Steven Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > I was interested to read the differing opinions on 5.0 or not, and I was > interested to hear Pier say that he did not think tomcat was an option in a > production system. We have been using tomcat 3.2.3 (an out of date version > I know) and while it performs it very well under a light load, some strange > things start to happen when our site gets busy the only solution seems to be > to shut down and restart tomcat (I know that this it not supposed to > required on a regular basis is it ?). I wont bother describing exactly what > happens because we are using an older version and some of the issues may > have been resolved, but we do get some unexpected behaviour under high > loads.
I am really sorry, but you have only yourself to blame for not at least upgrading to Tomcat 3.3.x, which is the HA version of Tomcat 3.2. > Long and short : as a user of tomcat, i would be far more appreciative of a > so called "high-availability or hard-edition" than an new "feature rich" > version. Just because thats of most use (I think) to me though :-) Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
