On 2023/10/21 09:31, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2023 19:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
> > relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
> > -current) to bump buffers on
After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the
relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and
-current) to bump buffers on them.
On 2023/10/20 13:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/10/19 15:09, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> > that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> &g
On 2023/10/19 15:09, Silamael Darkomen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed,
> that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker
> processes.
>
> After some debugging the limit from net.unix.dgram.sendspace came up as
>
On 2023/10/20 11:51, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 15:03 +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> >
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=169272174500676=2
> >
> >
>
> Thank you, I missed that one.
>
> So the key piece of information from that thread is that
> Kusumi's implementation
On 2023/10/17 22:27, Philipp wrote:
> [2023-10-17 17:32] Omar Polo
> >
> > There is one part of the RFC7505 that I'd like to quote and discuss
> > with you however. The last paragraph of the section 3 says:
> >
> > : A domain that advertises a null MX MUST NOT advertise any other MX
> > : RR.
>
On 2023/10/09 14:55, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: mill...@cvs.openbsd.org 2023/10/09 14:55:33
>
> Modified files:
> usr.sbin/smtpd : smtp_session.c
>
> Log message:
> Add Message-Id as needed for messages received on the submission port.
>
On 2023/10/03 13:47, Paianis wrote:
> I wanted some cleaner pixmaps of the logo for the login greeter than
> those currently in the tree, so I remade them from the PDFs that used to
> be on the website, using mutool and imagemagick's convert.
>
> The low-color and greyscale versions are untested
On 2023/09/26 11:04, Eponymous Pseudonym wrote:
> There is a small window of mixed version sets at the newvers tagging
> from release to beta, likely due to the way currently mirrors are
> clearing the previous and syncing during that automatically (not
> signalled). There will be another one
On 2023/09/18 23:38, S V wrote:
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/games/phantasia/misc.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> diff -u -p -r1.21 misc.c
> --- games/phantasia/misc.c10 Jan 2016 13:35:10 - 1.21
> +++
On 2023/09/16 14:26, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> Currently /etc/rc.d/unbound only checks a configuration (using
> unbound-checkconf) upon starting as part of rc_pre(). It would would be
> nice to have a configtest, which checks a configuration before
> restarting/reloading as well.
>
> I recently
On 2023/09/14 11:55, Moritz Fain wrote:
> > My initial reaction is that it's easy to run "rm -f" before starting
> > the agent with the existing "-a" option.
same.
also if there's an existing agent running you probably don't want to
blindly remove the socket - and as the manual says "The sockets
-H is userland threads, -k is kernel threads. I guess "kernel visible" was
to distinguish between the old uthread where threads were handled in
userland and not visible to the kernel, and rthread ...
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 11 September 2023 10:02:32 Marc
On 2023/09/09 13:49, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> Thanks Peter, your comments were very helpful and I made some progress
>
> I have currently hosted server at 587. I have also set
>
> _submission._tcp.humaaraartha.in. SRV
>
> records which point to 587. However, I think such a thing is not
On 2023/09/04 11:13, Jos Dehaes wrote:
> How could we go about including this in OpenBSD (ports or native package)?
it would need to be added as a port, then packages will be built.
ports cannot be built with gcc 11 (gcc 8 and 11 can't be installed
together and other ports require gcc 8).
so
On 2023/08/18 17:39, Tobias Heider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at my authlog today and as expected on a server exposed on the
> public internet it is filled with random scanners and brute force attacks.
> One thing I noticed is that there is a lot of information we log multiple
> times for a
On 2023/08/15 18:16, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Did I do something wrong and should send it to another list, CC someone or
> did I do something stupid? 64-bit incompat feature is enabled on new ext4's
> by default, at least on Ubuntu
It's the right list. However as ext2fs support is
On 2023/08/13 11:44, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> My laptop doesn't have the fastest wifi and sysupgrade already uses a
> progress bar to show what it's doing, so I'd really like to provide more
> feedback on what it is doing:
Does a single -v give enough feedback? It's a fair bit quieter (it
On 2023/08/13 16:10, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 at 11:38, Tobias Heider wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 08:33:54AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > can you share the qemu cmd you are using in your tests?
> > > > I'd like to see if I can
On 2023/08/13 11:13, Omar Polo wrote:
> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ section starts with a declaration of the server
> Each
> .Ic server
> section starts with a declaration of the server
> -.Ar name :
> +.Ar name .
> +If no one matches the request the first one defined is used.
> .Bl -tag -width Ds
>
On 2023/08/12 19:07, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 03:21:00PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> > August 12, 2023 4:34 PM, "Theo Buehler" wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 02:29:45PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> Someone asked about
On 2023/08/12 13:16, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Ref: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=168458764424059=2
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=168071258109433=2
>
> I'm trying to update libreswan's automated test framework so that it
> creates an OpenBSD 7.3 test VM using install7.3.iso. Unfortunately
On 2023/08/11 16:43, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:13:23 +
> > From: Klemens Nanni
> >
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:00:27AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 05:07:30PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > > For new installs, it seems adequate to
On 2023/08/07 14:53, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:59:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I haven't looked at other ports, but asterisk, vim and vmm-firmware do
> > not use git submodules.
>
> With vim, it's the way colorscheme
On 2023/08/07 12:44, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> I tested this with the about 30 ports I could identify that use GitHub
> submodules, by adjusting the Makefile to use GH_SUBMODULES. Here a few
> points from what I've observed:
..
>
> The full table of what I tested and the result up to if the port
On 2023/08/03 07:23, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 05:52:02PM -0400, aisha wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Someone - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ5uD5x8vzg - mentioned that
> > our man page for tar(1) doesn't have an extract example, so I thought it
> > would be good to add a simple
When /etc/crontab is used, cron only skips over a single whitespace
character between the username and -n/-s/-q flags; more than one and
the flag is taken as part of the command:
printf '*\t*\t*\t*\t*\tnobody\t-n true 1\n' | doas tee -a /etc/crontab
printf '*\t*\t*\t*\t*\tnobody\t\t-n true 2\n' |
On 2023/07/13 00:57, George Koehler wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 13:29:58 -0700
> Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
>
> > Here is a patch to replace perl(1)'s use of syscall(2) with a dispatcher
> > that will call the libc function instead.
>
> patch(1) didn't "chmod +x gen_syscall_emulator.pl", but I
On 2023/07/04 09:48, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 03:39 +, Lee, Jonathan D wrote:
> > [cid:cd2efd41-42cb-4d83-9173-521bbb8f4539@namprd04.prod.outlook.com]
> >
> > Hello fellow software developers,
> >
> > I have noticed that p0f database files are not being updated. Many
> >
On 2023/07/02 16:49, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 15:51 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Use-case: some people want to branch automated installs based on
> > whether
> > pkg_add -u (or some other variation) actually did something.
> >
> > As usual we ignore quirks. This adds a flag
On 2023/06/27 10:55, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I have this (AP is mikrotik hapax2
> 0x0001, country 'GB ', channel 36 limit 23dB, channel 40 limit
> 23dB, channel 44 limit 23dB, channel 48 limit 23dB, channel 52 limit
> 23dB, channel 56 limit 23dB, channel 60 limit 23dB, chan
On 2023/06/27 10:55, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> This works fine with my 11ac setup and performance seems OK (around
> 200Mbps - what can I expect on OpenBSD these days?). I don't know if
> the device supports UHB channels.
That seems a little on the low side but in the right ballpark,
I have this (AP
wrong mailing list, moved to ports@ & reply-to set.
On 2023/06/24 23:02, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> bzr got deleted from openbsd ports about 2 years ago (died along with
> Python2).
> https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/ports/devel/bzr/Attic/Makefile?only_with_tag=HEAD
> bzr was superseded by brz but brz
This hasn't blown up yet... any interest?
- Forwarded message from Stuart Henderson -
From: Stuart Henderson
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 14:40:45 +0100
To: tech@openbsd.org
Subject: ospf6d fib reload [Re: bgpd fix for possible crash in SE]
Mail-Followup-To: tech@openbsd.org
On 2023/05/26
On 2023/06/17 09:02, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I don't see a positive value:cost tradeoff here, where cost is "time during
> boot, and potential for fragility in case of relink failure".
+ extra difficulty in debugging from core dumps.
On 2023/06/12 11:20, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> We need to compare the printable version of the last value displayed,
> not the floating point representation. Otherwise, we may print the
> last value twice.
>
> Old:
>
> $ seq 105 105
> 1.05e+06
> 1.05e+06
>
> New:
>
> $
On 2023/05/26 13:52, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I think my main issues come around LS_REFRESH_TIME intervals, when
> there's loads of churn and "ospf6d: ospf engine" can be busy for
> minutes at a time (not always, but very often). Don't know if that rings
> any bells f
On 2023/05/25 16:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 02:20:37PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023/05/25 15:06, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > sthen@ reported a bgpd SE crash to me and after inspection of the report
> > > it looks like he m
On 2023/05/25 15:06, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> sthen@ reported a bgpd SE crash to me and after inspection of the report
> it looks like he managed to trigger a mistake in session_process_msg().
> When for example a NOTIFICATION message is received then the state change
> clears the rbuf. Now normally
On 2023/05/25 10:29, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Can I suggest calling it quic as opposed to https
I think it should follow the name in the IANA registry which uses https.
> do we want PF Firewal to match https for TCP and UDP (for traditional)
> servers that only require https TCP ...
PF
- Forwarded message from Renaud Allard -
From: Renaud Allard
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 10:48:24 +0200
To: po...@openbsd.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: http3 in nginx
On 5/24/23 18:01, Theo Buehler wrote:
> This
On 2023/05/24 20:00, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2023/05/19 10:24:58 -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > If /etc/usermgmt.conf has a line like:
> >
> > group =uid
> >
> > where a new user's group ID in the passwd file is the same as their
> > user ID, remove that group when the user is removed.
On 2023/04/24 16:24, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Would be nice to have a backup of it and track changes.
>
> OK? No?
ok
> Index: changelist
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/changelist,v
> retrieving revision 1.135
> diff -u -p -r1.135
On 2023/04/21 20:23, Juan Picca wrote:
> But maybe a less surprise config for /etc/login.conf can be:
>
> --- /etc/login.conf.orig
> +++ /etc/login.conf
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> # Be sure to reset these values to system defaults in the default class!
> #
> daemon:\
> + :umask=022:\
>
On 2023/04/21 12:32, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Le Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 09:27:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > On 2023/04/20 00:55, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 19:11:40 +0300
> > > > From: Sergii Dmytruk
> > > >
>
On 2023/04/20 00:55, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 19:11:40 +0300
> > From: Sergii Dmytruk
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Pinging to say that this thread is silent for 3 months. EFI runtime and
> > bootloader changes are there, /dev/efi is the last piece left to be
> > committed
On 2023/04/21 02:45, Juan Picca wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:33:30PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > But this situation does not arise, not in this program, and not in 20 other
> > daemons.
> >
> > You changed something to cause this problem.
>
> Yes.
>
> I found a similar case in
>
On 2023/04/13 16:45, Sonic wrote:
> Is this multiqueue support in 7.3 or does it require patching?
> According to Intel the i211 should have 2 queues but I see no msi-x
> support in dmesg:
> em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03: msi, address
It is not committed, there's a diff.
On 2023/04/13 13:30, Brian Conway wrote:
> Reviving this thread, apologies for discontinuity in mail readers:
> https://marc.info/?t=16564219358
>
> After rebasing on 7.3, my results have mirrored Hrvoje's testing at the end
> of that thread. No issues with throughput, unusual latency, or
On 2023/04/06 15:49, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> bios0: vendor SeaBIOS version
> "1.14.0-20230330_133212-symphytum.spacehopper.orgp2-OpenBSD-vmm" date
> 01/01/2011
>
> in dmesg is a weird concat of port version, datetime, hostname,
> port revision, uname(?) and a fixed string(?) in that order.
oh
On 2023/03/31 19:40, Jared Harper wrote:
> However, I had some difficulty finding the source of access(2) so I could not
> vet by assumptions.
see sys_access() in sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c
On 2023/04/01 11:27, Jared Harper wrote:
> For some reason I haven't received the email from Solène (even after
> requesting it re-sent on lists.openbsd.org; nor is it in spam; I will
> look further into this issue), so I'm adding my reply in-line here:
Solène's domain publishes a DMARC p=reject
On 2023/03/10 13:31, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Other shells do not have this bug, such as bash, yash, mksh, ash, dash.
mksh does behave the same way as OpenBSD's ksh. I tested a source
build and the Debian package.
> On the other hand, ksh93 behaves the same way as ksh.
>
> Obviously zsh has a
On 2023/03/06 14:16, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> 06.03.2023 13:49, Raf Czlonka пишет:
> > To quote sthen@[0]:
> >
> > But that isn't, it is talking about _execdir,
> > _flags, etc where you need to replace the
> >
> > [0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=165364961710717=2
>
> I find this
On 2023/03/06 13:10, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> All relevant variables should be explained.
>
> Feedback? OK?
>
> Index: rc.conf.8
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/rc.conf.8,v
> retrieving revision 1.31
> diff -u -p -r1.31
On 2023/03/02 10:50, Dave Voutila wrote:
> Is this really a problem with ports? That Python issue was related to a
> Python 2.7 unit test and from 2014.
not really, no. there has been the odd patch over the years but nothing
current (no more than 4 including the Python one).
add a couple more lines to make that more clear though,
and give some hints for people who don't know what PKI is - see below.
On 2023/03/02 05:35, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 04:53:00PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > How about this? Show a strong psk in the exam
[from misc]
> > I don't see that in the iked.conf manual. There is some reference to not
> > using psk in /etc/examples/iked.conf but it's not clear whether that's
> > because of the need to share a single psk with all endpoints connecting
> > via the same iked.conf configuration line (certainly a
(moving to ports#, reply-to is set, although this is unlikely to be
OpenBSD-specific)
On 2023/02/25 02:18, Mikhael Lialin wrote:
> Trying to setup witi with radius eap-tls authentication.
>
> And getting time out while authenticated.
>
> Tried with custome setup, and default setup with
On 2023/02/25 11:32, jon@elytron.openbsd.amsterdam wrote:
> Hello, I'm in the process of adapting a driver from freebsd to
> openbsd. I was wondering what I should use in place of a call like
> ttycreate(tmptty, TS_CALLOUT, "N%r", i);
>
> any hints appreciated, tmptty is a struct tty from
A couple of comments,
> - while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "Aanqw")) != -1) {
> + while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "Aanpqw")) != -1) {
The use of -p as the flag seems a bit odd, -f would be my instinctive
choice - though it does match one of the three possibliities in Linux'
sysctl(8).
Noticed while testing with LLVM 15, but it affects plain -current
as well. If I take a binary that was linked with ld.bfd and strip it
(i.e. this is now using llvm-strip), it breaks the output file in
such a way that it cannot be executed:
: i386.p; cat a.c
#include
int main() {
On 2023/02/07 12:29, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:41:34AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023/02/07 10:20, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Arslan Kabeer (on the Internet) made me aware of clickjacking being done
On 2023/02/07 10:20, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Arslan Kabeer (on the Internet) made me aware of clickjacking being done on
> my site using OpenBSD httpd. This following patch implements a RFC 7034
> protection called "noiframe" which disallows other sites (but not the same
> site) to add
On 2023/01/21 14:00, Thomas Dunn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The man page for ifmedia(4) identifies the media modes defined for IEEE802.11
> Wireless LAN under the heading "MEDIA TYPES AND OPTIONS FOR IEEE802.11
> WIRELESS LAN".
>
> For better consistency, I suggest changing "TYPES" to "MODES" in this
On 2023/01/20 18:14, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > > I wonder if it makes sense to have a version of sysctl.conf that
> > > only gets used for the next reboot and then is removed, kind of
> > > like
On 2023/01/18 12:46, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> But you should not start a sentence with also.
> Also you should not start a sentence with but.
>
> Not the best english. jmc can weight in perhaps.
>
> Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > .Pp
> > Even with sufficient file system permissions,
> > these devices
Is there any benefit to pkg_add's TERM handling now that it no longers
uses the full terminal width?
To my eye the visual output looks the same with TERM=dumb (though
presumably it will avoid the intermittent problem where somewhere
between pkg_add, termcap and urxvt, pkg_add -u output jumps to
On 2023/01/12 04:49, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything else which I can do, to help this diff reviwed and
> increase the chance of getting in?
>
> Thread at https://marc.info/?t=16347829861=1=2
>
> Last version of the diff at
>
On 2023/01/09 18:39, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> Another update to the console patchset...
i386 ramdisk still fits.
; diff /tmp/old /tmp/new
--- /tmp/oldTue Jan 10 03:56:19 2023
+++ /tmp/newTue Jan 10 03:54:13 2023
@@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ text databss dec hex
1083 0 0
I don't think this helps.
It's the same for clean, update-patches, install, update-plist,
port-lib-depends-check, [...] and we already have "and of course, use the
same settings for the subsequent invocations of make" in the section
showing how to work with flavours.
--
Sent from a phone,
On 2022/12/30 02:06, Theo Buehler wrote:
> I understand that it is a libcbor major bump. Why is the libfido2 bump
> needed?
We can run into a problem with bumps with inter-library dependencies
in base. If software from packages uses functions from both libraries,
if you _don't_ bump major for
On 2022/12/26 11:25, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 07:18:45AM -0300, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 07:34:04AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:49:06PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > >
> > > hi. i've committed the parts of this
> +++ usr.bin/ctfconv/parse.c 22 Dec 2022 21:15:27 -
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ RB_HEAD(itype_tree, itype) itypet[CTF_K
> */
> struct isymb_tree isymbt;
>
> -struct itype *void_it; /* no type is emited for void */
> +struct itype *void_it; /*
On 2022/12/22 17:58, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > flag.
> > > Just like for IPsec, using the
> > > -.Fl r
> > > -flag,
> > > -.Xr netstat 1
> > > +.Xr route 8
> > > +.Cm show
> > > +command
> > > displays information about IPComp flows.
> >
> > That's a lie. Neither netstat nor route show IPsec
On 2022/12/18 20:53, Geoff Steckel wrote:
> OpenBSD 7.2 (GENERIC.MP) #758: Tue Sep 27 11:57:54 MDT 2022
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
It's a release kernel so kern.pool_debug is off by default. I don't know
rge(4) but in the absence of other ideas I'd try
On 2022/12/18 03:06, Lucas wrote:
> The following patch expands acme-client config file `domain` blocks to
> allow for a `owner user:group` directive, which allows to get rid of
> customs scripts that "fix" permissions for issued certs, mostly needed
> in ports land. I don't find it too invasive,
On 2022/12/15 09:47, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Other than that, I still think MAC is the identifier we should give priority
> to.
> So I would like for this to be flipped, and then I think we can consider this
> work done.
Do we want to give users a clue that this works (for hostname.vlanX
or
On 2022/12/15 05:19, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Yes, I agree with Theo here that lladdr is more specific and should win
> present.
That depends on the hardware ;)
On 2022/12/13 14:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/12/13 14:13, Janne Johansson wrote:
> > Den tis 13 dec. 2022 kl 14:11 skrev Alireza Arzehgar
> > :
> > > I implemented an interesting game. I thought this game is cool and could
> > > be
> > > fun
On 2022/12/13 14:13, Janne Johansson wrote:
> Den tis 13 dec. 2022 kl 14:11 skrev Alireza Arzehgar
> :
> > I implemented an interesting game. I thought this game is cool and could be
> > fun
> > for OpenBSD users. I don't know what game will accept on OpenBSD. But I hope
> > this patch is
On 2022/12/06 19:57, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> Which interface do you wish to configure? (name, lladdr, '?', or 'done')
> [vio0] ?
> Available network interfaces are: vio0 vlan0.
> vio0: lladdr fe:e1:bb:d1:dd:97
> Which interface do you wish to configure? (name, lladdr, '?', or 'done')
>
On 2022/11/30 08:53, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said "Theo de Raadt" on Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:56:21 -0700:
>
> > A new "enablecommandline" configuration option re-enables those
> > particular features, and the diff later on will show why we feel these
> > features should be optional.
>
>
On 2022/11/24 14:36, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:36:28PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > > > The other, that if both exist,
> > > > /etc/hostname.$if will override /etc/hostname.$lladdr.
> > >
> > > We do need to decide which one is
Need to query (and set $if, which might be used in route commands etc) I think.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 22 November 2022 08:37:05 Florian Obser wrote:
On 2022-11-22 18:06 +10, David Gwynne wrote:
There are a few things to keep in mind if we're going to use
On 2022/11/14 16:50, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> X segfaulted when I opened a window, Xorg.log.old only showed the
> address without anything specific, no core dump was created and
> xenodm automatically restarted.
>
> After I logged in I checked ~/.xsession for possible indications, but
> that file
ha, good catch. committed, thanks.
Seems some hosting providers have annoying "out of prefix"
default gateways whuch are painful to configure
(https://marc.info/?t=16678224225=1=2), should
we give a pointer in route(8)?
Index: route.8
===
RCS file:
On 2022/11/07 23:54, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> > > I know this makes rc(8) a bit noisier but it really does improve my
> > > (for want of a better term) "user experience" as I wait for my machine
> > > to boot.
> >
> > I like this and it doesn't add more **lines** to the
On 2022/11/04 23:32, i...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I am trying to understand how the code review process is conducted in
> OpenBSD. I can see all the OK's in the commit log, but not every commit
> has the OK.
>
> On FreeBSD there where a serious problem with a developer who was hired
> to by Netgear
On 2022/11/07 12:02, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> Le Sun, 6 Nov 2022 18:41:50 +0400,
> Loganaden Velvindron a écrit :
>
> > On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 at 18:31, Job Snijders wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Support for using Ed25519 for server and user authentication was
> > > introduced in 2014. I
On 2022/10/20 09:44, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
> I was testing the full setup for a lightweight desktop I posted on
> https://daemonforums.org/showpost.php?p=67677=1
>
> My downloaded miniroot:
> -rw-r--r--1 jsh jsh 5832704 Oct 20 08:51 miniroot72.img
>
> The system had previously been
On 2022/10/20 09:05, Heppler, J. Scott wrote:
> Using the miniroot img from https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.2, the
> set retrival still points to snapshots.
You (or someone else using the same IP) must have done an install from a
full URL previously rather than picking a mirror from the
On 2022/10/11 15:03, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> Here is a new diff for checksum offloading (ipv4, udp, tcp) for em(4).
>
> The previous diff didn't implement hardware vlan tagging for >em82578
> which should result in variable ethernet header lengths and thus
> wrong checksums inserted at wrong places.
On 2022/10/11 03:44, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:17:32AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > Any non-zero value indicates an error, that would include 2. You are
> > marking this as an error, when it isn't.
> >
> > You think this will help your scripting. Do you not
On 2022/10/06 18:20, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Just before lock mbuhl pointed out a new limit placed in pf, not
> exported yet over snmp. Here's a diff to add support for
> PF_LIMIT_ANCHORS.
>
> the OPENBSD-PF-MIB.txt DESCRIPTION is adapted from pfLimitMaxTables.
> The snmp{,d} parts are there
On 2022/10/04 10:36, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 06:32:04PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > diskless(8) just needs tftpd(8) to deliver files, none of the possibly
> > untrusted clients are supposed to ever write anything.
> >
> > Either way, even when run without -c, a single
These programs seem OK as-is, they are following the advice in
https://man.openbsd.org/setproctitle.3#CAVEATS
On 2022/09/26 18:06, Josiah Frentsos wrote:
> Index: sbin/dhcpleased/engine.c
> ===
> RCS file:
Released today so I haven't been able to give it much testing yet...
Index: doc/Changelog
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/unbound/doc/Changelog,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -p -r1.45 Changelog
--- doc/Changelog 29 Aug
On 2022/05/21 17:04, Tobias Heider wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 12:51:19PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022/05/21 13:44, Tobias Heider wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 03:41:12PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > I ran into problems with Ap
1 - 100 of 2217 matches
Mail list logo
