It's doubtful that list users have the will, skill or authority to remove you
from the list.
Were I you, I'd look for someone with the above attributes and work with them.
YMMV,
JP
P.S. In event of list malfuctions, the list operator is probably the correct
avenue.
JP
On Mon, 8 May 2017 15:0
Radius cluster solutions abound in the web. LBNAMED was what we used way back
in the day, before mysql even existed.
Now you can have a maria cluster with a load balanced radius fairly easily
that is what we use, three geographically separated radius servers that
replicate.
Easy as pie to use a s
Having been where you are (almost) I thank my lucky stars I bit the bullet and
put in redundant EPC setup.
We have had at least a half dozen 'fatal' epc failures, most only require a
cold-boot, but three have required remote intervention.
Without a spare epc (and I have cold spare on the shelf) w
We see them even on fiber ports. not as many, but a few. It's definitely in the
EPC.
YMMV,
JP
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:00:52 +, Nathan Anderson wrote
> So, as an update to this, we are still seeing these FCS errors between the
> EPC (port 11) and the CCR-1036.
>
> I know it is not just a re
.@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of J Portman Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:32 PM To:
> telrad@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [Telrad] Ethernet RX FCS errors from BreezeWay?
>
> Of course Telrad says it is a Mikrotik issue. Funny, I move several Terabytes
>
Of course Telrad says it is a Mikrotik issue. Funny, I move several Terabytes
of data on a daily basis through Mikrotiks talking to a lot of different
equipment, and none of my other vendors have this issue.
To get around it, we upgraded to 10G fiber ports and guess what, we get FCS
errors on the
Baicells CPE does work with telrad with a telrad sim card. We have only tested
one but it works pretty well.
JP
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:35:51 -0600, Anthony Will wrote
> So an update,
> I contacted a Baicells rep and they do support SNMP. Their pricepoint is in
> the same range as the 8000 UE.
We use 2/2 subframe/special subframe. Limits us to 10 miles but _much_ better
performance overall than 2/0.
YMMV.
JP
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:43:07 -0600, Matthew Carpenter wrote
> From what I have seen running 4573:
>
> 1. 4x4TM4 is working good. I have 2 [UTF-8?]eNBâs using it with good
> s
> From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of
> Jeremy Austin
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 2:51 PM
> To: telrad@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [Telrad] L3 MTU settings
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:26 AM, J Portman wrote:
Yup, but the EPC vlans are hard set to 1500 at the current time and no way to
change them. Beating my head against this wall right now.
JP
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:18:36 +, Terry Duchcherer wrote
> Andreas, we are in the process of changing this as well. Are using 1900 for
> Layer2 and 1600 f
Expect can do it.
Used to be you could 'echo show log /mnt/flashfs/log/tlsyslog' | sshpass -e ssh
IP_OF_EPC
but it quit working.
I have an expect script to grab the log.
If they would JUST PUT SYSLOG client into the epc, so I could send the logs to
my log collector.
JP
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 17:
elrad user out herebut I suppose
> it's not impossible.
> Ian
>
> On 05/08/2016 8:29 AM, J Portman wrote:
> We experienced these random disconnects as well.
>
> Went to the customer site, hooked into the UE and waited (a fewhours) and lo
> and behold, there was anothe
We experienced these random disconnects as well.
Went to the customer site, hooked into the UE and waited (a few hours) and lo
and behold, there was another Telrad operator transmitting into our area with a
very weak signal.
You could watch the UE attempting to connect to the other operators eq
13 matches
Mail list logo
