mturk 2002/06/25 00:06:19
Modified:jk/native/common jk_util.h
Log:
Introduced socket and cache timeout.
By Jan Singer, Henri Gomez and Mladen Turk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +21 -9 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_util.h
Index: jk_util.h
mturk 2002/06/25 00:06:42
Modified:jk/native/common jk_util.c
Log:
Introduced socket and cache timeout.
By Jan Singer, Henri Gomez and Mladen Turk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +80 -31jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_util.c
Index: jk_util.c
mturk 2002/06/25 00:06:59
Modified:jk/native/common jk_connect.h
Log:
Introduced socket and cache timeout.
By Jan Singer, Henri Gomez and Mladen Turk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.h
Index:
mturk 2002/06/25 00:07:14
Modified:jk/native/common jk_connect.c
Log:
Introduced socket and cache timeout.
By Jan Singer, Henri Gomez and Mladen Turk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +29 -18jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.c
Index:
mturk 2002/06/25 00:07:31
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.h
Log:
Introduced socket and cache timeout.
By Jan Singer, Henri Gomez and Mladen Turk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +22 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.h
Index:
mturk 2002/06/25 00:08:03
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c
Log:
Introduced socket and cache timeout.
By Jan Singer, Henri Gomez and Mladen Turk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +376 -334 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c
Index:
mturk 2002/06/25 00:08:26
Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp13.h
Log:
Introduced socket and cache timeout.
By Jan Singer, Henri Gomez and Mladen Turk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +8 -7 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp13.h
Index:
Hello everyone,
I am writing about an issue on invalidation of sessions.
In the current implementation, a session is deleted from the Database when
it is invalidated. Is this really the behavior expected?
I mean, if there is an attribute to specify if a session is valid or not,
a session that
Hello everyone,
I am writing about an issue on invalidation of sessions.
In the current implementation, a session is deleted from the Database when
it is invalidated. Is this really the behavior expected?
I mean, if there is an attribute to specify if a session is valid or not,
a session that
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send.
It works way better.
Why better?
recv/send on BS2000 goes directly to the network through the socket libraries
and read/write does with an additional POSIX layer.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL :
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send.
It works way better.
Why better?
recv/send on BS2000 goes directly to the network through the
socket libraries
and read/write does with an additional POSIX layer.
Hi JF,
History, history ;)
I switched from recv/send
Contributed documentation for jk2
PS: Note the info that Jetty will also implements ajp13 :)
-Original Message-
From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:24 AM
To: GOMEZ Henri
Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2
Attached is a copy of the notes that
Ok, we'll have now to update mod_jk HOWTO to reflect
these changes
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
If you replay the bench many times, you'll see that
the number will change a little.
Not a performance gain, a sort of chaos-random addition ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP
- Original Message -
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
That's why counts where
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see that much to remove. I assume JNDI is the ever popular
target, but I didn't notice it causing major problems (either
performance or reliability), so I'd say it's not worth it.
Actually, I have a complaint... 4.1.3
Hi all,
I was interested to read the differing opinions on 5.0 or not, and I was
interested to hear Pier say that he did not think tomcat was an option in a
production system. We have been using tomcat 3.2.3 (an out of date version
I know) and while it performs it very well under a light load,
Hi,
Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive 'inprocess',
cause it will register all the needed interfaces by itself...
12. This begs the question: how is mod_jk2 configured. It's done using
# Dynamic library
serverRoot=/usr/local/apache2
# load the jni
Steven Wood wrote:
Hi all,
I was interested to read the differing opinions on 5.0 or not, and I was
interested to hear Pier say that he did not think tomcat was an option in a
production system. We have been using tomcat 3.2.3 (an out of date version
I know) and while it performs it very
I'm also very interested in hearing more about Tomcat HA.
Speaking about HIGH AVAILABILITY, is linked to
reliability and scalabitity.
reliability should be provided by Tomcat core but
scalability should be provided by some sorts of
software between end-user and Tomcat's core.
As I said
I am really sorry, but you have only yourself to blame for not at least
upgrading to Tomcat 3.3.x, which is the HA version of Tomcat 3.2.
yip, I know, i'm dowloading it as i send this :-)
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 09:45
To:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see that much to remove. I assume JNDI is the ever popular
target, but I didn't notice it causing major problems (either
performance or reliability), so I'd say it's not worth it.
Actually, I
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive 'inprocess',
cause it will register all the needed interfaces by itself...
12. This begs the question: how is mod_jk2 configured. It's done using
# Dynamic library
Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/
This rpm use external rpms from the Jpackage Project (http://www.jpackage.org)
Only needed binary rpm will be present in jakarta rpms directory :
jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.1.cvs20020612-1jpp.noarch.rpm
Just joined the list after Gomez Henri cc'd the mod_jk2 howto that
I've been working here. If any of you want to correct any mistakes, or
suggest areas where a little explanation wouldn't go amiss, please let
me know. I'm now subscribed to this list, so there's no need to mail
me directly (though
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 11:48
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive
'inprocess', cause it
-Original Message-
From: Simon Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 12:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Configuring mod_jk2
Mladen also mentioned the RegisterNatives directive
inprocess. I'm about to go searching through the archives
of the list,
Dear Freinds
I am working on the
LINUX 7.2 , Apache webserver and Tomcat version 4.0.3
If I test all the examples they run perfectly well.
http://172.16.10.98:8080/index.html
http://172.16.10.98:8080/examples/jsp/index.html
http://172.16.10.98:8080/examples/servlets/index.html
All these
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25. lipanj 2002 11:48
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Configuring mod_jk2
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive
'inprocess', cause
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps we should explain the new RegisterNatives directive 'inprocess',
cause it will register all the needed interfaces by itself...
12. This begs the question: how is mod_jk2 configured. It's done using
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I allways use read/write on Unix instead of recv/send.
It works way better.
Why better?
recv/send on BS2000 goes directly to the network through the socket libraries
and read/write does with an additional POSIX layer.
hey Remy,
I did some more test and here is a bit more info. I tested jasper2 with
4.0.3 and the is NO memory leak there. In fact the memory profile is
more stable than jasper1. Also, the CPU usage profile is much more
stable with jasper2 with tomcat 4.0.3, so I doubt it is purely jasper2,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10212.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Arshad Mahmood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+100!
As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around 10
different sites with a reasonable load, maybe 1/4 of vnunet) this would be
very helpful to me.
You mentioned a couple of specific things you would like to do. Would it be
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do see the following on my Linux:
+++
tcp0 0 :::127.0.0:http-alt :::127.0.0.1:32893 TIME_WAIT
tcp0 0 :::127.0.0.1:32892 :::127.0.0.1:8005 TIME_WAIT
tcp0 0 :::127.0.0.1:32894
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10212.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
We add a timeout features in mod_jk 1.2.0 to close
sockets after some time of inactivity
:)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10220.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
peter lin wrote:
hey Remy,
I did some more test and here is a bit more info. I tested jasper2 with
4.0.3 and the is NO memory leak there. In fact the memory profile is
more stable than jasper1. Also, the CPU usage profile is much more
stable with jasper2 with tomcat 4.0.3, so I doubt
Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:34:12 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JDBCStore implementation
Hello everyone,
I am writing about an issue on invalidation of
hey remy,
did this CVS commit
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg29253.html,
fix the bug where FileNotFoundException is thrown because the working
directory was deleted for force a refresh?
peter
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your answer!
Well, I agree that the refered field in the database would fit perfectly
in the case of having more than one instance of Tomcat handling requests,
but why can't it be used for the local session handling as well?
About what you wrote: Once a session is marked
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6279.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25.06.2002 18:08
Please respond to Tomcat Developers List
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: JDBCStore implementation
Hello Craig,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon,
Has anyone had this problem with any success?
platform:
Windows 2000 Professional
Jakarta Tomcat 4.1.3
Apache 2.0.39
Mod_jk.dll connector
My_Sql 4.0.1
I have a successful connection between Tomcat and Apache via the mod_jk module.
All JSP's are displaying with the appropriate data from
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
TC5.0 will have a 'higher availability' then 4.1 which is better
than
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
Well... It's a matter of code... Given that there is not one line of code
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/svn/jakarta-tomcat-ha/
If you guys don't want to see it associated with the Apache name, just let
me know and I will move it off on my (Betaversion or VNU) servers.
If possible, please also change the name - unless ASF
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10220.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
The RegisterNatives is the JNI way that we are using to force the
mod_jk2 to register its native methods instead of using that from
Java, so that we don't need to explicitly use the
System.loadLibrary.
The option can be enabled with the directive:
Although Pier is sometimes harsh with his words he does have some valid
points. I would be nice for tomcat to be somewhat modular so if all you
want is a servlet engine just get those components. This also goes with
moving the CVS repositories.. so you can get only the modules you want
and
See intermixed.
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:34:43 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JDBCStore implementation
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, John Trollinger wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:19:40 -0400
From: John Trollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HA tomcat ( was: RE: 5.0 proposal)
Although Pier is
- Original Message -
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal
Arshad Mahmood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+100!
As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10220.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm interested in this Tomcat HA also. If you have a plan, please send
it out. I'm willing to help.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around 10
different sites with a reasonable load, maybe 1/4 of vnunet)
this would be
very helpful to
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, John Trollinger wrote:
Although Pier is sometimes harsh with his words he does have some valid
points. I would be nice for tomcat to be somewhat modular so if all you
want is a servlet engine just get those components. This also goes with
moving the CVS repositories..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
TC5.0 will have a 'higher availability' then
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10153.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
While documenting the jk2 config, it would be _very_ usefull to
make some notes on how we can improve the configuration in
future.
My goal was (is) to eventually support a preferences-like configuration,
with multiple backends ( including directory services and
win32 registry ).
The model
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Pier could you detail what should be a Tomcat HA, and how
it could fit in TC 5.0 proposal ?
As far as I can remember it was voted -1...
What about TC 5.0 with HA capability ?
TC5.0 will have a 'higher
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10225.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Two patches attached,
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/DefaultServlet.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/WebdavServlet.java
There are two main pieces to this patch:
1) The addition of an isDefaultServlet initialization parameter to the
WebdavServlet
This
Mathias,
Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in our product
for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for minimum 100K
simultaneous connection to our server side. If you could share some of
your knowledge how you did it with your site, it would be
Anyone know anything about the mod_jk directive JkAutoMount? I've
seen some about it in the documentation, in the source, and via a web
search, but it's all a little bit sketchy. It sounds like it can be
used instead of JkMount, to have the web server query the servlet
container for what URL's
We're trying to come up with a way to use Tomcat integrated with
Apache in our production enviroment. In this environment, we have
service managers and system managers. There may be multiple
services (and hence multiple service managers) per machine. And
there'd be one Tomcat instance per
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Huy Tran wrote:
Mathias,
Thanks for the encouraged news. We've been using Tomcat in our product
for a while now. Now, I need to set it up with support for minimum 100K
simultaneous connection to our server side. If you could share some of
your knowledge how you
Mathias,
It would be great to see some details on your experiences with
load-balancing Tomcat, and any tricks you've come up with would be much
appreciated by the community (well, at least my part of it ;)
We also run Tomcat 4.0 in production, behind a hardware load balancer. It's
working great
Dunlop, Aaron wrote:
Mathias,
It would be great to see some details on your experiences with
load-balancing Tomcat, and any tricks you've come up with would be much
appreciated by the community (well, at least my part of it ;)
We also run Tomcat 4.0 in production, behind a hardware load
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8552.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your answer!
Well, I agree that the refered field in the database would fit perfectly
in the case of having more than one instance of Tomcat handling requests,
but why can't it be used for the local session handling as well?
About what you wrote: Once a session
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10229.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
75 matches
Mail list logo
