Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 6:49:34 AM UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > It would be interesting to know what features caused the 4x increase in > the core, despite dropping support for Jquery. > Basically we traded size for convenience and configurability. With TWclassic, you have 5 main

Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

It's unfortunately true that developers often think in terms of state of the art technology. It would be interesting to know what features caused the 4x increase in the core, despite dropping support for Jquery. -- Mark On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 8:44:07 AM UTC-8, vayira wrote: > > The

Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Fyi My old twc has 8000 Tiddlers at 17mb and I expect tw5 to perform better. True this is local access single file only without auto save. Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 5:44:07 PM UTC+1, vayira wrote: > > The bloat is to do with file size. The TW 2.8.1 with 294 tiddlers that I > have built up over years takes up only 585k, but an empty TW 5.1 uses 2M. > So I'm not going to migrate my day to day TW at all, but I am experimenting >

Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

The bloat is to do with file size. The TW 2.8.1 with 294 tiddlers that I have built up over years takes up only 585k, but an empty TW 5.1 uses 2M. So I'm not going to migrate my day to day TW at all, but I am experimenting with it for a new project, which I was thinking of putting online, but over

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Fyi No bloat in tw5 in my view, I maintain my twc in TiddlyDesktop and links open in the default browser. Rather than upgrade I am moving from a monolithic twc to multiple tw5s with a high degree of intergration. The tw5 wikis run in the latest FF with local host or IP address using

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On windows you can use links (junctions) to trick the browser into thinking your folder is below the downloads folder. I imagine you can do the same with symbolic links on Linux. -- Mark On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 7:13:01 AM UTC-8, vayira wrote: > > Thanks Tony. > > I've downloaded

Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I understand, but using Tiddlywiki in the Sky for Dropbox saves your wiki to your dropbox. Other saving options needs you to use a folder under your download folder. Birthe Den søndag den 24. december 2017 kl. 17.08.29 UTC+1 skrev vayira: > > But dropbox is just a folder on all my hard drives

Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

But dropbox is just a folder on all my hard drives so I don't need a special app or anything to use it. Been doing it for years. The only issue that concerns me is if save stops working in my browser. On 24 December 2017 at 12:04, Birthe C wrote: > I think you will

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I think you will like https://twcloud.github.io/dropbox/# You can read about that and all the opther saving options here https://tiddlywiki.com/#GettingStarted. Birthe Den søndag den 24. december 2017 kl. 16.13.01 UTC+1 skrev vayira: > > Thanks Tony. > > keep my TW on dropbox so having to

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Thanks Tony. I've downloaded TiddlyDesktop-linux64-v0.0.9 in case it's needed but I'd rather have TW in my main browser because I have a lot of external links in the wiki. I kind of use it instead of bookmarks. My experiences of upgrades & "improvements" is that 90% of it is bloat & those

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I am using Linux Mint too and has been updated to Firefox 57.1 I think you should look into some of the other saving options, do not rely on tiddlyfox, at least not for long. If tiddlyfox works for you right now, you need to avoid updating Firefox. Birthe -- You received this message because

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Somehow FFox updated itself to 55.0.2 which seems to be the latest version for linux mint. TW saving stopped working but I imported to classic version 2.8.1 and tiddly fox started working again which I'm very happy about. I was expecting to have more problems. Can I expect to have problems

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Hi PMario, I'm using an encrypted TW on dropbox and it saves without problem with your plugin. FrD Le lundi 4 décembre 2017 14:25:18 UTC+1, PMario a écrit : > > On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 4:09:48 AM UTC+1, tony wrote: >> >> Thank you very much Mario >> > > :) > > >> for me it restores

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 4:09:48 AM UTC+1, tony wrote: > > Thank you very much Mario > :) > for me it restores the old datestamped backup feature in the old TW > classic > Almost. ... I did use LessBackupsPlugin for all of my TWclassic's ... But it could be confusing. eg: 1 backup

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Thank you very much Mario Just wanted to give a shout out for ease of backups with file-backups: https://github.com/pmario/file-backups for firefox... chrome > version is planned. > for me it restores the old datestamped backup feature in the old TW classic Tested for a few days and so far

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Mark, In all my years of using Portable apps (perhaps even 20 years) off and On I have never seen malware. Once you install it running a scan against it should be insightful as many people use it and most virus programs know these files, most of which are the same as the original just packaged

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

But portable apps isn't mozilla, so there's the possibility of malware having been inserted. On Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 3:35:29 PM UTC-8, Alfonso Arciniega wrote: > > Mark, > > With FF portable you may also use as many profiles as you want: > >

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Mark, With FF portable you may also use as many profiles as you want: https://portableapps.com/support/firefox_portable#second_profile There's also FF ESR portable versions in 17 languages if preferred: https://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox-portable-esr I am using portable versions

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 3:46:02 AM UTC+1, vayira wrote: > > I'm glad I ignored FF's messages about upgrading. I've been using TW > classic for so long I can't remember & I run my life from it. But I'm not > sure what to do now. > > If I upgrade FF then I'll loose autosave by the looks

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Yes. I downloaded the latest version of the classic TW yesterday to check it out. At least that gives the option of download type saving on any browser in case of emergency. When I have time i'll try to import my tiddlers to that. I'm also thinking of trying waterfox, as I'm very used to a

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I always wonder whether I can trust the portable apps site. Using profiles, a command argument string, and a zip extractor, you can run multiple versions of FF. (See https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1170758) Presumably you could run an old version of FF as long as the operating

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Vayira; Try TiddlyDesktop first, but also consider Getting a Portable Firefox ESR V 52 There are a lot of solutions available and looking in this forum will help, however having a version which is a few steps behind even TWC (classic) could be an issue, have a go at upgrading (a copy)

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I'm glad I ignored FF's messages about upgrading. I've been using TW classic for so long I can't remember & I run my life from it. But I'm not sure what to do now. *TiddlyWiki (clasic ) 2.6.6* If I upgrade FF then I'll loose

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 1:29:23 PM UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > PMario wrote: >> The problem is. That it's difficult for newbies to decide what they >> should use. Or what they need. We need to improve this situation. > > > An issue is, that julien23 raised, is "what is THE

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Ciao TonyM The one thing you miss, in your otherwise accurate depiction of the situation, is julian23's slight standing back from the situation. That is VERY valuable to read and absorb IMO. There IS an issue with complexity now that was there before too but is now VERY amplified. TonyM

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

PMario Spot on. PMario wrote: > The problem is. That it's difficult for newbies to decide what they should > use. Or what they need. We need to improve this situation. An issue is, that julien23 raised, is "what is THE mode" (or maybe TWO). I think D.I.Y. users get used to 17

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 9:44:20 AM UTC+1, julien23 wrote: > > Great to read we have a (too) many temporary solutions left so we'll > survive this time again. > Why temporary solutions? Most of them are *optional* solutions. It depends on your usecase. For me it's nice to have a

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Julian, i cant agree, it is still Standalone or hosted Multiplatform and device type Futurproof both internaly and via the community even Easyer to share We are just dealing with a transition largely brought about by malware. The future is rosey. -- You received this message because you are

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

There are plenty of solutions here, to this changg in browser security, some which are so close to tiddlyfox its amazing, however for my large TWC I use TiddlyDesktop. I am now moving to TW5 but in a multi-wiki approach. Regards Tony On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 1:34:00 PM UTC+11, George

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I have a giant TW Classic I don't want to upgrade, and it was broken yesterday by Firefox upgrading itself (haven't been watching this group for a while, so not warned!). I've changed to Firefox ESR (version 52) and it works again, and seems that Firefox ESR still gets security upgrades. Not

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Waterford fits the bill on WIndows 10 as well. Tiddlyfox works a treat and saves the TW with no hiccups. The zero faffing solution it seems to me ... Mark P On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 10:38:23 PM UTC-5, James A Bernard wrote: > > I'm using Waterfox who intend to keep the plugin structure

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

savetiddlers install on ff56. There are two versions of tiddlyfox - version 2 will not work with android - you need the older version all the best BJ On Sunday, November 19, 2017 at 4:38:23 AM UTC+1, James A Bernard wrote: > > I'm using Waterfox who intend to keep the plugin structure of

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I'm using Waterfox who intend to keep the plugin structure of Firefox while keeping up-to-date with firefox. The tiddlyfox plugin works well. As i use android a lot, for some reason the tiddlyfox doesn't install inWaterfaox on android. I am looking for solutions, when I do I'll report back. But

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

If you plan on using the savetiddlers add-in/extension & wish to use your existing TiddlyWiki central directory (I have a notes directory that I use for all my TiddlyWikis) then I recommend that you use the mklink command to create the tiddlywikilocations directory. By using a hard junction

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I found tiddly-saver here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/9984ShVVbbA and it works quite well. Only negative point is that it requires a dedikated place to store the TiddlyWiki. Am Samstag, 28. Oktober 2017 11:33:51 UTC+2 schrieb Norm Davis: > > > Firefox and Tiddly have

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 11:33:51 AM UTC+2, Norm Davis wrote: > > > Firefox and Tiddly have long been great companions, but Firefox is going > sideways and the old Firefox Tiddly extension for saving in the new Firefox > 57 doesn't work. Will there be anyone working on a rewrite or a

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Does this offer hope of tiddlyfox working again with some preference tweaking? http://www.morbo.org/2017/11/linux-sandboxing-improvements-in.html On Saturday, November 11, 2017 at 4:47:49 PM UTC+1, BJ wrote: > > I briefly did a search and could not find a statement saying they plan on > not

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

As I understand it, Seamonkey is going to continue to allow "legacy" extensions/addons. I tried "auto-converting" the Tiddlyfox addon using this tool: http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/ While the resulting XPI "installed" no problem, there wasn't a functioning tiddly-save-thing. However,

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Thanks, Mark. I found that thread afterwards. On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 11:49:21 AM UTC-5, Mark S. wrote: > > Wrong thread ;-) > > There's another thread going about tiddlyspot. Apparently it's down, but > nothing to do with FF or plugins. > > Mark > > On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Wrong thread ;-) There's another thread going about tiddlyspot. Apparently it's down, but nothing to do with FF or plugins. Mark On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 8:26:34 AM UTC-8, springer wrote: > > After 12 years of using my tiddlyspot-hosted sites regularly, tiddlyspot > is suddenly not

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

After 12 years of using my tiddlyspot-hosted sites regularly, tiddlyspot is suddenly not accepting updates this week (the "uploading changes..." process hangs indefinitely). My files still get served up for reading purposes, but with no new edits. Do any of you know what's going on??

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 4:39:17 AM UTC-8, Schorschi wrote: > > I'm using TiddlyWiki classic. When I save an edited TiddlyWiki file using > the browser's Ctrl-S shortcut, then close, then reopen the file, I get a > message that the file “has been incorrectly saved“. Simply put, you must

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I'm using TiddlyWiki classic. When I save an edited TiddlyWiki file using the browser's Ctrl-S shortcut, then close, then reopen the file, I get a message that the file “has been incorrectly saved“. The backstage link is then duplicated at the top of the page. When I edit that page, save again

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Ah okay, thanks Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Hi Eric, re your post:"Alternatively, I can let the browser automatically add the "(n)" suffix to the current filename". Can you just briefly indicate how this is done in Firefox and Chrome? Thanks for the good overview. Egbert On Sunday, 29 October 2017 03:17:05 UTC, Eric Shulman wrote: > >

Re: [tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

I believe there is now an option (or will be in 5.1.15) to trigger the download saver with autosave. But if you tend to keep TiddlyWiki open, then the download saver is not your best option, since you are tied to one browser anyway and there are better solutions. But the download saver still works

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Hi Eric, In my opinion, the problem with relying on the Download Saver for many people is the chance of losing work accidentally. It depends, I suppose, how one actually uses TW. I tend to have it open all the time for making notes and personally, I wouldn't be at all happy to have to manually

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Ciao Mark S. This is the BEST overview I have seen so far on SAVING in TiddlyWiki now. Josiah Mark S. wrote: > > Here's some links to content and/or discussions re possible solutions: > >- Use a different browser (Firefox ESR, Beaker, Pale Moon) > - Firefox ESR: >

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 7:47:48 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote: > > Firefox is going sideways and the old Firefox Tiddly extension for saving >> in the new Firefox 57 doesn't work. >> > With Firefox 57, sharing a TW is officially dead, unless you only want to > share with savvy users who can be

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

> > Firefox is going sideways and the old Firefox Tiddly extension for saving > in the new Firefox 57 doesn't work. > Totally sideways. Not sure why Mozilla cares about users who need to be protected from themselves. There's IE for that. With all the change to both TW and browsers over the

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Has Jeremy made any comments on this? On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 8:51:11 PM UTC-5, Mark S. wrote: > > Here's some links to content and/or discussions re possible solutions: > >- Use a different browser (Firefox ESR, Beaker, Pale Moon) > - Firefox ESR: >

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

Here's some links to content and/or discussions re possible solutions: - Use a different browser (Firefox ESR, Beaker, Pale Moon) - Firefox ESR: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/4yyMPH-0hXg - Beaker Browser: https://beakerbrowser.com/ - Pale Moon:

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 5:12:38 PM UTC-7, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > You know, there really ought to be a sticky for this topic. >> > Our ship sails without a captain, it seems. > ok.. I just made it sticky ("display at top") -e -- You received this message because you are

[tw] Re: Tiddly Extension for Firefox 57?

> > You know, there really ought to be a sticky for this topic. > Our ship sails without a captain, it seems. RR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email