Re[2]: 100% server CPU usage

the email was particularly big, so timeout issues weren't the problem. It's been a while though, like I said, so I'm afraid I can't suggest anything else. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[3]: Weird TB! crash problem

the word /EXIT at the end. Have a look at both the shortcuts. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Creating filters without having to create a new folder every time

found is to change the 'Move to folder' option to 'Inbox', but since I really don't want to *move* the message anywhere(I just want to set flags or something), I think it's a design flaw for TB to make me go through this extra step. Any thoughts? Thanks, -Vishal

Re[2]: Creating filters without having to create a new folder everytime

Friday, June 20, 2003, 10:03:20 AM, you wrote: BM On Fri 20-Jun-03 7:56am -0400, Vishal wrote: BM I'm not seeing the problems you've mentioned. I see by your sig that you're using 1.62r too, like me. Strange that you don't run into the same situation, since Leif mentioned

Re[2]: Creating filters without having to create a new folder everytime

created regardless. LG Change it to inbox, or the folder you're most LG likely going to need it in. Yep, I do that before clicking Edit and setting my further options. Wish I didn't have to remember to do that every time though. Thanks, -Vishal

Re[2]: Creating filters without having to create a new folder everytime

be an excellent choice. The reason I've never really thought about creating a manual filter is that the 'Detect by' options in quick filter creation are very good and save much typing. Thanks for your help. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL

Re[2]: Creating filters without having to create a new folder everytime

Monday, June 23, 2003, 10:26:24 AM, you wrote: LG Hello Vishal, LG Sunday, June 22, 2003, 5:57:31 PM, you wrote: V I don't choose Ok. I choose Edit and set my filtering options, but V the folder gets created regardless. LG Yeah, a little bit of a pain, but I guess half the people would want LG

Re[2]: Creating filters without having to create a new folder everytime

about when i started this thread. TB makes you adjust this all the time and creates a new folder even if you didn't want to. -vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Creating filters without having to create a new folder everytime

entry point. -vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Mac OS X Client

. Since OSX is based on that, I wouldn't think there would be many problems there. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Mac OS X Client

generically available. I've found it's true for FreeBSD. Must confess I've never used OSX though. I was guessing that getting linux packages to work on that (derived) platform wouldn't be *too* hard. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL

Nothing to send?

noticed this? It usually happens when I choose 'Send and receive for all'. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Nothing to send?

it happen here. RMR It's a very erratic but recurring bug, unfortunately. I agree with Ricardo. I already have the options set up as you mentioned, Allie. Thanks though. btw..sorry for the late reply..I was out of town. -Vishal Current version

Re[2]: Nothing to send?

there was no mail to send in *any* account. This is what made it seem like it was erratic, since there clearly was mail to send in at least one account. Thanks -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[3]: A wish...

to see myself. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

dupes dupes dupes!

with over 1500 duplicate messages that kill dupes in all folders completely ignores. Can anyone suggest what I should do about this? thanks, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: dupes dupes dupes!

. I remember that the creation dates were identical, though I didn't check the message IDs. Thanks for your help. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: TB! Hotmail Yahoo mail

version of web2pop did you try? -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: dupes dupes dupes!

with the message IDs. It does not only happen with one server though - happens with myrealbox and yahoo/hotmail retrieved through web2pop. This made me think it was a TB problem rather than a server one. Sorry for the late replies..my network was down for a day. -Vishal

Re[2]: dupes dupes dupes!

for the new version though..there are too many good things in TB. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: dupes dupes dupes!

are changed. TF I confirm there is no problem with real POP accounts. Actually there is. myrealbox.com does not have to go through web2pop, yet I see the same problem with that account. It is not restricted to my yahoo/hotmail ones. -Vishal Current

Re[2]: dupes dupes dupes!

Friday, August 8, 2003, 8:37:38 PM, you wrote: AM . Since this is so strange, I have to ask the AM obvious. I assume the duplicates are in the same folder, right? Yep, they sure are. Same folder..even get arranged right next to each other when i sort on date or anything else. -Vishal

Re[2]: TB! Hotmail Yahoo mail

think there were some forums on the site) would be able to answer that better though. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TB! Hotmail Yahoo mail

Monday, August 11, 2003, 2:59:02 PM, you wrote: S It appears from recent posts that SOME are having success with using S web2pop to access Hotmail and yahoo mail with TB!. Maybe my posts? Yes they're working fine for me. I use web2pop version 1.0.3.8 and TB 1.62r. How about you? -Vishal

Re[2]: dupes dupes dupes!

understand now though. -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

Hi Vishal Monday, August 18, 2003, 1:25:56 PM, you wrote: RO Yep, on the 'Advanced' tab of your filter. RO Scroll down till you find: RO 'Address(es) must not be listed in the Address Book' RO You can check this and use some options... Thanks from me too Roelof. I also run into this situation

Re[2]: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

pre-existing addressbook names? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

Hi Dan Wednesday, August 20, 2003, 7:06:39 PM, you wrote: DG Actions: [x] Add Addresses to Address Book | Recipients I just tried your suggestion and I see no entry for add addresses to address book in the Actions panel. Where do you see it? Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

Hi Roel Wednesday, August 20, 2003, 8:22:32 PM, you wrote: R It's there, but you'll have to scroll down (it's the ninth select-box R visible) I must be blind..never even noticed the scrollbar :) Thanks! Cheers, -Vishal Current version

Re[2]: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

? Is there a way to do it through filters? Thanks! Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

back to RO Vishal's original post, you'll see that he asked for a 'same name RO different addresses' pop-up. Yep, I was just about to respond with the same myself. Any other suggestions? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL

Re[2]: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically

Recipient {All Recipients?} Interesting. I'll try it out and let you know. Thanks Dan. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: TB and Opera/Crazy Browser

preferences and check HTTP and HTTPS off. Things should work as before. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: TB and Opera/Crazy Browser

you did in Opera 7 and check them off in Opera 6 instead. 6 should now be the default. I'm a regular Opera user myself. Curious - why do you prefer 6 over 7? Perhaps you'd better reply to me offlist as this is getting OT. Cheers, -Vishal Current

Re[5]: TB and Opera/Crazy Browser

Hi John Thursday, August 21, 2003, 11:09:12 PM, you wrote: JB I'm sure I would prefer Opera 7 if my touchpad would work with it. Ah I see. definitely extenuating circumstances :) Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL

Re[2]: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

with it. After you delete the config and all the necessary programs had been entered, did TB work fine with ZA? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

give it a shot then. Thanks for the tip Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: OT: Vote for The Bat! :-)

it is not possible to copy anything once an address book entry is the active window. - Offer a very good help file. It's decent, but there are so many undocumented features that everyone keeps running across that I hesitate to call it 'good'. TB is good, but not perfect by any means. Cheers, -Vishal

different reply quotes for different people

? This yahoogroup is stored in my address book as The Group, so the initials TG instead of TYC as my quote prefix would be great. 2. If not TN, is there any way I can get The Group as my quote prefix just for this one group? Cheers, -Vishal

zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

what the problem is. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[5]: OT: Vote for The Bat! :-)

version is even better! Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Wishlist item for scrutiny

. The way I work around this (quite effective, if I may add) is to increase the time limit after which a message is marked read. Change it to around 7-8 seconds. This will give you enough time to delete spam or move on to the next message if you prefer that this one remain unread. Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: 2.0: slower - and other issues

for one. As long as there is a default skin that caters to the blind, having alternatives to spice up TB's otherwise bland interface would be great. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

it working properly with TB I'd rather do that. TB isn't as indispensable to me. Maybe version 2.0 will change that :) Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: different reply quotes for different people

in the help file. I am TF using %QuoteStyle=Mutti for messages to my mother. Awesome! It worked. Thanks a lot! Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Edited glyphs file for download if you wish...

things). I just downloaded version 2.0 and I'm glad to see an interface change over 1.62r. I definitely like it better so far, but more color is definitely nice :) If there's any way you could mark specifically which icons you changed, it would be great. Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

efficiency. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

only know your initial is 'A'), I don't seem to have received your message from the list. Could you let me know the same? Thanks! Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Allie Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 7:33:23 AM, you wrote: AM Vishal, [V] wrote: V So could you suggest someone who has? It would be a big help. AM I've had problems. When I did, the problems weren't restricted to just AM TB!, though t snip By the way, your signature doesn't validate

Re[2]: 2.0: slower - and other issues

but different looks, that's ok, otherwise it's not. I completely agree. Let's hope someone's listening :) Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Wishlist item for scrutiny

, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: different reply quotes for different people

:) And the Spanish beer I like best is Mahou and is pronounced M mau. Oh *you're* the MAU Thomas was talking about. I spoke too soon :) Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re[2]: different reply quotes for different people

.), as in: I am drunk? um..no. I don't even know who MAU is..more's the pity. Could have had a good laugh at his/her expense. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 8:12:59 PM, you wrote: A Yes Vishal I have - it works fine for me.. (I did reply earlier but A you maybe didn't see it). Lucky you :( Oh yes, I actually did reply to you earlier. But I included my reply in a reply to Robyn. I referred to you

Re[3]: Edited glyphs file for download if you wish...

, A2, A3, F3, F5, F10, F11, F12 Very nice. Thanks :) Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Thursday, September 4, 2003, 4:09:29 PM, you wrote: A Thursday, September 4, 2003, 6:22:01 AM, Vishal wrote: V For the person who Robyn replied to (sorry I only know your initial is 'A'), I V don't seem to have received your message from the list. Could you let me know V the same

Re[5]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

using Symantec. I wonder if there's some kind of incompatibility here. Anyway, thanks for your help! Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

? No need to press Alt+F2? It looks like everyone who can do this properly is not running Win2k..connection somewhere? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

Hi Steve Saturday, September 6, 2003, 12:29:23 PM, you wrote: SMK I'm beginning to feel that the standard 30-day trial SMK period just isn't enough, and that maybe users should push for 60 to 90 days. For TB? How about one year? It might be enough :) Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

and tried BlackICE PC protection 3.6. Automatic mail checks still don't work for me. Could you tell me how you configured your installation to handle this? It's very disappointing. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL

Re[4]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

. I'm sure there are people here who can us better ways to handle our email. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

that the computer as a whole would be observed to slow down. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Thomas Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:49:19 AM, you wrote: TF Hello Vishal, TF On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:34:14 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 11:34 +0700 GMT), TF Vishal wrote: It can check email automatically? No need to press Alt+F2? It looks like everyone who can do this properly

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

with it and it definitely seems cleaner. Very rarely do I see the need for HTMl mail. The only reason I'd want to do something like that would be to change the font to, say, Verdana which has great on-screen legibility. Nothing outlandish. Cheers, -Vishal

Re: Broken threads and general threading question

!, we would be able to maintain a consistent thread. Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re[5]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

. I'm sure you know what that means since VB is widely acknowledged as the world's best name in this field along with ICSA. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

the option, does it? I don't have any. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

them quickly. I also have it set to delete from server, but it doesn't always do that. Does that help you any? I've never used the purge option. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

seem right. I've often deleted the root message only to see many properly threaded replies the next day. It's only since I installed v2 that this is happening. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

it with Blackice PC Protection 3.6. Same problem - no automatic mail checks. I'm waiting to see if Allie or someone else who uses BlackICE can help me with this. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

tries to relieve some of the monotony of plain email, perhaps have some fun doing something which isn't always fun when you deal with a lot of it. Many reasons, but I know a lot of people who *like* receiving messages with fancy stationery. I don't see that changing. Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: Broken threads and general threading question

Hi Jeffrey Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:19:34 PM, you wrote: JAS Hi Vishal, JAS On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:19:54 -0400 you wrote: V Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you V mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it. JAS Good to hear that someone else

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

permissions so it should work ok. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Quick Templates usage (was: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?)

, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

a little easier. I think of it as a harmless and possibly beneficial suggestion. But I agree that they should be free to use what they want, which is why I don't use HTML mail. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

in order for it to work with TB. Looks like I didn't word it properly. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

that Allie last used ZA over a year ago, version 2.6 I think. This is 4.0 Pro. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[4]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

can live without a firewall :). Right now I get nervous when I don't have one installed for even a few minutes because of the attacks I see all the time. Even with the other security checks I have in place, a firewall is indispensable. Cheers, -Vishal

Re[4]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote: A S'ok ;-) No, all that's in my Trusted zone is our own network. Ok. Well I'm not sure what's wrong then. I'll keep looking Anne, thanks for your suggestions :) Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

you're using. Worth thinking about though. I never run TB as admin, btw. I've had no end of problems with TB and administrator accounts that I've found no solution to. Part of the reason I'm not so enamored of this client. Check the archives if you're interested. Cheers, -Vishal

Re: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Ok, great. I just automatic mail checking with NO firewall installed and it still doesn't work. I'm using the eval version of 2.0.0.6. It looks like ZA wasn't to blame after all. What could be wrong? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

the check mail button. Any thoughts on that? The intervals are all set up properly so I don't see the problem. The log shows no attempts were even made. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:35:01 PM, you wrote: A Allie and Vishal, A Over on TBBETA Marek has just advised Melvyn who has this same A problem to try using the Scheduler to do the auto downloading and A Melvyn tried it and he says it worked. Perhaps if Vishal tries A this also

Re[2]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

do get my own domain. Thanks for the tip. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

things somehow? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Broken threads and general threading question

loading the wrong emails when I select them. *investigates some JA more* Very odd. It does look like TB's getting confused somewhere. Hopefully I'm wrong :) Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

, and having the original root deleted never messed things up before. JBL YMMV, of course! Sure looks like it :) Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

that does POP3 scanning? Symantec Antivirus version 8. As of yesterday, BlackICE PC Protection 3.6. AM Any TB! plug-ins? No. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: HTML as default on v2.00 ...........?

himself during the time he stood for election. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

further to choose at all. The administration options wouldn't be relevant here regardless. JBL, I am using the Network JBL Connection option, so the options are greyed out. Same here. Thanks though..can you think of anything else? Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

folders, opening the ticker virtual folder, What do you mean by opening the ticker virtual folder? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

installing SP4 will resolve the A problem? Unfortunately I have the same - SP4 build 2195. Is Daniel using v2 or some beta? Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:35:01 PM, you wrote: A Thursday, September 11, 2003, 1:34:32 AM, Allie wrote: AM I'm wondering if it's ZA at all. :/ A Allie and Vishal, A Over on TBBETA Marek has just advised Melvyn who has this same A problem to try using the Scheduler to do

Re[2]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

Hi Anne Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:35:01 PM, you wrote: A Perhaps if Vishal tries A this also and then lets Marek know - he's doing some kind of A feedback for devs about this. How do I let Marek know? Do you think you could forward the mail I just sent about it working? I'd really like

Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?

done this before. Didn't do the kill task manager bit though.. i it to work with hotmail accounts Try web2pop. Works for me. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Dial-Up, TB and Firewalls

a patch for a long time ago. If you were up to date with the patches, there is no way a dialup user would have been infected. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Dial-Up, TB and Firewalls

Hi Clive Saturday, September 13, 2003, 3:12:55 AM, you wrote: CT Hi Vishal, You don't stay online very long: This is the primary reason DSL/Cable users are at risk. If you're online for a long time you become a much more attractive target. CT You couldn't be more wrong, Vishal

Re[2]: some threads not sorted as threads

things somehow? RO No, that doesn't matter. Didn't think so. Good to know. Cheers, -Vishal Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

  1   2   3   >