Hi,
David Coppa wrote:
still rocking hard
My old Athlon 1600+ blow dries something like
I'm gruvm up the country, where the memory tastes like wine.
Is this a regression, then??
--steffen
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 14:37, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
sdao...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
David Coppa wrote:
still rocking hard
My old Athlon 1600+ blow dries something like
B I'm gruvm up the country, where the memory tastes like wine.
Is this a regression, then??
--steffen
System
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 05:09:02PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
Hi,
Just to prove my point that vmmap testing is still relevant: today a bug
got found and fixed, where grepping a 1.7GB file on i386 tripped an
assertion (I love assertions).
This brings the latest versions to:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 05:09:02PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
Hi,
Just to prove my point that vmmap testing is still relevant: today a bug
got found and fixed, where grepping a 1.7GB file on i386 tripped an
assertion (I love assertions).
This brings the latest versions to:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl
wrote:
Hi,
Just to prove my point that vmmap testing is still relevant: today a bug
got found and fixed, where grepping a 1.7GB file on i386 tripped an
assertion (I love assertions).
This brings the latest versions to:
Hi,
Just to prove my point that vmmap testing is still relevant: today a bug
got found and fixed, where grepping a 1.7GB file on i386 tripped an
assertion (I love assertions).
This brings the latest versions to:
http://www.stack.nl/~ariane/vmmap_sys.diff.65
(apply against /usr/src/sys)
Hello.
I want to ask you about vmmap changes introduced here and in your
presentation http://openbsd.org/papers/tdose_memalloc/presentation.html
1. http://openbsd.org/papers/tdose_memalloc/presentation.html#%2816%29
Browsers, java mono breakage
You pointed to some buggy software. If I
I want to ask you about vmmap changes introduced here and in your
presentation http://openbsd.org/papers/tdose_memalloc/presentation.html
1. http://openbsd.org/papers/tdose_memalloc/presentation.html#%2816%29
Browsers, java mono breakage
You pointed to some buggy software. If I understand
On 2012/02/17 22:01, Anton Maksimenkov wrote:
Hello.
I want to ask you about vmmap changes introduced here and in your
presentation http://openbsd.org/papers/tdose_memalloc/presentation.html
1. http://openbsd.org/papers/tdose_memalloc/presentation.html#%2816%29
Browsers, java mono
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl wrote:
Everybody thanks for testing this, it's been a tremendous help to me.
As far as I'm concerned, this diff will be commited once we unlock after
release (in a coordinated manner ofcourse, since this is uvm we're
Ariane van der Steldt wrote [2012-01-14 08:42+0100]:
As far as I'm concerned, this diff will be commited once we unlock after
release (in a coordinated manner ofcourse, since this is uvm we're
talking about).
It's about time too, ofcourse: 64 revisions of the same diff is alot. :D
--
Ariane
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 11:47:32PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:51:28 +0100, Ariane van der Steldt
ari...@stack.nl wrote:
I found and fixed the i386 bug. Please test this, to confirm that it
fixes the problem (and doesn't introduce anything else,
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:51:28 +0100, Ariane van der Steldt
ari...@stack.nl wrote:
Hi,
I found and fixed the i386 bug. Please test this, to confirm that it
fixes the problem (and doesn't introduce anything else, ofcourse).
(vmmap_sys relative to /usr/src/sys, vmmap_userland relative to
Hi,
I found and fixed the i386 bug. Please test this, to confirm that it
fixes the problem (and doesn't introduce anything else, ofcourse).
(vmmap_sys relative to /usr/src/sys, vmmap_userland relative to /usr/src)
New version of the diff:
http://www.stack.nl/~ariane/vmmap_sys.diff.64
with
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:55:27 +0100, Ariane van der Steldt
ari...@stack.nl wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:04:30PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:42:18PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
The huge diff included below is to replace vmmap for something that
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 05:55:27PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
- it's only a 3^W 10494 line diff :P
Wow, you weren't kidding.
I'll need testing on any and all architectures.
I'm now running this on my sparc64, macppc and amd64 boxes, the amd64 is the
only one i currently actually use,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Alexander Schrijver wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 05:55:27PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
I'll need testing on any and all architectures.
Is this in snapshots too?
No, it's not in snapshots.
--
Ariane
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 05:55:27PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
I'll need testing on any and all architectures.
Is this in snapshots too?
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:42:18PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
The huge diff included below is to replace vmmap for something that
works a lot better. This is the second version I plan to commit.
I have been running this on my laptop for months and have had no
problems.
The current
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:04:30PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:42:18PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
The huge diff included below is to replace vmmap for something that
works a lot better. This is the second version I plan to commit.
I have been
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:07:28AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:05:32PM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:44:45AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:43:19AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
The
In fact kernel_map itself is 0 when my machine stops. So the command
above also fails.
[...]
ddb x kernel_map
kernel_map: 0
Use x/qx, you're on a 64-bit platform and this is a 64 bit pointer (of
which the upper 32 bits are zero).
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
Hi,
The newest version of vmmap (as of now) is vmmap_sys.diff.26
Since the diff is scheduled to go in may 20 and has a lot of changes and
fixes, please test this diff and report any failures and successes.
If I start a program with this patch
there is a newer diff; I won't post the whole thing but in
uvm_map.c around line 5954, replace this:
KASSERT(start = srcmap-min_offset end = srcmap-max_offset);
with this:
if ((start PAGE_MASK) != 0 || (end PAGE_MASK) != 0 || end
start)
return EINVAL;
On 2011/05/16 13:04, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
there is a newer diff; I won't post the whole thing but in
uvm_map.c around line 5954, replace this:
KASSERT(start = srcmap-min_offset end = srcmap-max_offset);
with this:
if ((start PAGE_MASK) != 0 || (end PAGE_MASK) != 0
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/16 11:37, Eivind E wrote:
If I start a program with this patch (usually I just use top),
then gdb top `pgrep top`, then bt, the machine hangs.
there is a newer diff; I won't post the whole thing but in
uvm_map.c around line 5954,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:44:45AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:43:19AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
The newest version of vmmap (as of now) is vmmap_sys.diff.26
Since the diff is scheduled to go in may 20 and has a lot of changes and
fixes, please
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:43:19AM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
The newest version of vmmap (as of now) is vmmap_sys.diff.26
Since the diff is scheduled to go in may 20 and has a lot of changes and
fixes, please test this diff and report any failures and successes.
I use this separate
28 matches
Mail list logo
