On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:29:58PM -0800, Charles Yates wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:34:55AM -0800, Charles Yates wrote:
After getting errors from apachectl configtest relating
to invalid port I added a Port directive to httpd.conf and got
an error that Port directive had been
Gets rid of lame warnings against latest httpd-2.0 and APR.
-- justin
Index: webapp/apache-2.0/mod_webapp.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0/mod_webapp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:34:55AM -0800, Charles Yates wrote:
After getting errors from apachectl configtest relating
to invalid port I added a Port directive to httpd.conf and got
an error that Port directive had been replaced by Listen. I then
removed my Port directive, hacked on
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 07:25:40PM -0500, GAWLAS,JULIUS (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
This patch contains minor fixes for mod_jk for Apache 2.0;
Most important is the change in prototype of jk_post_config
which used to be void but now needs to return success code,
also changes to types of
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:15:07AM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote:
Syntax error on line 206 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_webapp.so into server:
ld.so.1: /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:31:13PM -0500, mgoyer wrote:
Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same version that I'm using for
mod_webapp.
Then, just add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0.1/lib to your LDFLAGS for
httpd.
(Using gcc-3.0.1 on Solaris is a really tricky beast because
gcc doesn't add the -R flags
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:26:41PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote:
Tricky beast it is!
I installed gcc 3.0.1 using the sunfreeware package and it looks like
it's sticking the lib files in
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.0.1 so:
To configure Apache I'm doing:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:32:05AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
You could try:
LIBS=-Lgcc \
LDFLAGS=-R/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.0.1 \
./configure --enable-module=rewrite --enable-shared=rewrite
Ack, I meant -lgcc not -Lgcc. Freezing cold sticky fingers. -- justin
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:22:02AM -0600, Brian P Millett wrote:
Quick Synopsis of error (apache 2.0):
Syntax error on line 2 of /opt/apache/conf/mod_webapp.conf:
Invalid port number (p1) No Port statement found
Oooh, I bet it is related to the change that we committed to set
port to 0
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 08:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all I attempt to calmly summarize the problem and only then let my emotions
get through.
My insufficient knowledge of AIX platforms prevents me from successfully compiling
mod_webapp (as well mod_jk) on AIX 4.3.3
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:16:18AM -0800, Michael Jennings wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a project for a client that involves a servlet engine component. I
suggested tomcat
since I am most familiar with it and it seems the most compliant servlet engine
around.
My client has mentioned
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:29:41AM -0500, Marc Saegesser wrote:
Here's an update on where I stand right now on building/running mod_jk for
Apache 2.0 beta 16.
Please don't use Apache 2.0.16. Use the latest version from CVS.
Also, I'm not sure where automake is coming from - we don't use
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:53PM -0500, Marc Saegesser wrote:
I'll grab the latest CVS and see how that works.
The buildconf.sh in jk/native/Apache-2.0 runs libtoolize, automake, aclocal
and autoconf. Cygwin includes all of these except libtool. I built it and
installed it into
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:49:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think option 2 ( in-process ) is what mod_jk is doing - the code has
been written and used quite a bit in the last year. It didn't got all the
attention that Ajp got, because it doesn't work with Apache1.3, only
with IIS and
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 01:46:37PM -, Shailesh S. Gokhale wrote:
1. I understand that Tomcat can work with any (supported) web
server in two modes - 'In Proc' and 'Out of Proc'. I have
successfully configured Tomcat (Out of Proc) to work with Apache.
The question is how can I make it
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:41:10AM -, Shailesh S. Gokhale wrote:
***
Tomcat can be used as either a stand-alone container (mainly for development and
debugging) or as an add-on to an existing web server
s are supported). This means that whenever you are deploying Tomcat you will have to
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:50:27AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Hi to all,
I've just commited updated code for Apache 1.3/2.0
I will need a serious code review on Apache 2.0 part
and particulary the ws_read() which was grabbed from
1.3 and works (at least on Apache 2.0.24) but may
be
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that nobody
will actually care unless they're testing something... And by testing good
practice says get the HEAD of CVS and try it out yourself if it doesn't
work.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 02:48:56PM -0600, Christopher Cain wrote:
Oh well ... as an unrepentant terminal geek, I'm glad I took the time to
learn it on the command line. Like most Linux commands, it has a pretty
steep learning curve, but once you're familiar with it it's really quite
powerful
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 05:46:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
costin 01/08/27 22:46:28
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/test Header.java
HttpRequest.java
Log:
Fixes in the test suite. We must send 1.0 requests, since we can't handle
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 10:24:30PM -0700, Jason Hunter wrote:
So what does the Apache Web Server do for PATH_INFO on a request to
http://foo.com/cgi-bin/somecgi/http://extra.com?
Ask for /index.html/http://extra.com with httpd-2.0, it strips out the
second /.
(gdb) print r-path_info
$5 =
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 06:51:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
craigmcc01/08/21 11:51:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardServer.java
Log:
Fix for a DoS attack against the shutdown port, that could cause an out
of
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:18:53AM -0700, Henry Yeh wrote:
I have noticed that after applying the patch the date is now
included in the tomcat HTTP response header, but it still
does not send back not modified 304 if the file requested
hasn't been modified since the date specificed by the
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:24:01AM -0700, Henry Yeh wrote:
yes. I analyzed the HTTP header that's being sent and received by the
browser.
If-Modified-Since messages are sent to tomcat, and we are dealing with
static files here (javascript and images).
So is tomcat doesn't have the '304
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:54:43AM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I'm not sure I would make quite so blanket a statement as that. If the
servlet itself understands that the content it produces changes rarely, it
can improve performance by respecting If-Modified-Since values. To make
this
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:16:52AM -0700, Mark Castillo wrote:
Hi all,
Ok. After reading through some of the sources some questions came to mind.
What are some of the specific goals of the project regarding robustness,
performance, and security? At what point can we say that it is robust
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:56:45AM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
I am concerned that the loss of original escaping
will break somebody. For instance:
As Costin pointed out, the escaping of a URI does not change its
semantics - they should be treated as identical by anyone who follows
the URI
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 06:13:24PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
--- mod_jk.c.orig Tue Aug 14 17:58:21 2001
+++ mod_jk.cTue Aug 14 18:04:58 2001
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@
s-method = (char *)r-method;
s-content_length = get_content_length(r);
s-query_string = r-args;
-
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 10:20:26PM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
Hi David,
Unfortunately there are people who were breaking because
we didn't follow the spec. The better way to fix it is
to create an inverse function for
ap_parse_uri(request_rec *r, const char *uri) [http_protocol.c]
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:25:32PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 10:20:26PM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
Unfortunately there are people who were breaking because
we didn't follow the spec. The better way to fix it is
to create an inverse function for
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 03:41:30AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how Pier is addressing this in mod_webapp. I'll have to
look. -- justin
Easy as 1.2.3... WARP has a concept of URI and QUERY STRING... Very separate
things
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:12:31PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Which, of course, is the right solution.
Is it ? Re-escaping the URI will most likely generate something very
different from the original, it's not symetrical. Getting a re
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 11:13:34PM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
Costin's right.. seems like the problem encountered
was that there was no way to recreate the encoding
(or lack thereof) on the original uri. So the
kludge/solution was to use the unparsed uri and
chop off the query string.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 05:25:03PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:17:18AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I have tested it with 1.3.20 it behaves the same way.
This is correct behavior on httpd's part
[ CCing dev@apr ]
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:56:58PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Klaus Sonnenleiter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody successfully compiled mod_webapp and/or the APR library on
Solaris? I was able to compile everything without any trouble on a RedHat
7.1
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:28:25PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The CVS I have does not compile because apr_socket_create()... It misses the
inherit parameter!
APR has added it to the apr_socket_create(). Should I fix it or just tell we
need a tagged APR (like APACHE_2_0_20).
I think it
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
I have an old pre-sms version of APR I'm using, and it seems it's working on
most platforms as-is... I might ask the APR guys to tag it with
MOD_WEBAPP_1_0, or redistribute it in a nice tarball...
Ha! -- justin
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:29:31PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I would advise to use a tagged version of APR in mod_webapp. Using the lastest
one is/was not a good idea.
I am using the APR tagged APACHE_2_0_20 for testing mod_webapp and it compiles
Ok at least on 2 of test plateforms
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
I just tried it on Nagoya, and it does the same for me...
Do someone has _ANY_ clue of WTF is going on
Yeah, I've seen this before (Solaris, too). I had to add -lgcc.
Don't ask me why the linker didn't pick up on that
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:38:55PM -0700, Si Ly wrote:
I submitted a very simple patch last week, and I haven't heard from
anyone about it. It seems to me that outsiders (non-committers)
can't get anything into CVS because the committers are not looking at
the patches, for whatever reasons.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:29:39AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
APR will be the future, but it still in changing state.
Do you want to works on a moving API ?
We need a release and binary builds for majors OS
When I have commit access to APR, yeah, I do. =) (That change to the
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:09:44PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Realistically though, APR is fairly stable API-wise. There *are*
going to be some minor changes and tweaks along the way. But, they
should all be for the better (like the util_date migration).
I'm confident that APR is stable,
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
so is there still interest in a patch for the mod_webapp docs or has focus
been shifted over to mod_jk?
I'd like to see a patch, but that's me. =) Pier probably can tell you
what he's doing with mod_webapp. I'm not a fan of
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 11:13:24PM +0100, hiten pandya wrote:
hi everyone...
hope everyones is fine,
i have downloaded the latest copy of the tomcat server from the cvs
repository,
Please see:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:38:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't take this personally - I put some (free) time into
this, and if I don't like your solution doesn't mean I consider you an
idiot ( or that I'll not use the same solution, as it's considerably
easier to implement
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It doesn't
seem to be doing so. -- justin
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
On Thu, 28
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:52:01PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of APRVARS (which has this information
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez, now i get this
error:
It includes it, but mod_webapp doesn't link it. It seems that Pier is
whipping
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:31:50AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
As Pier said, just add ServerName.
Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs.
I'd
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:03:47AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
sources in srclib (or something like that).
We don't have to stick it into the CVS, but we can have
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 08:52:03AM -0500, kevin seguin wrote:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I'm using tab = 4 so +1 there.
it's important to make the distinction between indent level and number
of spaces per tab -- they are totally different. i'm for 4 space indent
level, tabs set to 8 spaces
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:17:37PM -0500, kevin seguin wrote:
so, is there a tabs policy in jakarta? like the number of spaces per
tab (4 vs. 8), of no tabs in source code? i ask because i just got the
latest jtc source, and when i open up some of the files in emacs (in
which i have tab
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:39:58AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I made a first try some months ago and get it started on a non-threaded machine,
by adding #define APACHE20 but the code has evolved a lot from that time. Should
I try again in the today code?
If you've got time. You might
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:28:47AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
mod_jk support Apache 2.0
And TC 4.0 as preliminary support for ajp13 used
in mod_jk.
Could you take a look at it ?
Okay, what's the difference between mod_webapp and mod_jk? I thought
that mod_webapp was the preferred TC 4.0
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:16AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Now which webservers are you using :
- Apache 1.3 (Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl)
- Apache 2.0
- Domino
- IIS 4/5/2000
- JNI
- Netscape/IPlanet
This quick poll will help us know on which direction must be
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:06:42PM +0200, Fabian Loschek wrote:
Hello,
I would like Tomcat to serve requests for a new Internet Draft Protocol
named ICAP. The intension is to develop HTTP like ICAP servlet base classes
to allow writing ICAP applications.
Can someone give me
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:34:17PM -0400, Salim Virani wrote:
Hi Justin,
I faced a similar problem. I figured I could write my own server/servlet API
.. which is what I did.
Just curious was your implementation in Java ??? And are you working
for a company or this is some school
[ CCed to dev@apr ]
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 02:32:25PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
(4) Tested configuration (/etc/rc.d/init.d/apache configtest) and got
the following error message:
Syntax error on line 1027 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load
59 matches
Mail list logo
