That seems to save a little bit of typing.
I guess I saw the use of dialog element as nice because it kind of stands
out (as in: something different going on here), an element I likely
wouldn't otherwise use for anything else
i.e. a by-the-jugular attention grabber. Yeah, I need that kind of
If you want even less steps you can do
inset:0;
position:fixed;
z-index:1000;
background:white;
On any element (other than forms, these will require a width 100vw)
Le jeudi 25 novembre 2021 à 00:32:30 UTC+1, cj.v...@gmail.com a écrit :
> All kinds of cool possibilties.
>
> I tried with a div,
All kinds of cool possibilties.
I tried with a div, gave up as soon as I realized it needed a few extra
steps compared to dialog.
What I did find interesting with a div, is a div the full size of the
browser window and a high z-index, allowed to see the TiddlyWiki, but
prevented clicking on
Interesting. I did not know about the dialog html tag but I'd assume it can
as well be achieved with a div. Anyhow, your idea triggered an idea for a
"wall", e.g a password wall or paywall type application so here's some
direct copy-paste-code with size so people can manipulate it more easily:
See if https://leftbar.tiddlyspot.com/ works for you. There was some
complaint about 1-2 months ago about some problem on - if I recall - the
nodejs version... or maybe it was resolved, can't remember. If you search
for it you should find it.
<:-)
On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 8:19:32
Found it:
I had to chose "open pdf in chrome".
[image: no-pdf-possible-solution.png]
Hope, that helps others, too. ;-)
jeremy...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. November 2021 um 18:35:18
UTC+1:
> Hi Uwe
>
> How large is the PDF?
>
> In the last couple of years Chrome added a limitation
[image: tiddly-3col-sm-30.jpg]
Like this. The main content is in the middle, with more or less the same
stuff on the right as in the new tiddly, to search, list tags, list
everything, etc. On the left is what was useful every day, a list of fixed
links. I had one for each day of the week, for
Oops. Open the imported tiddler and Poof. TiddlyWiki interface gone.
Setup such a tiddler as the default tiddler to open, or default tiddler at
startup. Maybe check for something in the URL to not open this tiddler at
startup, or some mechanism (visible or hidden-keyboard-driven) to
Into a TiddlyWiki you don't care about or can't edit (I suggest
TiddlyWiki.com), download and drag the attached file.
Poof. TiddlyWiki interface gone.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Totally agree. It is a fool's errand to think one can secure TiddlyWiki,
unless I've missed something somewhere that says otherwise.
I'm just about minimizing the pains in the caboose caused by human error,
by computer-related total foulups, and certain kind of folk who should
crawl back in
Yeah, security isn't really my aim here. I back it all up regularly so it's
really just a) trying to save me from someone that felt like being a d*ck
and b) family getting confused when roaming around. My family, on both my
side and my wife's, like for me to keep a wishlist. So I have it on my
Hi Uwe
How large is the PDF?
In the last couple of years Chrome added a limitation on the size of data URIs
which means that embedded PDFs won't work above a megabyte or two.
The workaround is to save the PDFs separately, and embed them via a
_canonical_uri tiddler.
Best wishes
Jeremy
--
Poop. Typo: there is one *KINK* in the setup.
On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 1:27:44 PM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot wrote:
> Arg. I forgot to mention there is one kind in the setup: tiddler import
> mechanism.
>
> An enterprising and knowledgeable-enough TiddlyWiki user can break my
> secure
Arg. I forgot to mention there is one kind in the setup: tiddler import
mechanism.
An enterprising and knowledgeable-enough TiddlyWiki user can break my
secure setup by dragging and dropping a tiddler that totally up-ends my
fine-grained security. That's the one thing I need to resolve.
On
Alternatively, you could setup a "guest" login account that anybody could
use to edit only certain tiddlers.
For that to work requires some trickery that allows only certain users to
do certain things for certain tiddlers.
It is a setup for fine-grained user-id/role fine-grained control which
Hi dear helpers,
are there any known issues with Google Chrome and pdf-Files?
I use Version 96.0.4664.45 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit) and a fresh
downloaded tiddlywiki 5.2.0
This works with Firefox 94.0.2 (64-Bit):
[ext[Skript_Facharbeit.pdf|./FW Abschlussarbeit
Based what you said, I took a sojourn into private mode and confirmed that
I was probably logged in without realizing it when I tested this setup.
Roger on everything you said, then. I probably should just separate it into
two wikis, which I had been thinking about anyway.
On Wednesday,
I think how I'd set things up:
Those few tiddlers you want anonymous users to edit, put those in another
TiddlyWiki, say TiddlyWiki B. TiddlyWiki A being the one you referenced in
your OP.
Setup TiddlyWiki A to include TiddlyWiki B.
For tiddlers from TiddlyWiki B, setup an alternative "edit
i'm sure it's just something weird in my source tiddlywiki but if i just
upgrade as-is, it breaks. deselecting all tiddlers and selecting all
tiddlers to upgrade (i.e. to include state tiddlers etc. -- lots of my
tiddlers have state-tiddler-dependent moving parts) in the wizard seems to
Write access is all-or-nothing, so if you grant write access to anonymous users
they will be able to change anything, not just the tags of interest.
It might be possible to modify $:/config/SyncFilter so that only the tagged
tiddlers are synced, but at the moment that’s a per-wiki setting that
OK, let me preface this by saying that I am trying to selectively get
around the read-only mode on my wiki.
I usually run my main instance with anon access for readers and
authenticated for writers. It's great and does the job.
But, I want to be able to allow changes by anons for *some*
G'day,
A festering thought for a while, I decided to throw that into my portal
project.
It is, in my mind, the next best thing to in-person collaboration. Maybe
better in many respects.
I've added this page
As a long-term, but fairly light-weight user, I can find no issues with my
fairly low-complexity environment.
However, I've only been able to test with single-files instances.
I mostly run on Node, and to upgrade, I usually drag the new file atop a
browser page connected to the Node version,
23 matches
Mail list logo
