[tw] Re: [TW5] How do I center an image?

I imagine by morning someone will give you a good answer, but this seems to work. The image link allows you to insert a class, and you can use html to create classes on the fly. So you can have .centerme { display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto } } [img class="centerme"

[tw] [TW5] Introducing my Plugin Library

It's been on a back burner for awhile now, adding plugins until I finally decided to try to figure out how Jeremy, Tobias and Jed created Libraries for their plugins. Now, I present my Plugin Library . Enjoy, and let me know what you think. -- You

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlyServer 2.0 - Announcement!!!

Yup; looking good! I haven't given it more than a very brief trial but multiple datafolders as well as a complete, single TiddlyWiki are all accessible now. I'll follow up if I run into anything unexpected. Thanks! Another nice option for serving TWs. -- You received this message because

[tw] [TW5] How do I center an image?

I'm trying to bring an image to the middle of a toddler. I'm using the format [img[http://image hosting.com/image.png]]. How do I accomplish this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[tw] Re: Is it possible to make a new menu button to open a specific tiddler?

Thank you, both of you! I found what I needed :) On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 6:18:10 PM UTC-4, Mark S. wrote: > > I think this should list most, if not all available at tiddlywiki.com : > > <$list filter="[all[tiddlers+shadows]prefix[$:/core/images]sort[]]"> > <$transclude mode="inline"/>

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

> > IN FACT the whole question of Performance in TW deserves a lot more > attention IMO. The performance has improved a lot since the early versions of TiddlyWiki5. I remember some of the early advances between 5.0.4 (when popups took a second to open) and 5.0.14 (400 ms or so). Now they are

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

It was on an almost empty TiddlyWiki datafolder mounted in TiddlyServer (which currently uses $:/core/save/all), so just a stock TiddlyWiki with hardly anything in it. I didn't think about it that I was using an almost empty TiddlyWiki or I would have mentioned it! :) Windows 7 64 Bit / Chrome

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

Hi Arlen, What is your setup? Nodejs or stand-alone? Which browser, what OS, and what kind of machine. I'm thinking that if you can zip through these in 4 seconds that you might need to load the first list filter some more. Mark On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 4:44:45 PM UTC-7, Arlen Beiler

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

Had no idea one could do this! Here are my results, running it on tiddlywiki.com on my win10 chrome: 49:16 49:27 <– 11 seconds for 49:54 <– 27 seconds for is[current] switching places (no idea if that makes sense but anyway): 53:57 54:25 <– 28 sec for is[current] 54:40 <– 15 sec for

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

Brilliant!!! Here is my test and result <> <-- 41:23 > <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20"> > <$list filter="[all[tiddlers+shadows]]"> > <$list filter="[has[text]]"> > > > <> <-- 41:27 (4 seconds) > <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

[tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

WHOAH! Is that a proto Test Suite? On Monday, 26 June 2017 22:15:13 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > My informal test, running the code below on TiddlyWiki.com, suggests that > may be twice as fast as is[current]. Minutes and seconds > are posted at the top and bottom of the process loop for

[tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

My informal test, running the code below on TiddlyWiki.com, suggests that may be twice as fast as is[current]. Minutes and seconds are posted at the top and bottom of the process loop for comparison. <> <$list filter="1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20"> <$list

[tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

I DO NOT know the answer. But I do think its a very good question. IN FACT the whole question of Performance in TW deserves a lot more attention IMO. Erwan did one interesting, thorough, performance study that showed that use of tags can impair performance. Its the only documented performance

[tw] Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

Nobody has an opinion about this ? Or a measurement? Or an rough idea ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

[tw] Re: Global RegEx for Word Occurence Counts?

Thanks Mark S. Its a good start Mark S. wrote: > > You need something to split the text up into words. Tobias has something > like that here: https://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins > > If you want to save hours reading, here's a graphic Dickens spoiler: >

[tw] Re: Global RegEx for Word Occurence Counts?

You need something to split the text up into words. Tobias has something like that here: https://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins Then, assuming that your tiddlers are tagged as "Great" and you're looking for Pip: <$list filter="[tag[Great]sort[]]" > <> <$list

[tw] Global RegEx for Word Occurence Counts?

I'm a but unclear on how TW interfaces with the browser native JavaScript Regular Expression functions. Here is a *Use Case* 1 - I want to analyse the novel Great Expectations for the occurrence of the proper names "Pip", "Jaggers", "Havisham", etc. Across ALL Tiddlers that comprise the

Re: [tw] Re: w5.com-docs plugin

​Hi Ton, That's uber cool. Thanks again, Sergei​ On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Ton Gerner wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > Thank you much for your time and expertise. >> >> You're welcome. > > Using Advanced search gives results with many "real" shadow tiddlers > (starting

Re: [tw] Re: w5.com-docs plugin

Hi Sergei, Thank you much for your time and expertise. > > You're welcome. Using Advanced search gives results with many "real" shadow tiddlers (starting with $:/). Yo can create a special Docs search tab: 1) Clone $:/core/ui/AdvancedSearch/Shadows and name it e.g.

Re: [tw] Documentation macros in the empty tiddly wiki

Nevermind, they come with the documentation plugin. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > Hi, > > The tiddlywiki on www.tiddlywiki.com talks about Documentation Macros here >

[tw] Documentation macros in the empty tiddly wiki

Hi, The tiddlywiki on www.tiddlywiki.com talks about Documentation Macros here . While the empty wiki does have the tip (light bulb) image, the

Re: [tw] Re: w5.com-docs plugin

Hi Ton, Got it. I will use the advanced search functionality. Thank you much for your time and expertise. Sergei On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Ton Gerner wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > For some reason I'm not seeing "Contents" in my sidebar. >> > > I really don't know why.

Re: [tw] Re: w5.com-docs plugin

Hi Sergei, For some reason I'm not seeing "Contents" in my sidebar. > I really don't know why. I have downloaded an empty wiki, installed the plugin and I do see it. > Glad that worked. > Oh, one more question. Even though the docs are there, they don't seem to > be searchable? Is there

[tw] Re: [INTRO] uni-link plugin

On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 2:43:37 PM UTC+2, Lost Admin wrote: > > I'm not PMario, but I can do short. > > Hate CamelCase? Use Caption instead. PMario's uni-link for Pretty Names. > like it ...  -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki"

[tw] Re: Donating to TiddlyWiki - Lets UPDATE

FWIW, I disagree with Mat on this: Mat Wrote: > I think it is good that the subject of donations is kept somewhat in the > background when it comes to the official TW project. > If they were any further back they'd not exist at all. :-) Mat wrote: > ... donate to specific projects. > That

[tw] Re: [INTRO] Tiddler Bundle Plugin

On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 12:01:07 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > The Bundler works really well. My only issue is I really would like to be > able to document what's in a bundle without it throwing off the count ... > > I'm wondering if there is another way to deal with this if it can't be

[tw] Re: [INTRO] Tiddler Bundle Plugin

On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 11:26:40 AM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > I think the beauty of it is it eases export and import a lot in a minimal > way. If somehow the same "Bundle List" could be passed to selectable delete > it would make it a top-notch management tool IMO. > > The fact is

[tw] Re: [INTRO] Tiddler Bundle Plugin

On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 10:44:32 AM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > > Its not an issue for plugins if taken over whole since the author deals > with that in the plugin anyway? > > So it would be needed for *only* the small number of cases where you > bundle Tiddlers from a plugin, but not

[tw] Re: Donating to TiddlyWiki - Lets UPDATE

On Saturday, June 24, 2017 at 3:12:27 PM UTC-4, Mat wrote: > > ... > > That said, I think it is good that the subject of donations is kept > somewhat in the background when it comes to the official TW project. > ... > I find it interesting you say that. While I agree with your sentiment, I

Re: [tw] Re: w5.com-docs plugin

Hi Ton, For some reason I'm not seeing "Contents" in my sidebar. The plugins tab shows: Highlight.js: syntax highlighting <#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Ftiddlywiki%2Fhighlight> Markdown parser <#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Ftiddlywiki%2Fmarkdown> TiddlyWiki5 core <#%24%3A%2Fcore> But the source html does mention

[tw] Re: [INTRO] uni-link plugin

I'm not PMario, but I can do short. Hate CamelCase? Use Caption instead. PMario's uni-link for Pretty Names. That should be short enough for a twit ...er tweet even if it lacks coherence. :-D On Saturday, June 24, 2017 at 11:29:07 AM UTC-4, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao PMario > > I wanted to

[tw] Re: [INTRO] Tiddler Bundle Plugin

Ciao PMario The Bundler works really well. My only issue is I really would like to be able to document what's in a bundle without it throwing off the count ... I'm wondering if there is another way to deal with this if it can't be done directly in the Bundle? PMario wrote: > > > 2017.06.18

[tw] Re: [INTRO] Tiddler Bundle Plugin

Ciao Mark S. & PMario The Bundler mechanism, from my point of view, *especially when you have an exact list*, rather than a filter, looks to me like it could be re-factored to provide bulk delete selection. I think the beauty of it is it eases export and import a lot in a minimal way. If

[tw] Re: [INTRO] Tiddler Bundle Plugin

Ciao PMario PMario wrote: >> >> *So you basically should include the license tiddler*: >> https://wikilabs.github.io/editions/bundler/#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Fwikilabs%2Fbundler%2Flicense >> >> *too*. It contains the copyright notice. and a link to the original >> license. but no link to the

Re: [tw] [NoteSelf] Bug fixes and (cool) new features

Great stuff Danielo, I shall look forward to playing with the new version. Best wishes Jeremy. -- Jeremy Ruston jer...@jermolene.com http://jermolene.com > On 24 Jun 2017, at 23:40, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > New weekend and new version of NoteSelf.