F35 beta Gnome/Workstation on Wayland: could folks please check if Zoom screen share still works for them?
Hi folks, I'm on a completely up to date F35 Beta here with Workstation/Gnome on Wayland. During a work meeting on Zoom yesterday, I realised I could no longer share my screen. The option for "share full screen" just does not come up any more. It only allows a whiteboard. Could others on F35 Beta on Wayland please check and let me know if they're also seeing this? I've tested it out on two machines now, and am in touch with Zoom support about this. It could either be Zoom not having F35 in their list of supported Fedora versions yet, since they seem to read /etc/os-release and enable features accordingly, but it could also be a regression on our side. So it'll be good to get some additional information to confirm. https://www.guyrutenberg.com/2020/06/22/fixing-zoom-screen-sharing-on-debian-unstable/ Zoom are most likely to say "well, it's Fedora 35 beta at the moment", but if it's something on their side and I can help them support F35 before it's released to prevent lots of users getting a nasty shock, that'll be a good result here. Here's the discussion on Ask Fedora too: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/unable-to-share-screen-using-zoom-on-fedora-35-beta/16884/2 -- Thanks very much, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F33 WS ISO checksum
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 11:21:07 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > Are you saying that the warning message about the 19 lines is a don't care > or is their a problem with the way the checksum file is made? Does this mean > that the OK message that comes first is in error? I guess you could call it a "don't care". That isn't completely accurate though---sha256sum cares about all lines in the file, but if it they don't fit the format it can understand it skips them and tells the user. The format is explained in the man page: `man sha256sum`. It finds the one line it does understand, uses it to verify the ISO and prints "OK". This is all expected. So, there is nothing wrong with the CHECKSUM file, and there's nothing wrong with the output. Try the GPG related steps listed here. Those are what the PGP signature in the CHECKSUM file is for. https://getfedora.org/en/security/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F33 WS ISO checksum
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 10:55:28 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > On 10/28/20 10:16, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > I think sha256sum is pointing out the 19 lines related to the PGP > > Signature in the CHECKSUM file, which it can't understand. > > > > https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-33-1.2-x86_64-CHECKSUM > > > > Perhaps the CHECKSUM files were not previously signed. > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. The checksum file you sent gives the same OK and > Warning results as above; Yes, it also includes the 19 lines for the PGP signature, which sha256sum doesn't understand. So, this is expected. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F33 WS ISO checksum
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 09:32:51 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > I wanted a fresh copy of the F33 ISO to use for the PCs I maintain. I went > to the getfedora.org site. and downloaded the ISO and CHECKSUM files for F33 > Workstation. > > When I run: > > sha256sum -c Fedora-Workstation-live-33-1;2-x86_64-CHECKSUM > > I get: > > Fedora-Workstation-live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso: OK > > But right under that I get: > she256sum: WARNING: 19 lines are improperly formatted > > I went back to koji and downloaded the files for 1.2 that I originally got > for testing 1.2. When I ran the check sum I got the same warning, but I did > not get the worning when I originally downloaded 1.2 for testing. > > What's up? Is their a new bug in sha256sum -c? I think sha256sum is pointing out the 19 lines related to the PGP Signature in the CHECKSUM file, which it can't understand. https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-33-1.2-x86_64-CHECKSUM Perhaps the CHECKSUM files were not previously signed. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Thunderbird - Unpleasant Surprise
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 19:05:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > In testing the upcoming F33 release I noticed that it has included > thunderbird-78.3.1-1. > > I decided that I wanted to test the newest TBird but didn't want to go > through the process of setting up > accounts. So, I downloaded this new release from F32 updates-testing. What > could go wrong? > > IMHO, big mistake. I found that none of the extensions that I use with > thunderbird-68.11.0-1 are compatible > with the version 78. This includes Enigmail. I was also unable to get > calendar working. With TBird 68 > I have a local calendar as well as 3 synced Google calendars. > > I switched back to using 68 and had to figure out how to get my calendars > back. > > In addition, the update to version 78 managed to delete all the entries in my > address book. I do nightly > backups so it was easy to recover. > > I wonder if I've done something out of the ordinary or if other users will > run into similar pain. I think this came up on AskFedora too: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/why-is-thunderbird-outdated-in-fedora-repository/9115?u=franciscod Thunderbird 78 seems to be a major "breaking" upgrade: https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/78.2.1/releasenotes/#changes -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32: input methods "show keyboard layout" does not work
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 13:42:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2020-03-28 at 20:59 +0000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'd installed a new ibus-m17n input method to answer a question on Ask > > Fedora[1]. It was installed correctly, but when I click on the "show > > keyboard layout" button either in Gnome-settings or in the top panel > > bar, nothing happens. Instead, it appears that something somewhere > > crashes. > > > > Abrt filed this for me[2] > > > > Steps to reproduce: > > > > - F32, up to date install > > - ensure ibus-m17n is installed, > > - Go to Gnome-settings: region + languages > > - In input sources, click "+", search for "Hindi". > > - Click "Hindi" to see the available methods. > > - Select one to install: Hindi (inscript(m17n)) or Hindi > > (phonetic(m17n)). > > - Once installed, click the "eye" icon to see the keyboard layout. > > - Nothing happens, each time one clicks the number of crashes in abrt > > seems to increase by one too. > > > > I don't remember testing it on F31, so I cannot say if this is a bug in > > F32 or one that has always been there. > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/849 > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgnomekbd/issues/1 > > I believe that's the same issue. Indeed looks like it. Thanks. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
F32: input methods "show keyboard layout" does not work
Hi! I'd installed a new ibus-m17n input method to answer a question on Ask Fedora[1]. It was installed correctly, but when I click on the "show keyboard layout" button either in Gnome-settings or in the top panel bar, nothing happens. Instead, it appears that something somewhere crashes. Abrt filed this for me[2] Steps to reproduce: - F32, up to date install - ensure ibus-m17n is installed, - Go to Gnome-settings: region + languages - In input sources, click "+", search for "Hindi". - Click "Hindi" to see the available methods. - Select one to install: Hindi (inscript(m17n)) or Hindi (phonetic(m17n)). - Once installed, click the "eye" icon to see the keyboard layout. - Nothing happens, each time one clicks the number of crashes in abrt seems to increase by one too. I don't remember testing it on F31, so I cannot say if this is a bug in F32 or one that has always been there. [1] https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/add-devanagari-inscript-marathi-hindi-sanskrit-etc-keyboard-layouts-in-kde/5904/5 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818514 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome 3.36 Wayland OSK
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 13:47:00 +0300, makaveli wrote: > Hello everybody, > > This is my first e-mail to the mailing list. I hope this is the right place to > send. > > I'm having a problem with the onscreen keyboard on F32 Beta Gnome Wayland. > > When using Wayland native programs, keyboard auto-show works when clicking on > a > text field but on Xwayland programs(such as Google Chrome), there is no way to > open the onscreen keyboard. On previous version of Gnome(3.34), I was using an > extension named "On Screen Keyboard Button" to place a keyboard button on the > top bar. Ever since upgrading to 3.36 version, the extension stopped working. > > My question is that how do you guys manage the onscreen keyboard, because I > don't see a way to open it manually so I cannot use it on Xwayland programs. I can confirm this behaviour here on F32 beta. The on-screen keyboard doesn't come up in the terminal either---it should work there, shouldn't it? This would cause this test case to fail probably: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Gnome_Accessibility -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: My testing of F32 Workstation beta drop 0322.n.0
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 11:51:58 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > Abrt caught a SIGSEGV on QtWebEngineProcess. The retrace failed. I think I > read a note on this list about this and I believe someone already filed a > bug against Abrt; so I did not file one. Perhaps this one, that I had filed. Qutebrowser is crashing regularly at the minute: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812482 I've also filed it upstream now: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-83054 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome-boxes can't create virtual machines on F32 beta
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 12:57:45 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:41 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > Up to date F32 beta here. I needed to set up a VM but Boxes fails. I've > filed a bug here. Could someone see if they can reproduce this please? > If yes, this is an important bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816553 > > I'm using virt-manager now, and that works just fine. > > > Thanks for the heads up, I can reproduce it and I proposed it as a blocker. Thanks very much, Kamil. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gnome-boxes can't create virtual machines on F32 beta
Hello, Up to date F32 beta here. I needed to set up a VM but Boxes fails. I've filed a bug here. Could someone see if they can reproduce this please? If yes, this is an important bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816553 I'm using virt-manager now, and that works just fine. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32: Gnome dimming screen in gnome-terminal with solarized dark theme
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 18:06:29 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > I thought I'd check before I filed a bug. > > I'm on a fully up to date F32 Gnome install here: > gnome-shell-3.36.0-3.fc32.x86_64 > > When I switch to the terminal, to write mail in neomutt like I'm doing > now, for example, Gnome dims the screen a little automatically. This is > making it a bit hard on the eyes. Switching to another app with a light > background makes the screen bright again. Is anyone else seeing this? > Would anyone know if this is a bug or by design? > > I do have night light enabled, but disabling that does not affect > brightness. > > I will also go create a new user to see if this is reproducible now. Was able to reproduce it with a new user, so I filed an issue upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2426 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
F32: Gnome dimming screen in gnome-terminal with solarized dark theme
Hello, I thought I'd check before I filed a bug. I'm on a fully up to date F32 Gnome install here: gnome-shell-3.36.0-3.fc32.x86_64 When I switch to the terminal, to write mail in neomutt like I'm doing now, for example, Gnome dims the screen a little automatically. This is making it a bit hard on the eyes. Switching to another app with a light background makes the screen bright again. Is anyone else seeing this? Would anyone know if this is a bug or by design? I do have night light enabled, but disabling that does not affect brightness. I will also go create a new user to see if this is reproducible now. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How do we keep an eye on the CompNeuro Lab image's status?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 12:27:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 20:04 +0000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Sorry, very noob question: how would the NeuroFedora SIG keep up with > > the status of the CompNeuro Lab image? Could someone point me to the > > docs please, I wasn't able to find them on the wiki. > > > > I found it on Koji and realised that the image wasn't created because > > of some dependency errors, but it'll be nice if we can check on it > > regularly to ensure it keeps building. > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41480869 > > You can follow tickets in failed-composes: > > https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issues > > the name is a bit of a misnomer - a ticket is filed for failed and > incomplete composes, not just failed ones. When a compose is incomplete > (meaning some non-critical images failed to build) it'll record info on > all the failures. So you can see the ticket for the last incomplete F32 > compose: > > https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/988 > > and you can see there that it records a Comp_Neuro failure, task > 41477283 (just search for 'Comp_Neuro'). Great. Thanks, Adam. I'll also inform the members of the SIG about this also and we'll try to ensure that the image keeps building correctly. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
How do we keep an eye on the CompNeuro Lab image's status?
Hello, Sorry, very noob question: how would the NeuroFedora SIG keep up with the status of the CompNeuro Lab image? Could someone point me to the docs please, I wasn't able to find them on the wiki. I found it on Koji and realised that the image wasn't created because of some dependency errors, but it'll be nice if we can check on it regularly to ensure it keeps building. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41480869 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction
Hi Vikesh, On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 10:13:30 +0530, Vikesh Baid wrote: > My name is Vikesh Baid, I live in Jaipur ( Rajasthan, India ). I have > been working with a Linux based OS for 7 years. I used Ubuntu, Kali > Linux, and Fedora( since F22 ). I like Fedora very much. Welcome! > I want to contribute to Fedora. I have filed some bugs on Bugzilla > before. So now I am thinking to do it more often and understanding > basics of QA work. I have applied to become a member of the QA group > already. As @alciregi said on the "Welcome to Fedora" ticket[1], you can start with updates-testing checks[2,3]. That will help you familiarise yourself with bodhi etc. which are used by the QA team. If you have any queries, please ask them without hesitation. I have approved your membership to the QA FAS group also now. [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-join/Welcome-to-Fedora/issue/4 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing [3] https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/how-can-i-test-updates-and-provide-karma/1360 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Testing request: fpaste 0.4.0.0 (uses paste.centos.org)
Hello, I've updated fpaste to use paste.centos.org and cut a new release. I've tested it out and it works fine here, but since a few options changed, could more people please test it for a bit before I push it out to users? The bodhi updates are here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=fpaste Changes include: - update options to match what Stikked allows: * expiry * languages * author * title - the URL option has been removed---since the API key is hardcoded, it can't be used for other Stikked servers anyway. (Making it configurable is on my list, but it is quite low priority.) Users should not notice any changes in normal usage (sysinfo etc). If you notice any weirdness, please let me know. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gnome on F31: Qt applications cannot be fullscreened
Hello, Ran into another bug today while trying to watch netflix. Qt applications cannot be full screened. Bug filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759490 This is more basic functionality---worth proposing as a blocker? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome on F31: X and Wayland clipboard weirdness(es)/regressions
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 13:10:19 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 12:50 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > Both have been rejected as blockers due to being too "edge case". But > pasting into QT applications seems sufficiently broad to be > considering > as blocking, I think. So if your problems are not related to those two > issues (e.g. have a VM running), please file new bugs and feel free to > propose them as blockers (or at least mark them as CommonBugs). > > > I am not sure you would be able to block on this, since no QT applications > are in standard Workstation installation. As far as I have seen, there is > a > tendency not to block on additional software. > > > It would be of course up to debate. I'm just saying it's a good topic for > debate. +1, if not blockers, they should be listed in CommonBugs at least. I've filed two issues, and proposed one as a blocker now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758865 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758873 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Podman issues on F31
Hello, > Thanks Ankur, I am wondering if this bug was just fixed, with some changes > around sd_notify any chance you could test the podman-1.6 release candidate? Sorry---just got back from a trip today. I tried this one, but it didn't seem to fix the issue: $ rpm -q podman podman-1.6.0-0.2.rc2.git9181c65.fc31.x86_64 Is there anything else I should try? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thinkpad: Fedora 31: kernel panic on reboot
Hello, I've filed a bug here about kernel panics on reboots. It only seems to happen on my Thinkpad, not the non Thinkpad workstation. It only happens when I reboot from Fedora into Fedora, not from Windows into Windows, so it shouldn't be a hardware error. Would someone else here be using a Thinkpad---could you check if you see this too please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755107 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Podman issues on F31
I've filed a bug now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756059 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Podman issues on F31
Hello, While working with docs, I ran into a few podman issues. I've not been able to find any bugs related to these yet. Are these known by any chance. If not, I'll go file fresh bugs: --- Issue 1 $ ./build.sh This build script is using Podman to run the build in an isolated environment. WARN[] Error initializing configured OCI runtime runc: no valid executable found for OCI runtime runc: invalid argument Error: could not get runtime: default OCI runtime "runc" not found: invalid argument @hhlp pointed out that it's listed in F31 common bugs here: https://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F31_bugs#Podman_fails_to_run_containers_on_upgraded_systems_.28due_to_use_of_runc_runtime_with_cgroups_v2.29 The fix, unfortunately, lead to a new error: --- Issue 2 $ rm ~/.config/containers/libpod.conf -f $ ./build.sh This build script is using Podman to run the build in an isolated environment. 2019-09-25T10:28:24.000811303Z: cannot rm state directory '/run/user/1000/crun/42c03e3c10e7b2de25b41fbd1d69ee7fb2ac656a18b77a005e7c6e9556e07195': Directory not empty ERRO[0002] Error removing container 42c03e3c10e7b2de25b41fbd1d69ee7fb2ac656a18b77a005e7c6e9556e07195: error cleaning up container 42c03e3c10e7b2de25b41fbd1d69ee7fb2ac656a18b77a005e7c6e9556e07195: error removing container 42c03e3c10e7b2de25b41fbd1d69ee7fb2ac656a18b77a005e7c6e9556e07195 from runtime: `/usr/bin/crun delete --force 42c03e3c10e7b2de25b41fbd1d69ee7fb2ac656a18b77a005e7c6e9556e07195` failed: exit status 1 $ --- Issue 3 I tried on a different F31 machine and ended up with a different error: $ ./build.sh This build script is using Podman to run the build in an isolated environment. Trying to pull docker.io/antora/antora... Getting image source signatures Copying blob 56174ae7ed1d done Copying blob 284842a36c0d done Copying blob e7c96db7181b done Copying blob 7fa322d31adf done Copying blob ee3fdb6b9c98 done Copying blob 50958466d97a done Copying blob 6fd7bef320a5 done Copying config 8e549fc7fa done Writing manifest to image destination Storing signatures Error processing tar file(exit status 1): there might not be enough IDs available in the namespace (requested 0:42 for /etc/shadow): lchown /etc/shadow: invalid argument Error: unable to pull docker.io/antora/antora: unable to pull image: Error committing the finished image: error adding layer with blob "sha256:e7c96db7181be991f19a9fb6975cdbbd73c65f4a2681348e63a141a2192a5f10": Error processing tar file(exit status 1): there might not be enough IDs available in the namespace (requested 0:42 for /etc/shadow): lchown /etc/shadow: invalid argument -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gnome-calendar 3.34 bug reported
Hello, Gnome-calendar doesn't always work in F31. Upstream bug was already reported, and I've also filed on on our bugzilla for completeness now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753558 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/issues/455 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Help needed with intel (iwlwifi) firmware breakage
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 16:24:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 11:15 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > A firmware update seems to have broken Intel wifi for lots of users. You > > can see the Fedora bug report here[1]. It also contains mentions of > > other distribution's trackers (I cannot add them to external trackers > > because they are "not recognised", yay!). > > The complete bug URL didn't make it to the list. It sounds like it > could be either of these: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204153 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728319 No, it isn't this. In the firmware bug, the wifi hardware doesn't even come on---so it doesn't get to the scanning for networks stage at all. This is the description of the bug which contains the dmesg output, so please take a look to see if the issue fits yours: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733369#c0 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Vit 2.x could use some testing
Hello, Vit upstream has completely written the tool in Python now, with lots of enhancements. The 2.x branch is doing quite well, but upstream has requested that we test it out to ensure it's in better shape before it is declared stable. So, I've now built it for rawhide, and pushed updates (with stable pushes disabled) to F30/F29. If you use Vit, please help test the new version. If you don't, take a look at Vit and Taskwarrior today (and improve your efficiency)! :P References: https://github.com/scottkosty/vit/tree/2.x https://taskwarrior.org/docs/30second.html F30: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8575a8af5e F20: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-86051ecae4 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Help needed with intel (iwlwifi) firmware breakage
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 20:24:20 +0200, Alessio wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 8:08 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Would someone here with a rawhide system please verify this? I tried to > use the rawhide kernel with my F30, but it wouldn't even boot properly. > > > Hello. > Are you talking about 5.2 kernel? > Which kernel package did you use? I simply did --enablerepo=rawhide update kernel-core. Looks like that found the 5.3.0 kernel: Packages Altered: Install kernel-5.3.0-0.rc1.git3.1.fc31.x86_64 @rawhide Install kernel-core-5.3.0-0.rc1.git3.1.fc31.x86_64@rawhide Install kernel-modules-5.3.0-0.rc1.git3.1.fc31.x86_64 @rawhide I'm not concerned about the kernel at the moment, since it isn't affecting users. The firmware bug is hitting lots of us :( -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Help needed with intel (iwlwifi) firmware breakage
Hello, A firmware update seems to have broken Intel wifi for lots of users. You can see the Fedora bug report here[1]. It also contains mentions of other distribution's trackers (I cannot add them to external trackers because they are "not recognised", yay!). Some comments indicate that a 5.2 kernel would fix the issues. Would someone here with a rawhide system please verify this? I tried to use the rawhide kernel with my F30, but it wouldn't even boot properly. :/ Here are the main details for your convenience: - Description of problem: Breaks wifi: 05:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9260 (rev 29) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 0014 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 Memory at a120 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi Kernel modules: iwlwifi Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -q iwl7260-firmware iwl7260-firmware-25.30.13.0-99.fc30.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. sudo dnf update -y iwl7260-firmware 2. sudo rmmod iwlmvm iwlwifi 3. sudo modprobe iwlwifi Actual results: Wifi does not work. Dmesg output below. Expected results: Wifi should work Additional info: Downgrading to this version fixes it: iwl7260-firmware-1:25.30.13.0-94.fc30.noarch --- [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
F30 workstation beta fresh install: all well apart from gnome-clocks bug (and possibly suspend)
Hello!
Just installed F30 beta workstation on a brand new E490 thinkpad[1]. I
am happy to report that everything's gone very well---installation and
set up. I've run into the gnome-clocks issue, which won't let me login
without the workaround[2,3].
I've closed the lid once or twice only, and in both cases, on re-opening
the lid, there was a black screen with a mouse cursor but it didn't get
past that. I haven't yet been able to debug it yet, so this may not be a
bug---any one else seen this? Output of fpaste --sysinfo is attached.
[1] https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=da7c2876d3
[2] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1062
[3] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1837552#p1837552
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
=== fpaste 0.3.9.2 System Information (fpaste --sysinfo) ===
* OS Release (cat /etc/*-release | uniq):
Fedora release 30 (Thirty)
NAME=Fedora
VERSION="30 (Workstation Edition)"
ID=fedora
VERSION_ID=30
VERSION_CODENAME=""
PLATFORM_ID="platform:f30"
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 30 (Workstation Edition)"
ANSI_COLOR="0;34"
LOGO=fedora-logo-icon
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:30"
HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/;
DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f30/system-administrators-guide/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/;
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=30
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=30
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy;
VARIANT="Workstation Edition"
VARIANT_ID=workstation
Fedora release 30 (Thirty)
* Kernel (uname -r ; cat /proc/cmdline):
5.0.7-300.fc30.x86_64
BOOT_IMAGE=(hd0,gpt5)/vmlinuz-5.0.7-300.fc30.x86_64
root=UUID=4513482c-fe17-4fe1-97a7-1cf75fd1fc92 ro
resume=UUID=b1e1eca3-d616-4b04-b1df-571fcef5327e rhgb quiet
* Desktop(s) Running (ps -eo comm= | grep -E
'(gnome-session|startkde|startactive|xfce.?-session|fluxbox|blackbox|hackedbox|ratpoison|enlightenment|icewm-session|od-session|wmaker|wmx|openbox-lxde|openbox-gnome-session|openbox-kde-session|mwm|e16|fvwm|xmonad|sugar-session|mate-session|lxqt-session|cinnamon)'
):
gnome-session-b
* Desktop(s) Installed (ls -m /usr/share/xsessions/ | sed 's/\.desktop//g' ):
gnome-classic, gnome, gnome-xorg
* SELinux Status (sestatus):
SELinux status: enabled
SELinuxfs mount:/sys/fs/selinux
SELinux root directory: /etc/selinux
Loaded policy name: targeted
Current mode: enforcing
Mode from config file: enforcing
Policy MLS status: enabled
Policy deny_unknown status: allowed
Memory protection checking: actual (secure)
Max kernel policy version: 31
* SELinux Errors (selinuxenabled && journalctl --since yesterday |grep avc: |
grep -Eo comm="[^ ]+" | sort |uniq -c |sort -rn):
10 comm="gmain"
5 comm="rngd"
* CPU Model (grep 'model name' /proc/cpuinfo | awk -F: '{print $2}' | uniq -c |
sed -re 's/^ +//' ):
8 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz
* 64-bit Support (grep -q ' lm ' /proc/cpuinfo && echo Yes || echo No):
Yes
* Hardware Virtualization Support (grep -Eq '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo && echo
Yes || echo No):
Yes
* Load average (uptime):
18:14:26 up 52 min, 2 users, load average: 0.27, 0.25, 0.29
* Memory usage (free -m):
totalusedfree shared buff/cache
available
Mem: 158822147 10914 6092821
12798
Swap: 8005 08005
* Top 5 CPU hogs (ps axuScnh | awk '$2!=15881' | sort -rnk3 | head -5):
1000 8975 7.3 0.6 1218136 107100 pts/1 Sl+ 17:32 3:05
offlineimap
1000 15713 6.9 0.5 1691948 89184 tty3Sl+ 18:14 0:00
QtWebEngineProc
1000 4898 6.1 0.0 226648 4616 ?Ss 17:28 2:50 tmux:
server
1000 1607 4.2 0.5 1747744 93960 ? SNsl 17:22 2:10 syncthing
1000 14055 3.8 0.7 1807228 118392 tty3 Sl+ 18:12 0:05
QtWebEngineProc
* Top 5 Memory hogs (ps axuScnh | sort -rnk4 | head -5):
1000 3800 3.7 2.8 4017092 465792 tty3 Sl+ 17:27 1:44
qutebrowser
1000 3046 0.1 1.4 1317236 236372 tty3 Sl+ 17:27 0:03
gnome-software
1000 2568 2.2 1.4 3395612 228044 tty3 Sl+ 17:27 1:02
gnome-shell
1000 317
Re: Unusable dnf after dnf system-upgrade to F29
Hello, Turns out it was caused by some leftover files in /var/lib/dnf. Removing them fixed it. Thanks @alciregi for sorting this out for me :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unusable dnf after dnf system-upgrade to F29
I also see packagekit crashing with the same error: > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: terminate called after throwing > an instance of 'SQLite3::LibException' > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: what(): Step: UNIQUE > constraint failed: comps_environment_group.environment_id, > comps_environment_group.groupid in > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: INSERT INTO > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: > comps_environment_group ( > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: environment_id, > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: groupid, > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: installed, > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: group_type > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: ) > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: VALUES > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: (43799, 'base-x', > 1, 4) > Sep 30 16:00:39 ankur.pc packagekitd[23904]: -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Unusable dnf after dnf system-upgrade to F29
Hiya, I upgraded to F29 via dnf last evening and it went off without a hitch. However, now dnf is unusable. Each time I try to run it, I get this: > transaction.py:729:__init__:RuntimeError: C++ std::exception: Step: UNIQUE > constraint failed: comps_environment_group.environment_id, > comps_environment_group.groupid in > INSERT INTO > comps_environment_group ( > environment_id, > groupid, > installed, > group_type > ) > VALUES > (43799, 'base-x', 1, 4) I can't install/remove/update or even check packages. I've filed a bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634305 It's a bit of a pain, and I'm considering a fresh install, but I thought I'd hold on for a bit if this was a bug that needed further looking into? Any ideas, anyone? > $ rpm -qa \*dnf\* > dnfdaemon-selinux-0.3.19-4.fc29.noarch > python2-dnf-3.5.1-1.fc29.noarch > python3-dnf-plugins-extras-common-3.0.1-1.fc29.noarch > dnf-plugins-core-3.0.3-1.fc29.noarch > python3-libdnf-0.19.1-3.fc29.x86_64 > python3-dnf-plugin-tracer-3.0.1-1.fc29.noarch > python3-dnf-plugins-core-3.0.3-1.fc29.noarch > python2-libdnf-0.19.1-3.fc29.x86_64 > python3-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-3.0.1-1.fc29.noarch > dnf-3.5.1-1.fc29.noarch > python3-dnf-3.5.1-1.fc29.noarch > dnf-data-3.5.1-1.fc29.noarch > libdnf-0.19.1-3.fc29.x86_64 > dnfdaemon-0.3.19-4.fc29.noarch -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F28 beta: Flawless dnf update (almost!) + Bluetooth keyboard doesnt work + systemd-udev/upower eating CPU and continuously logging to journalctl + inaccessible man pages
> > This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533717 > originally filed on 2018-01-11. Additional comments that this breaks > not only rawhide are clearly appriopriate. > > The bug description also includes suggested fix which does not require > a deactivation of an offending module. Besides thoroughly breaking man > this module does few other things too. Thanks. I've dropped a comment there. I'm seeing it with openmpi, while you've filed it for mpich. Maybe it's to do with the "environment-modules" package that is responsible for setting modules up rather than these specific packages? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F28 beta: Flawless dnf update (almost!) + Bluetooth keyboard doesnt work + systemd-udev/upower eating CPU and continuously logging to journalctl + inaccessible man pages
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 01:36:05 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Issue 1 > > > systemd-udev has been running continuously, hogging up a CPU, and > keeping my laptop at 75C. I'm not sure what it's doing. journalctl has > *many* lines like this, and from the looks of it, it's still logging > them: > > $ journalctl -b --no-pager | grep hid2hci | wc -l > 100998 > > I filed a bug for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563554 > > Issue 2 > --- > > I also notice that my Wireless Keyboard + mouse (that worked before) > have stopped working now[3]. I have the same set on another F27 machine > that is working away without trouble now. It may be linked to the > previous issue, but I don't really know. If I boot with the receiver plugged in, they work (phew!). -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F28 beta: Flawless dnf update (almost!) + Bluetooth keyboard doesnt work + systemd-udev/upower eating CPU and continuously logging to journalctl + inaccessible man pages
Hi! Just updated to F28 via DNF. Thanks for all the work. F28 looks like another solid release! The upgrade went off almost perfectly. I only ran into an issue with Pokerth, but that's already been reported[1]. I've run into a few issues after rebooting, though. Any help would be appreciated. I'm happy to file bugs, of course. Issue 1 systemd-udev has been running continuously, hogging up a CPU, and keeping my laptop at 75C. I'm not sure what it's doing. journalctl has *many* lines like this, and from the looks of it, it's still logging them: $ journalctl -b --no-pager | grep hid2hci | wc -l 100998 Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc systemd-udevd[530]: Process 'hid2hci --method=dell --devpath=/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0' failed with e> Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc upowerd[20615]: unhandled action 'unbind' on /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0 Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc systemd-udevd[530]: Process 'hid2hci --method=dell --devpath=/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0' failed with e> Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc upowerd[20615]: unhandled action 'bind' on /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0 Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc systemd-udevd[530]: Process 'hid2hci --method=dell --devpath=/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0' failed with e> Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc upowerd[20615]: unhandled action 'unbind' on /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0 Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc systemd-udevd[530]: Process 'hid2hci --method=dell --devpath=/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0' failed with e> Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc upowerd[20615]: unhandled action 'bind' on /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0 Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc systemd-udevd[530]: Process 'hid2hci --method=dell --devpath=/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0' failed with e> Apr 04 01:04:13 ankur.pc upowerd[20615]: unhandled action 'unbind' on /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1.2/1-1.1.2:1.0 This isn't an error, apparently[2], but I can't find a way of turning the logging off. Any hints? Issue 2 --- I also notice that my Wireless Keyboard + mouse (that worked before) have stopped working now[3]. I have the same set on another F27 machine that is working away without trouble now. It may be linked to the previous issue, but I don't really know. Issue 3 (solved, sort of) -- The man command wouldn't find any man pages, somehow. When I ran `sudo mandb` to update it, I noticed lots of errors of the following variety: Processing manual pages under /usr/share/man/kk... mandb: can't chmod /var/cache/man/kk/CACHEDIR.TAG: Operation not permitted mandb: can't remove /var/cache/man/kk/CACHEDIR.TAG: Permission denied mandb: fopen /var/cache/man/kk/25811: Permission denied Purging old database entries in /usr/local/share/man... Processing manual pages under /usr/local/share/man... mandb: can't chmod /var/cache/man/local/CACHEDIR.TAG: Operation not permitted mandb: can't remove /var/cache/man/local/CACHEDIR.TAG: Permission denied mandb: fopen /var/cache/man/local/25811: Permission denied 0 man subdirectories contained newer manual pages. 0 manual pages were added. 0 stray cats were added. 0 old database entries were purged. I hadn't changed anything. It was OK before the upgrade. A `sudo rm /var/cache/man/*` and another `sudo mandb` didn't fix it either. Then, I noticed a warning: mandb: warning: $MANPATH set, ignoring /etc/man_db.conf Turns out, this is set by the mpi/openmpi-x86_64 module, which should probably be appending to MANPATH instead of overwriting it? $ echo $MANPATH /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64 Deactivating the module (module unload mpi/openmpi-x86_64) fixes it and my man/apropos/whatis commands work again. Should I file a bug? I don't see one filed here yet[4] --- [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1556603 [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/56797 [3] https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00EO4NN5C/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8=1 [4] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/openmpi/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: 3rd Party software submission
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 14:19:48 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller > <cscha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > What I meant with my comment was that we want this to be a positive push > for free software alternatives, > not a 'your an asshole for using non-free software' because that detracts > from the goal of promoting free software. > > > These goals are not mutually-exclusive. We should be able to provide some > education on free software in a prominent and meaningful way, without shaming > the user or making it difficult to install the software. Thanks for explaining this in such a clear way :) > > Strawman proposal: I'm imagining a moderately-sized red banner that says > something along the lines of "This software does not respect your freedom. href="...">Learn more...", which would be hard to miss, but also not so > large that it gets in the way or slows down the user. Currently the little red > Proprietary license tag is easy to ignore and doesn't mean much. Kalev showed > me a screenshot showing the existing "Learn more..." link in the software > sources dialog, but that's somewhat buried and very easy to ignore. This would be a nice start - is something like this doable? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: 3rd Party software submission
> Nothing at all. So, no, the "proprietary" label is not enough. > > That label is there AFTER you have been pushed through the gated enable 3rd > party software > setup, > which is mean to include in dept information about free software and > Fedora's mission. I'm not concerned about the gating. I agree that asking the same question again and again inhibits usability. As Michael pointed out in his e-mail, better wording could give more visibility to Free software and the community's mission than the current text. > So my point was that even after you been educated on the issue through that > gating process > there is some subliminal messaging around it. Well, it should really be more than subliminal messaging even at that point. :) For example, instead of framing all of this in terms of "proprietary" software, can we frame it in terms of "non free"/"non free and not open source" software? Would that require a review from a legal perspective? I ask because even though the two terms are synonymous, "non free" (to me) says more than that the software is proprietary. It also says that there is something called "free software", and that gives me more information to a user in an educational sense. Would something like this be doable? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 12:49:02 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:58:22AM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Yes. I believe mattdm wanted to have a new docs.fedoraproject.org page > > with end-user facing text that we can link to from gnome-software. > > Yes. Thank you for filing a ticket regarding this[1], Kalev. I'd love to help with it. [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/41 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: 3rd Party software submission
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 12:47:50 -0400, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote: > Well the current enablement of 3rd party software is meant to include stuff in > that regards and I think the revised text that was worked on with among others > Matthew Miller tried to come up with something better than the current > screenshots. What screenshots are you referring to here? > Also in the GNOME software the licensing field do put the work > Proprietary in a bright red colour box which to me signals 'warning' since red > usually is used as the colour of negative alerts. So I do think we are > covering > this and I think that is good, No, see, it isn't good enough. What does the word "proprietary" mean to an end user that is targeted here---one that is not necessarily part of the Open source eco system and has no context? What does it say about Free Software, and its importance? What does it say about how and why the Fedora community has made a commitment to this movement? Nothing at all. So, no, the "proprietary" label is not enough. > but we should be careful not to get to the stage > where installing Chrome comes with a blinking warning saying 'You can install > this, but be aware that we morally judge your for it' :) I won't reply to this hyperbolic comment. What I will do, is quote the "Freedom" foundation from here instead: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-project/project/fedora-overview.html "We are dedicated to free software and content. Advancing software and content freedom is a central community goal, which we accomplish through the software and content we promote. We choose free alternatives to proprietary code and content and limit the effects of proprietary or patent encumbered code on the Project. Sometimes this goal prevents us from taking the easy way out by including proprietary or patent encumbered software in Fedora. But by concentrating on the free software and content we provide and promote, the end result is that we are able to provide: - releases that are predictable and 100% legally redistributable for everyone; - innovation in free and open source software that can equal or exceed closed source or proprietary solutions; - and, a completely free project that anyone can emulate or copy in whole or in part for their own purposes. " So, how is this new feature is coherent with this in its current form? What do the other community members think please? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 10:58:22 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Sure, suggestions for better wording are very welcome. This is the best > we've managed to come up with so far. Could the software sources can be divided into a few categories maybe? For example: - Fedora defaults "These are default Fedora repositories. Keep them enabled to get the latest updates from Fedora" - Extra Free/Open source software for Fedora Workstation "These are extra repositories for Fedora Workstation users that provide Free/Open source software from other sources, such as COPRs" - Extra Proprietary software for Fedora Workstation "These are extra repositories for Fedora Workstation users that provide proprietary software that is not free/open source" - Other repositories "These are other repositories that have been configured, such as user-enabled repositories" Maybe there could be a colour scheme too to signify each category's status, like Blue for Fedora repositories, Green for Workstation-free, Red for Workstation-nonfree, and a Yellow for user-enabled ones. How does that sound? I don't know how much work it'll take, of course. > > Yes. I believe mattdm wanted to have a new docs.fedoraproject.org page > with end-user facing text that we can link to from gnome-software. Great. Thank you for following this up. :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 10:47:37 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi, Hello, > > Thanks for starting the discussion, Ankur! I was just about to send a > request for testing to the test list. Ah - sorry. I was slightly overzealous here XD > > More replies in-line down below: > > On 03/18/2018 01:28 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > - Clicking "enable" should tell the user what repositories were made > > available for activation. Open up the "software sources" dialogue > > straight-away, maybe? > > Good point. I'll talk to aday (gnome-software designer) and discuss > this. We were polishing the new software repositories dialog a lot, but > the notification that appears on the overview page didn't get that much > love. I'll see what we can do; maybe just disable the notification for now. Thank you! Would it also be possible to use a different term than "Third party repositories" in the software repositories dialogue? What's happening now is that the repositories from the fedora-workstation-repositories package come under "Third party repositories" accompanied by the notice on how some of these may be proprietary, and other third party repositories that users may have enabled themselves, such as Adobe/Dropbox/RPMFusion are coming up in a separate section. This isn't quite intuitive---it almost gives one the feeling that the latter are not "third party". > > > - The "find out more" link goes to the wikipedia page on properietary > > software, which is frankly useless. The Fedora Forbidden items would > > be a better page[2]. I would think the Forbidden Items page should > > require a section explaining what Gnome-software is doing here. The > > ideal scenario would be a special page that describes the individual > > repositories that are included in the fedora-workstation-repositories > > package. It should be a page that clearly speaks about free-software, > > and Fedora's commitment to it. I.e., it must educate users about the > > matter, and say "if you must use software that is not free/open > > source, you can do so here." > > Yes, we are supposed to get a new docs page for this. I'll talk to > mattdm and see how far we are with this. I'll make sure we update the > link before pushing it out to stable. I see this is up at the moment. It isn't updated, though (A ticket has been filed for Nvidia repositories etc already but I didn't want to update the page myself because I'm not completely sure of the complete process at the moment) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_party_software_list I would really like whatever page we link to to have a clear, end-user targeted summary of free software and our commitment to it right at the top, and then possibly a rationale as to why we're making it easy for users to install some very commonly used proprietary software to improve usability. I think this is an excellent opportunity to explain to end-users the importance of free-software, and let them make an informed decision on whether they want to use this set of proprietary software even if we're giving them easy access to it. (I do expect some will query why all of RPMFusion cannot be included, so maybe that will need to be addressed in short too.) > > > - And of course, can RPMFusion repositories be included here too if > > we're happy to include Google's software? > > Please open a ticket on https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation -- I don't > know the exact process how to add new repos, but I believe opening a > ticket there would be a start. Yeh. I'm following the discussion on the Nvidia ticket now: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/37 > > I didn't want to comment on the update. Where would the right place to > > discuss this be? > > desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org please. Lovely. I've (re-)subscribed to the list and am sending my reply there too, so that this thread can continue there. One last thing: I'm not too well versed with how the Changes process works, but shouldn't this quite major new feature be announced to the community similar to the other changes? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy -- Thanks again, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support
Hello, I just got the new gnome-software update which asks a user if they'd like to enable third-party repositories[1]. It then installs the fedora-workstation-repositories package which provides repo files for a pycharm copr and Google chrome(!). (ins)[asinha@ankur ~]$ rpmls fedora-workstation-repositories -rw-r--r-- /etc/yum.repos.d/_copr_phracek-PyCharm.repo -rw-r--r-- /etc/yum.repos.d/google-chrome.repo Was this discussed somewhere? Could someone please point me to a ticket or an ML thread if it was? I must've missed it. I'm on board with it in general, but I think few improvements are needed: - Clicking "enable" should tell the user what repositories were made available for activation. Open up the "software sources" dialogue straight-away, maybe? - The "find out more" link goes to the wikipedia page on properietary software, which is frankly useless. The Fedora Forbidden items would be a better page[2]. I would think the Forbidden Items page should require a section explaining what Gnome-software is doing here. The ideal scenario would be a special page that describes the individual repositories that are included in the fedora-workstation-repositories package. It should be a page that clearly speaks about free-software, and Fedora's commitment to it. I.e., it must educate users about the matter, and say "if you must use software that is not free/open source, you can do so here." - And of course, can RPMFusion repositories be included here too if we're happy to include Google's software? I didn't want to comment on the update. Where would the right place to discuss this be? [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-55a6726164 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: anyone else seeing long delay before responsiveness after resume?
On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 21:40 +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote: > No such issue here. No Matthew, not seeing it here either. Anything in the logs? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora-Easy-Karma Bodhi Errors
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 20:24 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Unfortunately, yes, it needs to be changed in the script at the > moment. > I am currently considering options to fix this so the next update > will > not require this manual change anymore. Ah, that's great! Thanks, Till. I'll keep an eye out so I can test out the new stuff whenever you announce it :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora-Easy-Karma Bodhi Errors
On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 12:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, Hi Till, > > in case you encounter problems with messages containing " Max retries > exceeded with url:" it might help to reduce the number of updates f- > e-k > requests, for example to 100. For this you need to change > > "limit": 1000 > > to > > "limit": 100 Does this change have to be made in the script itself? Do you think we could make this a command line argument to the script that has a default value of 1000? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: DNF system-upgrade to F27 failed
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 09:38 +0200, Charles-Antoine Couret wrote: > Hi, > > It's already reported: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498207 > > Lovely! Thanks! -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please test fpaste 0.3.9.0 in rawhide
Hello, I've just pushed a new version of update to rawhide. This version contains updates that were needed for the new modernpaste server that we're using. Please do give it a whirl and report any funny incidents if you observe them. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21409337 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Intro
On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 06:37 -0400, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > P.S. Ankur, I am mentoring a small bunch of people to help us with > Fedora QA effort. :) Ah - brilliant! If you aren't doing this already, may I request you to blog about your work and your experience as a mentor on the planet too? It may rub off on others and help us restart the mentoring SIG sooner (it's also on our TODO list) :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Intro
Hello Sahana, Akshat, Iroshan > I wish to contribute to the Fedoa community. Welcome to the Fedora community! There's so much you can help with! Since you've posted on the QA mailing list, may I assume you'd like to start here? The simplest way of getting started is to provide feedback to updates as documented here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing If there are other areas of the project you'd like to contribute to, do let us know and we'll be happy to help. There's also the Fedora Join SIG that is set up specifically to help new contributors get started: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Join?rd=Fedora_Join_SIG -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating to F26 using dnf system-upgrade - conflicts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 18:30 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Ah - thanks, Adam! I'll wait a bit, retry it and report back. The upgrade went well on two of my systems. I checked up to see if there were any duplicate packages and so on, but nothing there either - Yay! My laptop doesn't quite boot properly with the F26 kernels somehow. I checked with the live image too, and I still get cpu lockups. Filed a bug. So apart from the kernel package which is f25, the rest of my laptop is now on F26. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439890 The workstation works perfectly well, no issues encountered yet. - -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEufm/TFrZddG9mj0N+NjAvrrImL0FAljmkiMACgkQ+NjAvrrI mL0ZEwgAitRD0dRGSJsZWgz8ECtG8VgIHMOE+EEHnrEUJiL9j7zm2AcMBFzoDFbG O4ZWCZv59oEO0RvJRsLI5UuX8rc+nupG02BqMFw4OMwXqREbM7l6BVTIaENCU1KC Ahc1IXYnGuYFo4eGpOlr7V83nLsP4/rLjrmiwCZyEdhPKkppDjr1zAbSTelGmJ5v 6JMWp19PcZFcb5UtGGQRa/wMpdhPn3iWCuELYL/zJxu7qxSnEB78sICgvpcO9vZd UiKtWkJeLQDbbeFeTivJOS30poYRGHvu/3ue+MP5GRHHdYYjoMdy8LPprzCRK1sh zdJjG3zBt1RFvJ4t/J8EVTMKj4q93g== =ajTo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating to F26 using dnf system-upgrade - conflicts
On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 10:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > No, that's wrong. An nss update which several other packages had > already rebuilt again was unpushed a couple of days ago, which caused > many dependency issues like this. It's since been re-pushed, and when > the nightly compose that just completed (20170405.n.0) syncs out to > mirrors the problem should be resolved. Ah - thanks, Adam! I'll wait a bit, retry it and report back. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Updating to F26 using dnf system-upgrade - conflicts
Hello, I was looking to upgrade my machine to F26 using dnf system-upgrade. I got a conflict or two and was wondering if this is a known issue and whether it is OK to proceed? > > [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk ~]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download > > --releasever=26 > > > > > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates', disabling. > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates', disabling. > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:18 ago on Wed Apr 5 11:59:31 2017. > Error: nothing provides nss(x86-64) >= 3.29.3 needed by > java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1:1.8.0.121-10.b14.fc26.x86_64. > nothing provides nss >= 3.29.3 needed by firefox-52.0-7.fc26.x86_64. > problem with installed package lz4-1.7.5-1.fc25.i686. > nothing provides nss(x86-32) >= 3.29.3 needed by > java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1:1.8.0.121-10.b14.fc26.i686. > nothing provides nss(x86-64) >= 3.29.3 needed by > java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1:1.8.0.121-10.b14.fc26.x86_64 > (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) > -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Wallpapers on Fedora
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 15:00 +0300, Allan Mwenda wrote: > The background setting in gnome-settings was already barebones as is > (can't even set a slideshow of wallpapers) it just feels ever the > more bland Like I said, this is something that will have to be taken up with Gnome upstream. I'm not currently aware of any discussion around the background. I see an extension here that seems to do what you want: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/543/backslide/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Wallpapers on Fedora
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 11:11 +0300, Allan Mwenda wrote: > Hi everyone > I just noticed a behavior on fedora 25 and I just wanted to share it > here as I think it is not ideal > If you have pictures in the Pictures subdirectory of Home, you can > set them as your background by going to Settings > Background > > Pictures Tab. > However if you gather those pictures in a folder (in my case labelled > Wallpapers) then you can't set them as wallpapers anymore, even > though they are still in Pictures, just in a folder. > Its not ideal at all, you'd expect everything in there to get > detected folders or not. If you are referring to gnome-settings, you'll have to speak to upstream (Gnome) about this. It isn't a Fedora specific behaviour. You can still open whatever image you'd like to use as a background in the default image viewer application and right click > set as background. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Instructors for Fedora IRC classroom sessions on QA?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 15:54 -0500, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey Ankur, > > I have gone through the wiki and I'm willing to volunteer for this. > :) > Lovely! Would you please mail the classroom list with a potential classroom session idea? We'll put it on the list and start to draw up a schedule :) - -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYsYgvAAoJEPjYwL66yJi9HqsH/A4d7rY95/CqfMm3yKUrcX7/ jXzRsHuPfHqtaRjkHnFMPJrjnw+0l0kejwL20F5gBTVgWZjwkC5vDTErFpeyMEmy Lja32ajqROcqRjQC7DpaTRodcy9ovpHhA2zqkZSTHnkyO0pi6xQkhJ1DB9eWeD+1 ENqgxaBJX5wqK6ndjtsI0UNNsGiSxIu2QPPKYJp2sEt5IXwa8dpKQgqJVpi9i3hz rHzaQvdC4Dg2MWvYCDOZ1tykadd12bxm/rzzAHg0bAQYFP6+mv9coLaMdOC+wW5N 9pnB4mYmo6E2AyiUlFBUUcdV9MXX5784aHmdAGLyR2GVWIopVMaI6dWbKIE2CtY= =X2rC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Instructors for Fedora IRC classroom sessions on QA?
Hello, We've recently been trying to bring back the classroom sessions we used to have over the IRC[1][2] a few years ago. Before we publicly announce the resurrection, we'd like to get some sessions lined up. I was wondering if any of the experienced QA folks would like to instruct some sessions? The sessions can be about absolutely anything (Fedora related usually, but there isn't a rule). Even simple things like using updates-testing would be quite useful to help folks looking to contribute to QA, for example. Please do get in touch with me or e-mail the classroom mailing list[3] if you'd like to instruct a session. There's always more to do too - please look at the "help wanted" section to see how else you can help the classroom programme. [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-join/Fedora-Join/issue/23 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom [3] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/classroom -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: United RPMS - Repository with additional software for Fedora 24 and Fedora 25
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 13:04 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > Is this a substitute of Rpm Fusion? > https://unitedrpms.github.io/ > > At least it allows you to try software that would be unusable with > RPMFusion: > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/88485/vlc-installation-on-f > edora-24/ RPMFusion is in the middle of an infrastructure overhaul and should be ready shortly - they have koji etc. running and they've begun building packages for the rpmfusion-free tree. Unitedrpms is an alternative that some folks set up. As with RPMFusion, you can use Unitedrpms at your own risk :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F24 - ncsvc VPN doesn't work any more
On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 10:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > To start, I think you want to try to narrow down the issue. You want > to > see if the routing is working correctly. If the routing appers to be > working, > then you want to check dns resolution. Thanks Bruno - I'll look into that. I switched to the openconnect client and that works for the moment. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F24 - gnome3 - hidpi any better?
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 16:49 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote: > That seems like an impossible question to answer, since the complaint > is so vague. What exactly is meant by 'make it look OK'? I know - this is a new F23 user here - not exactly used to our debugging practices. The issue seems to be centred around the sizes of the bars, borders, text and so on. While text scaling and window scaling using gnome- tweak-tool seem to improve it, the general consensus seems to be that it still isn't "the way it should be" (as Nick also says in his reply). Unfortunately, I haven't access to an hidpi monitor and can't see what the issue is myself. I'll request screenshots - that should explain the issue better. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
F24 - gnome3 - hidpi any better?
Hi, I just had an email from someone that installed F23 on a box with an hidpi screen. Apparently, even using the window scaling etc doesn't quite "make it look OK" - has anyone tried F24 with one of these screens? Is it any better? (All I've found are multiple posts suggesting tweak-tool and then a few that crib about window scaling options being limited to whole numbers.) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
F24 - ncsvc VPN doesn't work any more
Hi, I've just updated to F24 - a clean install, not an upgrade - and I was wondering if someone else that needs to use the ncsvc thing to use a vpn could please check if it still works? I need to use this to vpn into the university network - it worked flawlessly with F23 but I haven't been able to get it to work since upgrading to F24. It seems to connect, the IP of my system changes, the /etc/resolve.conf is updated too, but neither can I access any websites, nor can I ssh into boxes at uni. Any tips on how to debug this? The ncsvc thing is the same - the change here is F24. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
selinux denial notifications but sealert says nothing to show
Hiya, I've been getting selinux AVC denial notifications recently but clicking on them opens up sealert which says there's nothing to do. Anyone else seeing this? [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk SRPMS]$ rpm -qa \*selinux\* libselinux-debuginfo-2.4-3.fc23.x86_64 libselinux-python-2.4-4.fc23.x86_64 libselinux-2.4-4.fc23.i686 rpm-plugin-selinux-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64 selinux-policy-3.13.1-151.fc23.noarch libselinux-2.4-4.fc23.x86_64 libselinux-utils-2.4-4.fc23.x86_64 selinux-policy-targeted-3.13.1-151.fc23.noarch libselinux-python3-2.4-4.fc23.x86_64 [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk SRPMS]$ rpm -qa \*trouble\* setroubleshoot-3.3.1-0.2.fc23.x86_64 setroubleshoot-server-3.3.1-0.2.fc23.x86_64 setroubleshoot-plugins-3.3.2-1.fc23.noarch -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: User ID 42 freeze. (Was: Re: F23 suspend issues anyone?)
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:47 -0600, linux guy wrote: > I had the same issue on a Dell laptop as well. I'm running an XPS17 > with an i7 and an SSD. > > Right now I can't boot at all using an nvidia driver. > > What laptop are you running ? Hey, I'm running an old vostro 3400. Here's the sysinfo: http://ur1.ca/nxvcz The weird part is that it doesn't always happen. I suspended the laptop just fine last night. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 suspend issues anyone?
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 04:26 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Ankur, > > I never had suspend problems in F23 with any kernel (my actual > included: > 4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64). :/ I guess it's hardware specific then - suspend issues and the gdm thing. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: No GUI on booting F23 sometimes - system gets stuck
On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 10:05 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 03:44:58PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > I've recently noticed that my system doesn't always get to GDM on > > boot. I'm not sure what's causing it, but looking at the boot > > messages, it seems to get stuck around something to do with "User > id 42". > > You can check what is "User id 42" by typing > > id -n -u 42 > > (or by looking at id numbers in /etc/passwd). Unless you were > forcing > some id changes on your system you will most likely find that the > answer > is "gdm". Surprise! Should've guessed that.. > > > I'm trying to get more info off journalctl but it doesn't have > > any. Any suggestions? > > systemctl -l status gdm > It is really hard to guess without any information what troubles you > may have and why. > > > Oh, booting into run level 3 and then running startx seems to work. > > How about 'telinit 5' instead here? 'systemctl default' should do > the > same (one would hope so). I know, but when gdm fails, the system just hangs and I can't access a virtual terminal or anything - journalctl doesn't seem to store data about this boot at all :/ For the time being, I've changed my login manager to lightdm and that appears to work fine. I'll keep testing this from time to time and see if I can get some logs or error info. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: No GUI on booting F23 sometimes - system gets stuck
Hi Michal, On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 08:43 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > Yes, but if you can type 'startx' after booting to level 3 you can > type 'systemctl default' or 'telinit 5' too. Does this hang the same > way? If this is producing any ouput on a console before hanging you > may try to redirect that to a permanent file to be looked at after > the > next boot. This is hanging the same way, unfortunately, > In any case 'journalctl -xb-1' is supposed to get you at > least some data from the previous boot. Did you try to examine that? > Results of 'journalctl -xb-1' are usually way to chatty but sometimes > one can fish out from that something useful and informative. I did try that, although I'll reconfirm this when I get home later today. I tried a journalctl --list-boots and it gave me something weird too - not a list of boots as it should've. I'll post the output when I get back home to the laptop. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
No GUI on booting F23 sometimes - system gets stuck
Hiya, I've recently noticed that my system doesn't always get to GDM on boot. I'm not sure what's causing it, but looking at the boot messages, it seems to get stuck around something to do with "User id 42". I'm trying to get more info off journalctl but it doesn't have any. Any suggestions? Oh, booting into run level 3 and then running startx seems to work. Happened with both an F22 upgraded to F23 and now a fresh F23 (I thought maybe something had broken in the upgrade, but that doesn't seem to be the case). This is only happening on my dell laptop which I power off and reboot frequently. The other machines seem to be fine, but I don't reboot them often so I can't really be 100% sure about this. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf shows no F23 updates
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote: > Thanks for the hint. Downgrading dnf from 1.1.2-2 to 1.1.1-2 > resulted > in 'dnf update' finding 214MB of updates, which is more like what I > was > expecting. I see that dnf-1.1.2-2 wasn't among them. Probably a faulty update which is why it was unpushed - happens from time to time if you're using updates-testing. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: DNF upgrade test cases
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 19:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I did do a quick F22-F23 test and it didn't seem to work, I'll > check in with wwoods about that. I did a fresh F22 install and then used this to upgrade to F23 and it went off without a hitch :D -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Introduce myself
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 14:52 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Hello Mr. Info. Can you use your real name in email address? This isn't really a requirement. ;) Sure, nice to know and all that, but it isn't compulsory - quite a few people prefer to just use their nicks and aliases. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fros install by default but recordmydesktop is missing ( mate desktop)
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 06:55 -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote: Ok, recordmydesktop is not install by default. no problem i solved this with dnf -y install recordmydesktop'. But, i question is this, if fros is installed by default why recordmydesktop is missing ? Yes. Please file a bug requesting the fros maintainer to add recordmydesktop as a Requires if it is required for fros to function correctly. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Rawhide testing request - fpaste 0.3.8.0 - with python3!
Hi all, I've updated fpaste to use py3 recently and pushed a build with the new 0.3.8.0 version to rawhide for the time being. I've tested the script out myself, but if some folks running rawhide could please give it a whirl and report any issues, I'd be most grateful. :) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=668962 Please file your issues at either the bugzilla or fedorahosted instance: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedoraversion=rawhid ecomponent=fpaste https://fedorahosted.org/fpaste/newticket -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: problems with publican on Fedora 22 Workstation beta
On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 15:51 -0700, Mike Vevea wrote: 1) on Fedora 21, the current version is 4.2.6; I have everything working happily with that version. When I installed the Fedora 22 beta (which I fully updated; it's completely current as of Thursday May 14, 2015 afternoon), I ended up with version 4.1.3. That doesn't seem reasonable, though there's probably a reason this version is older... I noticed this too. Looks like they haven't been able to build the new publican on F22. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5800 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Incorrect ISO size on website for Fedora Scientific Spin (Re: [Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 22 Beta!)
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 01:45 -0400, Amit Saha wrote: The ISO size for the Fedora Scientific Spin is displayed incorrectly to be the same as that for the security spin. How can i get it fixed? The websites team probably handles that. You can contact them on their ML here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Annoying bug in NM1.0.0-8
On Sun, 2015-04-19 at 20:17 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote: Ok, my wired networking problem has been hashed out - it was a physical layer issue. That led me to discovering that the problem is worse than I feared, it exists on wired networking also, and can't be tied to Intel drivers since both systems I tested this on have either a Qualcomm Atheros or Realtek gigabit ethernet NIC. I have filed a bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213194 Weird. I haven't seen this issue at all. Feduped to F22 a few days ago and everything appears to work fine. I haven't noticed a network issue at all. Have you checked journalctl to see if there are any errors there? NetworkManager-1.0.0-8.fc22.x86_64 btw, rsyslog.org appears down: http://isup.me/rsyslog.org The other sites worked just fine. 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection I217-LM (rev 05) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: Evolution and gpg2 changes - repeatedly being asked for gpg passphrase while sending e-mail
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 09:06 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Hi, I've continued this discussion on Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745050 Thanks Michael, I'll wait for the 3.16.2 update and report how that works out. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: Evolution and gpg2 changes - repeatedly being asked for gpg passphrase while sending e-mail
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 16:22 +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: I had a custom script to launch gpg-agent from .bashrc, but this version launches the agent automatically. So I have decided to drop my init script and everything works fine. Hrm. It asked for a passphrase a second time, but not a third time.. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F22: Evolution and gpg2 changes - repeatedly being asked for gpg passphrase while sending e-mail
Hi, I've just used fedup to upgrade to f22. fedup worked really well (hooray!). Now that I'm down to using the system normally, I've noticed that I get asked for my gpg passphrase each time I send a gpg signed e-mail. This was not so in F21. Would someone know what has changed? This should be documented somewhere IMO - users that will notice this change should easily be able to find what's changed and if anything is being done about it. Stephen pointed me to a bug he's already filed, but it doesn't have enough info on it yet: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745050 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Weird artefact in grub entry after fedup upgrade to F22
Hi, I just feduped to F22. The upgrade went relatively smoothly. However, the first grub entry seems to be incomplete, or well, not correct. This is what it looks like[1]. The grub file is here[2]. I came across more people who had this issue, although I can't remember where this was any more. Should I file a bug about this any place? [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B173WBsvtlGoeDVOWEZQTmRXUVE/view [2] http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211863/42919406 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Self Introduction: Atmn Patel
Hi Atmn, On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 16:51 -0500, Atmn Patel wrote: As for my computer skills, I know C and Python to the level of an introductory undergraduate course. I am currently learning Java in my spare time. I am also working towards getting the Linux Foundation Certified System Administrator. As for project experience, I have none. I believe that I am an excellent match for the project because I am willing to learn and dedicate time to the project (I have no experience whatsoever). I'm assuming you've mailed the test list because you've already read the Join Fedora[1] page and would like to get your hands dirty with QA? The simplest would be to get started with testing updates as detailed here[2]. If you're looking for admin work, the fedora infrastructure team is where you should head to[3]. If you're looking to work on coding tasks, the infra team does develop applications mostly in Python that you can help with[4]. Other than that, the coding that takes place in the community is mostly patches that are sent upstream. We endeavour to make all our contributions to upstream directly and do not carry local patches unless absolutely necessary[5]. I hope you have a great time in the community. Please feel free to ask us any questions. We also have a dedicated mailing list and channel for newcomers here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG Lastly, happy new year everyone! [1] http://fedoraproject.org/join-fedora [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates-testing [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/GettingStarted [4] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/ [5] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: evince nasty bug with fedora f21
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 08:22 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: Just updated to fedora f21. When I try to use evince, I can't use the print dialog. It seems selection widgets don't work. For example, under print/page setup, attempting to choose '2 sided' just hangs. even the widget is not redrawn. This is using nouveau, if that matters Does it crash or does it just not work? I'm using evince here without any issues, with nouveau too, and I've printed quite a few documents using evince too. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: evince nasty bug with fedora f21
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 09:08 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: The dialogs hang. This hangs the app, and in fact my entire desktop, until I can kill evince. Sounds like a much deeper issue than just evince - is this with a specific file? Could you give us the steps to reproduce it? I just double checked - printing with evince works just fine here, and so does everything else in general. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: evince nasty bug with fedora f21
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 10:34 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: I found the problem. Don't use gtk+ style oxygen with kde. Ah. Please file a bug if one isn't already filed. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora Beta to R5, how?
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 11:33 -0200, Fernando Lozano wrote: Hi, I installed F21 Beta from the Workstation (live) DVD on a computer I don't mind to reformat a few times. If I do yum update do I get RC5? Next week, when the final release is out, will yum update suffice? Yes. A yum update would be enough: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/56002/sticky-how-do-i-update-from-fedora-alpha-to-beta-to-final/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: tracker
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 07:37 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: Well, I am sure it is not a show stopper but tracker is going to be a royal PITA for some users. In Fedora 20 we have tracker-0.16.5-1.fc20.x86_64 and in Fedora 21 it is tracker-1.2.4-3.fc21.x86_64. That difference in version/release means that the tracker developer has been very busy adding to the different files now handled by tracker. Well, they actually jumped to 1.0 after 0.17: https://github.com/GNOME/tracker/releases Still quite a few releases, though, yes. Unfortunately, either the implmenetation is bad or a lot of files are incorrect or both. After doing a fresh install of F21-TC2 workstation, I noticed a log of crap being dumped into the log (journal). This was a fresh install of Fedora 21 but keeping all my data including the existing home directories. The problem is reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148570 and here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735406 Since there was some mention of the F21 tracker using old data, I re-installed but with a new set of home directories. I then moved the old data a bit at a time. I used tracker-preferences to ignore a lot of files and that reduced the number of error/warning messages in the log. It may be possible to simply delete ~/.cache/tracker/* files rather than recreating the home directories. I will be testing to see if that works. At the very least, I believe that the following should be done: 1. Add something to the release notes warning of the situation. 2. If tracker is installed, then tracker-preferences should be installed too. The easiest way to do this is to add a requires in the tracker rpm for tracker-preferences. 3. Put a little pressure on upstream to address this problem with tracker. Does tracker really need to put these error/warning messages in the logs? In the end, I had to add the following Glob patterns to ignore: *.au, *.azw, *.mobi, *.mov, *.MOV, *.mp3, *.MP3, *.mpg, *.tif, *.wav and *.xcf Comments? I'm using tracker on two of my systems and for most of the part, it works OK. I had do add *.cpp *.c to the globs to exclude, but this is more because I didn't want to see them in the search results, not because they were hurting tracker. We could have something added in the release notes about advanced tracker configuration - that would certainly help. I don't know if the default install will include tracker-prefs, the search settings is sort of enough for normal end users. Gnome is moving towards tracker quite a bit - photos/music/documents all use tracker so any issue should be filed upstream and fixed. I don't know how we could pressure upstream as you put it, but I do file all the bugs that I run into. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 09:05 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I notice that dnf does not have swap. Is this intentional? Try: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:46 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 09:05 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I notice that dnf does not have swap. Is this intentional? Try: Gah, sent it early: http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/cli_vs_yum.html#packages-replacement-without-yum-shell-or-yum-swap as Tim pointed out already. :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 19:39 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. By installing Fedora 21 live Workstation, I noted that all unallocated space on hardisk is not detected so it's not available for a standard partitioning. I had to format in ext4 the unallocated space of which I needed in order to make it visible by Anaconda. Fedora 21 Common Bugs talks of a NTFS resizing bug, not of space management troubles. Hrm. I didn't run into this. Anaconda saw the free space just fine. Is the configuration special in anyway? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 21:21 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Try, # yum swap fedora-release-workstation fedora-release-nonproduct # yum install @lxde-desktop Aha! I don't see a dnf version of the `swap` command, and dnf doesn't have the `shell` either. Worth an RFE? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 16:19 +, Tim Lauridsen wrote: dnf --allowerasing install fedora-release-nonproduct http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/cli_vs_yum.html#packages-replacement-without-yum-shell-or-yum-swap Thanks Rahul, Tim. I think Radek pointed me to this on some bug too just yesterday. I'll note it for future use. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Adding GNOME ....
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: There is a Fedora Workstation but that can't be installed due to I have a similar issue actually, but the other way around: Fresh F21 beta workstation install. I tried to install KDE using dnf, but fedora-release-workstation and fedora-release-nonproduct conflict. If I try to remove fedora-release-workstation, dnf replaces it with fedora-release-server which gets me back to the same state really. Is it impossible to install other DEs along the workstation at the moment using dnf? [asinha@localhost ~]$ sudo dnf remove fedora-release-workstation Dependencies resolved. Package Arch Version Repository Size Installing: cockpit x86_64 0.27-1.fc21 fedora 342 k cockpit-assets noarch 0.27-1.fc21 fedora 920 k fedora-release-server noarch 21-0.16 fedora 19 k firewalld-config-server noarch 0.3.12-1.fc21 fedora 45 k libssh x86_64 0.6.3-3.fc21fedora 150 k python-futures noarch 2.1.6-3.fc21fedora 34 k rolekit noarch 0.1.0-2.fc21fedora 99 k storagedx86_64 0.3.1-1.fc21fedora 92 k Removing: fedora-release-workstation noarch 21-0.16 @System1.0 k firewalld-config-workstationnoarch 0.3.12-1.fc21 @System1.0 k Transaction Summary Install 8 Packages Remove 2 Packages Total download size: 1.7 M Is this ok [y/N]: __ I'm assuming yum shell should be able to help here, but dnf doesn't have such a feature yet - I also don't expect a normal end user to resort to yum shell. Do the different fedora-release-* packages have to conflict? Can't I be running a workstation product and a server product and miscellaneous bits (a union, rather than the current apparent mutual exclusion)? This must've been discussed before, I just can't find the discussion. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Grub and something called ZISD
Hello, I've recently gotten a new workstation at university. It came with Windows 7 and of course, I added Fedora 21 to the mix. However, each time I log into Windows and reboot, it seems to get stuck in a kind of boot loop at BIOS - probably can't find grub. Would anyone know what causes this? Seems to be some Windows boot repair? It's quite simple to fix - boot into rescue mode from a netinstall or dvd media and reinstall grub. However, when I do this, grub gives me a message on the lines of: Installing for i386-pc platform. grub2-install: warning: Sector 5 is already in use by the program ‘ZISD’; avoiding it. This software may cause boot or other problems in future. Please ask its authors not to store data in the boot track. I've looked around and ZISD seems to be some Novell program - I'm really not sure what it is. Can I remove it? Is there a simple way to? Will my system always loose grub after booting to Windows?? -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur Sinha FranciscoD signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Grub and something called ZISD
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 06:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: Google ZISD. Look at screen. See GRUB and ZISD - Cool Solutions | Novell as second entry. Click on link. https://www.novell.com/communities/coolsolutions/grub-and-zisd/ I actually tried that - it didn't seem to work. Instead of one sector with ZISD, now I have 2. The post is from 2008 and is probably referring to legacy GRUB. From the error I had posted earlier, I think GRUB2 leaves the sector occupied by ZISD be. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 13:36 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: Please, tagged with keywords of ui-review -- thanks! Finally got down to filing it: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738825 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21/rawhide-20141012 - missing firewall-applet
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 17:40 +0200, poma wrote: Cinderella, who decided to remove firewall-applet and why? Poma, please, word your queries in a more respectful manner? Even if you're only trying to be playful here, using things like Cinderella to refer to people is quite disrespectful. The idea is to use communication that doesn't offend *anyone* in *any way*. Information on the package sets that different spins provide can be seen here: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/spin-kickstarts.git/log/ and the spins mailing list is in place for any discussion on the topic. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/spins -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-21/rawhide-20141012 - missing firewall-applet
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 20:58 +0200, poma wrote: Snow White, your information is totally useless. Please take it to the spins mailing list. May be if you ask respectfully, someone will take the trouble to answer you. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: test request: kernel 3.17 for F21
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 16:00 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote: On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi, folks! It'd be great if people could test this kernel: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-3.17.0-301.fc21 I've been running the kernel all day on my primary laptop, and it seems rock solid. I haven't seen any weird Intel wireless crashes (I was getting two or three a day with the 3.16 kernel), and it's nice to see that the multi-stream transport stuff (DisplayPort 1.1) is working with the Intel driver. I've been running the 3.17 series for a while now - I'm on rawhide nodebug. I haven't seen any issues at all yet. They seem to work quite well. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What package is causing these traces?
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:54 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: Could someone please look at the traces and tell me what package may be causing them? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151407 filed -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:50 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: On 10 October 2014 11:24, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: Try 'pkcon get-transactions'. Hrm - that works, obviously. Or if you install gnome-packagekit, gpk-log Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in yum.conf, and g-s removed 3 of my older kernels. No, it doesn't use yum at all. I thought so. Is there a place one could add things like installonly then? If not, what does it do by default? I mean, how did it decide that I had five kernels and installing a new one, making it six, implied removing three older ones: - cleanup kernel-core-3.17.0-0.rc7.git2.1.fc22.x86_64 - cleanup kernel-core-3.17.0-0.rc7.git0.2.fc22.x86_64 - cleanup kernel-core-3.17.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc22.x86_64 I just thought *forbidding* updates-testing from g-s would be an added layer of security - even if an unassuming user wants to enable it, he should either be told - Nope matey! If you wanna test stuff, use yum/dnf! or at least a warning that says Woah! Are you sure? This stuff isn't tested - it might break and you'll need to be able to debug it!. You know, something on these lines? We used to do a warning like this for rawhide, but it would add new strings and also needs some design advice from #gnome-design. Should I file a bug upstream, Richard? -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: os
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 18:56 +0530, shailendra acharya wrote: hello folks, i am shailendra, currently in final year of btech i want to make new os for my project. plz show me path how to do it. i searched on google no. of times but there is only motivational speech are written or may be i couldn't find the correct way. i hope u will show me the best path where i cat get start working Hi Shailendra, This channel isn't the right one for this question. This channel is for Fedora QA only. I'm not sure what you mean by make a new os - it really isn't a simple task, and is certainly not something Fedora works on. Fedora is a Linux distribution, so we use the Linux kernel[1]. If you want to *build* Linux from sources, you can use the information here[2]. I suggest you use other, more generic forums for your query. [1] https://www.kernel.org/ [2] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
