Hi Johannes,
I owe you a beer ;) At first I didn't realize that you aren't
located in Germany. I was talking with my own experience in mind,
which is the 100% digital phone network in Europe. As you can get
ISDN in every (!!) lost corner around here,
Really!? Are you sure? Can you get ISDN
Hi there Ming-Li,
Am 10.08.2000 so gegen 10:57 meintest Du:
Really!? Are you sure? Can you get ISDN in, say, Kosovo, or Poland?
I think they are part of Europe, too. (If the answer is yes, then I
envy you Europeans.)
In Poland, yes, they have the same E-DSS1 as we (means you can buy
Hi there Thomas,
Am 10.08.2000 so gegen 05:55 meintest Du:
Anytime. :-)
Gimme a call when you're back in good old Germany ;)
Remember 2400bps? Those were the times... g
Uhhh. I started with a really old 14,4k back in 1995...
No, what I mean is, it depends of the inormation content. If a
Hi there Thomas,
Am 10.08.2000 so gegen 05:26 meintest Du:
Go to www.egroups.com and look for a group called "tbot".
I just subscribed, thanks ;) I'd say we move the thread over there...
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
A real person has two reasons
Hi Johannes,
On 10 August 2000 at 15:15:52 GMT +0200 (which was 14:15 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
No, what I mean is, it depends of the inormation content. If a
messag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi there Thomas,
Am 08.08.2000 so gegen 12:16 meintest Du:
In Germany, maybe. That's where my POP server is, yes. But my computer
is in Taiwan. I have never, ever have had even 33.6K or any of the
other speeds you're talking about, and it is mostly around
Hi there Chuck,
Am 08.08.2000 so gegen 13:45 meintest Du:
I agree ... however, allowed or not, I find it ironic how much
bandwidth has been used to discuss waste of bandwidth.
It's always like that =) Remembers me of Usenet laws™ =))
Chuck
Cheers,
Johannes
Hi Johannes,
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 21:02:54 +0200GMT (10/08/2000, 03:02 +0800GMT),
Johannes M. Posel wrote:
JMP PS: What was the subscribe address for the OT list?
Go to www.egroups.com and look for a group called "tbot".
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.45
under
Hi Johannes,
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 21:09:41 +0200GMT (10/08/2000, 03:09 +0800GMT),
Johannes M. Posel wrote:
JMP I owe you a beer ;)
Anytime. :-)
JMP To be honest I cannot really believe you only get 1kb (this would be a
JMP connect at *less* than 9600bps, which is what you get here when you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jason,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 06:12:04, you wrote:
BJ Hello Mark,
BJ Monday, August 07, 2000, 9:27:38 AM, you wrote:
JDB Point semi taken. I'll switch off PGP and leave S/Mime turned on. With
JDB people like you we need to be careful.
MA
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 08:08:12 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 15:08 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD Personally I believe that when on a public list where you may make
JD controversial decisions or flame people being able to certify who you
JD are is very necessary.
There is no flaming ion
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:14:41 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 16:14 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD OK 6k as opposed to 2K. That's 4K extra, on a 56K modem that's 1
JD second extra download time.
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data communication
Business Group ???
Not everybody lives in the UK, you know.
not in Taiwan either
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:20:10 GMTGMT (08/08/2000, 17:20 +0800GMT),
Rob wrote:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
R are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data communication
R
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:11:13 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 17:11 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
TF Also, it's not one message that may take longer. Take a list of 100
TF postings per day, and imagine each posting comes 4 or 5K extra.
JD I actually made that point clear in my post and it has
Hi Jamie,
I own up. This is Jamie Dainton pretending to be Thomas. At first
glance this e-mail should look like it came from him. Who really
checks the headers?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.45
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
Hi there Thomas,
Am 08.08.2000 so gegen 10:51 meintest Du:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes. I have a 56K
modem, but that does not mean that I actually get the data with that
speed.
Hey Thomas,
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:39:41 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 17:39 +0800GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Hi Jamie,
TFI own up. This is Jamie Dainton pretending to be Thomas. At first
TF glance this e-mail should look like it came from him. Who really
checks the headers?
ROTFLMAO!
--
Hi Johannes,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:00:57 +0200GMT (08/08/2000, 18:00 +0800GMT),
Johannes M. Posel wrote:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes. I have a 56K
modem, but that does not mean that I actually get
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:48:05 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Your opinion is that it doesn't matter to you. It does matter to me.
TF Please do not send S/Mime signatures. In this relase version which I
TF am using here in the office, and for which this list is anyway, your
TF certificate shows
On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 6:10 AM or thereabouts, Curtis wrote
the following about OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server
rules):
Curtis The moderators need to step in here, I believe, and clear the
Curtis air. Is S/MIME signing of messages allowed or not? If it's
Curtis allowed
Hi Curtis,
On 08 August 2000 at 06:10:49 GMT -0500 (which was 12:10 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
C The moderators need to step in here, I believe, and clear the air.
C Is S/MI
Hi Jamie,
On 08 August 2000 at 11:19:37 GMT +0100 (which was 11:19 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
TF Your opinion is that it doesn't matter to you. It does matter to
TF me.
Hi Chuck,
On 08 August 2000 at 06:45:37 GMT -0500 (which was 12:45 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
CM ... I find it ironic how much bandwidth has been used to discuss
CM waste of
1) Your Thawte certificate is *not* notorised and does *not* certify
that the mail comes from Jamie Dainton.
just out of curiosity ; i just downloaded PGP 6.5.1i, but as far as i remember -
i toyed with it in the DOS days - a PGP key also is not a 100% guarantee that
the sender is who he
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 06:45:37 -0500, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
CM Curtis The moderators need to step in here, I believe, and clear the
CM Curtis air. Is S/MIME signing of messages allowed or not? If it's
CM Curtis allowed then leave Jamie alone please. Simple. The above is
CM Curtis not an opinion but
On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 7:10 AM or thereabouts, Curtis wrote
the following about OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server
rules):
-- [snip] --8
CM Curtis what's the word moderators?
Curtis teasing We had better decide if quote prefixing like the
Curtis above
Hi Rob,
On 08 August 2000 at 12:26:37 GMT GMT (which was 13:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY
R you have a filter/macr
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 1:26:37 PM, you wrote:
1) Your Thawte certificate is *not* notorised and does *not* certify
that the mail comes from Jamie Dainton.
R just out of curiosity ; i just downloaded PGP 6.5.1i, but as far as i remember -
R i toyed with it in the DOS days - a PGP key
Hi Thomas Rob,
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per
second on a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
R are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data
R communication Business Group ???
I'm wondering about that, too. I knew Chunghwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 7:43:48 AM, David wrote:
Anyone could forge a PGP key, if you manage to give fake details to
Thawte it says they can sue you for about 10,000 dollars or something
crazy.
No, noone can force a PGP key. If you think
Hallo Ming-Li,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:30:19 -0700 GMT (08/08/2000, 22:30 +0800 GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per
second on a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
R are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data
R
Hallo Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:04:02 +0100 GMT (08/08/2000, 19:04 +0800 GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD I await your reply.
Sorry, I do owe you a reply. The thing was, I left the office, and by
the time I checked my email at home, the thread had been finished.
Should you wish to continue,
33 matches
Mail list logo
