On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:35:03PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
The SIOCG80211ALLNODES operate on struct ieee80211_nodereq_all, not
on struct ieee80211_nodereq, right? If I understand things correctly,
we were on a safe side because struct ieee80211_nodereq is larger
than struct
2014-08-19 14:19 GMT+04:00 Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:35:03PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
The SIOCG80211ALLNODES operate on struct ieee80211_nodereq_all, not
on struct ieee80211_nodereq, right? If I understand things correctly,
we were on a safe side because
When the procfs root directory is listed using more than one getdents()
call, the process iterator can mistakenly skip a few processes. The
patch corrects this by making the index of the first process entry match
with the static procfs entries. This prevents over-winding of the
process list during
Hello,
This patch corrects the process iterator in procfs_readdir(), allowing
procfs root listing to work again. The iterator was stuck to the first
instance of allprocess list because all the relevant LIST_NEXT()
statements were mistakenly removed in revision 1.58 of procfs_vnops.c.
Regards,
2014-08-18 9:23 GMT+04:00 Kent R. Spillner kspill...@acm.org:
Haven't tested, just eyeballing the diff; I have two questions inline
below.
1). Did you want to use proglen here?
Yep, good catch, thanks!
2). proglen is declared as an int; is there any danger malicious
values could cause an
On 18/08/14 6:24 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i think i'll try to find the sk at work and wire it up. its just annoying cos
im pretty sure its sr optics with sc connectors.
thanks for testing.
how's this one?
Only running regular
From what I remember from last attempt to convert sk(4) to MCLGETI,
there were problems which only showed up under load (possibly also involved
NFS, I don't remember for sure) - I probably used netrate with something like
netblast 11.22.33.44 12345 1 30 to generate a bunch of packets over it
On 19/08/14 2:43 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
From what I remember from last attempt to convert sk(4) to MCLGETI,
there were problems which only showed up under load (possibly also involved
NFS, I don't remember for sure) - I probably used netrate with something like
netblast 11.22.33.44 12345 1
All,
I had implemented a network using openospf and initially left
router-priorities off. Problem is I kept coming up FULL/OTHER and would
not get routes. I changed the router priority values (not to match as when
I matched got the same). I changed one side of a line to 10, while the
other was
All,
I noticed in a few write-ups by Claudio that PWE3 and VPLS were next on the
roadmap. This seemed to be a few years ago. Any progress in that regard?
Is their a page that tracks that status? Very interested, Thanks
Tim
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:48:51PM -0400, Tim Epkes wrote:
All,
I noticed in a few write-ups by Claudio that PWE3 and VPLS were next on the
roadmap. This seemed to be a few years ago. Any progress in that regard?
Is their a page that tracks that status? Very interested, Thanks
Tim
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:59:42AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
I will split this diff into smaller parts to make review and
discussion easier.
Replace gethostbyaddr(3) with getnameinfo(3).
Note that I remove the sigprocmask() that was added in rev 1.23
before privsep. It was necessary
Hi,
while working on rcctl(8), i noticed that the rc.conf(8) manual
is of... err, how can i express it politely... somewhat doubtful
quality. Here is a stab at it.
As a first step, i moved all the examples from the DESCRIPTION to
the EXAMPLES esction. After that, the DESCRIPTION section was
On 08/19/14 21:45, Tim Epkes wrote:
All,
I had implemented a network using openospf and initially left
router-priorities off. Problem is I kept coming up FULL/OTHER and would
not get routes. I changed the router priority values (not to match as when
I matched got the same). I changed one
I think sthen is referring to the original diff Kettenis had in the tree a
few years ago.
On 20/08/2014 4:44 am, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 19/08/14 2:43 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
From what I remember from last attempt to convert sk(4) to MCLGETI,
there were problems which only
On 2014/08/20 07:06, David Gwynne wrote:
I think sthen is referring to the original diff Kettenis had in the tree a
few years ago.
Yes - I just wanted to give ideas of things that might be worth testing
that have been known to cause problems on those NICs in the past
On 20/08/2014 4:44 am,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:59:42AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
I will split this diff into smaller parts to make review and
discussion easier.
Rename priv_gethostserv() to priv_getaddrinfo() as this is what the
function does. Change the return code semantics to match getaddrinfo(3).
ok?
On 20 Aug 2014, at 7:12 am, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2014/08/20 07:06, David Gwynne wrote:
I think sthen is referring to the original diff Kettenis had in the tree a
few years ago.
Yes - I just wanted to give ideas of things that might be worth testing
that have been
On 19/08/14 2:19 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
On 18/08/14 6:24 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i think i'll try to find the sk at work and wire it up. its just
annoying cos im pretty sure its sr optics with sc connectors.
thanks for testing.
Agree with once elected a DR he stays that way (eliminates a lot of
bouncing). My issue was that both sides became FULL/OTHER. I stopped all
and removed all router priorities and let them go default. When I brought
it all back up, most went FULL/OTHER on both sides so I got nothing. I am
using
Cool thanks.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Rafael Zalamena rzalam...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:48:51PM -0400, Tim Epkes wrote:
All,
I noticed in a few write-ups by Claudio that PWE3 and VPLS were next on
the
roadmap. This seemed to be a few years ago. Any
On 2014/08/19 18:32, Tim Epkes wrote:
Agree with once elected a DR he stays that way (eliminates a lot of
bouncing). My issue was that both sides became FULL/OTHER.
I get this sometimes, usually after a link has gone away for a bit but
hasn't lost link, normally restarting ospfd on one router
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:44:54PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi,
while working on rcctl(8), i noticed that the rc.conf(8) manual
is of... err, how can i express it politely... somewhat doubtful
quality. Here is a stab at it.
As a first step, i moved all the examples from the
this lets you have networks on the native vlan on an interface
at 1500, while setting a child vlan interfaces mtu to jumbos.
ok?
Index: if_vlan.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c,v
retrieving revision 1.108
diff -u -p
Hi Robert,
Robert Peichaer wrote on Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:39:51AM +0200:
In the Base system daemon configuration variables section, in the
last paragraph this is incorrect.
... including a string containing only a single blank character, ...
Looking at the _rc_parse_conf() code in
jumbos seem find. nfs seems fine.
im going to put this and the other jalloc driver changes in to see what happens.
dlg
On 20 Aug 2014, at 7:41, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 19/08/14 2:19 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
On 18/08/14 6:24 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at
On 20 Aug 2014, at 11:53 am, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote:
can you fix this?
Begin forwarded message:
From: David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au
Subject: ftp, proxies, and https
Date: 20 August 2014 7:47:27 AEST
To: guent...@openbsd.org, js...@openbsd.org
ola. do you guys have
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
I don't know if we recycle them somehow, but just in case...
--- sys/sys/file.h
+++ sys/sys/file.h
...
-#defineDTYPE_CRYPTO5 /* crypto */
+/* was define DTYPE_CRYPTO5 */
When it goes, this
I don't know if we recycle them somehow, but just in case...
--- sys/sys/file.h
+++ sys/sys/file.h
...
-#defineDTYPE_CRYPTO5 /* crypto */
+/* was define DTYPE_CRYPTO5 */
When it goes, this is the way to document it, yep.
...but you better delete the
29 matches
Mail list logo
