----- Original Message ----- From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:49 PM Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > > >> That's why counts where not right on my side of the border... I don't recall > >> vetoing the proposal... I just complained vehemently that I'd prefer to see > >> 4.0 out of the door and stable rather than a 4.1 and a 5.0... > > > > 4.0 is out of door - the release happened long ago. So did 4.0.1... 4.0.4. > > > > 4.1 is getting close - and it should be more stable and better than 4.0.4. > > And 5.0 should be more stable and better than 4.1 and 3.3. > > > > And 6.0 will probably be better than 5.0. > > > > If you are interested in maintaining and improving 4.0.4 - just volunteer > > as release manager for the branch, you have my +1 on it. > > I can't be a RM for 4.0.4 because I would simply remove 70% of the code, and > kiddies would start crying their butts off because they don't have the > manager application, or JSP support :) > > But if anyone is interested I'd like to explore the opportunity of a > Tomcat-HA (high-availability or hard-edition), based on 4.0 without the > "crap" in there, and straightening out the request-response model... +100! As somebody who also intends to use Tomcat in production (around 10 different sites with a reasonable load, maybe 1/4 of vnunet) this would be very helpful to me. You mentioned a couple of specific things you would like to do. Would it be possible for you elaborate a little more. Regards, Arshad -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
