
--
St
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello fellow tbudl subscribers!
Stuart Hemming put his TB! list accounts on hold for awhile, and now
he can't get them back. He sent me a PM yesterday to ask if there were
traffic and if I had been seeing his posts. I said yes to traffic and
no to Stuart H. posts and suggested he ask Marck by PM
Hi Jon
JP in 3.5. When mail arrives, all the sounds are the same as the one set in my
JP first account. If I turn off the sounds in my first account, all sounds for
JP arriving mail do not trigger even though they are set up correctly in the
JP other accounts.
Can't confirm here. Have
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 9:55:04 AM, Natasha V Pearce wrote:
NVP Hi Jon
JP in 3.5. When mail arrives, all the sounds are the same as the one set in
my
JP first account. If I turn off the sounds in my first account, all sounds
for
JP arriving mail do not trigger even though they are set
Hello David.
--On 19 May 2005 12:56 +0100 you wrote about Norton Antivirus 2005 and
connection centre startup problem.:
I've an odd problem with running
Don't tell me, your knees knock together, your toes turn in and it chafes
the tops of your legs?
--
Tony.
M.
pgp7zetDQaat1.pgp
I'm just curious...
With peace,
Henry
--
Henry L. Lefkowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When all that you feel are sharp teeth of an eel, that's a moray.
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Henry,
Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 7:56:16 PM, you wrote:
H I'm just curious...
Nope.
--
__ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
)(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons:
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 9:46:58 AM, Jon Polish wrote:
JP in 3.5. When mail arrives, all the sounds are the same as the
JP one set in my first account.
I don't seem to be getting sounds at all with 3.5
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
Hallo Henry,
On Wed, 18 May 2005 21:56:16 -0400GMT (19-5-2005, 3:56 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
HL I'm just curious...
No, but it took gmail an awful long time to get the message to the
list.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
0100111011010110000111 - Well, computers think it's funny.
The Bat!
Hello Peter Hampf everyone else,
on 19-Mai-2005 at 14:24 you (Peter Hampf) wrote:
as of my tests it also depends on WHERE you write the %clear%- sequence.
If it appears anywhere inside the QT or - as in my case - at the end, it works
like expected and documented. If it appears at the top of
Good evening Alexander,
on Thu, 19 May 2005 18:23:42 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote:
ASK Surprising that the position of %CLEAR in the QT is not important... not
ASK very logic if you ask me.
That has been always true, AFAICR.
ASK Should I file a bug report?
Regarding the %clear%-
Hello TBUDL,
is there a macro or QT to set the editor type (text, rich, html) on a per
folder / contact / group / account / ... base?
--
Regards,
Ralph
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using
Hello Steve,
Hi Marck,
I just got some time to do this then came to a grinding halt when I
could not find where to Open Customise. Your assistance here would
be greatly appreciated.
Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has
already given you an answer.
--
Best
Hello Peter,
as of my tests it also depends on WHERE you write the %clear%- sequence.
If it appears anywhere inside the QT or - as in my case - at the end, it works
like expected and documented. If it appears at the top of the QT it shows the
bug (I think it is a bug) as described by
Hello Fredrik,
I have copied and pasted this filter onto three of my accounts and
attached the same hotkey to all of the three accounts.
And here comes the tricky part, sometimes the hotkey for the filter
on the first account (only this account) stops responding and
nothing
Hello rich,
How can I get 'em?
Account/Dispatch Mail on Server/All messages.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hi Ralph,
On 19/05/2005 06:14 PM +0200, you wrote:
is there a macro or QT to set the editor type (text, rich, html) on a
per folder / contact / group / account / ... base?
Errr. no. :(
--
Allie Martin
System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
Experience: a
I did not know, where to send it, but as I see Stefan (Tanurkov)
here, I decided to post it here:
We are translating the new v.3.5 LNG file to Hungarian. My suggestion
would be to Ritlabs that when you change something in the interface
that needs some translation, you should have a webpage (a
Hello MAU,
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 6:54:31 PM, you wrote:
I have copied and pasted this filter onto three of my accounts and
attached the same hotkey to all of the three accounts.
And here comes the tricky part, sometimes the hotkey for the filter
on the first account (only this
Hello Chris,
What graphics card do you have? It seems as if it may be a graphics
card issue. All those who have reported it thus far have been using
ATI cards, if I remember correctly.
It's definitely not a graphics card problem. I've tested four
different machines. All of them have different
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 2:02:06 PM, Michael Mlinaric wrote:
MM Hello Chris,
What graphics card do you have? It seems as if it may be a graphics
card issue. All those who have reported it thus far have been using
ATI cards, if I remember correctly.
MM It's definitely not a graphics card
Hello Steve,
Hi Marck,
I just got some time to do this then came to a grinding halt when I
could not find where to Open Customise. Your assistance here would
be greatly appreciated.
Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has
already given you an answer.
Yes
is there a way to prevent the bat from looping to the beginning of the message
list after the last unread message is read? i think it's illogical that this
occurs but don't see a way to prevent it. did i miss a setting somewhere?
thanks/regards, .. mark davidson
--
Dear Steve,
@19-May-2005, 22:35 Steve Lee [SL] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
Although you say Marck, you replied to me. Anyway, I see Marck has
already given you an answer.
SL Yes and it works well thank you - now if only we could find a way to
SL do both next message and mark as read
Time was when you could hold down the ALT key and drag folders. That
doesn't seem to work any more with 3.5. I have common folders nested
as many as 3 or 4 layers deep. I wanted to move a folder from 2nd
level into a different primary catagory on 3rd level. This would have
been a simple operation
Hello Dwight,
Time was when you could hold down the ALT key and drag folders. That
doesn't seem to work any more with 3.5.
Works here just fine.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Current version
Hello mark,
is there a way to prevent the bat from looping to the beginning of the
message list after
the last unread message is read? i think it's illogical that this occurs but
don't see a
way to prevent it. did i miss a setting somewhere?
What is your setting in
Hello Steve,
Yes and it works well thank you - now if only we could find a way to
do both next message and mark as read in one go.
I don't know why but I have the feeling that it will be possible soon.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 6:00:25 PM, Peter Ouwehand wrote:
Doesn't seem to be a problem here. But, are you ALT-LMB-ing on the
icon or or the name? ALT-LMB-ing on the icon won't work (here), on
the name it will.
You are correct. That seems like odd behavior too, but better than
what I
Hello Peter,
Sorry to hijack, but I tried replying to your PM Peter and it bounced
back, twice. Any ideas why.
--
Best regards,
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.5
Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.2
On Windows 2000 5.0 Build #2195
DAC Time was when you could hold down the ALT key and drag folders. That
DAC doesn't seem to work any more with 3.5.
PO Doesn't seem to be a problem here.
PO But, are you ALT-LMB-ing on the icon or or the name?
PO ALT-LMB-ing on the icon won't work (here), on the name it will.
Be careful with
Dear Stefan,
When we click on one for the field headings to sort the table, could you
please have the scroll bar shoot up (or down) so that you can see the
first or last message?
In theory clicking on the flagged column for instance, all the flagged
messages should shoot to the top and be
it's set to 'just stay in the current folder' ... i really don't want to move
anywhere else once i'm done reading messages in one folder but i'll try the
other settings and see what happens.
thanks/regards, ..
-
Hello mark,
is there a way to prevent the bat from looping to the
Hi Dwight
DAC Each time you punch the three buttons, you manage to move the folder one
DAC step. When you get to the end of the group where it is nested, you have to
DAC move it out to the level of the next group. then you can jump to the bottom
DAC of the next group, and when you get to the
Hello all,
How to make original glyph to work with the new 3.5 version?
http://thebat.orgavision.de//img/preview_glyphs_v2plus.gif
thanks
--
The Final Cut
Have become comfortably numb..
pgpJtGv8cwKi1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 8:26:45 PM, Natasha V Pearce wrote:
I know others have already answered this from a GUI perspective, but
for those interested in the keyboard specifics...
TB! allows you to press Move Out at any time to move your folder out
one level, then you only need to use Move
Hello Steve,
When we click on one for the field headings to sort the table, could you
please have the scroll bar shoot up (or down) so that you can see the
first or last message?
In theory clicking on the flagged column for instance, all the flagged
messages should shoot to the top and be
Hello Peter Ouwehand
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 9:43:47 PM +0400 GMT
You wrote:
PO Hello The Final Cut,
PO on Thu, 19 May 2005 21:35:00 -0400 (2005-05-20 03:35:00 in .nl) in the
PO message with reference
PO mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
PO [TC] wrote (at least in part):
PO I'd say:
PO wait till
Friday, May 20, 2005, 12:41:30 AM, Stuart wrote:
SC Sometimes persistence pays off. ;) Did you report the bugs on
SC BugTrack? What is the other bug you have?
Yes, that was me (aka ZKARJ). The other bug is #2094:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2094
It's over a year old. The bug
75 matches
Mail list logo
