Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:23:52 +0100 GMT (09/10/2004, 00:23 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: TF Found it. I don't have a Certification Path tab, though. MDP Hmmm .. Then you may not have gone deep enough. Correct. Found it. MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, click the

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:48:30 +0100 GMT (07/10/2004, 17:48 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, Where do I do that? I have imported the cert. I went to the AB, there are Root CAs and Trusted CAs, many of them, which one is the INVALID one?

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Thomas, @8-Oct-2004, 22:14 +0700 (08-Oct 16:14 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, TF Where do I do that? I have imported the cert. I went to the AB, there TF are Root CAs and Trusted CAs, many of them, which one

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:29:35 +0100 GMT (08/10/2004, 22:29 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, MDP The button that is the X marker on the signed message. That was my MDP start point for the instructions. Go back there and follow the MDP

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Thomas, @8-Oct-2004, 23:40 +0700 (08-Oct 17:40 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, MDP The button that is the X marker on the signed message. That was my MDP start point for the instructions. Go back there and

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Marck, on Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:23:52 +0100GMT, you wrote: MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, click the View button at the MDP bottom of the certificate view dialog, click to the Certification MDP path tab in the View dialog, select Henk's authority certificate MDP there and click the Add

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-08 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello Peter, On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:57:33 +0200GMT (8-10-2004, 19:57 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ...snip PM I came late in this thread, but this works to have Henk's previously PM invalid sig turn to valid. It is not always necessary to do so much trouble to valid a S/MIME sig.. --

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-07 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello Julian, On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:08:46 +0100GMT (6-10-2004, 9:08 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ...snip No, I tried generating a self-cert certificate and it failed for the same reason, so you are not alone. I too am using the Pro version, so maybe the problem is as you and Marck have

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-07 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 00:38:28 +0100 GMT (06/10/2004, 06:38 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: TF Not here: Big red X on Hank's message. MDP Yes - until I approved Henk as a certification authority. I wouldn't know how to do that. But don't worry, this is probably a question for

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Thomas, @7-Oct-2004, 01:07 +0700 (06-Oct 19:07 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: TF Not here: Big red X on Hank's message. MDP Yes - until I approved Henk as a certification authority. TF I wouldn't know how to do that. But don't worry, this is

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-07 Thread aceman
Unfortunately, it's increasingly looking likely that I'm the only one (so far) suffering from this problem. I guess it doesn't look too hopeful I'll be able to resolve it. :( Phew, I'm sooo glad I'm not the only person with this problem :) No, I tried generating a self-cert certificate

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-06 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 11:36:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, it's increasingly looking likely that I'm the only one (so far) suffering from this problem. I guess it doesn't look too hopeful I'll be able to resolve it. :( No, I tried generating a self-cert certificate and

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Aceman, @5-Oct-2004, 02:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... snip A When you say I have done do you mean you were able to generate A your own certificate using TB! feature without the errors I A experienced? I have done. Just did another. RO I've actually

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Maria Cristina Ramos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, On 05 October 2004 at 11:18:24GMT +0100 (which was 11:18 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and made these points on the subject of 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME: This message should be so signed with my Thawte certificate. A

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread aceman
... snip A When you say I have done do you mean you were able to generate A your own certificate using TB! feature without the errors I A experienced? I have done. Just did another. Yes, and it was all present and correct at this end. Thanks. Now I wonder why it doesn't it work for me?

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Cristina, @5-Oct-2004, 12:31 Maria Cristina Ramos [CR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP ... and this one with a brand new, freshly generated, self signed one. CR They are different than those with PGP, because they appear CR already verified, with no ? I meant to answer you the

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread aceman
They are different than those with PGP, because they appear already verified, with no ? The first one had a green check, this comes with a red sign with a cross. So those self signed are useless? Not necessarily. I have a use for them although I agree, that most probably will not.

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Aceman, @5-Oct-2004, 11:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: A Now I wonder why it doesn't it work for me? :( No ideas at this end. You're using the internal implementation (you must be - MS Crypto API doesn't have a Generate option - nor even an Edit personal

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread aceman
No ideas at this end. You're using the internal implementation (you must be - MS Crypto API doesn't have a Generate option - nor even an Edit personal certificates button). Yes, internal implementation. I'm using RC2 encryption algorythm and SHA-1 hashing. 3DES and SHA-1 (well, I'm

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread aceman
snip Try downloading the Home version instead. I agree, TB! seems to be choking on the token issue. I'm going to try installing Home version now to see if that helps. Will report back ASAP. Thanks for your help so far. Ok, I downloaded and installed the Home version (BTW the Help/About

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread aceman
snip On a somewhat related note, my email provider has issued a new POP3 certificate today but TB! keeps giving me the error: TLS handshake failure. Invalid server certificate (The issuer of this certificate chain was not found). Now, the certificate was issued by Comodo Group so I know

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello aceman, On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:01:10 +0100GMT (5-10-2004, 18:01 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ...snip OK, please disregard the above problem. I have now managed to fix it (somehow). I still have the problem with the self-signed certificates though :( I am already working with two

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henk, @5-Oct-2004, 19:27 +0200 (05-Oct 18:27 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: OK, please disregard the above problem. I have now managed to fix it (somehow). I still have the problem with the self-signed certificates though :( HDB I am already working with

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 18:40:37 +0100 GMT (06/10/2004, 00:40 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: HDB I am already working with two X.509 certificates (Thawte and CAcert) HDB and tried to generate a certificate myself withing the Bat! HDB Let´s see if it works? MDP Perfecto. Not

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 5 Oct 2004, @ @ at 19:27:50 +0200, when Henk de Bruijn wrote: Hello aceman, On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:01:10 +0100GMT (5-10-2004, 18:01 +0100, where I live), you wrote: snip

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread aceman
I still have the problem with the self-signed certificates though :( I am already working with two X.509 certificates (Thawte and CAcert) and tried to generate a certificate myself withing the Bat! Let´s see if it works? Yep, looked ok here. Thanks for trying. Unfortunately, it's

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Thomas, @6-Oct-2004, 00:48 +0700 (05-Oct 18:48 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: HDB I am already working with two X.509 certificates (Thawte and CAcert) HDB and tried to generate a certificate myself withing the Bat! HDB Let´s see if it works? MDP

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo aceman, On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:46:07 +0100GMT (4-10-2004, 16:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: A Bump! Still no responses :( That probably means, that nobody has a direct answer. You wouldn't like the list to be flooded with messages like: 'Sorry, no idea!', nor to your messages, nor

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Roelof, @4-Oct-2004, 18:48 +0200 (04-Oct 17:48 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: A Can *anybody* help with the above problem(s)?? RO Not me. Nor me. A Is *anybody* able to actually create a digital certificate using A The Bat! v3 Pro? I have done. I see little

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-04 Thread Maria Cristina Ramos
Hello Roelof, On 04 October 2004 at 18:48:19GMT +0200 (which was 17:48 where I live) Roelof Otten wrote and made these points on the subject of 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME: RO I'd like to help, but I can't even find the 'generate' button you're RO talking about. RO After your previous post

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-04 Thread Maria Cristina Ramos
Hello Marck, On 04 October 2004 at 18:02:35GMT +0100 (which was 18:02 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and made these points on the subject of 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME: MDP I have done. I see little point. Self signed certificates are actually MDP invalid to most recipients since

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-04 Thread aceman
A Bump! Still no responses :( That probably means, that nobody has a direct answer. You wouldn't like the list to be flooded with messages like: 'Sorry, no idea!', nor to your messages, nor to somebody else? I know, I wasn't trying to be a pest :) I hadn't received even a single

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-04 Thread aceman
A Can *anybody* help with the above problem(s)?? RO Not me. Nor me. Thanks for responding anyway:) A Is *anybody* able to actually create a digital certificate using A The Bat! v3 Pro? I have done. I see little point. Self signed certificates are actually invalid to most recipients

Re: 2nd REPOST: Problems with S/MIME

2004-10-04 Thread aceman
snip Shucks, sorry about the lack of cut-mark! embarrassed -- Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html