DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Chad Thompson wrote:
Hello!
I recently compiled and configured the mod_jk module to work under Mac
OS X.
In the process, I created a script to compile the module (with
instructions for obtaining libraries from the 'fink' project), along
with the compiled binary for apache-1.3. (I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jan Luehe wrote:
Costin,
Something like:
logic:iterate id=sub name=scope property=associations
bean:write name=sub property=value/
/logic:iterate
It'll fist generate a duplicated declaration ( once at top level,
once at block level ) for _jspx_sub_1, and then look for a
variable named
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Each time I am replying a message of the list I am getting a message from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Advert or complain?).
Has any one received this kind of message?
Is someone not receiving my replies? (last was on topic: Making A Donation
(mod_jk for Mac OS X)).
Cheers
Jean-frederic
--
To
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sean Reilly wrote:
Hi,
I posted bug #11091
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July 23rd.
Since then, nobody besides myself has posted a comment to it, and it is
still assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The recent test milestone (4.1.10) released on August 30th does
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12286.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
I realised à webmail in JSP/Servlet on Linux RedHat 7.2 / Apache 1.3.26 /
Tomcat 4.0.1 and I've a problem... I can't upload file to the server. This
is a bug of the connector mod_webapp.so (method toRead() return char
between -128 to 127 instead of 0 to 255
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which
should be addressed before a milestone can be
Hi,
I have been testing tomcat 4.1.10 with our web application,
which uses i18n tag from jakarta-taglibs. When running
it under 4.1.10 with jsp default settings in web.xml it
produces very odd results - it seems that each i18n tag
return same string to page (the string might be the
one the first
Ari Suutari wrote:
Hi,
I have been testing tomcat 4.1.10 with our web application,
which uses i18n tag from jakarta-taglibs. When running
it under 4.1.10 with jsp default settings in web.xml it
produces very odd results - it seems that each i18n tag
return same string to page (the string
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
/ballot
I think the 4.1.10 is better than the 4.0.4.
Cheers
Jean-frederic
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
Remy,
If people vote for stable will it be released as an 'rc' for a week or so
before being declared stable?
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 09:59
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [4.1.10] Stability rating
I
On 03 Sep 2002, Bob Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, your changes to your changes have been checked in.
I've seen it, thanks - and you'll be getting your first nag mail
rather soon.
TC5 knows about all it's dependencies (see the download target in
TC5's build.xml),
So there is quite a
On 04 Sep 2002, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you would have gotten something like Dropping project
jakarta-tomcat-5 as it depends on jakarta-site-5 which doesn't
exist or similar.
s/site/servletapi/
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
I think the 4.1.x is great however, I would like to see BUG#11662 resolved:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662
The sharing of global resources is a great asset but cannot be fully utilised until
the bug is resolved.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
I think the 4.1.x is great however, I would like to see BUG#11662 resolved:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662
The sharing of global resources is a great asset but cannot be fully utilised until
hgomez 2002/09/04 04:31:33
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
jk/native/common jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp_common.c
jk_ajp_common.h jk_connect.c jk_global.h jk_map.c
jk_msg_buff.c jk_msg_buff.h jk_pool.c jk_pool.h
hgomez 2002/09/04 04:35:13
Modified:jk/native/common jk_jni_worker.c
Log:
First try to make use of JNI of iSeries (AS/400).
We don't dynamically load the JVM libraries (dll/shared) but instead
use it directly (mod_jk should be compiled with JVM SRVPGM).
I'll have to
David Oxley wrote:
Remy,
If people vote for stable will it be released as an 'rc' for a week or so
before being declared stable?
The httpd project didn't do it AFAIK. Why would we ?
You can consider the RC period is right now, also (the build is
available to both devs and users).
Remy
hgomez 2002/09/04 04:41:20
Modified:jk/native/common jk_jni_worker.c
Log:
Corrected typo (missing ;)
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_jni_worker.c
Index: jk_jni_worker.c
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
Sean Reilly wrote:
Hi,
I posted bug #11091
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July 23rd.
Since then, nobody besides myself has posted a comment to it, and it is
still assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The recent test milestone (4.1.10)
Hi,
as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5
with the XML Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1
are currentzly in the build system.
Has anyone tried the new Xerces release 2.1.0 yet ?
If 2.1.0 fixes the XML Schema problems it might be
worth including it in
Hi,
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
/ballot
Stable. Been using it in our staging environment (exact copy of
production) since the day it came out, without any problems.
I agree that this has been the RC period. I don't think there are any
showstopper bugs, and I don't think we'll get a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Also, you probably ought to include the XML parser (Xerces 2.1.0) with the
LE edition of TC5 (If it does fix it).
Does Sun JDK1.4 come with Xerces or Crimson? I thought I read that it was
supplied with a version of Xerces, but the source that comes with it has
org.apache.crimson. stuff in
Hans Schmid wrote:
Hi,
as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5
with the XML Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1
are currentzly in the build system.
Has anyone tried the new Xerces release 2.1.0 yet ?
Yes, I have done some tesing and it works fine. It the
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which
should be addressed
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
Hans Schmid wrote:
Hi,
as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5 with the XML
Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1 are currentzly
in the build system.
Has anyone tried the new Xerces release 2.1.0 yet ?
Yes, I have done
David Oxley wrote:
Also, you probably ought to include the XML parser (Xerces 2.1.0) with the
LE edition of TC5 (If it does fix it).
Does Sun JDK1.4 come with Xerces or Crimson? I thought I read that it was
supplied with a version of Xerces, but the source that comes with it has
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
Hans Schmid wrote:
Hi,
as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5 with the XML
Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1 are currentzly
in the build system.
Has anyone tried the new Xerces release 2.1.0
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which
David Oxley wrote:
Also, you probably ought to include the XML parser (Xerces 2.1.0) with the
LE edition of TC5 (If it does fix it).
I plan to propose to get rid of the LE edition with 5.0.x.
The idea would be that:
- we bundle a parser, since not even the one included in JDK 1.4 would work
-
remm2002/09/04 06:38:50
Modified:.build.properties.sample
Log:
- Update to Xerces 2.1.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.50 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.properties.sample
Index: build.properties.sample
remm2002/09/04 06:39:32
Modified:.build.properties.default
Log:
- Update to Xerces 2.1.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.35 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index: build.properties.default
Hi everyone
I'd like to volunteer to help with tomcat ;) I've been using it for a
while, read the Apache guidelines, looked at the source code a bit, and
been developing in Java for a few years.
From Remy's message, it sounds like maybe more people are needed to help
with the admin webapp?
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
If not voting stable, please suggest if
glenn 2002/09/04 07:09:50
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config server.xml service.xml
Log:
Add docs for debug attribute
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +6 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/server.xml
Index: server.xml
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
If not voting stable,
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Each time I am replying a message of the list I am getting a message
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Advert or complain?).
Has any one received this kind of message?
I don't, but I suspect your mail server has been placed on a spam mail
list and now monitored by
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X ] Stable
/ballot
From the DTD validation point of view, the performance seems better
with Xerces 2.1
Here are the contents of the attachment.
The directory structure is as follows:
Error.jsp and test.jsp would be in the web-app's main directory
web.xml goes in a WEB-INF subdirectory
Sean
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Sean,
The error still exists.. I fixed the directory structure and can get
other exceptions to work fine, but when I though and map a
javax.servlet.jsp.JspException it fails every time..
I think it happens before it checks to see where to forward the error as
I have looked at that code in the
Hi, The Servlet 2.4 spec includes HttpSession.logout().
My question is, how should Tomcat handle a logout() when the webapp is
using Basic Authentication ?
Basic Authentication is described in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt
Chapter 2.
My assertion is: Once a remote user has logged in
Remy,
I don't think Xerces-J-bin.2.1.0.tar.gz is in old_xerces2. The URL should be
http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-j/Xerces-J-bin.2.1.0.tar.gz.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 14:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 10:00, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi everyone
I'd like to volunteer to help with tomcat ;) I've been using it for a
while, read the Apache guidelines, looked at the source code a bit, and
been developing in Java for a few years.
From Remy's message, it sounds like maybe
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
patrickl2002/09/04 08:31:18
Modified:catalina/src/bin shutdown-using-launcher.bat
startup-using-launcher.bat
tool-wrapper-using-launcher.bat
Log:
Append %PATH% for all Windows platforms since the %0 DOS bug is not limited to
Windows
patrickl2002/09/04 08:32:53
Modified:jasper2/src/bin jspc-using-launcher.bat
Log:
Append %PATH% for all Windows platforms since the %0 DOS bug is not limited to
Windows 9x platforms
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bobh2002/09/04 08:53:49
Modified:.build.properties.default
Log:
- fix url to xerces (not under old_xereces2 dir anymore)
Revision ChangesPath
1.36 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index: build.properties.default
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
Sean Reilly wrote:
Hi,
I posted bug #11091
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July 23rd.
Since then, nobody besides myself has posted a comment to it, and it is
still assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
back to the list.
My vote goes for : mod_jk-logo5.jpg
BTW, artwork contributions are welcomed so if you have some nice
logos, just send them to the list.
regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12306.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hmm... it was working well for me.
Maybe it was a whitespace issue?
At any rate your version should have essentially the same effect.
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
I only just installed 4.1.10 today. I hit a lot of problems with my
existing
apps that run fine on 4.0.3 because of this bug with jsp:param tags. Having
a
null value for a jsp:param value causes a NullPointerException.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12307.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12307.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2002/09/04 09:39:23
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
Fixed 12283: If a tag implementing SimpleTag is invoked within a tag file a
NPE is thrown
Revision ChangesPath
1.88 +11 -7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12283.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2002/09/04 09:58:57
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspUtil.java
Log:
Added javadoc comment for toClass() method
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +9 -3
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspUtil.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12110.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11826.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11826.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11775.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2002/09/04 10:27:11
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
TagFileProcessor.java
Log:
Fixed 12282: NPE thrown when a tag defined by a tag file is specified
as a fragment in the attribute of a tag defined by tag file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12282.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/09/04 10:59:11
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java
TagFileProcessor.java
Log:
- Fix 12269: accepts lower case body content types.
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +4 -4
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12269.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade a production installation running TC 4.0.4 to lastest 4.1.10. So
far, so good ( still using Jasper 1 ), but I think there is a problem with the
configuration of catalina.policy for individual jar files.
On catalina.policy it says to use:
grant codeBase
Hi Experts,
Greetings!
I am using APache(1.3) and Tomcat (4.0.4) on IBM AIX (5.1) System.
I am havin high time in integrating APache and Tomcat. Binary mod_jk is
NOT available for IBM AIX System - so I try to build it using following
procedure but get ERRORS.
I tried to execute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12310.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
/ballot
Amy
If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which
should be
bobh2002/09/04 11:48:08
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteResponse.java
coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
- I noticed that RequestDumperValve was unhappy, so
bobh2002/09/04 11:54:02
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteResponse.java
coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
- Oops, fix the tabs (I also fixed my .emacs to
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
If not voting stable,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12319.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12319.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12319.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12321.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/09/04 15:54:54
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler PageInfo.java
Parser.java Validator.java
Log:
- Fixed 12107: Null content type when a tag file is used.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +3 -12
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12107.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:48 AM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteResponse.java
bobh2002/09/04 11:48:08
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12200.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2002/09/04 16:45:29
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Collector.java
Generator.java Node.java
Log:
Renamed isHasXXX() to hasXXX()
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +3 -3
Amy,
I was in the middle of reviewing the admin app when Remy called for the
Tomcat 4.1.10 vote. I'll provide complete feedback when I have time to
finish my review.
Regards,
Glenn
Amy Roh wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
