@febo.com
Sent: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic etc
Hi
Again, I'd say it's the lowest common denominator. Synchronous comm using
RS-232 levels on a DB-25 came before asynchronous comm. It's long dead.
Being first isn't *always* best. Same could be said
Corby,
Power Basic certainly does the job. However, there's a fairly big learning
curve. I use Just Basic, which is a FREE cut-down version of Liberty Basic.
While there are a few limitations, and some things you need to do aren't
entirely intuitive, it works very well and the serial comms
Murray we offered up the same thing for pretty much the same reasons.
Good to know I am in fine company. Hmmm Ham + free??? Any link?
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Murray Greenman denw...@orcon.net.nzwrote:
Corby,
Power Basic certainly does the job. However, there's a
You know there is one other aspect of this question from Corby. How do I
say this. Age. If you are using the old basics then things like the latest
basic by different names are quite convoluted and distracting. They are
designed for mobile phone apps. You know those crazy modern apps that sell.
We
What aspects of USB would HP have used? Just the complexity of a USB
OHCI/UHCI would have been economically prohibitive compared to an
asynchronous serial UART. An OHCI/UHCI is more like an ethernet
controller and those took up the space of entire expansion boards
initially.
What they did
David it was humor
Regards
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, David davidwh...@gmail.com wrote:
What aspects of USB would HP have used? Just the complexity of a USB
OHCI/UHCI would have been economically prohibitive compared to an
asynchronous serial UART. An OHCI/UHCI is more like an
Ah well, I missed it but only because I have seen other people make
the same suggestion seriously in the recent past.
Where is my box of 2102 DRAMs? I left it around here somewhere.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:32 -0400, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com
wrote:
David it was humor
Regards
On Wed, Oct
real-time logging and plotting capability.
/tvb
- Original Message -
From: cdel...@juno.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:44 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
Hi,
I'm currently using a GWBasic program at 9600 Baud to get 1 second T.I
and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic etc
What aspects of USB would HP have used? Just the complexity of a USB
OHCI/UHCI would have been economically prohibitive compared to an
asynchronous serial UART. An OHCI/UHCI is more like an ethernet
controller and those
On 10/10/2012 11:49 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
No easy solution. Serial com is still with us because it's a lowest common
denominator. I'm sitting here coding it into a new product right now (once
the uber super compiler finishes a build). It's supported on just about
every chip set in the universe. I
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Tharp
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:55 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic etc
On 10/10/2012 11:49 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
No easy
Commodore computers in the longago dimdark past serialized the GPIB.
They started out with the GPIB as the disk drive and printer interface
from the get-go. I used a Commodore as a cheap controller when Hp GPIB
controllers cost a small fortune.
Don
David
What aspects of USB would HP have used?
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic etc
What aspects of USB would HP have used? Just the complexity of a USB
OHCI/UHCI would have been economically prohibitive compared to an
asynchronous serial UART. An OHCI/UHCI is more like
Hi,
I'm currently using a GWBasic program at 9600 Baud to get 1 second T.I.
data (12 digits) from an SR620 counter, display the reading , put the
reading into a file, name the file sequentialy, and either save or delete
the file via a function key.
I'm switching to a new counter that outputs at
Great question
I think the newer basics have no problem with that rate and also many more
com ports.
I seem to recall liberty basic free and for $59 you get a distro license or
more lines of code or something.
The basics out their seem pretty capable these days. You still have Windows
VB also.
other will have their thoughts. Moving code from
GWBasic to another flavour just to chnge the speed might not be completely
trivial :-))
Alan
G3NYK
- Original Message -
From: cdel...@juno.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 6:44 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] 57600 baud
Have a look at Robot Basic http://www.robotbasic.org/
he price is right, it's easy to use, and transportable.
Don
cdel...@juno.com
Hi,
I'm currently using a GWBasic program at 9600 Baud to get 1 second T.I.
data (12 digits) from an SR620 counter, display the reading , put the
reading into a
:46 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
Hi,
I'm currently using a GWBasic program at 9600 Baud to get 1 second T.I.
data (12 digits) from an SR620 counter, display the reading , put the
reading into a file, name the file sequentialy, and either save or delete
the file via
I don't know abut Windows but onother OSes I can pipe the serial
port trough some other program, even one as simple as cat and then
you BASIC program can read the data from cat's output and not have to
even know about serial ports. I'm pretty sure this works in Wndows.
BASIC will think it is
measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
I am pretty sure good old Visual Basic Pro version 6.0 (and newer) supports
to 115kb.
GW Basic officially makes you a ...
Didier KO4BB
Sent from my Droid Razr 4G LTE
: shali...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
I am pretty sure good old Visual Basic Pro version 6.0 (and newer)
supports
to 115kb.
GW Basic
4:10 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
Looked at powerbasic and yes it supports the higher rates.
Various pricing models up to $200 and $50 for a paperback manual.
It looks pretty interesting.
But at least liberty
...@juno.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:46 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
Hi,
I'm currently using a GWBasic program at 9600 Baud to get 1 second T.I.
data (12 digits) from an SR620 counter, display the reading , put the
reading into a file, name the file
- Original Message - From: shali...@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
I am pretty sure good old Visual Basic Pro version 6.0 (and newer
: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of cdel...@juno.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:44 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] 57600 baud rate with Basic???
Hi,
I'm currently using a GWBasic program at 9600 Baud to get 1 second T.I.
data (12 digits
25 matches
Mail list logo