Awesome. Thank you!
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 11:49:55 AM UTC-7, Mark S. wrote:
>
> Yes. The filter needs to change. You can try this for the list-based
> english fields:
>
> <$list filter="[tag[Lexeme]each:list-item[english]sort[]addprefix[en-]]">
>
> HTH
> Mark
>
> On Tuesday, August 15,
Yes. The filter needs to change. You can try this for the list-based
english fields:
<$list filter="[tag[Lexeme]each:list-item[english]sort[]addprefix[en-]]">
HTH
Mark
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 11:22:22 AM UTC-7, Silvercat wrote:
>
> > Is there a data-based reason that you couldn't put all
> Is there a data-based reason that you couldn't put all the words in a
single english list field (e.g. [[film]] [[dust]] ... etc.) ?
Nope. The only reason I did it that way (English, english1, english2) is
cuz I don't know what I'm doing. It looks like there needs to be a change
to the fil
Ah, I see. I was getting confused cuz I have too many things called
english! (tags, fields...)
Thanks!
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017, 8:40 PM 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki <
tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> The problem is that the those items in the nyji language don't have
> 'english' fields -- they hav
The problem is that the those items in the nyji language don't have
'english' fields -- they have english1 and english2 fields. You can fix
this in the short term by extending the filter:
[tag[Lexeme]each[english]get[english]]
[tag[Lexeme]each[english1]get[english1]]
[tag[Lexeme]each[english
Any idea why film and evil aren't showing up in EnglishIndex?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2AstAs9QlRjSnhvU1ktWGF0c28
I'm sure it's user error, but I can't see any difference between those two
and the three (cat, here, and wrong) that are showing up.
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 11:17:4
Thanks! That helps a lot.
> About filters, did you look at the tiddler "Introduction to filter
notation" at Tiddlywiki.com ? I'm sure it's simpler than Ŋyjichɯn
You overestimate my conlanging skills. :D
On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 12:15:51 PM UTC-7, Mark S. wrote:
> Ok, to make the following
Ok, to make the following work, I made some changes to your en-Cat entry.
It looks like:
caption: Cat
changecount: 5
tags: english Mammal
taijin: [[chun]] [[kaŋi]]
title: en-cat
type: text/vnd.tiddlywiki
;Cat: {{nya{[[chun]]}}}
So I added a caption field (Cat), and a taijin (I don't know wha
I've got it on google drive here -
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2AstAs9QlRjSnhvU1ktWGF0c28
The pertinent tiddler is EnglishIndex and I'm trying to make it more or
less look like the old one at
http://www.silversspace.com/conlang/nyji/nyji-lexicon.html#EnglishIndex with
the English meani
Something like:
<$list filter="[tag[lexeme]each[english]get[english]sort[]"/>
Should make your basic english list. With a variety of techniques, you can
make the list look more like something you want.
If you can make a tiddler that automatically culls and presents the items,
do you really nee
So any pointers toward telling tw5 to take the 'english' fields from all
the tiddlers tagged 'lexeme', match them with the tiddler title fields,
alphabetize them by the 'english' fields, and then throw them all in one
tiddler? Cuz I'm clueless, sorry. I'm focusing on the 10 or 11 completely
com
Not any more, but I have as much time as I need to work on it. If I can get
the concept working...
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017, 8:38 PM RichardWilliamSmith <
richardwilliamsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A data dictionary is only going to give you 1:1 mappings. I think Mark's
> on the right track - each tiddle
A data dictionary is only going to give you 1:1 mappings. I think Mark's on
the right track - each tiddler has as many fields as it needs and each
field can contain a list if it needs to. You can write an interface for
entering/editing the information and you can transclude it into the view
how
I don't have anything right now for the TW5 version. Is there a 101 for
doing a data dictionary?
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017, 8:21 PM 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki <
tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Do you want to have 3 english fields, or would you prefer a single list
> field with as many words as rela
Do you want to have 3 english fields, or would you prefer a single list
field with as many words as relate (e.g. [[Wordy 1]] [[Wordy 2]] [[Wordy
3]]) ??
You mention EnglishIndex tiddler. Does that mean that you have a data
dictionary with english definitions, or were you referring to a group of
I'm not worried about *maximum *flexibility as there are just too many
parts in an entry. The standard noun has the word, between one and ten
meanings; any irregularity; an abbreviated form for deriving words; notes;
the spelling, stress, IPA, and phonetic of the singular, plural, and
paucal; a
I would say that for maximum flexibility, instead of fixing the formatting,
put the various bits of information into fields. Then use template tiddlers
to display the field information as needed. If the information is stored as
fields, then you can do things like list English - word - phonetic o
Yes, I did that. I'm working on fixing all the old formatting. There's
double because there's the lexicon entry itself then the english index
entry. To use Spanish as an example instead of my weirdo language, there'd
be the lexicon entries for 'ser' and 'estar' with their definitions, notes,
and ex
Silvercat wrote:
Any ideas of an easier and better way of doing it? My current method
> effectively doubles the number of tiddlers needed and since I have over 300
> words, it's kinda a pain.
>
Not really clear what "doing it" means, or exactly what you mean with
"double" (maybe two tiddlers p
19 matches
Mail list logo
