Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Using a CDN like cloud flare made an otherwise almost unusable wiki fast, add a splash screen to ensure people wait for it to load, advertise they are loading the whole site for fast performance. Now when distributing content consider sharing JSON packAges of tiddler, or via a library, then

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Hi Mark, On Saturday, November 7, 2020 at 8:05:28 PM UTC+3:30 Mark S. wrote: > There's more than server storage size that's important. > > Imagine you were an instructor who wanted to distribute and receive lesson > plans via TW to remote students with limited data rate accounts. Having >

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

There's more than server storage size that's important. Imagine you were an instructor who wanted to distribute and receive lesson plans via TW to remote students with limited data rate accounts. Having 2megs overhead for each transfer would make the whole process expensive, in addition to

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

> > TiddlyTweeter > suggested: > > I think a few tests showing the benefit of GZippery on this might help >> show a larger core is not, in itself, a major issue for most use cases. > > Jeremy Ruston replied: > GZip is enabled for tiddlywiki.com, so an interesting test case is to > look

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Hi TT > On 7 Nov 2020, at 09:53, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > > Right. I think a few tests showing the benefit of GZippery on this might help > show a larger core is not, in itself, a major issue for most use cases. GZip is enabled for tiddlywiki.com , so an interesting

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Jeremy Ruston wrote: (My emphasis) > ... right now the goal for the core is for it to contain not the bare > minimum possible functionality, but rather the functionality that has the > *potential > to be universally useful*. That broader criteria means that the core > itself is sufficient

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Thank you Jeremy! That is really good! I think 5.2.x will be an elegant new generation as I follow discussions, ideas and proposals on GitHub. There are good experiences and huge amount of feedback in forum and GitHub on TW 5.1.xx. Stay healthy! Mohammad p.s: I really like to have a set of

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Hi Mohammad > Many thanks for clarification! So, there are obstacles and limitations for > having a microkernel Tiddlywiki. Just factors that hadn’t been discussed so far, it’s a good discussion. I meant to add to my earlier reply that I do plan to do something similar for v5.2.x in that I’d

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Hi Jeremy, Many thanks for clarification! So, there are obstacles and limitations for having a microkernel Tiddlywiki. Best wishes Mohammad On Friday, November 6, 2020 at 9:21:33 PM UTC+3:30 jeremy...@gmail.com wrote: > The idea of stripping TiddlyWiki down to a microkernel and making >

Re: [tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

The idea of stripping TiddlyWiki down to a microkernel and making everything be a plugin comes up fairly frequently, and seems to be an idea with some appeal. One factor that hasn’t been mentioned so far is that the microkernel architecture would make testing and support a good deal more

[tw5] Tiddlywiki Empty: The size empty.html

Tiddlywiki is rapidly improving and you can see great features in the recent releases. >From 2.1.17+ amazing features have been added to Tiddlywiki! One question is about the size of empty.html (the virgin Tiddlywiki). See the below table Release Size (kb) 5.1.12 1820 5.1.15 2025