Hello Stephan,
That was a question that I was about to post before I saw this...if fields
could be used for such.
Actually that's a nifty idea once some type of syntax can be agreed upon.
One tiddler for text and ref links. Once you click on any one of them,
one will get another tiddler with
Can anyone summarise the hangout discussion?
The discussion starts here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=0xWd4nhlQoE#t=6299
To summarise, I was trying to explore whether people were after:
* The specific interactive effect of clicking on a footnote link and being
In an attempt to creat something useful for footnotes, I created a match
filter which is similar to JavaScript's match function.
I already uploaded it to http://tiddlystuff.tiddlyspot.com as Idea for a
footnote filter but haven't done any documenting worth mentioning…
The idea is to filter all
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 1:38:19 AM UTC+1, Daniel Baird wrote:
Naively it seems to me that when editing, the footnote content should be
right there where the reference is. This means you can easily edit the
note, and avoid hassles like orphaned notes when you copy/paste stuff, etc.
Hello all,
I was glad this was touched upon in the Google hangout #34 by Jeremy.
I completely understood where Jeremy was coming from in regards to
navigation in TW5.
So, to that effect, if this may not be semantically possible and can do
tool-tip (*like I believe I heard mentioned?*) then I
Can anyone summarise the hangout discussion?
The high level goal of footnotes is to make a little bit of additional info
available to the few readers who need it, without interrupting the flow of
other readers. In a web/computer screen context having notes show up at
the bottom of the page
Hello Jonathan:
It would be interesting if this could be achieved via pure wiki syntax for
simplicity's sake.
Like for example:
This is my sentence with [[[note1]]].
which then you would combine it at the bottom of article or end of page with
[^[ref|note1]]
For me this would be on the
I don't like these approaches. I'd prefer something like in the big wikis
refhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Footnotes/ref where the footnotes
are numbered automatically and placed where you put a
{{reflist}}
Of course not with curly braces, as they are already taken.
--
You received this
Hello Stephan,
Yes, I saw that also...hence why I gave my idea about using wiki syntax as
a wish...but yes...that's the (your) idea.
The less typing the better I'd say.
Can that be incorporated somehow to TW5 in it's present state?
Best regards,
Julio
On Monday, February 10, 2014 12:30:17 PM
I agree. It would be nice to have this feature incorporated somehow. It
seems as though many people use TiddlyWiki for research and footnotes would
be helpful.
Jonathan
On Monday, February 10, 2014 2:09:44 PM UTC-5, Julio Peña wrote:
Hello Stephan,
Yes, I saw that also...hence why I
I agree. In fact I'm currently using footnotes by hand with superscript and
underscript
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2014 20:09:44 UTC+1 schrieb Julio Peña:
Can that be incorporated somehow to TW5 in it's present state?
At the moment I doubt it. I also think, before implementing something, one
needs to decide Whether or not footnotes are a good means for... For what!?
I can see use
Naively it seems to me that when editing, the footnote content should be
right there where the reference is. This means you can easily edit the
note, and avoid hassles like orphaned notes when you copy/paste stuff, etc.
e.g:
This is my sentence with [[note1::Sentences are usually more well
13 matches
Mail list logo
