Tomcat 5.5.12 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues,
[ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it?
[ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details..
-- Jeanfrancois
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Bugs
[ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Commits
[X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote away :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Mladen Turk wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
Actually, on Solaris the big winner is ChannelNioSocket. It wins the
performance race easily now. Too bad that NIO on Windows s*cks. I
guess that JFA was right, and non-blocking sockets is the way to go.
He he. We shall see :)
:-). Just take
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
:-). Just take a look at the GlassFish module called
appserv-http-engine on java.net
(http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/). I'm sure you will like it
:-). And I'm sure this community can come with something even better
Yes, I do
Mladen Turk wrote:
Vicenc Beltran Querol wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm not trying to be a Tomcat developer. I'm working on my PhD on web
performance and just decided to share with you the experimental code
I've developed after studying the performance obtained ;).
I've done some serious testings with
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
I disagree ;-) I would like to see your implementation, because from
what I'm seeing/measuring, it is completely the inverse. I would be
interested to see how you did implement your NIO connector. The
problem with HTTP is not NIO
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
I've done some serious testings with HTTP server and NIO.
The results were always bad for NIO.
Blocking I/O is minimum 25% faster then NIO.
Faster in what? Throughput and/or scalability?
I disagree ;-) I would like to see your implementation, because
N G wrote:
Hi,
I found some strange behavior while using Tomcat 5.5.7. In my web.xml
Schema declaration, I have this:
web-app xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xsi:schemaLocation=
N G wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005 10:31 AM, Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomcat uses it's own local version. This way you can use Tomcat without
being connected to the internet, or pay the price of connection over
http everytime a war is deployed.
And what's WAY more important: what does
[ +1 ] Remy Maucherat
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG
Protected message is attached.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I need to move the Tomcat nigthly build out of nagoya.apache.org and
currently I'm using an sh script for the task. I would like to try Maven
and build.xml(s) that we have. Anybody have a Maven project.xml file ;-)
that I can use?
Thanks
-- jeanfrancois
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:57:51 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF,
not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow.
It would be best for someone from Sun to actually do this work.
[X] Stable
[ ] Beta
[ ] Alpha
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
OK. Please finish committing by noon EDT today if you're still working on stuff. If that's impossible, please let me know before noon, as I plan to CVS tag around then and start the release.
There is a couple of exception when you turn the security manager on
(some
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
OK. Please finish committing by noon EDT today if you're still
working on stuff. If that's impossible, please let me know before
noon, as I plan to CVS tag around then and start the release.
There is a couple
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
I approve the release plan:
[X] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
ballot
Tomcat 5.5 should use the following API set for the coding:
[ ] J2SE 1.3
[X] J2SE 1.4
[X] J2SE 5.0
/ballot
1.4 for Tomcat 5.5 is right.
For Tomcat 6, specs folks are talking about *maybe* requiring 5.0 (for
Hi Keith,
Keith Wannamaker wrote:
By setContentLength taking an int instead of a long, even in jsr154,
does this mean the only way to send back files longer than max_int
is to chunk them?
Spec folks, has there ever been dicussion of changing this related
parameters to long?
I'm not sure the
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Please make sure target=1.3 is present in all javac tasks :-)
Shouldn't we support only JRE 1.4 and 5.0 instead ? I would be able
to replace jakarta-regexp use with Java regexp. Obviously people who
don't want to upgrade (ex:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/08/25 12:25:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Add missing case to support the following web.xml:
servlet
display-nameServletTest/display-name
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/08/25 12:25:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Add missing case to support the following web.xml:
servlet
display
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Actually, yes, raise them :-) This is the perfect time for raising
issues to the spec leads if we want a fix for the next spec revision.
This mapping issue was sent by the spec leads, so probably somebody
else complained about that.
I have
Petr Jiricka wrote:
Hi,
I remember there was an issue that the default DD in conf/web.xml was
not valid by the schema - is this change related to that issue?
Yes, this should fix the issue.
-- Jeanfrancois
Thanks
Petr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/08/24 10:01:34
Modified:
Jess Holle wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
To make things a bit more interesting, I believe there are some
checks in JDK1.4 to prevent you to override rt.jar classes. That's
what endorsed really does, allow you to bypass those checks.
I don't think we managed to get xerces and jaxp to load from
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Jess, this is the wrong direction in principle. We're
encouraging users to stick with 4.1.x if we do this release.
Normally we have just an informal if everyone is OK with this, I'd like
to push out release X on this day and then a vote on labeling it as
Mark,
I can't give you karma, but one thing I recommend is you post the patch
here first so the spec leads can take a look to make sure the previous
specs is not impacted by the changes.
Just recommending.no need to vote ;-)
Thanks
-- Jeanfrancois
Mark Thomas wrote:
There are some bugs in
[back from vacation :-)]
Costin Manolache wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of only-slightly-related comments, but related
nonetheless so I'll put them here.
Re: endorsed directories. Do we still want to support JDK 1.3 in Tomcat
5.1? Since we're gearing up for JDK 1.5, we might
+1
-- Jeanfrancois
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Peter Rossbach pr _at_ objektpark.de as a
committer on the Tomcat project. Peter submitted a significant amount
of useful patches for Tomcat, and wants to contribute more.
He has my +1.
Rémy
Bill Barker wrote:
It hurts my eyes to see the Socket in the o.a.c.connector.Request :). Now
that Remy has gotten rid of the o.a.catalina.Request, there isn't any reason
for it to be there. However, I thought I should give people a chance to
veto removing it before I put the work in (I'm lazy
ballot
Release 5.0.27 as Stable:
[X] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
My upcoming change list:
- Attempt to redo a bit the deployer:
* remove the CL code which is there to avoid JAR locking (or at least
allow disabling this feature for non-Windows OSes); when enabling
anti locking
code, move everything to a temp deploy
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
You didn't post a vote for 5.0.26, BTW. I don't think there's any
critical stuff in this build, though.
Yeah, I'm lazy ;) I think 5.0.26 is fine, and would pass a stable vote,
but I also think 5.0.27 is close, and will be more significant because:
- It will mark
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Not a bad idea -- open a Bugzilla enhancement item for this please.
Thanks,
And make sure nothing is broken by turning xml validation on ;-)
Xerces is a gold candidate when its time to introduce regression in Tomcat.
-- Jeanfrancois
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
We need to do a new release, 5.0.26, because of
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29255. Does anyone
have stuff they're working on, and would therefore like me to wait a
couple of days (or more, or less?) before tagging and building?
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik (lists) wrote:
BTW, is it ok if I start my refatoring(s) in a separate branch based on
go ahead, refator. :-)
I'll refator then.
I'll redo logging as well, and define c-l categories (for webapps, for
example) to be able to eventually remove Logger altogether.
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote:
Facading is likely worthless for sessions,
you think so, you don't think session.setPrincipal is a security issue?
Try it by turning the Security Manager on ;-)
-- Jeanfrancois
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat
ballot
Release 5.0.25 as Stable:
[X ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
OK. I spent the weekend on this and with help from Remy I can actually
do a tomcat release now ;) Here's the plan:
- Tag 5.0.25 in CVS tonight
- Please update the changelog with your changes since 5.0.24 during the
day today. I'll fill in stuff (if there's any)
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2004/05/14 04:00:25
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteAdapter.java
Log:
- Major mistake: the sever cookies should be parsed after the
context is mapped,
otherwise, the
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
The spec is conflicting. We've been telling people to simply not use 0 at all, as different containers handle it differently: use 1 for the first load-on-startup servlet, and -1 (or omit the element altogether) if you don't want it started when the server starts. I
Hi,
I would like to make the current deployment objects public instead of
private (all objects under org.apache.catalina.deploy.*). I would like
to be able to customize those objects, mainly when Tomcat is embedded
and the container already have information about the deployment
descriptor
+1
-- Jeanfrancois
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Yoav has expressed interest in being the release manager for Tomcat 5.
Since he has shown interest in nearly all Tomcat components, and
apparently has enough time at the moment, I think he would be the most
qualified to replace me, and has my +1.
Your file is attached.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.22 as Stable:
[X ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
I've tested the new Windows wrapper, and it did work for me (and it
looks as if we did hire some M$ guy to do its UI). However, some more
testing is needed (note: it's not suppoed to work on Win9x for now).
Another
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm -0 on this. The classes modified are all internal to the Tomcat 5.x
CoyoteConnector, so there is no good reason to make them public.
The way that Coyote is designed, this should always be unnecessary.
The way
to build a new connector is to define
daniel andefors wrote:
Hi,
IMO, this will not work if you are trying to avoid serializing
attributes with the name javax.security.auth.subject.
You are right. The key will not be serializable, but the value will be.
I also need to make the value (e.g. the Subject) transient.
Thanks!
--
Hi,
I would like to propose two modifications:
[1] XML Validation
I would like to make two changes to the way xml validation is implemented:
(1) make the attribute available at the context level (turned off by
default)
(2) add supports for turning on/off web.xml
+1
-- Jeanfrancois
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
jk2 2.0.4 seems in a good shape and I'd like to thanks all of
you commiter, and tomcat-dev members for your feedback, patches
and time.
I'd like to see Guenter Knauf promoted to commiter since he
provided us may fine patches on jk2 and help make
Hi,
init:
build-tomcatcoyote:
[echo] == Building: tomcat-coyote
compile.shared:
[javac] Compiling 13 source files to
/disk/raid0/home/jfarcand/jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5/build/classes
[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
[javac] Note:
Florent BENOIT wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working with Tomcat 5.0.19 and with a SecurityManager and I have a
problem with an attribute which is not Serializable.
The class which is not serializable is the class GenericPrincipal from
the package org.apache.catalina.realm.
Note that I use an
Fixed.
Thanks
-- Jeanfrancois
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Florent BENOIT wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working with Tomcat 5.0.19 and with a SecurityManager and I have
a problem with an attribute which is not Serializable.
The class which is not serializable is the class GenericPrincipal
from
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[ X] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
All Servlet/JSP tcks passes with/without validation/security. I've fixed
a minor jmx problem that should not stop the release.
-- Jeanfrancois
Rémy
Read the solution of your problem here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
In bref, all you need to do is
* Respect the mailing list type *
There are generally two types of lists.
* The User lists where you can send questions and comments about
configuration, setup, usage and
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy, 5.0.18 has been good, so there's no big rush. But there are
bug fixes and doc updates, which are always good to get out ;) So
I'm neutral on the date, I think next week is fine.
There are a number of significant fixes having been made since
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy, 5.0.18 has been good, so there's no big rush. But there are
bug fixes and doc updates, which are always good to get out ;) So
I'm neutral on the date, I think next week is fine.
There are a number of significant fixes having been made since
Hi,
the nightly failled:
build-catalina-cluster:
[javac] Compiling 40 source files to /disk/raid0/home/jfarcand/jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5/build/classes
[javac]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/02/04 09:28:28
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java Log: When using the embedded interface and
calling removeChild(..), the mbean wasn't unregistered. That's only
occurs when you call
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
Release 5.0.18 as Stable:
[X ] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
All TCKs passes, as well as XML validation and -security option.
-- Jeanfrancois
I'll have a proposal for at least one refactoring after the next
stable release.
Rémy
Hi,
I'm currently running the JSP/Servlet tcks. More results to come...
-- Jeanfrancois
Bill, I'm still working for you trying to get the tcks. The situation is
similar to Les 12 travaux d'Asterix and le laissez passer A39. I
might be getting mad before I find the right person to speak ;-). I
They all passes, with and without the SecurityManager.
-- Jeanfrancois
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently running the JSP/Servlet tcks. More results to come...
-- Jeanfrancois
Bill, I'm still working for you trying to get the tcks. The situation
is similar to Les 12 travaux
The best information you can have is to re-sent your email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The dev is not for such questions, and you will have a very fast answer
on the user list.
-- Jeanfrancois
Its Magic wrote:
Hi...
Well,
I am a developer.
I am working with the apache since 1999.
My company
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker2004/01/05 20:27:34
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/security
SecurityClassLoad.java
Log:
Adding classes for Coyote-Jk.
This addresses Bug #25819.
Reported By: Dario Bonino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Not yet, but it is one of the thing I want to do when I've found
spare time. For sure (5.0.x + sec manager) is faster than (5.0.x +
sec manager + jsr115) since with 115, the policy provider is called
everytime hasUser/ResourcePermission
Ias wrote:
I found that all the web.xml files in webapps except jsp-examples uses
!DOCTYPE web-app
PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN
http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd;
instead of
web-app xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee;
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I see no reason to create a new branch, which is not what happened
with previous releases, where branches were created sometimes even
before the stable release (4.1.x got forked for 4.0 final, and 5.0.x
was forked for 4.1.7). Reasons for no branching:
- Tomcat is
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Zzzzoui :-)
I will do that (on my own time unfortunalty, so may take a couple of
weeks)
First, it would be easier just to convert the web.xml into security
permissions, and to keep internal collections, for unchecked,
excluded, and role
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Mmm, ok. I'm not quite following very well, since I didn't read the
spec yet ;-) If I understand, you would implement something which
would work as the JSR 115 security policy provider, but (likely :) )
simpler ?
Yes, as a first steps
Adam Fisk wrote:
Just to chime in on the NIO issue, I agree that it's not immediately
obvious what the performance benefits are. Perhaps more importantly,
though, the code changes to switch Tomcat (or any other good-size app)
to NIO are tremendous -- basically a rewrite of the hard parts.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I like this page:
http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty/doc/JettyArchitecture.html. Does anyone
have anything close to this for tomcat, or would I need to create one
from scratch?
I have something very similar if you want them. Those are basic UML
diagram I did a long
Brian Stansberry wrote:
At 10:03 PM 12/8/2003 -0800, you wrote:
The decision on whether to change the Realm interface, or
move the header processing to AuthenticatorBase is still open.
So soon after such a major release it seems foolhardy to bring this up, but Phillipe's post seems to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Brian Stansberry wrote:
At 10:03 PM 12/8/2003 -0800, you wrote:
The decision on whether to change the Realm interface, or
move the header processing to AuthenticatorBase is still open.
So soon after such a major release it seems
Done
Thanks,
-- Jeanfrancois
Mark Thomas wrote:
Noticed this while looking at the examples. Worth making sure we get this sort
of thing right.
Mark
Index: webapps/examples/servlets/helloworld.html
===
RCS file:
Very easy:
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)
-- Jeanfrancois
Anamika . wrote:
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Scott, Sean wrote:
How do I go about getting commit status to that project?
Read: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
Then:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html#Patches
;-)
-- Jeanfrancois
Thanks
-sean
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This e-mail transmission, and any
+1
You can also remove the xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false,
since they are optionals.
-- Jeanfrancois
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
IMHO the server.xml that comes with tomcat by default
($CATALINA_HOME/conf/server.xml) is nice in that it provides many
comments and examples. But I
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2003/12/02 08:27:11
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote Request.java
ActionCode.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteRequest.java http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java Log:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[...]
Now the big question is actually what the new getLocalPort call
should return. If you need an extra localPort (and its friend
getLocalName - did you notice the getLocalName() call was always
returning whatever hostname was in the host header)
Dominik Drzewiecki wrote:
There's a new Xerce 2.6 release, but I still plan to include 2.5 in
tomorrow's tag (which works). 2.6 *apparently* works (without any
noticeable improvements either), but I fear possible schema related
regressions. So not upgrading for this
ballot
Release 5.0.16 as Stable ?
[X] Yes
[ ] No
/ballot
All tcks passes with/without validation/security
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2003/12/01 12:44:14
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java Log: Use the socket info instead of hardcoded
value. HttpServletRequest.getLocalPort() is currently broken if the
port are not the default
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2003/12/01 12:44:14
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java Log: Use the socket info instead of hardcoded
value. HttpServletRequest.getLocalPort
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2003/12/01 12:44:14
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java Log: Use the socket info instead
OK I've ran:
- Servlet 2.4 TCKS
- JSP 2.0 TCKS
with validation enabled/disabled, security enabled/disabled. I also
tested admin with security enabled.
They all passes.
-- Jeanfrancois
Remy Maucherat wrote:
5.0.15 is available for testing. Please be extra careful about
regressions.
If
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
costin 2003/03/20 07:55:29
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ContainerBase.java
Log:
Fix valve registration.
Few methods to simplify registration.
You'll
Oups. Sorry I commit my working file instead of the new one :-(
Costin Manolache wrote:
Few questions ( and thanks for the help ).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!-- If not set explicitely in one of the user overrides, set it here
--
- property name=base.path location=../repository /
I know. Give me 10 minutes :-)
Costin, this line seems to break the build :-(
property name=base.path location=../repository /
More to comes...
-- Jeanfrancois
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2003/03/13 11:32:56
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Will run the nightly build script and let you know. From my own
workspace, everythings works fine.
Thanks,
-- Jeanfrancois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
costin 2003/03/13 14:08:22
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Another try, I hope this clarifies things.
We have 2 kinds of code:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi,
I'm close to get JAAS realm and the memory LoginModule working - if I
remember correctly we agreed to make JAAS the default for 5.0 ( I don't
remember any objections ).
What about authorization :-) Righ now, the Realm implementation includes
the 3 authorization
+0 (I have little time to help those day)
-- Jeanfrancois
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I proposed that to Costin a few days ago, but got not so enthusiastic
comments.
The idea would be to add a new monitor servlet to the manager webapp.
It would generate data similar to
Costin Manolache wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Costin,
are you planning to tag the modeler workspace to reflect all you recent
changes (once they are completed of course)? Something like
MODELER_2_0_alpha (I'm not good for name) will be helpfull. Also, is
this module supposed to build
I would like to fix a security exception before the alpha release:
Security Violation, attempt to use Restricted Class:
org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.C2BConverter
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
(java.lang.RuntimePermission
accessClassInPackage.org.apache.tomcat.util.buf)
Are you able to build it? The nightly build failled with the following
(see below). I will look at the failure latter this afternoon...
-- Jeanfrancois
build-static:
[copy] Copying 1 file to
/disk/raid0/home/jfarcand/jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5/build/server/webapps/admin
[copy]
Hi,
I'm in a process of getting an account on nagoya where I will install a
script that will do the the nightly build (for Tomcat 5). I should have
something automated for the week-end if all goes well :-)
-- Jeanfrancois
Remy Maucherat wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Remy Maucherat
Hi,
an easy way to build tomcat 5 is to:
cvs -d bla bla checkout jakarta-tomcat-5
cd jakarta-tomcat-5
ant download //download all dependencies (including common-el.jar)
ant checkout //jakarta-servletapi-5, jakarta-tomcat-catalina,
jakarta-tomcat-connectors, jakarta-tomcat-jasper
ant
Oups. I tested the patch using 1.4 (having the impression Costin was
working with 1.3). I will revert the patch.
Thanks,
-- Jeanfrancois
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
BTW, this does not build with JDK's 1.4 and if you use a servlet.jar
built with 1.4 in a JVM 1.4 you get a NoSuchMethodError.
This
cd jakarta-tomcat-5
ant download
pouf! Everything you need :-)
-- Jeanfrancois
Lars Stenberg wrote:
Hi!
I Tried to apply a patch to tomcat earlier today, it went fine, BUT! =)
In the BUILDING.TXT there is 1000 things to download, isnt there any
download-all-all-depends-script?
Mvh
Lars
Hi,
I have ran a couple of tests (Schemas/DTD) using Xerces 2.3 on Tomcat
4.1.x (HEAD branch) / 5.0 and didn't find any regressions ( wow ;-) and
any new bugs (wow wow! ). At least we can start recommending that
version and wait a couple of weeks before making it the default. . The
version
Where did you find that information (of which bundle have you download?)
If you download
http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-j/Xerces-J-tools.2.3.0.tar.gz (to get
the minimal), you will find a version of xalan also (I guess is the latest).
-- Jeanfrancois
Oxley, David wrote:
Should we not
Costin Manolache wrote:
What about this:
instead of 3 methods, have a single method:
interface Authorization {
boolean hasPermission( HttpServletRequest, Permission perm )
}
115, not 155 :-)
Where the permission object will be created? In Authenticator? I would
prefer delegating the
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
